Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13694 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13782 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 16:33 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
Hi, all.
app-admin/gwcc has security issues, and has been unmaintained upstream
for 3 years. The Gnome herd is no longer interested in maintaining it.
I've masked it, and will remove it in a couple of weeks, if no one steps
and the
forums. GWN announcements for example do not need to appear elsewhere...
While we're talking about replicating the front page, I just added the Gentoo
News rdf feed to Planet Gentoo and Gentoo Universe.
I hope this helps the overall situation a very little bit :)
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev
contain links to any relevant *documentation* which would then be
governed by the GDP if said documentation was in fact Gentoo created and
in the official Docs repository.
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13748 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
a client side tool that can identify what is installed
already...why not use it?
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
a client side tool that can identify what is installed
already...why not use it?
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 14:02 -0500, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
[snip]
After going through the list, I got the impression there is simply no
place where such messages clearly would go. gentoo-announce sounds as
the best option to go for, but its description somehow suggests not.
Though
.
|
| The deadline for submitting items for the meeting agenda is set to
| Sunday, November 13th, 20:00 UTC.
Assuming there aren't any further comments between now and then, I'd
like GLEP 34 (GLEP File Hosting) to be approved please.
I assume you meant 43 yes?
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14406 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14544 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
and developers alike will still be able to generate
them on their own using catalyst and the provided spec files...sure it
is an extra step and all but it's not all that huge...
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
down *before* we get any
further in discussion.
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
the text links below each advertisement
graphic also be underlined. The implication of the current text is that
they are not links at all when they are.
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14890 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14377 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
On Friday 09 December 2005 08:19 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 01:09:50AM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with
a small enough subset of packages you can handle ?
I'd rather say that we
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13568 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
from an overlay ;)
you get the idea
i will add your email to the dvd::rip filter in kmail so i hopefully do not
miss things
wife's surgery is friday, so i don't expect to do much before then
Thanks,
Daniel Goller
pgpzxz08W7VDT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13634 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
. That
is something we cannot and will not do.
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-mail, it is a question of culpability do to the
facilitation of an illegal act, a crime in and of itself, nothing more,
nothing less. Sure we wouldn't be shipping the actual source, but what
we would be doing is facilitating your use of said source, which is
*illegal*.
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14140 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 17:18 +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
Hi Daniel,
what you've done breaks runtime dependencies, if not for other packages so at
least for KDE. Such a change should be announced on the gentoo-dev mailing
list before you do it. Also a tracking bug to coordinate
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13904 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
you don't need the server profile.
ln -s ${PORTDIR}/profiles/default/linux/${ARCH}/10.0 make.profile
gives you a minimal profile.
--
Regards
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
flag to global USE
2. Enable USE=cracklib by default in profiles/default-linux/make.defaults
3. Add cracklib USE flag to sys-apps/shadow. Right now shadow
unconditionally depends on cracklib and includes cracklib support.
4. Remove cracklib from base/packages
Thanks,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev
Welcome Alon,
Pleasure to have you on board.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
This is your 1 week warning.. fix any packages which don't compile and
ensure the fix is also in the stable tree.
Thanks.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
are appreciated.
Daniel
P.S. The tone of your email didn't offend me, but that's probably
because I completely agreed with it. Andrew is certainly right in that
we should be really careful about how we write things.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
stuff which is lagging
behind.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Mike Pagano wrote:
This seems to me like a good opportunity to engage the arch teams for
some assistance.
So the arch teams would be happy to handle package foo doesn't compile
with 2.6.18 bugs, for example, bug 148381?
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 17:37 +, Kurt Lieber wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:19:44PM +0200 or thereabouts, Alin Nastac wrote:
I say we should have +all (SPF-capable MTAs will consider any IP address
as authorized to send mail on behalf of g.o - equivalent with Message
source OK).
understanding was that it was intended
to include all packages with a hard dep on gtk+-1, in addition to gnome
1.x.
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
, or we could
slap a warning in the ebuild saying that it's not supported from a
security perspective, or something along those lines.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 22:55 +0200, Alin Nastac wrote:
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Friday 10 November 2006 16:28, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 08:56 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
Ok, the list definitely isn't accurate. If there is a legitimate reason
to mask
unmodified config-protected files on
unmerge a while back?
If not, is this a sensible suggestion?
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
to take this
is an option, provided the usual requirements are met.
Please mention this in the next GWN.
Thanks!
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
. Upstream appears to be dead as well.
If nobody steps up within a week it will go in package.mask for removal
3 weeks later.
Suitable replacements for this package include the in-kernel
automounter, hal, ivman.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
requiring people to create Manifests for these ebuilds,
they will do so, and this has not changed the security implications of
these untrusted ebuilds.
Am I missing something?
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
After no response to my call for maintainers, submount will enter
package.mask tomorrow for removal in 3 weeks.
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_141377.xml
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
- fix your packages, and ensure they are
fixed in the stable tree. Find me on IRC if you need help.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
this is a showstopper to removal.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
removal
(despite it being hardmasked already)?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
working towards a smooth transition and this has
occurred really smoothly (as far as I have seen).
I've noticed the usage of bugs.gentoo.org is now, dare i say it,
pleasureable :-).
Thankyou again GNI for your hardware.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgpGh0CCsOUk5.pgp
in filesystem corruption.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
or areas that
you might be interested in offlist, and I'll look into getting you in
contact with appropriate people.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
to run 2.4), I'm not interested in seeing this
maintained-but-neglected.
Please mention this in the next GWN.
Thanks!
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
as feeding the same info into a mailing
list for all kernels.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 10:00 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
There's a ChangeLog file in profiles/ChangeLog now. Please use it when
making changes to things in profiles/*...
Should we prefer this location for trees that already have a ChangeLog
in them as well? It's
Steve Long wrote:
Daniel Drake wrote:
Construction of a dynamic website for tracking kernel security issues.
There are too many of them and too many kernels to do this through the
normal GLSA process, and currently users are kept in the dark about
fixed security issues.
Who put's up the fixed
digest good - assuming it was xdelta generated
(more fetching)
unpacking
.
I'm thinking xdeltas that gets generated on the staging server and some portage
support so facilitate a minimal download.
Note: i haven't looked at previous xdelta portage patches from years ago.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL
should do some kind of
recruiting drive / call for help.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
the config files are restored in the same order
listed in save_config with the -s.
WARN_CONFIG
warn_config (useflags)
warns the user that the useflags have been overridden by savedconfig
Anything else?
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgpekacYAqKrP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 01 February 2007 18:48, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 01 February 2007, Daniel Black wrote:
Also creates the following symlinks to it
i dont see much value in these symlinks ... what do they gain us ?
An easy way to find the closest config when merging a revision/version
On Thursday 01 February 2007 18:55, Brian Harring wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 06:21:01PM +1100, Daniel Black wrote:
Fellow devs,
WARN_CONFIG
warn_config (useflags)
warns the user that the useflags have been overridden by savedconfig
Anything else?
overriding use flags
Please welcome Martin as a new fellow developer among us !
Welcome to Gentoo and netmon in particular.
May your free time be filled with many solved bug reports, version bumps, and
better integration activities.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgpdhj1tgAqwk.pgp
on IRC.
The good thing about the Gentoo community is there is so many mediums to
harass you. Its all about choice after all.
So please welcome Dean as a new fellow developer among us !
Welcome.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgppr2IEnyiqK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
February 2007, Daniel Black wrote:
The savedconfig configuration control does NOT aim to:
- replace the USE flag determination of dependencies
It will be possible to configure an option that conflicts with a USE flag in
some cases. Given the grief that would be caused by trying to determine
Wondering if the religion herd would kindly see over the last rites of
packages on their journey into oblivion?
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgpJiNMiFzyiY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.
I assume you have set your USE flags to include the appropriate dependencies
and/or emerged the dependencies already.
- implement warn_config (though I don't think its really needed)
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgpmidpUiJ7NI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
from Windows can write it as ini files, users
who like Java can write it as resource files, and old-school Unix types
can write RFC822 headers. And they're all mutually comprehensible if the
parser is just reasonably lenient.
-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
--
gentoo-dev
--
Subject: Re: afflib licence
Date: Wednesday 07 February 2007 09:56
From: Simson Garfinkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Brian Carrier [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carl Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Daniel. Thanks for your email. We'd be happy to have you add
AFFLIB to the Gentoo
/rcS script that starts all the
stuff you need.
-Daniel
On 2/8/07, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 08 February 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 07 February 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
In the current code I'm running it's only
the flexibility of baselayout but can't squeeze in bash. And I
have a pretty good imagination.
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
distributions are doing in this area.
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
?
-Daniel
On 2/15/07, Anders Bruun Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:01:11AM -0500, Caleb Cushing wrote:
which most probably aren't since that was changed in the handbook
(wonders why it was).
It might have something to do with the fact that FHS specifies that /usr
does
Um, alternatively you could just copy /usr/share/zoneinfo/foo to
/etc/localtime rather than having a symlink. Since the zoneinfo file
has the name of the timezone in it already, it is probably not
necessary to preserve the filename of the timezone file.
-Daniel
On 2/16/07, Daniel Robbins [EMAIL
you could log in
and start something that requires something that has not yet been
started, and it would need to understand and deal with this
appropriately and gracefully.
But I think it would be cool.
The perception of speed is based on how long you have to wait before
you can do stuff.
-Daniel
/timezone/MST7MDT idea since the
corresponding file can be located and compared.
-Daniel
On 2/16/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:36:53 -0700 Daniel Robbins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Um, alternatively you could just copy /usr/share/zoneinfo/foo to
| /etc/localtime
OK, I did not understand how it was supposed to work. Is there
documentation anywhere that explains how it works and why?
-Daniel
On 2/16/07, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 16 February 2007, Daniel Robbins wrote:
Well, sure, but the timezone-data ebuild could be upgraded
fast that we never really got to do this.
-Daniel
On 2/16/07, Daniel Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see any reason why not to add it. It would certainly make it
easier to play around with.
On 2/16/07, William Hubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
in theory, but of course in this line of work
there is no guarantee that there won't be unexpected transition
problems for real users on real systems - but you know that already.
With some reasonable amount of testing I think it is a great idea.
-Daniel
On 2/17/07, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL
-time
over 3 months (this *is* summer, after all) and have clearly defined
goals for completion.
-Daniel
On 2/20/07, Christel Dahlskjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiya all,
Let's do a quick re-cap of Summer of Code '06:
Gentoo had 14 project slots, out of these fourteen two were on Gentoo
something changes, gentoo-sources-2.4 will be put in package.mask
on March 1st and removed from portage on March 31st.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
see a real problem with any arch, mips included, either
from the arch side or from the gnome side. There's more gnome cruft in
the tree from us failing to clean intermediate versions up than there is
from slacker arches.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi Ciaran,
Can you please refrain from making inflammatory accusations in your
posts? This is not a forum for airing personal grievances, and they do
not serve any purpose besides encouraging others to do the same to you
- as you have discovered.
-Daniel
On 2/20/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL
that you might not intend. So from the
perspective of many, right or wrong, it is you who is starting the
fight.
-Daniel
On 2/20/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:12:26 -0700 Daniel Robbins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Can you please refrain from making inflammatory
just getting familiar with all this but those are my thoughts.
-Daniel
On 2/20/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:22:14 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Perhaps not all of the council; distinctly recall diego pushing about
| it though. Quick look
and this problem of cross-package manager
compatibility will never go away.
Those are my thoughts, anyway...
If you wanted to get me to agree with you by giving me lots of eclass
compatibility issues, then it worked :)
-Daniel
On 2/20/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:19
Ciaran,
Is there any way that the public can view the PMS spec that you have
created so far?
I am not totally familiar with how you are going about developing PMS,
but based on some of your comments in this thread I'm a little bit
concerned.
-Daniel
On 2/20/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL
that includes all interested parties, and serves
the needs of everyone, not just the Paludis developers.
-Daniel
On 2/21/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A number of ebuilds do things like this:
inherit foo
VAR=${FOO_VAR}
src_compile()
{
emake blah=${VAR
who are chronically verbally abusive and make no effort
at all to be polite?
We shouldn't have to put up with this.
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
typically drive open source
projects.
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Gentoo
and b) I don't like to see people get away with crap over and over
again by using cheap debating tricks. But I will cut myself off from
this thread now.
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
as I hate gtk1, I agree with this. Leave the themes as long as
they're working and there's apps.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hey all, and thanks for the welcome back. It was a bit strange to find
old stuff from 2005 in my dev.gentoo.org homedir. Sort of like a time
capsule :)
-Daniel
On 2/27/07, Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's my please to introduce to you Daniel drobbins Robbins. Daniel is
going to work
not really what Portage
is aimed at.
-Daniel
On 2/26/07, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 10:43 -0500, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 21:31 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
Andrej Kacian wrote:
It makes sense slowly removing *applications* depending on gtk1
that it isn't always black and white :)
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
little
things that could be done.
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Welcome Matt :)
On 3/1/07, Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please give the usual warm welcome to Matt aetius Drew. Matt pings us
from Durham, North Carolina, USA. He says he lacks the skills that make
someone a software engineer as opposed to a programmer. Well I hope he
has never looked
parties in the Council agenda trancends the actual authority of the
Gentoo Council and should be reconsidered or at least massively
clarified so we can understand why it is relevant for the Council to
be discussing in the first place.
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
In the interests of not being accusatory/one-sided, please replace this phrase:
- partly your fault
with the phrase
due to ambiguity on the part of Gentoo and Paludis
That is what I meant anyway. I shouldn't have expressed it in such a
negative way. Sorry.
-Daniel
On 3/2/07, Daniel Robbins
a Gentoo project.
-Daniel
On 3/2/07, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Daniel Robbins wrote:
On 3/2/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, er, to whom does this deadline apply then, if not the people
writing PMS?
I have no clue.
PMS
OK, but it appears that PMS is not hosted on Gentoo infrastructure,
and its development is not controlled by Gentoo. Therefore it is not a
Gentoo project, and therefore the Council, QA, etc. should not be
treating it if it is a Gentoo project.
Right?
-Daniel
On 3/2/07, Andrew Gaffney [EMAIL
a description of one particular program.
PMS (and Paludis) are not hosted on Gentoo infrastructure and their
development is not controlled by Gentoo, so they are both not Gentoo
projects and thus fall outside the scope of Gentoo.
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
official Gentoo projects.
Paludis does not have a Gentoo Foundation copyright, does PMS?
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
if this policy has changed.
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
process with small links
to alternate approaches and options that a user might opt to follow.
And it should be one (web) page.
In my opinion.
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
301 - 400 of 882 matches
Mail list logo
