to map each binpkg into the url space
for it.
~harring
--
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 12:11 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
On 02/14/2010 04:36 AM, Brian Harring wrote:
This gets nasty... you're basically talking about the rpm equivalent
of EPOCH.
Not a fan of an adhoc UUID (especially since it'll become standard
via portage doing it), but a *timestamp*
. More abstract ideas
at this point.
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org:
The dev population is quite a strange beast. I never expected to win.
Nor did I, especially because you were quite low on my ballot.
Congratulations.
The devs have a voice one time of the year: when it comes time to
vote
The dev population is quite a strange beast. I never expected to win.
Why would you vote for somebody who did not even publish a manifesto?
I don't know but I love you for it. My only intention was to help offset
dev-zero being able force the will of outside forces upon us.
Well that has been
-[2.1.6.11]
Quick work around that should be safe would be to
tr '[,]' ' , ' |awk '{print $3-$4}'
It is expected however that -q vs no -q will result in the atoms being
at the same index.
--
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 13:18 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 10:00 +0300, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Hi.
Seems like --columns depends on -q to work:
amit0 ~ # emerge -p --color=n --columns -O -q portage
R
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 12:55 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 16 April 2009 19:05:46 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:50 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:59:58 Ned Ludd wrote:
There is also
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 08:26 +0100, Markus Duft wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 11:44 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
[snip]
While much of what you are talking about here mainly applies to prefix,
it looks to me from glancing over the code that you might of solved a
long standing problem
problem in the embedded world with cross compiling via
portage. 222895 If that is the case, then I owe you a beer. one about
the size of a keg.
--
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 19:45 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 18:49:04 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 14:35:15 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 18:34 +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Hi all
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:59:58 Ned Ludd wrote:
There is also a bug with atom parsing iirc on 32bit platforms. gradm was
the test case. Think we need to change from int to long.
the code is documented as having 64bit limitations
not if you are hitting it.
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-projects/portage-utils/libq/vdb_get_next_dir.c?r1=1.2r2=1.3
--
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 14:35:15 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 18:34 +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Hi all.
While working on my overlay, I stumbled on an issue where qfile refused
to acknowledge an installed file
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 00:37 +, Angelo Arrifano wrote:
On Qua, 2009-02-04 at 18:36 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
Some packages are not automake driven. We have to detect those.
make DESTDIR=${D} PREFIX=/usr \
STRIP=true ENABLE_NLS=${USE_NLS} \
the stuff.
Happy xcompiling,
Assuming you have the G2 you could skip all that and simply merge from
these .tbz2 into a $ROOT
http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/embedded/armv6j-softfloat-linux-gnueabi
--
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux
that FEATURES='strict' is enabled per default in all
profiles. It's rather vital that things remain the way they are now.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
time for me to leave the Gentoo train.
Marius
I will always remember you as the guy who provided us with the much
needed glsa*.py (thank you again)
Take care and I wish you the best in all your future endeavors.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 15:12 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:23:45 -0700
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 13:01 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
So, what do people think about removing (some) of the special
treatment for the system and world targets
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 08:28 +0200, Lars Weiler wrote:
* Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07/08/06 19:20 +0300]:
Well perhaps we should just look at the overall usage of the mail box
instead of how it's used. I think there is already some limit in our
policy for how big you can keep your
or at LWE.
One thing to note.. If we do make mailing list for this. It should not
be archived in any such way. devs that subscribe to the mailing list
better not be storing mail in imap on infra resources.
We simply don't have that kinda spare space to mirror all
cvs commits 2-300 times.
--
Ned Ludd
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
Please stop flooding my inbox.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
the need need to comment on this stupid ass thread.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
. Or is this your swansong? If
so it's l4m3.
Is there some reason you feel fscking compelled to respond to every
single mail on this list. You know it's guys like mostly just you that
are driving us away..
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 10:08 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote: [Mon Jul 16 2007, 04:00:44PM CDT]
Long term I worry about the foundation. No offense to anybody. I'm sure
I don't know or understand the problems you/we have encountered along
the way. But I think we need to face
-firewall/ebtables
net-misc/netkit-telnetd
net-misc/vconfig
net-proxy/middleman (dead upstream)
net-wireless/chillispot
sys-devel/sparse
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
it.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
have input, now would be
the time.
--taco
A lot of people seem to be confused about this mail of yours. Namely
mainly how it does or does not relate to the core mailing list. Perhaps
you could clarify the idea a little bit for those who seem confused.
Thanks in advance.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL
.
FYI we do have stats..
http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-dev-per-month.xml
http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-dev-per-year.xml
http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Forwarded by request of somebody thats smart/lucky enough to not
be on this list but still monitoring it.
Forwarded Message
From: Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New Linux-PAM stabling plans
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 20:51:36 +0200
Hi everybody; sorry to mail
-python/pycrypto-2.0.1-r5: it may not be legal to redistribute this.
* Building package for dev-python/pycrypto-2.0.1-r5 ...[ ok ]
* Packages now in '/usr/portage/packages':
* dev-python/pycrypto-2.0.1-r5: 188K
-mike
Please do the same for qpkg.c
tia.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL
: 307K
Suggestion:
If you go down this sensitive route. please ensure that the
generated.tbz2 is mode 600 to prevent exposing this sensitive
data more than need be.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 03:35 +0200, Bryan Østergaard wrote:
It's with a bit of sadness but also a bit of relief that I'm finally
retiring from
Gentoo.
I've been a Gentoo developer for nearly 4 years now and I like to at least
pretend that I've made some important contributions to Gentoo
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 08:47 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007 00:05:13 -0700
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can understand your frustration and all but I expected and assumed
you had big balls..
It takes more balls to go against the prevailing stagnation than to
just
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:21 -0700, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
Grmbl Can you do us a favor and provide us with a clone, for doing
MIPS keywording?
Looks like Kumba has been quite active doing it recently.
Alexander Færøy wrote:
Hey,
It is my time to leave Gentoo as well. It
I'm looking to get rid of a few ebuilds I half ass maintain.
net-wireless/chillispot
(Open source captive portal or wireless LAN access point controller)
sys-devel/sparse
(C semantic parser)
Both are relativity low maintenance.
Any takers? pretty please with party socks on top.
--
Ned Ludd
in this thread where maintainers have to opt
in as I'm sure the metadata.xml files wont be updated by enough people
to really gain the benefit of what we are trying to do here if they have
to do opt in.
Thanks.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
in the near future.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
it wrong
-mike
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
TY3o9fnj09fsmbEZut3VZac=
=gPXZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
it, and spread
the word ;-)
Bjarke
Ned Ludd wrote:
You sent this to -dev vs -core.. Pretty sure they are going to need to
revoke this license now.
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 23:05 +0200, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote:
Hey everyone :-)
Infra told me to go ahead and email
.
--
Gentoo Linux
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
.
Then we require this file to be updated
monthly. What do you think?
I'd rather not put this stipulation into place.
Unless you are proposing that planet.gentoo.org die. Which I don't think
you are doing..
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
. In reality it should be fairly
trivial to maintain.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
/profile requests from people who would be interested
in rapid install methods.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
can be unexisting.
Chances are you will need to directly communicate with the kernel via a
module if proc and sys are not mounted.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
good one...
Can you please stop taking cheap pot shots every chance you get. We all
get it. You are not a fan of portage.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 20:06 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:57:36 -0700
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Portage or the tree? Portage is just a way of using the tree, and
it's not a very good one...
Can you please stop taking cheap pot shots every chance you get
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 21:02 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:25:00 -0700
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are being dismissive of the hard work others are doing. I find
that downright offensive. You want to write a kickass package manager
then by all means do
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 14:03 -0700, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
The correct reply should of been.
I'm sorry I did not mean to offend anybody. I'll make an effort to not
make any cheap shots
Man, stop playing the silly Ooh, we are all so fragile and offendable
to no benefit in the additional overhead in
doing that. But if you can make a case to say robbat2 and pylon for why
this would be useful to our community then I'm sure we could open up a
rsync of the raw anoncvs mirror.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
deep and was coming out the
walls.
More than one way to flood a building. :/
Flooding/burning etc are not likely to happen. See page two of the spec
for more details.
http://www.365main.com/images/365_Main_San_Francisco_CA.pdf
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev
one data center to another. As GNi/365 Main move into
more data centers world wide chances are Gentoo will be moving into
those additionally as well.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
/fcron/fcron-3.0.0.ebuild:33:
sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.1-r1.ebuild:33:
sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.1.ebuild:33:
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
shouldnt be ignoring these sort of problems, we
should be fixing them
Seems a forced ignore would fix them. (problem solved! next bug..)
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
actually helping
*at all*), the chances of a project such as nightly builds ever taking
off is well beyond our means at this time.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
the arrays are used in config files.
i guess my point was i think we really need to be consistent here ... either
arrays are OK for init.d scripts or they're not OK
did you get a chance to see how hard it would be to integrate the bash array
code ?
-mike
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 14:49 -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote:
On 2/8/07, Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As somebody that's had to hand write many of those kinds of scripts. A
single rcS is not very ideal. Our init scripts are in fact mostly usable
by busybox. Granted there are a few special
The ; seems logical.
You could even use bash expansion here, provided that bash is your shell
config_eth0=10.1.1.{1..30}/8; 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
See, that's not too bad is it?
Nope.
Thanks
Roy
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
and the change isnt invasive, then sure we'll generally make the
change
/me likes the direction Roy is heading with this.
-mike
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
.
But with make oldconfig, so the user gets asked about new options, and
those get saved back to the savedconfig, right?
No way.. Please see how we handle this in busybox.ebuild which is the
best documented example of the savedconfig option in the tree.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
to the 9th.
Rinse and repeat.
If we run out of nominees then we'll need another election.
Agreed. #3
From my POV having a new election potentially over and over is a waste
of time and resources.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
get people who want use to add support for their
$favorite-compression
that said, i would entertain the notion of auto uncompressing
just .bz2, .gz, .Z and telling everyone else to toss off ...
What about .zip?
Not apart of the base-system.
*runs away*
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL
or tarballs or whatever comes in handy)
and those who dislike git can just go with svn and be happy with it.
Jokey
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
the profile.
If this change does happen I'd suggest that we support make.profile
symlinks as long as they exist unless the make.conf defines the
variable. If variable exists it should override.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
they reference make.profile or not, and flag a QA warning if they do.
And packages that don't switch to the standard by the end of the grace
period I guess we'll see on a last rites bulletin ;)
Or we/gentoo could just support it and stop breaking the end user.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED
/genpkgindex/genpkgindex
it generates output like the following.
http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/hardened/x86/Packages
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
idea for some non linux which
forces all other profiles to update to mask or unmask some use flag.
We/I tend to request that they update it themselves.
But note taken. If I have to edit something I'll try to remember to
add a ChangeLog entry.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 08:58 +, Steve Long wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
cd $(portageq envvar PORTDIR)/virtual/
mkdir mike
cd mike
echo 'echo OWNED at phase $EBUILD_PHASE' mike-0.0.ebuild
emerge -pv mike
Just checking; commands run there are run as root, right?
Most often yes
at phase $EBUILD_PHASE' mike-0.0.ebuild
emerge -pv mike
-mike
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
.)
/me lands in the profiles dir when he really wants the *-* dir all the
time.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
be setting
this feature for the most part before stable markings.
It's a noble idea. I just don't think we are ready for
FEATURES=test USE=test either.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
*isn't* there a portage team member
who works on sandbox?
cuz portage is a python beast and azarah wrote sandbox in c as a
preload module.
And really as Mike already pointed out the problem lies within the mips
dynamic linker/loader..
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo
of Gentoo Bugzilla
[1] and anon CVS/SVN [2].
Please elaborate why you need the council to discuss
ongoing active bugs that are in progress.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:06 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 11:21 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 16:07 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:06 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Would like the Council to discuss the current state of Gentoo Bugzilla
[1] and anon CVS/SVN [2].
Please elaborate why you need the council to discuss
ongoing
/amd64)
lu_zero (senior dev/ppc)
jaervosz (sec dev)
ramereth (infra)
robbat2 (gpg signing/CGL)
-- No --
nattfodd (nfc)
patrick (nope)
pauldv (probably not/new dad)
spb (really bad idea)
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
are
thinking about.
Thanks for clarifying. I wish you the best of luck then.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 23:30 +0200, Lars Weiler wrote:
* Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06/07/31 16:48 -0400]:
Pylon (maybe.. not around enough however)
I don't know the basis for your statement, but I'm quite
good around.
Is it that you don't see that many emails from me here at
this list
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 21:39 +, Bryan Ãstergaard wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:48:42PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
kloeri (nice guy but dunno if the council is a proper match)
Guess I could do a lot worse than nice guy :) I haven't been part of
the council before so it's a bit difficult
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 00:29 +0200, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 23:14:56 +0200, Ned Ludd wrote:
-- No --
nattfodd (nfc)
...
clue? I might agree to both :)
Meaning only that we have not really worked together.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 17:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:10:51 -0400 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Every single year quarter after quarter the more updates
| that happen the slower portage is becoming.
| Care to solve that?
This is a minute amount of time
category for *new*
packages.
[1] http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/dev/genstef/net-im
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 15:15 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:34:37 -0400 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Creation of a new categories is fine. pkg moves are bad.
| See the countless other posting on this subject of why pkg
| moves are bad.
Uh, as far as I recall
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 15:51 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
Creation of a new categories is fine. pkg moves are bad.
See the countless other posting on this subject of why pkg
moves are bad.
yeah new packages is my primary concern.
Any objections, problems with the plan
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 13:41 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 17:45 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
The local root exploit-of-the-week would have been unable to run if our
users systems had /proc mounted with nosuid and/or noexec
It would be worthwhile considering making
+FI7IQsoQCg8o6M
UW+dnXPwMe/tIje1A4RYqRs=
=9uIv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
pkg cflags are here already it would fall under the per
pkg env variables.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 15:18 -0500, Tushar Teredesai wrote:
On 7/7/06, Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You want a pure 100%
vanilla(POS) non working toolchain then go download it and
compile it yourself. You will soon see why things exist the way
they do..
LFS http
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 23:09 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 03:57:51PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 20:40 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
Keep pushing this and the only thing you will end up
most.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
..
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 20:40 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
Keep pushing this and the only thing you will end up with is the
vanilla flag being removed all together..
Is that a threat? If not, is there a reason behind this?
Yes
the same as the x86 flags.
There's probably some USE_EXPAND trickery that can be used here...
CPU_FEATURE_X86=mmx sse - cpu_feature_x86_mmx etc might be cleaner?
I tend to agree this might be a cleaner approach vs having to edit
redit CFLAGS all over the place.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED
PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT= and the
attachment as an example which solves this exact problem.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
export PORTDIR=$(portageq envvar PORTDIR)
export ROOT=/dev/shm/blah
export PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT=${ROOT}
PROFILES=$(grep ^[a-z,0-9] ${PORTDIR}/profiles/profiles.desc | awk
uses the GNU Toolchain.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 18:44 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Thursday 06 July 2006 17:33, Ned Ludd wrote:
I tend to agree this might be a cleaner approach vs having to edit
redit CFLAGS all over the place.
Really if one has to disable mmx support in one package, it should
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 19:09 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Thursday 06 July 2006 18:58, Ned Ludd wrote:
All together as in across the board? Or simply for the 1 pkg
in question?
For the package in question of course. Do you think I'm an idiot? Seriously?
Well. Sorry
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cellphone: +49 174 7066481
-
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
