rich choice of high quality kernel trees Gentoo
> Linux must apply, write and test several kernel patches to the official
> upstream releases before they can offer finished ebuilds to the users.
> This is where the Gentoo Kernel project comes into play."
>
> --
> With kind regards,
>
> Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
> Gentoo Developer
>
> E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
> GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
> GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
This thread derailed as usual.
The kernel team made a decision. We can simply accept it and move on.
Stable keywords imply at least a minimal build and runtime testing by
arch teams.
Since we have no manpower to do it, then stabilizing them blindly is
not appropriate.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On Aug 3, 2013 10:06 AM, "Donnie Berkholz" wrote:
>
> On 15:36 Fri 02 Aug , William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > This message is an announcement and a reminder.
> >
> > OpenRc-0.12 will be introduced to the portage tree in the next few days.
> >
> > If you are using ~arch OpenRc, the standard
gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/kde.git;a=tree;f=sets;h=0e7389b34215915696d99fdb19e03c6d5ce1902f;hb=HEAD
>>>
>>> All the sets I've had a look at are a list of package atoms.
>>>
>>> No python code involved. None of your conspiracy theories supported.
>>>
cifications, grouped together
> and given a name for convenience".
>
> --
> Ciaran McCreesh
My understanding is that the cvs tree should be PMS compatible and
since 'sets' are not part of PMS that means that it would be wise not
to use them yet.
It is unfortunate that nobody seems to have realized that all these
years that 2.2.X was masked :-/
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
opics, so please take your
> personal quarrels elsewhere.
>
> Ulrich
>
Last warning for both hasufell and Ciaran. Keep the discussion on
acceptable technical and polite levels or go away
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
something
that is not part of PMS, is not a PMS problem. So unless it becomes
part of PMS, it can't be used in places where you expect PMS
compliance.
If you want PMS to go away, and call portage the one-and-true PM for
Gentoo, then it's probably something for the Council to decide.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 15 August 2013 00:42, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 08/15/2013 04:21 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 14 August 2013 21:17, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> And their lack of time (
ad to manually add it back,
> using a syntax I found on the wiki site.
>
>
The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few people
lost their net configs
So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
nly and require fancy kernel features.
>
>
Awesome! Thanks a lot!
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
also help developers get rid of
old ebuilds and keep the portage tree healthy and reasonably updated.
If I get enough positive feedback on this, I will propose this in the
next Council's agenda.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
eople testing this as part of their regular testing can
only improve
the user experience in the end.
For such arches, my personal opinion is that most people have been running ~arch
all along because stable was lagging so far behind.
>>
> Or no serious negative feedback. I don't think
On 21 August 2013 16:32, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It's time of year again to consider moving a few arches to dev-only status.
>>
>> I propose the following arches to lose their stable k
ou are talking about keywords
> only, right ? Do these arches keep their stable mark in profiles.desc?
>
I am not familiar with portage internals to understand what
implications will an ~arch only architecture have if marked as stable.
Is there a good reason for that?
--
Regar
On 21 August 2013 20:10, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:03:30 +0100
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> On 21 August 2013 19:28, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>> >
>> > Instead of dropping them entirely to ~arch, maybe something in
>> > between could
On 22 August 2013 11:01, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> On 22 August 2013 01:19, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Markos Chandras
>>> wrote:
>>>> Is there an alternative? afaik a profi
On 22 August 2013 12:24, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 22 August 2013 11:01, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> I think the result of a policy like this would be that stable keywords
>>> would get dropped on most peri
ages, like I've been doing on sparc, ppc and arm.)
>
This is yet to be decided.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
rrect. Your ChangeLogs have no
name and the email address looks a bit weird. I presume the correct
one should be jbarto...@gentoo.org
Please read this
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/tools-reference/echangelog/index.html
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
T. That's why I fixed my script now.
>
> --
> Robin Hugh Johnson
> Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
> E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org
> GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
>
I believe we discussed this here
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473946
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
o I was wondering if that's the only reason. If yes, then maybe this
needs to be solved in PM scope instead?
As in, prevent portage from inheriting the same eclass twice instead
of handling this case in the eclass itself.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
o find all the "good" people out there and
bring them on board.
The individual projects/team need to do that for us.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
ng the git-r3 eclass without touching
the existing git-r2 compatible ebuilds? And why do you want to do that in
the first place? If the maintainer is happy with how git-r2 works with
his ebuilds
I see no reason to allow users to silently override that eclass.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo
On 3 September 2013 12:17, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2013-09-03, o godz. 11:53:22
> Markos Chandras napisał(a):
>
>> On 3 September 2013 11:45, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > Hello, all.
>> >
>> >
>> > I'm attaching git-r3.eclass and a pa
nk raising this issue to the mailing list
is appropriate as a first step. Did you try to talk to him? If you
feel he violated the perl@ team policies please consider
following the QA policy for such violations
https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0048.html
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
been through that before
http://gentoo.2317880.n4.nabble.com/Response-to-a-quot-friendly-note-quot-about-changing-bug-reports-td266749.html
How about we continue on that thread (or re-read it)
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
.desc and arch/~arch are orthogonal.
>
Yes in practice they are orthogonal. One could argue that all profiles
should be marked 'stable' in order to improve the overall dependency
coverage and stability because, lets face it, very few devs run repoman -d.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
without -d) but without stable
> keywords.
>
> Alexis.
>
I believe the 'exp' profile makes no sense. It might did in the past,
but I believe we are fine having only 'stable' and 'dev'. So unless I am
missing something obvious, 'dev' can be us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (23 Sep 2013)
# dead upstream. The microcode is now in the latest
# sys-kernel/linux-firmware. Bug #455208
# Removal in 30 days.
sys-firmware/amd-ucode
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http
versions get removed.
>
I agree. There is absolutely *no* reason to drop the keywords on
existing packages and cause massive downgrades/upgrades for people
(unless of course you want to increase your number of cvs commits which
is a worrying argument on its own)
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/24/2013 07:28 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On 09/23/2013 22:41, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> (unless of course you want to increase your number of cvs commits
>> which is a worrying argument on its own)
>
> 11:16 #gentoo
On 09/29/2013 10:41 PM, hasufell wrote:
> Arch teams do not test them, so this is the business of the maintainer
> or the dev who requested stabilization.
>
That is definitely not true. We always trained Arch Testers to test
reverse dependencies as well.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 09/30/2013 11:44 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 09/30/2013 09:22 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 09/29/2013 10:41 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> Arch teams do not test them, so this is the business of the
>>> maintainer or the dev who requested stabilization.
>>>
&
or us)
What's is this thread for?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJSXaVwXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive project
>>> leaders/membe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/15/2013 09:53 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 10:46 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>> On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, has
] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
pt is there just for convenience. You shouldn't
take it too seriously and go filing bugs like crazy. The affected
packages can slowly be fixed. It's not like they are totally broken
but it's more like of another way to tell you that a few QA problems
exist and that it would be nice
rkaround broken deps,
well, then you get what you deserve.
I was mostly referring to whitespaces, too long descriptions and other
non-fatal warnings that a few devs may ignore.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.
d join efforts than having
yet-another-shiny overlay.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
>>>> * not related to the games team * no review whatsoever from any
>>>> dev on ebuilds that get pushed there
>>
On 10/20/2013 02:45 PM, hasufell wrote:
> - gpg control packet
> After doing some tests we will probably apply this patch from bug 483304.
"probably"? Then this does not belong to the announcement list if no
final decisions have been made yet
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo
asterisk-moh-opsound
net-misc/asterisk-rate_engine
net-misc/asterisk-spandsp_codec_g726
net-misc/asterisk
net-misc/astmanproxy
net-misc/dahdi-tools
net-misc/dahdi
net-misc/libss7
net-misc/openr2
net-misc/sipsak
The rest will end up maintainer-needed, so first comes first served :)
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>> On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
>>>>>
m not sure why you even open that thread. Your e-mail basically
requests the games@ team opinion. Again, if you didn't want others to
comment on this, you shouldn't have CC'd gentoo-dev.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 10/20/2013 05:04 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:40 AM, hasufell wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 05:26 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>>> On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>>> On 1
On 10/21/2013 02:32 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:41:02 +0100
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> No I never meant broken depgraphs. Well for broken deps, repoman does
>> not let you commit. If you use --force to workaround broken deps,
>> well, th
further. People can form their own opinions on
the subject.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
to be against of gamerlay. We have
> got this, thanks.
>
Again, lets stop here please. I think we proved that the Gentoo dev
community as a whole is not hostile to user community overlays/projects.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (02 Nov 2013)
# On behalf of Treecleaners
# Upstream started a complete rewrite of the package
# meaning that existing bugs will not be fixed by future
# version bumps of the existing code.
# It is unclear when/if the new code
from
scratch.
2) It has no maintainer.
3) It has open bugs and upstream will never fix them and there is no
maintainer to patch the code to fix it properly.
So per treecleaner policy the package will be removed.
Or have you just volunteered to become maintainer and fix the bugs?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 11/02/2013 07:12 PM, yac wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 17:57:34 +
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> On 11/02/2013 05:55 PM, yac wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I don't think that upstream deciding to rewrite a package is good
>>> enough reason t
ey have a cluster/big box for this purpose but they just didn't have
the time to deploy it properly or something.
Not everyone can afford paid solutions when it comes to contributing to
free software
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
with proxy-maintainers to bring this package up
to date.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=net-analyzer%2Fnagios
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
projects to be in
the Wiki so I don't think that you are supposed to add a proj/en page
anymore just so you can redirect it to the Wiki
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
verything :(
>
(picking up a random e-mail from the thread)
2 weeks later and the number bugs is pretty much the same. I suggest
whoever is interested in helping out to add himself to metadata given no
coordination has happened so far.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
with pambase
>> and pam_ssh
>>
>> Thanks for the info :)
>>
>>
>
So I guess it's time to call for maintainers or we should consider
merging this herd with another one (base?) to avoid unattended bugs for
a long time.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
ed while cronie forked it
> fixing some bugs :/
>
> What do you think?
>
>
>
>
If vixie-cron upstream is dead as you say, then I agree we should move
away from it.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
ather than in the actual sources. I don't think Debian will keel over
> and die if it takes a little extra time for the change to go through,
> and it beats a ton of broken systems.
>
> Chris Reffett
>
>
+1
The ebuild can grep the inittab and it if finds an "rc" there, just
print a huge warning telling the user to migrate || die.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
see no reason to go through the migration path
for users :) The symlink thing can be done immediately.
I am wondering, wouldn't Debian be able to rename "rc" to "openrc" in
their openrc package just before merging it to the read filesystem (I
assume Debian also builds and installs in sandbox first?)? In this case
we will not have to touch openrc (or the ebuild) at all.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
t to
> change the default in the install manual to one that is being developed.
>
Can we please stop this derailed part of this thread? Please do not let
Peter render another thread useless.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
nfra side or its the pre-
> christmas present, the git migration.
>
> Greetings
>
maybe worth opening a bug (assuming there is no one already) or talk to
#gentoo-infra?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
gree with this. I feel that this thread is a sign that
there is a problem on how the new QA communicates problems with the
developers that cause them. I read the entire thread and I still don't
think there is an agreement on who broke the tree and why. Would a
private discussion be better before
Point.
> QA can do trivial fixes. Point.
>
> None of these two points needs any discussion.
>
Certainly, but look at the size and contents of this thread and now tell
me if what you said is clear to everyone. It certainly isn't to the
person who caused the problem so what I
On 01/09/2014 08:20 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 09 December 2013 16:32:09 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 12/09/2013 02:21 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> Is p
is case, either a 'parent' herd needs to
inherit the packages or simply drop them to maintainer-needed
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
yes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
>
Fine by me. We will drop the rest to m-n
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
we could have expected that since we're diffing
> a compressed filesystem. What's important, however, is that applying
> it takes ~2.5 second on my 2 GHz Athlon64.
>
> So, even with the extra download time, the update is much faster
> than recreating the squashfs. And unlike some types of unionfs,
> it doesn't come with extra runtime slowdown.
>
> What do you think?
>
+1 I like the idea
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
was infra-status.
> Now with overlays using the new theme too, I've updated the list.
>
> (NB: During the outage, I added a link to the site from the g.o frontpage.)
>
>>
I haven't noticed there was a http://overlays.gentoo.org webpage.
Looks awesome :)
Thank you for the post-mortem analysis and for restoring the data
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
c/index.html
Discussing this in gentoo-dev makes no sense. Whoever wants the
profiles.desc to be part of the devmanual document, please submit a patch.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJS3XuZXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1
ven't looked at the implementation, but I wonder if we need a
function for such trivial stuff. Most maintainers deal with this problem
using pkg_postinst() einfo/elog messages. Why do we need a dedicated
function for that? Just for consistency reasons...?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 01/25/2014 01:09 PM, Chris Reffett wrote:
> On 01/25/2014 05:12 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 01/23/2014 04:48 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Dnia 2014-01-23, o godz. 11:36:06 Chris Reffett
>>> napisał(a):
>>>
>>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
t; documentation and not a policy manual -- policy lives in the Gentoo Developer
> Handbook.
The handbook has not been updated for a good number of years therefore I
am moving bits from it to devmanual whenever I have the time.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
ist, most of the bugs are ebuild
> related (bumps, compile and installation issues).
>
>
(picking a random email from the thread)
ping again. 3 months later, the list of bugs remain the same. Shall we
consider dropping it to maintainer-needed?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 01/26/2014 01:57 AM, Chris Reffett wrote:
> On 01/25/2014 12:22 PM, Andrew Hamilton wrote:
>> On 1/25/2014 9:24 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 11/10/2013 06:12 AM, Johann Schmitz wrote:
>>>> - gpg control packet
>>>>>> I already have too many p
ve that properly?
What other distributions do? Or are we a special case and we need our
own pc files?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 05/09/2014 09:08 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Fri, 09 May 2014 20:57:29 +0100
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> I was wondering, is there a good reason we keep our own pkgconfig
>> files instead of communicating that to upstream and resolve that
>> properly?
>
> Y
in order to make the
package compatible with gentoo. Some people may consider downstream pc
files more dangerous because reverse deps are affected. But really, if
there is no other alternative, we shouldn't be treating this as a
special case. We patch upstream packages all the time after all
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 05/10/2014 07:31 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 13:50 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> On 10 May 2014 04:34, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 05/09/2014 09:32 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 9 May 2014 16:15:58 -0400
>>>> Rich
lose to upstream.
Gentoo should be close to upstream as much as possible and developers
are actively encouraged during recruitment sessions to always try to
upstream their patches. If you think a maintainer deviated from upstream
for no good reason, well, I would like to think this is an exception
instead of common practice.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
elevant x11-*
> categories, as they are perfectly usable in other environments as
> well, tho for ease of maintenance you could stick them with the LXQt
> packages.
>
+1 (pcmanfm-qt is already in the tree in x11-misc/, libfm too etc)
Maybe it's possible to merge obconf and obconf-qt with a new 'qt' use
flag. The less duplication we do, the less time we will need to spend
maintaining the packages.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
be unmaintained in practice. I will add something to the
Staffing Needs wiki page but feel free to join the herd if you have any
interest in these packages.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 05/28/2014 09:32 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Indeed. I only use a subset of the dev-tools packages so those that I
>> don't use will be unmaintained in practice. I will add something to the
>> Staffing Nee
ntoo.devel/88183
[2] http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/277054
[3]
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20130917-summary.txt
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJTixXHXxS
On 06/01/2014 01:07 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 13:00 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió:
>> On 06/01/2014 12:33 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 14:18 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
>>>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bu
On 06/02/2014 02:03 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Fri, 30 May 2014 23:07:55 +0100
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> On 05/28/2014 09:32 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>>> Perhaps it makes more sense to disband the herd and put all packages
>>> except the ones you use
On 06/29/2014 03:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Hi Markos,
>
> I was wondering why docker 1.0.0 wasn't seeming to get updated on my
> boxes recently, despite me commiting the update to the cvs tree, and
> Tianon noticed that it was masked at the moment:
>
> # Mar
On 06/29/2014 09:12 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0100
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> It's been a long time. To be honest I don't remember masking docker
>> but I most likely did it because I was asked to mask >=lxc-1.0.0 by
>
On 06/29/2014 10:03 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Sunday 29 June 2014 10:12:22 Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0100
>>
>> Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> It's been a long time. To be honest I don't remember masking docker
>>> but
On 06/29/2014 10:23 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Sunday 29 June 2014 17:03:52 Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> On Sunday 29 June 2014 10:12:22 Tom Wijsman wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0100
>>>
>>> Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>> It's been a lo
t;
> [1]:http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/maintainer-needed.txt
>
We already maintain such a list (along with instructions how to get
involved) here
https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/treecleaners/maintainer-needed.xml
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
rs?)
>>
>> This has nothing to do with specialists. Tox is configuration-free.
>>
>> And sure, it's pre-alpha as indicated in my previous mail.
>
> So it doesn't work, but you feel the need to feel superior by telling
> everyone
> else that they are doing it wrong.
>
> Sigh.
>
> Can you please troll somewhere else?
>
(picking random email to reply)
can we please move this off-list?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
ved these weekly emails for two weeks. Is
there a problem? Maybe you turned them off during the migration but
never turned them back on? Is there another problem? Is there a way to
get some stats for August so I can use them for the upcoming GMN?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNAT
# Markos Chandras (02 Sep 2014)
# MSN service terminated.
# You can still use your MSN account in net-im/skype
# or switch to an open protocol instead
# Masked for removal in 30 days
net-im/kmess
net-im/amsn
x11-themes/amsn-skins
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
ection.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUCsLeXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGRDlGMzA4MUI2MzBDODQ4RDBGOEYxMjQx
RjEwRUQ0QjgxREVCRjE5AAoJEB8Q7UuB3r8ZQR8H/22hdfZfk1TZiR2bxR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/06/2014 09:16 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 09/05/2014 11:42 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> Oldschool python broke on the new CVS box, fixed now.
>
>
> Hi Robin,
>
> Ok thanks. Is there a way to generate some stat
ct:Gentoo/Staffing_Needs
how do you expect to get more people on board if you don't make it
known where help is actually needed?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUELLEXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/11/2014 07:30 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 21:21:24 +0100 Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>
>> On 09/10/2014 03:01 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>>>
>>> +1; to summarize my thoughts: Herds misrepresent
re is someone
from the toolchain@ team who is going to take care of gcc from now on?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUMs2tXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGRDlGMzA4MUI2MzBDODQ4RDBGOEYxMj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/07/2014 01:00 AM, Patrick McLean wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:25:53 -0400 "Anthony G. Basile"
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/06/14 13:13, Markos Chandras wrote: Let's face it, this is
>> not a job just anyone can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/17/2014 09:43 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 10/17/14 14:55, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
>>
>> On 10/07/2014 01:00 AM, Patrick McLean wrote:
>>> On Mon, 06 Oct
301 - 400 of 782 matches
Mail list logo
