On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:19:20 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently we put portage into /usr/portage and all related stuff is to
be in the subfolders there (distfiles, binpkg).
I've always myself override these defaults in make.conf to point for
/var/portage/ (not
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:36:18 +0100
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
several people have pointed out to me that the 10.0 - 13.0 transition would
be a good moment to finally remove the (also in my opinion rather useless)
server profiles.
The easiest way to do this
On Aug 20, 2013, at 11:19 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
My question is, how can we improve our stabilization procedures/policies
so we can convince people not to run production servers on ~arch and
keep the stable tree more up to date?
do the Arch Linux thing…keep just one
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:52:24 +0200
Rémi Cardona r...@gentoo.org wrote:
Thanks for the wording, I've somewhat made it a bit stronger.
@Dev, please ACK or NAK or whatever.
Looks good to me. (Both as a dev and as a PR member.)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:54:31 +0100
AllenJB gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk wrote:
I have tried to bring up the issues on the docs team list but pretty
much get shot down and told everything is fine and dandy.
Going to have to call bullshit on this one. Who told you that on the lists?
Have you
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:58:56 +0100
AllenJB gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk wrote:
I have no intention of shitting all over anybodys work. My apologies
if that was the interpretation. I'm simply escalating an issue I have
raised before to somewhere I think it'll get more attention.
I realize (now)
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:45:21 +0300
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is actually true. Maybe all devs should have access on docs since the
docs teams are dead. I would suggest to let all developers contribute to
documentation whether they belong to docs team or not
No. Many
There. I did the x86 and amd64 handbooks (networked, anyway; who cares about
networkless). They're now ready for the 10th anniversary. I'm pretty sure.
I also did the x86 quickinstall handbooks.
GDP, and interested devs who can contribute patches to Bugzilla:
Please review all the files I
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:57:07 +0200
Matthias Schwarzott z...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi there!
As some of you have waited long for this to happen, sys-apps/openrc-0.5.1 is
there. It has a default enabled (eapi-1) useflag oldnet to install the
old-style network scripts called net.*.
Regardless of
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:04:50 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
lately I spoted that quite few packages have optional parts bit unstable (KDE
parts, boinc [i wont stable it until the cuda is, i wont do the work
explained bellow :)], kipi,...).
I really don't like the
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:52:06 +0200
Dawid Węgliński c...@gentoo.org wrote:
Upstream already provides such a documentation as you can see above. Gentoo
provides migration guide. I believe doc team will update use flag description
as soon as it's possible.
In this case, As soon as it's possible
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:54:31 +0200
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
I disagree in this place. ~arch is called testing because it actually is
about TESTING new versions and packages. You should expect problems and you
should be able to recover from them and you should be able to use
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:11:38 +0200
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
AllenJB wrote:
* Why is the developer profile even shown on eselect profile? Wouldn't
it be better to keep unsupported profiles off this list. Surely Gentoo
devs can cope with setting their profile manually in
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 02:44:47 +
Sylvain Alain d2_rac...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone, I think that the best should be to release a migration guide
just before the official release and also a news on the first page of
Gentoo.org
You really should have checked our doc repo before sending
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:20:36 +0100
Thilo Bangert bang...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi all,
similarly to the metadata.xml check, the following is a list of small
problems related to the project metadata as found in the gentoo CVS
repository.
Documentation: Only 1 developers signed up
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:09:20 +0100
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
Wasn't there some licence issue with this package, too?
Ulrich
There was with ion3, yes. It was removed for that reason about 2.5 years ago --
not just Gentoo, but basically all distros pulled it. Upstream went crazy.
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600
Victor Ostorga vosto...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Víctor Ostorga vosto...@gentoo.org (23 Dec 2009)
# Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
# stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
# Removal in 30 days
net-dns/ldapdns
So what about
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:47:51 -0600
Victor Ostorga vosto...@gentoo.org wrote:
Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc.
Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to
s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide?
Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 06:37:03 -0800
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 15.2.2010 22.26, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
As soon as the 72 hours on this news announcement are done, I'm going to
be unmasking it. I do expect most of the breakage to come from the
client libraries, and
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:20:06 +
Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
Giving the staffing levels of PR vs. the eyes on the -dev ML, I don't see the
point either.
Yup. Besides, it's not like any of us have commit access to go back and fix
something in a news announcement after the
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:04:04 +0100
Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 02/28/10 20:54, Markos Chandras wrote:
Do we still have bugdays? Who is taking care of this project and the
respective webpage? I think we first need to answer these questions before
we even consider resurrect
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:35:10 +0200
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (03 Mar 2010)
# Masked for QA, security
#
# Internal copies of vuln. zlib, jpeg, speex and likely
# others
#
# http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255453
#
# Masked
On 3 March 2010 19:45, Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't believe we should selectively cripple one GUI toolkit with not
having proper printing support out of the box on a desktop profile,
while others do, just because maintainers are lazy.
It is not something that is
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 19:22:41 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
Python 3 is a new major version of Python and is intentionally incompatible
with Python 2. Many external modules have not been ported yet to Python 3, so
currently Python 3.1 should not be set as
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:52:50 +0200
Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'll give three days max for the suggestions here etc, and then I'll proceed
in creating the news item. So I guess it will be committed in a week max.
Thanks
Feel free to submit some documentation patches now
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:10:00 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
Because 'stable' denotes that it works as intended, that it can be
installed easily, etc. All of these are true now for python3. There
are applications being written for it. We want to package those too.
I'm fine with
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:56:23 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
No one has said yet why this is. So . . . direct question, gimme a direct
answer: why?
Because in my opinion stable means that the people who package this
are stating that hey, we did some testing with this, it works
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:26:24 +0200
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/07/2010 07:32 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
no need to stabilize experimental python, not even convinced it should
be in ~arch yet (but package.masked for testing)
I don't think upstream considers python 3
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:32:22 -0600
Nathan Zachary nathanzach...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 09/03/10 22:08, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Hello!
We have about 500 bump request open at the moment:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump
I assume that quite a few of them would be no
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:43:56 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-23 20:28:38 Ben de Groot napisał(a):
As mentioned in the other thread, this news item should mention
that users who do not need python-3 should mask it locally to
prevent it from being
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:14:44 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-24 17:57:35 Joshua Saddler napisał(a):
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:43:56 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
Python maintainers do not recommend to mask
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:04:51 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
People, don't want Python 3, probably have already masked it. There is
no reason to waste Council's time for decision on what sentence should
be included in the news item.
Not the folks running
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:12:55 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:36:52PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
We agree that this is the minimum that should be done. But our
Python lead stubbornly refuses to honor this reasonable request.
On the other hand, I
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:09:07 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:07:52PM +0200, Rennn 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
Am 28.03.2010 21:04, schrieb Brian Harring:
Instead, if the purpose is a thanks, why not every once in a while
put up a news item discussing
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:16:32 +0200
Tobias Scherbaum dertobi...@gentoo.org wrote:
- Our formerly outstanding documentation still is somewhat maintained,
but that's it. I haven't seen any new additions (both to our docs, but
also to our docs-team) for years. People are constantly asking for a
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 03:20:53 +0200
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
GuideXML documents are often experienced as an unnecessary
barrier.
I think you should clearly state again that this is not gonna replace
GuideXML, just migrate a few use cases where a wiki fits better.
This is
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 10:22:06 +0200
Tobias Scherbaum dertobi...@gentoo.org wrote:
5 years ago [...] constantly added [...]
You need to clarify your metric. How are you defining constant? How often does
a new document need to appear?
What mostly happens is steady refinement and expansion of our
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 17:23:54 +0200
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
As has been pointed out, your table example was unfair, as they don't
do the same thing. I would frown on such inline styling (that's what
stylesheets are for), and there are a number of ways you can markup
tables in
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 02:08:06 +0200
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 4 April 2010 21:33, Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Having to write a custom stylesheet just to get one wiki page to do what
you want is pretty dumb.
Yes it would be. The idea is that you design
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 May 2010 12:45:54 +
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
Following Petteri's thread last month about RESOLVED LATER and given a
issue that has been reported to User Relations about the abuse of the
VERIFIED status
On Fri, 28 May 2010 22:47:58 -0700
spinugio spinu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
can I please get some so-to-speak reference accounts of products that
are using Gentoo as their embedded Linux distribution of choice? in other
words, can you please let me know of any embedded appliance
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 01:30:08 -0400
Jacob Godserv jacobgods...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 13:19, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm running a BoF session during the Linux Symposium 2010 in Ottawa next
week, entitled 'State of Gentoo'.
I've had my own uneducated
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:49:00 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello
I am a bit surprised handbook still doesn't suggest people to
create a separate partition for /usr/portage tree. I remember my
first Gentoo systems had it inside / and that lead to a lot of
fragmentation, much
Hey folks, thought I'd ask here, since I can't find answers on what's
maintained in our ipv6 packages.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326771 asks for updates to our sadly
neglected ipv6 guide (http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ipv6.xml). I removed the
note that said to keyword net-dns/totd,
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 11:42:13 -0700
Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org wrote:
There. I did the x86 and amd64 handbooks (networked, anyway; who cares about
networkless). They're now ready for the 10th anniversary. I'm pretty sure.
I also did the x86 quickinstall handbooks.
It's been several
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:11:10 -0400
Richard Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Is the process for creating these documented somewhere? I did some
googling and couldn't really find any documentation on how our stages
and liveCDs are built in the first place. There are some generic
catalyst
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:44:36 -0700
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
This might be a bit unclear to less savvy users. How about just make
sure your LDFLAGS in /etc/make.conf contains -Wl,--as-needed or is unset?
Instead of saying overriding, I'd say something more similar to
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:34:08 +0300
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
You should talk directly to the teams how are responsible for this part of the
webpage like dosc or pr teams
Common misconception. Neither the GDP, PR, or even Releng is directly
responsible for those pages, though
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:43:06 -0700
Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org wrote:
That said, I've been looking at the proposed changes, so I'll be implementing
some or all of them soon, probably today, time permitting.
I'm not going to be able to get to this, so anyone else with commit access
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:24:45 -0700
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
I have access to main/en and I am willing to do website stuff; just
nothing with a quick turnaround.
I know guidexml and enough xsl to be dangerous.
Excellent. I've been the defacto www@ team for as long as I can
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:30:20 -0400
Richard Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Looking at the tracker bug, I see all of three issues blocking openrc
from going stable. One is documentation,
It seems like we should just make the next bugday OpenRC Cleanup Day
or something like that. Everybody
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:18:56 +0200
Christian Faulhammer fa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org:
The big issue with the docs is that IF OpenRC/baselayout-2 are marked
stable, it will require massive changes to hundreds of our other doc
files.
Is there a list
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:57:46 -0500
Nathan Zachary nathanzach...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't think that the documentation changes should be a determining
factor in switching to OpenRC. If we are going to endorse using OpenRC,
the more relevant issues are the ones regarding its future
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 06:46:21 -0400
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
Why can't we keep both? There are strong advantages/disadvantages
either way and there are users invested in both new/oldnet. I know
this is more work on doc
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:16:08 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
All,
I want to start a new thread since the discussion on openrc is centering
on whether we should use oldnet, newnet, or keep both.
Use oldnet. Why?
1. We already have a migration guide setup for it:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:37:35 -0400
Jacob Godserv jacobgods...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
man, fix your line length. what a nub you are.
Or adjust your mail client. Then you could save yourself the name
calling, which
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:32:49 -0700
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
wrote:
because he's a stupid nub
-mike
NO U
Is that pronounced 'nub' or 'noob' ?
Man I should really go to SCALE next year :X
We got the
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:13:03 -0800
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:58:20 +0100
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
So we have some automatic reporting. Can we have a webpage for
that, or a mailing list that people can subscribe to?
Mailing list: http://bugs.gentoo.org/329165
I have no idea how to go about doing an automated
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:42:52 +0100
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Can anaconda give the user a shell at any point of the
installation? Is it possible to manually skip the automated steps?
Last I checked, Anaconda was designed for binary installations,
originally for RPM-based
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 01:17:18 +0100
Stefan Behte cr...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi list,
seeing Donnie link to a GSOC page on en.gentoo-wiki.com, I was
wondering about the status of our own, gentoo-hosted wiki. When
gentoo-wiki.com had its major failure, I was very frustrated and
thus have some
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:31:18 -0400
Daniel Gryniewicz d...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Daniel Gryniewicz d...@gentoo.org (13 Apr 2011)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Functionality is merged into and
maintained in
# the upstream kernel. Use any kernel (e.g. gentoo-sources)
instead.
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:24:07 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello,
As we discussed for a while, the media-sound/ category has grown
very large and it may be a good idea to split it.
Right now, it contains audio players, editing software, converters,
sound systems and a lot
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:49:23 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
if you dont want multiple builds on your system, then dont install
multiple versions of python.
-mike
This would be nice, but unfortunately the python maintainer forced
3.x on everyone, despite the fact that nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:05:42 +0300
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (10 Jul 2011)
# Dead upstream. Bugs #353788 and #348232
# Alternatives:
#
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:59:29 +0300
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (10 Jul 2011)
# Dead upstream. Bugs #353788 and #348232
# Alternatives:
# net-misc/dibbler
# net-misc/dhcp[ipv6]
# Masked
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:12:22 +0200
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello,
Please see the attached news item for review. The news item should
be published before mesa-7.11 goes stable.
Corresponding bug report:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377349
Best
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:53:44 -0600
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi all,
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389437
has prompted a discussion of whether or not we should use ifconfig
in openrc to configure networking on linux systems.
I'm not asking that we consider
68 matches
Mail list logo
