e loaders and stuff like that you don't have when you do proper
ACLs).
Regarding bin/non-bin: Software has bugs. Some software tends to have
more issues. Just because we have the source code and compile software
on user's system doesn't make the application itself more secure than
l reasons like "No one audited the Linux
version yet". But in security you don't issue warnings if you aren't
sure. Because if you make false statements people will no longer trust
you. But trust is everything.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F
ths (depends on severity of
reported vulnerabilities) we maybe decide to last-rite or apply a mask
to force user awareness through forced unmask action in case they need
that software. But again, this software isn't special and doesn't
require further discussion from our P.O.V.
--
Re
On 2020-03-19 04:03, Kent Fredric wrote:
> Because that experiment basically failed.
>
> Bugs with that flag, basically were treated (repeatedly) like that flag
> wasn't there.
Hehe, maybe because of missing tooling. Common tools like tatt don't
understand "ALLARCHE
mes to anything math related (no
SSE2, -mfpmath=387...). So as long as we want that a package keyworded
for x86 really works on old x86 hardware, we have to go the long route
an test it.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 7
e don't have a better mechanism like setting a mask to get
attention), you have to deal with the fact that this is disruptive and
that not everyone like that.
But please, nobody is publicly shaming anyone. If you play that card,
don't wonder that people will stop talking.
Don't rea
ncil meeting log and even the mail discussion
before you will read that I always shared concerns about touching
existing user. I was only fine because I was told "We are aware, what
you described won't happen" and I didn't make a secret that I didn't had
the time to f
ly might happen with the current implementation which
tries to keep user/group state like described in package. Something you
will only see in Gentoo and no other distribution.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.
s really a bad default and it's breaking with existing principles
you can find in most distributions: Don't touch stuff which were changed
by the user.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Desc
changing home, groups...). At least if user/group were created/modified
outside of PM.
See also:
=
[1]
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/05c9b211eb18012d16302194a7bc37e6
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
y for the future when
someone wants to understand why an ebuild was changed that way.
That's why Debian created https://salsa.debian.org/, Fedora has
https://src.fedoraproject.org/ ...
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-/
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Security Team
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
onfiguration from current running kernel.
Without providing a kernel config, user will probably fall back to
generic configuration which isn't intended for daily usage.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signatur
Hi,
news item has been published:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/gentoo-news.git/commit/?id=b53539af13d77a7ad811327b677b9933e1dfb1b0
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
.org/support/news-items/2019-07-18-syncthing-update-incompatibility.html
and
https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-items/2019-11-25-rpi-firmware-dtb-files.html
were posted? :-)
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
s
Title: Genkernel 4 changed default kernel and initramfs filename
Author: Thomas Deutschmann
Posted: 2019-12-27
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 2.0
Display-If-Installed: >=sys-kernel/genkernel-4
To be consistent with kernel's own naming which allows for easier
matching of kernel/initra
ges would work
for all the application servers running this specific role/state. But
these adjusted packages would be wrong for the servers running grafana
role/state, i.e. running www-apps/grafana-bin behind www-servers/nginx
proxy. So you would end up with multiple acct-*/nginx ebuilds for each
would have to ensure somehow that system
A which acts as application server for "myapp" will only get
acct-*/- and system B which will
act as application server for "myapp2" will get
acct-*/- instead?! Not
to mention what will happen if you get a third system which will be able
On 2019-12-26 12:04, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/25/19 10:11 AM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>> +ACCT_USER_HOME=/var/lib/jenkins
> Needed?
I cannot answer that for sure. In *my* setups I need a valid home for
standard SSH setup (~/.ssh/authorized_keys). But there are dozen ways
how
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.82, Repoman-2.3.20
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
dev-util/jenkins-bin/Manifest | 1 +
dev-util/jenkins-bin/jenkins-bin-2.210.ebuild | 47 +++
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 dev-util/jenkins-bin/jenkins
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.82, Repoman-2.3.20
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
dev-util/jenkins-bin/Manifest | 1 +
.../jenkins-bin/jenkins-bin-2.204.1.ebuild| 47 +++
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 dev-util/jenkins-bin/jenkins
Hi,
please see my first package migration to GLEP 81.
Complete change set can be found at https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/14121.
Previous ebuilds using user eclass called
fowners jenkins:jenkins /var/log/jenkins ${JENKINS_DIR} ${JENKINS_DIR}/home
${JENKINS_DIR}/backup
which I changed
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.82, Repoman-2.3.20
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
acct-group/jenkins/jenkins-0.ebuild | 9 +
acct-group/jenkins/metadata.xml | 12
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 acct-group/jenkins/jenkins-0.ebuild
create mode
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.82, Repoman-2.3.20
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
acct-user/jenkins/jenkins-0.ebuild | 13 +
acct-user/jenkins/metadata.xml | 12
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 acct-user/jenkins/jenkins-0.ebuild
create mode
.
Could you please be a little bit more precise what's changing?
acct-* shouldn't mess with already *existing* users. So upgrade
experience shouldn't be affected...
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signatu
container to access data
stored on host, i.e.
> $ docker run \
> --name some-mysql \
> -v /my/own/datadir:/var/lib/mysql \
> -e MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD=my-secret-pw \
> -d mysql:tag
which will make /my/own/datadir from host available in container as
/var/lib/mysql.
--
r <> host mapping has match.
No, when you follow best practice you will always pass user/group or use
other available mapping solutions.
So while it sounds like a valid *goal*, in real world, it isn't.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 56
On 2019-12-09 19:48, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 09 Dec 2019, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
>> Like said, if an ID is already taken for any reason on user's system,
>> that's not a problem. acct-* can handle that... there's nothing like a
&
eir Gentoo systems
(most packages used dynamic allocation until GLEP 81), you won't have
"clean", collision free systems with same ID all over the places.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
highest free number.
I.e. it should be recommended to pick the lowest free UID/GID pair
instead (just to avoid fragmentation and keep 501+ free as long as
possible).
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Descript
Hi,
just wondering if you have seen https://bugs.gentoo.org/532264#c24. If
this is still valid, is your change really needed?
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
.8 and
message will go away.
And again: If this will really solve problems, why is anyone allowed to
take over those package like I did for sabnzbd? If you are right and
this is really a problem for Gentoo I shouldn't be allowed to do that.
And *then* we would also have a reason to mask :-)
our reason to mask affected dependencies (like PHP project did with PHP
5.6 and consumers).
Maybe someday one of those responsible will admit that this step was not
a thoughtful and good decision and promise not to do it that way again
and I'll get over it. Who knows. :)
--
Regards,
Thomas
which drives me nuts...
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
n as a whole. For example, a lot of packages are now
masked *with* dev-lang/php:5.6 because Gentoo will finally get rid of
PHP 5.6 which is EOL since 2018-12-31. But we didn't break PHP 5.6 users
by starting to remove PECL extension for this version while
dev-lang/php:5.6 was still a thing...
-
ing which *can* work because we still have no
system to declare "Yes, I am the maintainer of this package but I am
fine with you touching it".
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
inimum.
[1]
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/d00a956180ab7df980ac5642e3abc179
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2019-12-05 04:06, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 03:56:05AM +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>> On 2019-12-05 01:15, Aaron Bauman wrote:
>>> * Removal in 30 days
>>
>> Why? I understand that Py2 will reach EOL upstream status but we all
>> kn
zbd is a perfect example. Up to date in repository and working.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
d somewhere
else, why do we care at all about "others"?
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I am requesting uid and gid 59, both named "unbound", for
net-dns/unbound.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I am requesting uid and gid 440, both named "collectd", for
app-metrics/collectd.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
this assignment, should it?
Therefore I am requesting uid and gid 818, both named "jenkins", for
dev-util/jenkins-bin.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
vers/nginx.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2019-11-07 18:57, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> sys-apps/lsb-release - Linux Standard Base version query program
>
> Low maintenance, but with six open bug reports.
base-system will take that package.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638
# Thomas Deutschmann (2019-11-07)
# EAPI 0. It's been almost a decade since that openssl bug.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #697218.
net-misc/openssh-blacklist
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Descri
changing packages
to address the issue raised in tracker bug used that bug as reference.
In other words: The initial failure was that no individual bugs per
affected package was created...
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 7
rts with "https...").
I also tried that code and it's working fine for me...
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
idate checksums for distfiles and thirdpartymirrors file
is only used for distfiles.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ixing' devmanual. It's about
*changing* devmanual which I *just* pointed out. But whoever will
propose changing devmanual should support such a change because he/she
will probably have to argue for that change. Something I cannot do when
I like status quo like I do currently or have concerns.
sing anything I suggested to improve devmanual in
case you believe this should be a hard requirement. Because at the
moment I don't believe it should be a hard requirement, *I* will not
propose any changes.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
"must" and maybe
clarify per-package exception and limit to update case if you believe
that really *all* *new* eclasses must be send to mailing list.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ed PMs don't do at the moment what specification will allow
them to do?
Moving to (B)DEPEND will address the problem for non-binary package
users only.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
All
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
eclass/autotools.eclass | 5 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/autotools.eclass b/eclass/autotools.eclass
index 9143aa454d0d..9df0e1b93663 100644
--- a/eclass/autotools.eclass
+++ b/eclass/autotools.eclass
package.deprecated file we would have a check in real
time against current repository. And once all CI warnings are gone you
can commit the mask.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hi,
now pushed,
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=7840e73dde3ff715806aff61708f134479581d9c
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Make sure we check only /boot mount and not any mount
containing '/boot'.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/691874
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
eclass/mount-boot.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/mount-boot.eclass b/eclass/mount-b
Due to the injection of $CTARGET and $CHOST in file path
we could end up with an already checked config file candidate
if $CTARGET or $CHOST isn't used.
This commit will make sure that we don't check the same file twice.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
eclass/savedconfig.e
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
eclass/savedconfig.eclass | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/savedconfig.eclass b/eclass/savedconfig.eclass
index f62a6055ffdb..1ea464271aff 100644
--- a/eclass/savedconfig.eclass
+++ b/eclass/savedconfig.eclass
From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Make save_config() re-use configuration file scheme used
by restore_config().
Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/686348
Signed-off-by: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
eclass/savedconfig.eclass | 40
On 2019-08-03 18:20, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 03 Aug 2019, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
>> +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: _SAVEDCONFIG_CONFIGURATION_FILE
>
> 31 chars? Seems excessive for a name of a private variable.
And? I'll keep that name for readabil
On 2019-08-03 15:31, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> The summary line on this patch is too long. GLEP 66 states it must be
> no longer than 69 characters.
v2 will have summary line <=69 characters, thanks.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638
Due to the injection of $CTARGET and $CHOST in file path
we could end up with an already checked config file candidate
if $CTARGET or $CHOST isn't used.
This commit will make sure that we don't check the same file twice.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
eclass/savedconfig.e
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
eclass/savedconfig.eclass | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/savedconfig.eclass b/eclass/savedconfig.eclass
index b96f55d4c27c..5c6fd228269c 100644
--- a/eclass/savedconfig.eclass
+++ b/eclass/savedconfig.eclass
From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/686348
Signed-off-by: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
eclass/savedconfig.eclass | 40 ++-
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions
[1]
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/net-misc/iputils/iputils-.ebuild?id=ec886beb76dc342eec146f7e4d3785437c12bfa9#n159
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2019-04-25 00:45, Gokturk Yuksek wrote:
> The following package is up for grabs:
>
> dev-libs/libaio
I'll take it.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
27;t handle keyserver failures very well. I.e. no real
timeout and switch to another server. But we enabled WKD a long time ago
which fixed most problems for me because this will avoid normal
keyservers in general. So I am wondering which problems do you have...
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gen
iners project
and deal with all those pull requests.
Looking forward to see your Gentoo developer bug in near future! :-)
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
words, too.
If ARM can keep up I am quiet. But please, be honest. We don't need another
HPPA. Nobody will win something if we tell world "ARM is a first class citizen
in Gentoo" when it isn't (anymore). But if people would know it is ~ARCH, we
would not disappoint expectations.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ntion that
again we have a lacking architecture (net-dns/dnssec-root is not the
only package where ARM arch team is lacking behind) which affects anyone
"trusting" somehow in STABLE keywords.
If everyone is using ~ARCH and don't care about STABLE keywords, well,
we could save a
r, this update is critical for anyone using something like
net-dns/unbound with DNSSEC validation enabled (which isn't enabled by
default but you are encourage to switch this on).
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
sig
online. ;]
Maybe it is time to destabilize ARM on Gentoo to stop the impression
that we really support ARM.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_BY is present since 2013-04-22 20:01:29 -0700. So it
should be available for all developers.
> 3) Announce it ahead of time.
I agree. Communication was bad. We should have included dev howto with
that announcement.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2
now, see
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=0fd44962557b7870ac34c9b64f9bcfefc508f1e0
for details.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
alternative is cleaner. Especially, since there
> are commits with a Signed-off-by line that don't comply with the
> conditions of the Linux DCO.
+1 for ignoring "Signed-Off-By" line until 2018-09-16 00:00:00.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
really need to discuss this. Simply
because everyone interested in "-Werror" *can* set that flag via CFLAGS,
even just per package, whereas the majority, not interested in this,
cannot do the same to filter "-Werror". Nobody advocating for "-Werror"
replied to that fa
n architecture. Not a general failure. See x86
build.log, https://paste.pound-python.org/show/F1361Zp3aCHJLje8sBRe/
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
or" creates
undesired problems in most cases. Given that we have another rule that
any package must respect user's CFLAGS any user or dev who care can add
"-Werror" back to his/her CFLAGS... but don't force every user of Gentoo
to deal with that.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2018-08-22 16:30, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> So +1 from me on removing -march=i686 from the x86 arch profile.
+1
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ional stuff didn't run due to USE=-test
accidentally set by the user (in the past or was forgotten).
The code above in an early phase like pkg_setup would prevent such a bad
user experience, not?
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
gs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=664104.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2018-08-07 01:44, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> Title: Migration required for OpenSSH with LDAP
> Author: Thomas Deutschmann
> Posted: 2018-08-xx
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 2.0
> Display-If-Installed: net-misc/openssh
>
> If your sshd authenticates against LDAP,
Changes:
* Incorporated suggestions by Peter Stuge
* Package sys-auth/sakcl added
* Last sentence corrected
---
Title: Migration required for OpenSSH with LDAP
Author: Thomas Deutschmann
Posted: 2018-08-xx
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 2.0
Display-If-Installed: net-misc/openssh
If your sshd
Changes:
* Incorporated suggestions by Peter Stuge
* Package sys-auth/sakcl added
---
Title: Migration required for OpenSSH with LDAP
Author: Thomas Deutschmann
Posted: 2018-08-xx
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 2.0
Display-If-Installed: net-misc/openssh
If your sshd authenticates against LDAP
Hi,
just an acknowledge for the moment that kernel project has seen the
request and is currently looking into this.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Thomas Deutschmann (05 Aug 2018)
# Deprecated. Using recent microcodes with this package either won't work
# or crash your system. Please change your setup and make use of kernel's
# early microcode loading feature, see https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Microcode
# for more details. Rem
ll
likely do something wrong. In favor of a better solutions which
should prevent such a misuse, mcrypt was deprecated.
See also:
=
[1]
https://why-cant-we-have-nice-things.mwl.be/requests/deprecate-then-remove-mcrypt.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A7
on't use it, why do we care and enforce such a value?
Well, if you take the *now* proposed "Foreword" into account I *could*
arrange with such a statement because expiration date plays a role in
the web of trust and GLEP 63 seems to be more than just a OpenGPG policy
for commit/pus
Hello everyone,
please review the following news item. The 'xx'-es will be replaced with
the publication date.
---
Title: OpenSSH LDAP support
Author: Thomas Deutschmann
Posted: 2018-08-xx
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 2.0
Display-If-Installed: net-misc/openssh
When your sshd aut
t/commit/?id=c6b150836dfef848e51ec2cce801b12daf2c77b1
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I second this. Please keep "prometheus-" prefix.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t like
/::gentoo
to make sure the package from Gentoo repository isn't used.
But I guess you are talking about a different thing?
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=cfaa5ec192519a74951fd57f05c483984e408e4b.
Thank you for the report.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Thomas Deutschmann (23 Feb 2018)
# Unmaintained in Gentoo, known critical vulnerabilities like
# auth bypass. Removal in 30 days. Bugs #559658, #592080.
sys-cluster/ganglia-web
If you are using sys-cluster/ganglia-web or want to keep the package in
official Gentoo repository, it is now _your_
nt, however I prefer a label
item like current "Unstable arches" which makes it easy for me to spot
the end of the typical list.
In mgorny's variant I don't understand the differentiation between "exp"
and "~arch". I won't split them to be honest.
Ca
add
it with a mask.
Breaking ~arch because a dev was unable to test for some reason is IMHO
unacceptable -- even for ~arch. That's the whole reason why
keywords/p.mask exist ;-)
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
asy/clean task to just add *one* small/temporary
patch if you need to.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
an be found upstream.
3) https://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/mirrors/
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
quot; stabilization and
after some time...
So why should we wait...
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
101 - 200 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
