Re: [gentoo-dev] vserver herd is empty

2013-07-24 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вс, 21/07/2013 в 10:23 +0200, Pacho Ramos пишет: Will remove the herd if nobody joins in a week. I talked to hollow and we think it's worth to remove this herd. Actually only openvz and vserver packages are in this herd and they are maintained completely independently for a long time... I'll

Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach?

2013-09-25 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вт, 24/09/2013 в 11:46 -0700, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. пишет: On 9/22/13 5:24 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: compiling with versions of v8 other than what is included is not currently supported. .. For now V8 upstream gives no guarantees about API/ABI stability and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives

2009-02-28 Thread Peter Volkov
EAPI inside ebuild is the best solution. If we really have to put it inside filename, keep it out of extension, like 2) b) suggests. -- Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009)

2009-02-28 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 24/02/2009 в 16:14 +0200, Serkan Kaba пишет: lucene-contrib eclass in java-experimental [1] sets EAPI to 1 to use slot deps. And I think that's a valid usage. 1: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/browser/java-experimental/eclass/lucene-contrib.eclass It's better (the only way...)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass -- review - 2

2009-03-03 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 02/03/2009 в 13:01 +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen пишет: On Monday 02 March 2009 08:24:35 Torsten Veller wrote: Could you just use dosed here? dosed needs to die. Why? -- Peter. signature.asc Description: Эта часть сообщения подписана цифровой подписью

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages needing manitainer

2009-03-10 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 08/03/2009 в 22:54 +0100, Rémi Cardona пишет: Le 08/03/2009 21:38, Tomáš Chvátal a écrit : net-misc/mDNSResponder How about dropping this one in favor of avahi? Or am I missing something obvious? Are they completely interchangeable? Last time (well, the only time) I built samba

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gems.eclass review

2009-03-14 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 12/03/2009 в 21:02 +0100, Alex Legler пишет: http://dev.gentoo.org/~a3li/ruby/gems.eclass.txt http://dev.gentoo.org/~a3li/ruby/gems.eclass.diff You have: EXPORT_FUNCTIONS src_unpack src_prepare src_configure src_compile src_install I'm not sure here. Is it safe to export src_prepare

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tcl/Tk multi-slot testing

2009-03-14 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 13/03/2009 в 19:09 +0100, Federico Ferri пишет: btw, on a different topic: the number of bugs on tcltk (8.5) has lowered a bit. maybe it's time to unmask it and have package maintainers fix the outdated apps? A number of packages depend on itcl which does not builds with 8.5. It is

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 16/03/2009 в 20:47 +, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: * Am I to take it src_test is to remain in its current worthless state? Is it possible in EAPI 3 make src_test failures not fatal? Something like make die() non fatal inside src_test. Package manager if it sees die() inside src_test should

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www category

2009-04-05 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 05/04/2009 в 09:38 +0200, Ulrich Mueller пишет: Is the following a reasonable scheme? net-www/adobesvg - www-plugins/adobesvg This one probably should be removed from the tree: http://www.adobe.com/svg/eol.html net-www/gnash- www-plugins/gnash

Re: [gentoo-dev] `paludis --info' is not like `emerge --info'

2009-04-06 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 05/04/2009 в 22:41 +0200, Timothy Redaelli пишет: i think it's better to develop an emerge --info package It already exists. But regretfully it does not provide useful output even about the package's USE flags so I suspect it was implemented for different purposes. -- Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-04-13 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 09/04/2009 в 15:32 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: Please provide a list of packages that use custom configure scripts, that currently work with econf (including all the weird things it already passes), that would break with this change and whose ebuilds are using econf. I have yet to see

Re: [gentoo-dev] `paludis --info' is not like `emerge --info'

2009-04-28 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 08/04/2009 в 16:36 +0200, Jeroen Roovers пишет: On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:11:02 +0400 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: В Вск, 05/04/2009 в 22:41 +0200, Timothy Redaelli пишет: i think it's better to develop an emerge --info package It already exists. But regretfully it does

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

2009-05-28 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 14/05/2009 в 03:32 +0300, Mart Raudsepp пишет: Project maintainer-wanted = Mart, I think that it's good idea to create such project but with a different goals. I think currently maintainer-wanted alias is missed by most developers: new packages are assigned there

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting Baselayout2/OpenRC from init.d scripts (summary of debate and plans from bug 270646)

2009-06-12 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 08/06/2009 в 20:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет: i dont see how that is relevant. we only care about Gentoo here. plus, the test is: if /sbin/functions.sh exists, it's baselayout-1 (which no one else outside of Gentoo will be using), otherwise it's openrc. once we toss

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting Baselayout2/OpenRC from init.d scripts (summary of debate and plans from bug 270646)

2009-06-12 Thread Peter Volkov
problems with this. В Птн, 12/06/2009 в 14:53 +0400, Peter Volkov пишет: Is there any problem with /etc/openrc-version? I don't think this is necessary any more. -- Peter.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] net-misc/l7-filter removal

2009-06-17 Thread Peter Volkov
This package is hard masked now finally. Another reference to count: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274341 В Втр, 28/04/2009 в 17:24 +1000, Daniel Black пишет: This package relies on disabling of essential package management features (collision-protection) to achieve installation. It

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-cpp/eigen: eigen-2.0.6.ebuild ChangeLog

2009-09-26 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 26/09/2009 в 00:18 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет: patrick 09/09/26 00:18:02 Log: Bump to 2.0.6, fixes #286462 (Portage version: 2.2_rc41/cvs/Linux x86_64) 1.1 dev-cpp/eigen/eigen-2.0.6.ebuild file :

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite (part 1): KDE3-only applications that won't build when KDE4 is installed

2009-10-17 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 16/10/2009 в 23:09 +0300, Samuli Suominen пишет: # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (16 Oct 2009) # Fails to build with KDE4 installed wrt bug #277427. # Masked for removal in 30 days. net-news/eventwatcher kde-misc/kisdnwatch ... http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279823

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: USE=qa-test

2009-10-17 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 14/10/2009 в 22:12 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет: On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:11:14 +0200 Peter Hjalmarsson x...@rymdraket.net wrote: Sorry for reviving an old thread, but was there any progress on this topic? A week isn't old. ;) I'll add it once the flu and homework let up for a minute.

[gentoo-dev] client/server consistency: USE flags / split packages

2009-11-04 Thread Peter Volkov
Hi. How do we handle packages that provide client, server, and possibly extra tools/libraries? Do we split packages like binary distros do or do we use USE flags? What USE flags? Currently some packages are split other use client, server or minimal USE flag(s). Back in 2006 similar problem was

Re: [gentoo-dev] client/server consistency: USE flags / split packages

2009-11-04 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 04/11/2009 в 17:34 +0100, Tiziano Müller пишет: Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 18:44 +0300 schrieb Peter Volkov: So are there any good reasons to split packages? In environments with a staging server and binary packages, yes. Currently you either have to script your staging server

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations

2009-11-07 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 06/11/2009 в 14:07 -0800, Zac Medico пишет: Fabian Groffen wrote: On 06-11-2009 19:48:16 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: In the past when smaller arches were not that active we used to mark Java packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA: package.mask policies

2009-11-08 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 07/11/2009 в 18:24 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal пишет: * Masking beta... This masks are good if the software release is KNOWN to break previous behaviour or degrade user experience. Otherwise the software should not be masked (its TESTING for purpose, not stable). God no! If we'll start to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations

2009-11-08 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 10:05 +0100, Fabian Groffen пишет: On 07-11-2009 17:54:25 +0300, Peter Volkov wrote: We could introduce noarch and ~noarch KEYWORDS, add noarch to the default ACCEPT_KEYWORDS setting for all profiles, and instruct unstable users to add ~noarch to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations

2009-11-08 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 07/11/2009 в 12:49 -0800, Zac Medico пишет: Peter Volkov wrote: We could introduce noarch and ~noarch KEYWORDS, add noarch to the default ACCEPT_KEYWORDS setting for all profiles, and instruct unstable users to add ~noarch to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS. Looks like this will not work

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/foremost: ChangeLog foremost-1.5.6.ebuild

2009-11-08 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 11:56 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет: patrick 09/11/08 11:56:46 Log: Bump file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/foremost/foremost-1.5.6.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup Index: foremost-1.5.6.ebuild

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/desklet-Mouse: - New directory

2009-11-08 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 09:40 -0500, Mike Frysinger пишет: On Sunday 08 November 2009 08:35:10 Joe Sapp wrote: Samuli Suominen wrote: Joe Sapp (nixphoeni) wrote: nixphoeni09/10/27 11:21:25 Log: Directory /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/x11-plugins/desklet-Mouse added to the repository

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/foremost: ChangeLog foremost-1.5.6.ebuild

2009-11-08 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет: And because I'm a lazy I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just fix it instead Do you mean that whatever you commit to the tree is not your responsibility? Sorry but it's your job. Also it's nice to see how

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA is unimportant? (was: gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/foremost: ChangeLog foremost-1.5.6.ebuild)

2009-11-09 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 09/11/2009 в 01:37 +0100, Vlastimil Babka пишет: I totally agree. And I must say it started with the very first mail of pva. Accusing of not knowing quizzes was totally uncalled for. If you know how to do thing properly what are the reasons avoid doing that? All I heard here is laziness

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flag(s) for ssl (always USE ssl)

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 15/12/2009 в 09:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller пишет: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Peter Volkov wrote: If package has ssl support use ssl USE flag for that. In case there are alternatives, use openssl/gnutls/nss for upstream _less_ recommended implementation(s). Small problem: If a user

Re: [gentoo-dev] metdata.dtd should require herd/

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 07/12/2009 в 21:20 +0100, Thilo Bangert пишет: Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org said: On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 12:56 +0100, Thilo Bangert wrote: dev-util/cucumber herd missing Fixed, but this is really a bug in metadata.dtd, which specifies !ELEMENT

Re: [gentoo-dev] changes to bzr.eclass

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 15/12/2009 в 10:39 +0100, Ulrich Mueller пишет: bzr.eclass currently uses bzr export for copying from ${DISTDIR}/bzr-src to ${WORKDIR} in src_unpack. Unfortunately, bzr export accesses the remote repository for lightweight checkouts (which are the eclass's default), so it cannot be used

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI={3,4} offset-prefix semantics mandatory?

2009-12-16 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 15/12/2009 в 19:59 +0100, Fabian Groffen пишет: Should an ebuild using an EAPI that has offset-prefix support make the use of that support mandatory or optional? I think no. Without real testing that package works in prefix there is no need to bother and create illusion that it does.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Versioning of Python scripts

2009-12-22 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 19/12/2009 в 16:24 +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis пишет: - Scripts of packages supporting only e.g. Python 2 can be executed (without necessity of using of e.g. python2 /usr/bin/${script}) after activating of e.g. Python 3. - Scripts of packages supporting

Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-free software in Gentoo

2009-12-29 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 28/12/2009 в 18:41 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan пишет: I think we can simply follow debian and fedora's lead on this. They have the lawyers, and Well, it's possible but not that simple. To do this it's not enough to compare packages, but files and patches should be compared as well (and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-free software in Gentoo

2009-12-29 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 29/12/2009 в 00:24 -0500, Vincent Launchbury пишет: File a bug with some ebuilds. It looks like somebody already has. See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266157. I tested the latest ebuild, and it worked fine (see comment #59.) What would have to be done to get it in the main

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again)

2010-01-16 Thread Peter Volkov
The bug you mentioned [253725] is not about layman location, it's only about keepdir line. Why don't we fix that and don't change defaults another time? Such change does more harm for our users then good. В Сбт, 16/01/2010 в 02:55 +0100, Sebastian Pipping пишет: On 01/16/10 02:45, Mike Frysinger

[gentoo-dev] new USE_EXPAND variable: XTABLES_ADDONS_MODULES

2010-01-18 Thread Peter Volkov
Hi. I'm going to add xtable-addons package to the tree. This is patch-o-matic replacement which allows to extend iptables without touching iptables source itself. Currently package contains 24 modules which I'd like to have USE configurable with USE_EXPAND'ed variable: XTABLES_ADDONS_MODULES

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3

2010-01-19 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 19/01/2010 в 01:22 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет: On 01/18/2010 03:02 PM, Tiziano Müller wrote: The proper replacement for such interactive notifications when called in pkg_setup is pkg_pretend, which will (hopefully) be available in EAPI 4. Thus I'd keep them around until then. ebeep

Re: [gentoo-dev] openssl 1.0.0 quick test

2010-02-01 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 30/01/2010 в 13:19 +0100, Hanno Böck пишет: - php fails, fix is trivial. I've sent it upstream and it got already applied to upstream svn: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50859 - wvstreams fails, fix also trivial and sent upstream, no reply yet:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Font eclass EAPI update and design

2010-02-01 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 01/02/2010 в 11:35 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal пишет: As I was reworking the x-modular-r2 eclass I found out that most of the slowdowns for fonts were produced in fonts eclass. Exactly what slowdowns are you talking about? I've reviewed all changes and I don't see any noticeable performance

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Font eclass EAPI update and design

2010-02-01 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 01/02/2010 в 14:29 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal пишет: 2. if has X ${IUSE//+} use X ; then I'm not sure. With this change should we update all packages depending on font.eclass to have X in IUSE? Nak this specialy allows that you dont have to keep X in iuse. But it does not matter

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upstream tags in metadata.xml (GLEP 46)

2010-02-05 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 04/02/2010 в 22:37 +0100, Tiziano Müller пишет: The upstream tags are meant as a way to track information about - id of a hosting or indexing site (automated version bump checks) Does there exist any scripts for this? -- Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling unknown commands in an ebuild

2010-02-08 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 07/02/2010 в 21:24 -0500, Mike Frysinger пишет: it might also be useful to add a default epatch() to the initial env that would be clobbered when the inherit occurred. epatch() { die you need to inherit eutils.eclass to use epatch ; } After fixing breakage that was introduced by

Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-19 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 10/03/2010 в 05:08 +0100, Sebastian Pipping пишет: How about a monthly bumpday? Good idea, but it should follow our policy to inform maintainers _in advance_: e.g. on first bumpday to work on bumps and notify maintainer about this work by attaching final ebuild to the version bump bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation

2010-04-13 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 06/04/2010 в 07:43 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan пишет: * It makes zero sense to manually manage ChangeLogs in git[1] Once I had stupid cutpaste mistake and entered wrong credits in ChangeLog. I don't see how to resolve this issue in case ChangeLog's will be generated from git log and until

Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation

2010-04-13 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 13/04/2010 в 17:18 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan пишет: The traditional ChangeLog that is currently employed in gentoo-x86 (and in other projects) is simply an ugly hack The difference between gentoo-x86 ebuild ChangeLogs and ChangeLogs used in other projects is that gentoo-x86 ChangeLog is

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-arch/rpm - a few questions

2010-05-06 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 06/05/2010 в 00:34 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky пишет: Moreover if I am not mistaken database is not compatible between 4 and 5 so if someone accidentally upgrades...he/she is screwed. That was original reason for masking rpm-5 as far as I know. It was hardmasked because some packages

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-analyzer/ipac-ng

2010-05-09 Thread Peter Volkov
ipac-ng fails to build/work with recent iptables (bug 191582, bug 255086 and bug 307813), suffers from parallel make issue (bug 240744). New version (1.33) crashs on start as reported by many people in upstream mailing lists and elsewhere (bug 310981). -- Peter.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/tripwire: ChangeLog tripwire-2.4.2.ebuild tripwire-2.4.1.2.ebuild

2010-05-20 Thread Peter Volkov
Hi. Guys, please, cleanup ebuids with version bumps! Also Patrick, if you use this software or at least investigated it during version bump, why it is still maintainer-wanted? Although everything below makes me think that this was blind bump. В Пнд, 17/05/2010 в 18:41 +, Patrick Lauer

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-fs/samba/files: samba-init

2010-05-20 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 11/05/2010 в 11:53 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет: start() { + # we can't assume that /var/run/ is persistent, so create dir if needed + [ ! -e /var/run/samba ] mkdir /var/run/samba Why? Is it impossible to create /var/run/samba during src_install? -- Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass eautomake update

2010-05-25 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 25/05/2010 в 12:12 +, Duncan пишет: Peter Volkov posted on Tue, 25 May 2010 11:46:12 +0400 as excerpted: sources.gentoo.org/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.97r2=1.98 Why is required at the end of file list? for makefile_name in {GNUmakefile,{M,m}akefile}.{am,in} ; do

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Nominations are now open

2010-06-07 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 05/06/2010 в 02:00 +0200, Torsten Veller пишет: Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2010/2011 are now open for the next two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2010). All nominations must be sent to the gentoo-dev mailing list. If you were nominated and want to run, you have to accept your

[gentoo-dev] LINGUAS handling

2010-06-09 Thread Peter Volkov
Hi. We have LINGUAS support in portage for quite some time now, but how do we handle LINGUAS? It's not as evident as it seems and thus we need some guidelines. So I'll formulate few questions below but first let's look how portage works with LINGUAS. If you know this skip to Questions section

Re: [gentoo-dev] LINGUAS handling

2010-06-11 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 09/06/2010 в 21:21 +0200, Harald van Dijk пишет: On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 11:38:03AM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: 1. Do we want all packages to support LINGUAS if possible? It is possible to leave gettext based package without LINGUAS and everything will just work, but I think that it's

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 10/06/2010 в 23:42 -0700, Alec Warner пишет: I don't agree with that, but just out of curiosity, is it possible to use a web interface? phpldapadmin or something The problem with phpldapadmin is that it potentially opens up LDAP to the world. Require everybody to forward connection

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 11/06/2010 в 09:48 +0200, Maciej Mrozowski пишет: On Friday 11 of June 2010 09:24:45 Peter Volkov wrote: В Чтв, 10/06/2010 в 23:42 -0700, Alec Warner пишет: I don't agree with that, but just out of curiosity, is it possible to use a web interface? phpldapadmin or something

Re: [gentoo-dev] Does libtool really support parallel make installs?

2010-06-16 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 16/06/2010 в 13:41 +0200, Pacho Ramos пишет: Trying to move the following bug to upstream: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253862 AFAIR this was never libtool bug, but automake and with recent enough automake (1.10 for sure) everything should just work. -- Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Does libtool really support parallel make installs?

2010-06-16 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 16/06/2010 в 17:21 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет: On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Peter Volkov wrote: В Срд, 16/06/2010 в 13:41 +0200, Pacho Ramos пишет: Trying to move the following bug to upstream: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253862 AFAIR this was never libtool bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation

2010-06-25 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 24/06/2010 в 16:43 -0400, Olivier Crête пишет: On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 20:59 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: On 04/13/2010 01:25 PM, Peter Volkov wrote: В Втр, 06/04/2010 в 07:43 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan пишет: * It makes zero sense to manually manage ChangeLogs in git[1] Once I had

Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation

2010-06-25 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 25/06/2010 в 14:19 +0530, Arun Raghavan пишет: On 25 June 2010 14:15, Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: В Чтв, 24/06/2010 в 16:43 -0400, Olivier Crête пишет: [...] Or you could review the changes before pushing (since in git these operations are separate). And live

Re: [gentoo-dev] [bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)]

2010-07-06 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 06/07/2010 в 01:29 +0200, Enrico Weigelt пишет: Hi folks, does he speak for all of you ? Enrico I don't see why we may need to maintain separate ebuilds for programs with patches scheduled upstream. Submit important patches separately or, better, work with upstream so we'll get

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-dotnet/libgdiplus: ChangeLog libgdiplus-1.2.5-r1.ebuild

2007-09-24 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 24/09/2007 в 12:56 -0700, Donnie Berkholz пишет: if use ppc ; then sed -i -e 's:-Werror::g' src/Makefile fi We should never leave -Werror in -- make this unconditional. never is too strong: for example, wireshark's upstream told me that they want code to be

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-base/xorg-x11: xorg-x11-7.2.ebuild xorg-x11-7.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2007-10-09 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 09/10/2007 в 07:43 +, Donnie Berkholz (dberkholz) пишет: dberkholz07/10/09 07:43:50 Modified: xorg-x11-7.2.ebuild xorg-x11-7.3.ebuild ChangeLog Log: Fix quoting issues caught by latest repoman. Revision ChangesPath 1.14

Re: [gentoo-dev] striping blank lines (was: stripping out the DO NOT REPLY from bugzie emails)

2007-10-22 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 29/09/2007 в 07:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет: when comments get added, there are 5 blank lines between the bugzilla URI's and the start of actual content ... This can be workarouned with another .procmailrc rule: # Strip out excess empty lines :0 Hfw * ^From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | awk

Re: [gentoo-dev] striping blank lines (was: stripping out the DO NOT REPLY from bugzie emails)

2007-10-22 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 22/10/2007 в 19:21 +0200, Elias Probst пишет: To delete empty lines with sed, just do a sed '/^$/d' I hope that's what you're looking for. No. awk command in the previous mail substituted 2 or more empty lines with exactly one empty line. Your command makes mail less readable. --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-libs/libpcap: ChangeLog libpcap-0.9.8.ebuild libpcap-0.9.4.ebuild

2007-11-04 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 09/10/2007 в 12:40 -0700, Donnie Berkholz пишет: On 17:57 Tue 09 Oct , Markus Ullmann (jokey) wrote: 1.1 net-libs/libpcap/libpcap-0.9.8.ebuild DEPEND=!virtual/libpcap PROVIDE=virtual/libpcap Does this still work properly with some of the new portage

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-firewall/ipset: ChangeLog metadata.xml ipset-2.3.0.20070828.ebuild

2007-11-07 Thread Peter Volkov
On Mon, 05/11/2007 в 10:03 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 14:23 Mon 05 Nov , Peter Volkov (pva) wrote: 1.1 net-firewall/ipset/ipset-2.3.0.20070828.ebuild src_defs() { # these are used in both of src_compile and src_install myconf=${myconf} PREFIX

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-irc/inspircd: ChangeLog inspircd-1.1.14.ebuild

2007-11-12 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 12/11/2007 в 18:20 -0800, Donnie Berkholz пишет: On 00:03 Tue 13 Nov , Michael Hanselmann wrote: On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:09:33PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 21:47 Mon 12 Nov , Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) wrote: pkg_postinst() { chown -R

[gentoo-dev] How to pass list of paths to eclass?

2007-12-11 Thread Peter Volkov
Hello. Some eclasses (kernel-2, font) use variable to pass space separated PATH to patch or fontconfig files from ebuild to eclass. In ebuild we use: FONT_CONF=path1 path2 Then eclasses use the variable: for conffile in ${FONT_CONF}; do ... done The problem with this doesn't work if

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to pass list of paths to eclass?

2007-12-11 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 11/12/2007 в 10:38 +, Roy Marples пишет: FONT_CONF=path1:path2 IFS=. IIUC should be IFS=: for for conffile in ${FONT_CONF}; do done unset IFS That way you work the same way as the classic $PATH variable. But this seems to fail if we have ':' inside path{1,2}. Is that

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to pass list of paths to eclass?

2007-12-13 Thread Peter Volkov
Thank you all, for your responds. Currently I see that the best approach is arrays. They provide required functionality, clear syntax and easy upgrade path. Speaking about the latter it is: 1. Modify eclass to use arrays: for conffile in [EMAIL PROTECTED]; do ... done 2. Modify ebuilds

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to pass list of paths to eclass?

2007-12-13 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 13/12/2007 в 09:41 +, Roy Marples пишет: On Thursday 13 December 2007 09:18:45 Peter Volkov wrote: use arrays. Why not use a function in pkg_setup as suggested earlier Because this is more code for the same functionality. Also if at one point somebody decides to add

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: How to pass list of paths to eclass?

2007-12-13 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 13/12/2007 в 10:52 +, Steve Long пишет: Peter Volkov wrote: Speaking about the latter it is: 1. Modify eclass to use arrays: for conffile in [EMAIL PROTECTED]; do ... done 2. Modify ebuilds to use arrays. -FONT_CONF=path1 path2 +FONT_CONF=( path1 path2

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI inside ebuild filename (.EAPI-ebuild of different?)

2007-12-20 Thread Peter Volkov
While it's may be a good idea to set EAPI inside filename and if we ever decide on this, consider different implementation. I really dislike idea of EAPI-suffixed extensions. It's easier for me (and I think for others too) to differentiate ebuilds between other files in directory when ebuild

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2008-01-09 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 09/01/2008 в 13:13 +0100, Fernando J. Pereda пишет: Why taking it against arch teams? How is that different from certain maintainer not taking care of a bug that holds stabilization of certain package by some time measured in months ? I'll tell you my answer: 'no difference at all'.

Re: [gentoo-dev] lastrite media-libs/libdts

2008-01-16 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 14/01/2008 в 02:10 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет: Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: On Sunday 13 January 2008, Petteri Räty wrote: Peter Volkov kirjoitti: Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge libdts? Package moves don't work very well if you move an existing

Re: [gentoo-dev] lastrite media-libs/libdts

2008-01-16 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 16/01/2008 в 06:09 -0500, Mike Frysinger пишет: if two packages provide the same binary and they blocked each other, a move would be doable as it would be impossible for the two packages to be installed simultaneously. but as Petteri points out, libdca/libdts dont provide the same

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: adding support for running eautoconf to base.eclass

2008-02-13 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 13/02/2008 в 13:22 +0100, Matthias Schwarzott пишет: How can I use PATCHES without quoting issues? default is this (when not using relative pathes): PATCHES=${FILESDIR}/p1.diff ${FILESDIR}/p2.diff You can not. This should be fixed like we did for font.eclass (bug 201834). BTW,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] global useflags

2008-02-14 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 13/02/2008 в 21:38 +0100, Markus Meier пишет: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:13:09 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote: css: Enables ripping of encrypted DVDs Are we sure that nothing intends css as Cascading Style Sheet? app-cdr/k3b:css - Enables ripping of

Re: [gentoo-dev] clean deprecated eclasses(?) (was: missing quotes in eclasses)

2008-02-14 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 14/02/2008 в 02:10 +0200, Mart Raudsepp пишет: On K, 2008-02-13 at 15:49 -0500, Doug Klima wrote: deprecated eclasses:64-bit, darcs, db4-fix, debian, embassy-2.10, embassy-2.9, gcc, gnustep-old, gtk-engines, gtk-engines2, inherit, jakarta-commons, java-pkg, java-utils,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] global useflags

2008-02-14 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 14/02/2008 в 11:33 +0100, Wulf C. Krueger пишет: Which *actual* packages would benefit from changing the current css USE flag to something different? Of course, I'm not talking about benefit for packages but about benefit for users (me included). Technically we could name USE-flags using

Re: [gentoo-dev] public system of ratings

2008-02-16 Thread Peter Volkov
Oleg, please, do not top post. В Сбт, 16/02/2008 в 15:16 +0600, Oleg Puchinin пишет: One hundred programmers which only also do that dig in mountain bugs a kind new package , it, in my opinion, how to use a steam hammer to crack nuts. Can it is necessary to make the processes occuring in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keyword request interface (SoC candidate?)

2008-02-29 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 28/02/2008 в 21:49 -0500, Richard Freeman пишет: Santiago M. Mola wrote: What do you think about? Would it be easy to integrate it with packages.g.o or should it belong somewhere else? Do you think this is a suitable project for SoC? I like the idea, although it is a bit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for March

2008-03-01 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 01/03/2008 в 14:39 +, Peter Weller пишет: There are also a number of problems with people on the team who are there soley so that they don't have to ask the team to mark a package stable for them - they can just go and stable it themselves. It'll be even better if we prohibit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for March

2008-03-10 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 10/03/2008 в 06:12 +0100, Natanael Copa пишет: Took me weeks to complete the quiz. I want to help, yes, but I do have a life. What were the problems? Do you think that knowledge of answers to the questions asked in quiz are not required to do actual work on ebuilds in the tree? What were

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for March

2008-03-10 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 10/03/2008 в 04:13 -0800, Alec Warner пишет: On 3/10/08, Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: В Пнд, 10/03/2008 в 06:12 +0100, Natanael Copa пишет: It's documented? It is mentioned in some places on website but no, it's not documented as I see. It is one of many of my

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/iproute2: ChangeLog iproute2-2.6.24.20080108.ebuild

2008-03-31 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 31/03/2008 в 06:21 +, Duncan пишет: Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:39:14 -0400: there is no package-manager specificness here. it's already completely doable from a user perspective, just having it in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April

2008-04-04 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 03/04/2008 в 18:56 +0300, Petteri Räty пишет: Petteri Räty wrote: Defining required amount of activity for ebuild devs. I would like us to raise the required amount of activity for ebuild devs. I checked the current slacker script and it checks for having at least one commit in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Putting edac and ipmi (and other server-related) packages in a herd

2008-04-21 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 20/04/2008 в 20:02 +0200, Tiziano Müller пишет: What do you think of putting edac and ipmi stuff (and maybe other server-related monitoring/controlling stuff) into the sysadmin herd? Alternative: Create a new herd (name?) for such tools. Actually this thread follows discussion in bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: qemu - add gcc-3.x dependency

2008-05-05 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 04/05/2008 в 21:48 +0200, Enrico Weigelt пишет: I'm just installing qemu, which requires gcc-3.x for building. The current breaks are very ugly, IMHO. So I'm proposing to add the old gcc-3.x as depedency to qemu, at least as long as it doesn't build w/ newer gcc. What do you

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)

2008-05-31 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 30/05/2008 в 20:28 -0700, Brian Harring пишет: Either way, basically it's coming down to if gentoo wants to follow the definition of 'academic' right, or 'pragmatic' right. Exempting ciaran, vote seems to be pragmatic. Well, although I've asked about problems with having --as-needed

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: use.local.desc

2008-06-09 Thread Peter Volkov
Hello, Markus. В Вск, 08/06/2008 в 19:28 +, Markus Ullmann (jokey) пишет: jokey 08/06/08 19:28:19 Modified: use.local.desc Log: Rename webkitgtk to webkit-gtk Revision ChangesPath 1.3576 profiles/use.local.desc  Whenever you modify

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask

2008-06-10 Thread Peter Volkov
Hello Luis. В Пнд, 09/06/2008 в 18:12 +, Luis F. Araujo (araujo) пишет: araujo 08/06/09 18:12:09 Modified: package.mask Log: Saving Squeak. Solving bugs #163724 , #196984 Revision ChangesPath 1.8705 profiles/package.mask Whenever you

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 (why use filename extension?)

2008-06-11 Thread Peter Volkov
If you need eapi in file name what are the technical reasons of putting it into file name extension? Why don't you suggest better ebuild name like: pkg-ver-eapi.ebuild or pkg-eapi-ver.ebuild ? I remember last time I've asked this genone told me that this is not backward compatible. Ok, it's not,

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 (why use filename extension?)

2008-06-11 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 11/06/2008 в 08:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:25:50 +0400 Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you need eapi in file name what are the technical reasons of putting it into file name extension? Why don't you suggest better ebuild name like: pkg-ver

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Default blank lines for error, elog, einfo, etc

2008-06-15 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 11/06/2008 в 19:45 -0400, Jim Ramsay пишет: Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would prefer something that doesn't add extra lines to ebuild. I think I would disagree with you here. I think that having a special 'eblank' or 'eseparator' command is much more readable in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees

2008-06-15 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 14/06/2008 в 19:28 +0200, Luca Barbato пишет: I don't see disadvantages, all I wanted is a simple way to archive this: [# emaint -r ffmpeg ... # emerge ffmpeg -L ... egen ... skipped most of stuff] Your example shows that .live ebuilds fix different issue. What you are suggesting are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Default blank lines for error, elog, einfo, etc

2008-06-15 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 15/06/2008 в 13:19 +0200, Benedikt Morbach пишет: But speaking about names of options - -A and -B are easier to remember as -A stands for above and -B for below and grep users already knew that. for grep -A means after and -B before ;) True. And still, one day I learn this

  1   2   3   >