of the masses becomes irrelevant. All that then matters is getting
the technical part objectively right, which IS possible, despite what some
may say.
Regards,
Thomas
--
-
~Thomas Anderson~
-
].
I nominate tanderson. And I (obviously) accept. :)
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
-
,
Thomas
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
-
pgpJDFjjFKKHd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
it is worth it to have this
special construct for USE-flag combinations(there're far more possibilities than
the one I gave), and I'd say it is worth it.
[1] http://www.exherbo.org/docs/exheres-for-smarties.html#myoptions
Thanks,
Mounir
Regards,
Thomas
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo
this as PMS
team member).
I must agree here too as a PMS team member. so 'me too' :P
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
-
pgp1DcsVBwPus.pgp
Description: PGP signature
that, but if at all possible it should be initially answered by the
recruit.
So please, let's not make the quiz into a set of yes/no questions(an
exaggeration I know, but still the same effect).
Regards,
Thomas
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:34:48AM +0100, Steven J Long wrote:
Thomas Anderson wrote:
Steven J Long wrote:
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
This list is for technical discussions only.
I look forward to the day when that actually happens, and we are not
regaled with countless emails about
even vote
on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev
list to see.
For more info on the Gentoo Council, feel free to browse our homepage:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/
Attached is the preliminary meeting agenda.
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
there's an election on.
So am I, but your slandering of my platform is not appreciated at all.
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
-
pgphDvbKl3t5P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Here is the summary from Thursday's council meeting. The full log along with the
summary will appear shortly at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council.
Regards,
Thomas
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
.
My manifesto is available at [1], please remember to vote for
gentoofan23, not tanderson(irc nick). ;-)
Regards,
Thomas
[1]: http://dev.gentoo.org/~gentoofan23/2009Manifesto/manifesto.html
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary
Here is the summary from Thursday's council meeting. The full log along
with the summary will appear shortly at
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council
Regards,
Thomas
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
undoubtedly unconstructive
comment(or it'll be impossible to wade through the thread looking
for constructive stuff which is the point of the thread).
Regards,
Thomas
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
as backwards compatibility goes putting
EAPI 55 in the filename really is the cleanest.
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
-
pgpTTGoJ1MWDK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
For one, there's the restriction that all *-alpha/*-rc has to be
represented _rc/_alpha. I plan on doing more research into perhaps
lifting this restriction in a future EAPI, but this would of course
require glep 55's solution.
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas
none of which there have been lies spread by their proponents(that I've
seen).
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
-
pgpvTyZVF4HXT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
for paludis --info the bug could have
been RESO INVALID without it getting to me. I wouldn't have wasted ~30
minutes deciding that the user was being crazy.
So yes, paludis --info can come in handy, and I found it useful in this
case.
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas
remote. Once you're a dev you don't have to go on
irc _at all_. It's not going to kill you to do two reviews on irc,
especially given the advantages various people have presented for a
real-time interview.
Regards,
Thomas
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility
actively work on
amd64 at all. We are handling the load fairly well though.
Thomas
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
-
pgp7QZdeBowcq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
thursday.
Thomas
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
-
S=${WORKDIR}/${P}
You don't need to set this, it's the default.
filter-flags '-fomit-frame-pointer'
filter-flags in global scope? You should put that in
src_unpack/src_prepare.
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo
to get rid of static libraries again? I have not seen
any compelling reason to remove libraries that may be useful to our
users. Perhaps I've missed some discussion(in which case, I'd love to
read it), but this seems like an unnecessary complexity.
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
,
Thomas
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
-
to be on IRC; pretty much
the only communication that occurs in #-amd64-dev is coordination of
stabilization efforts and goofing off(and the occasional xfce dev talks
:p).
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
-
patches, src_prepare would be in
there too. What I'm saying is that focusing on the one part(configure)
is ignoring the good part of the rest of the proposal.
Regards,
Thomas
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
that kind of
stuff thrown at them. Stable users use stable because they want a very
predictable workflow. Noisy errors that shouldn't affect them(they are
in the stable branch) *is* unacceptable, and not just because it's ugly,
though that's certainly part of it.
--
-
Thomas Anderson
,
democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding who to have for dinner)
Looking forward to the council meeting, where there will *hopefully* be
a decision.
Thomas
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
it's easy enough
to say that it's a new version of ebuild, it has newer features see
www.blah.org/blah for details. And really, users already ask what EAPI
is so it's not that much headache.
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary
for a *new* EAPI.
Regards,
Thomas Anderson
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
-
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 06:37:35PM +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 13:56:15 +
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
What would really benefit Gentoo would be able to have the package
manager aware of [...]
I am sure you know of one that would
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Please submit all comments, as long as they are not I don't like XML
or XML is the wrong answer and similar since the point here is not to
discuss the format of metadata but rather where to have it.
XML is the wrong
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 03:39:12PM +0300, Peter Volkov wrote:
В Сбт, 08/11/2008 в 17:20 -0500, Thomas Anderson пишет:
This is a reposting of a call for discussion on DEFAULT_* variables.
The original discussion was at [1].
1. Functions we have now are much more flexible then proposed arrays
to the PM are bad.
Credit for this idea goes to those who made the exheres package
format(used for the Exherbo linux distribution) and those who
participated in the discussion on bug #33544 over the past who knows
how many years.
Please discuss!
Thomas Anderson
[1
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:20:07PM +0100, Thomas Sachau wrote:
Peter Alfredsen schrieb:
Do you really think, a package that supports parallel make while compiling
fails support for
parallel make support on install?
Happened for jabberd and jabberd2 to me.
pgpjnLZOswT2t.pgp
Description: PGP
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 05:22:26PM +, Greg Kroah-Hartman (gregkh) wrote:
# Copyright 1999-2008 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/bti/bti-007.ebuild,v 1.1
2008/10/26 17:22:26 gregkh Exp $
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 02:58:02PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 01:36:29PM -0400, Thomas Anderson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 05:22:26PM +, Greg Kroah-Hartman (gregkh) wrote:
src_install() {
doman bti.1
dobin bti
dodoc bti.example README RELEASE-NOTES
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:44:10PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:24:35 +0200
Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please people,
if you want to get something tested, then don't mask it.
So, no, I'll continue using package.mask for testing just
as it always
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 08:18:05AM +0200, Vaeth wrote:
Steve Long wrote:
Thomas Sachau wrote: [...]
[[ -n ${DOCS} ]] dodoc ${DOCS}
[...]
It might be wise to use an array for DOCS there
Since I have now seen suggestions for using arrays unnecessarily
at least twice (see also
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 12:43:12PM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler
for ebuild writer if they don't have to customize the output file
name.
One needs exceptions
Hi,
Currently we have a lot of:
src_configure() {
econf $(use_enable dvdr) \
$(use_with ipv6 ssl) \
--with-system-zlib
}
Introducing(Idea shamelessly
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:31:17PM +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
[...]
The benefit is that it's a logically separate action, and will avoid
all the silliness of people repeatedly changing their minds about
which phase
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 02:18:05PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Getting the bot out there
-
If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-* channel, would
each channel founder/leader please respond to this thread, stating the
channel name, and that they are
Hi,
Currently we have default_* functions implemented in
portage(paludis has these too)
which allow the default implementation of a particular phase
to be called. Another handy function in the default_* series is
function 'default' which simply calls the
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 08:44:24AM +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
app-admin/tmpwatch -- low maintenance
I can take this one.
dev-cpp/libthrowable,
app-portage/gatt -- very cooperative upstream for both (mlangc for
both)
I can also take these two as well, as I use them for arch
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:26:13AM +0100, Tony Chainsaw Vroon wrote:
2) If you had your way, would you discourage users from filing early
version bump requests?
Just an idea:
How about a metadata.xml tag that indicates whether early bump requests are
welcome?
It's more of an individual
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add missing eutils inherit for the non-git ebuilds as otherwise it seems to
be failing.
(Portage version: 2.2_rc1/cvs/Linux 2.6.25-gentoo-r4 x86_64)
The reason it's failing is because you have things after the . You
can do this:
if [[ ${PV} == **
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 05:24:34AM +, Josh Glover (jmglov) wrote:
LICENSE=Intel
Check configure output, GPL-2 license is enabled if v4l and/or xine USE
flags are on.
SLOT=0
KEYWORDS=~x86
IUSE=ffmpeg gtk ieee1394 python swig v4l v4l2 xine
DEPEND=
dev-util/pkgconfig
With the code
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 07:16:05PM -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 07:00:16PM +0100, David Leverton wrote:
On Thursday 12 June 2008 02:46:03 Jim Ramsay wrote:
David Leverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since at least one ebuild has already been modified specifically to
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 08:23:59AM +0100, Richard Brown wrote:
Also, I think you seem to be suggesting that gentoo is so well tested
that once something's marked stable, there's no point in testing it.
A very good point. Just last week the *stable* perl cairo bindings were
broken by a
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:00:52PM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 09-06-2008 11:49:35 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:50:11 +0200
Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how, specifically, is PMS wrongly written, and why hasn't
anyone who
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:26:53PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:18:01 +0200
Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The people who wrote PMS should be able to make the decision
for themselves(as they will be maintaining it) as to what language
to use.
The main
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 09:03:33AM +0200, Krzysiek Pawlik wrote:
* net-im/jabberd net-im/jabberd2 - thanks to work from Marko Durkovic
both are easy to maintain
I can take jabberd(maybe jabberd2 too) by proxy, until I finish my
quizzes.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 09:40:22PM +0200, Santiago M. Mola wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:43:59 +0200
Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
Okay. So we can just agree it's better if the maintainer tells his
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 05:41:18PM +, Alin Nastac (mrness) wrote:
mrness 08/04/13 17:41:18
Modified: ChangeLog
Added:freeradius-2.0.3.ebuild
Log:
Version bump.
(Portage version: 2.1.4.4)
src_install() {
mv ${D}/usr/share/doc/${PN}
On 11:35 Thu 03 Apr , Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Petteri R??ty wrote:
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto kirjoitti:
Petteri R??ty wrote:
As others have commented, I don't agree with this point. Also, you're
forgetting we have quite a few people working on this project and that we
have
On Saturday 08 March 2008 12:30:17 Petteri Räty wrote:
Joining us from the zoos of Florida, we have Kenneth keninsert random
numbers here Prugh. Ken did such a fine job testing all those random
packages for amd64 that it will be the sole purpose of his life from now
on. He tells me his hobby
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 14:41:32 Petteri Räty wrote:
Thomas Anderson kirjoitti:
Please elaborate on how a full.fledged developer would differ from a
package maintainer technically. What requirements and/or
priviledges do you think could be reduced?
Marius
Perhaps there could
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 14:59:55 Doug Goldstein wrote:
Thomas Anderson wrote:
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 14:41:32 Petteri Räty wrote:
Thomas Anderson kirjoitti:
Please elaborate on how a full.fledged developer would differ from a
package maintainer technically. What requirements
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 14:59:55 Doug Goldstein wrote:
Thomas Anderson wrote:
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 14:41:32 Petteri Räty wrote:
Thomas Anderson kirjoitti:
Please elaborate on how a full.fledged developer would differ from a
package maintainer technically. What requirements
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 16:05:09 Petteri Räty wrote:
Thomas Anderson kirjoitti:
Arch Testers don't have tree access. This proposal gives the package
maintainer the ability to commit their changes.
How would you ensure ebuild quality for these package maintainers?
Regards,
Petteri
On Friday 29 February 2008 13:13:16 Richard Freeman wrote:
Rémi Cardona wrote:
+1 on that idea, using bugzilla with an external tool for keyword
requests is a good idea.
The tool could do bugzilla research to see if the keyword has already
been requested and point the user to the
On Thursday 28 February 2008 07:28:27 Rémi Cardona wrote:
Petteri Räty a écrit :
He has been breaking the tree for a while now but as Calchan has been
having availability problems I get to insult him a little bit later than
usual. Bo hails from Aalborg, Denmark. He studies to become a
On Monday 11 February 2008 14:47:35 Petteri Räty wrote:
Often we have someone wanting to become a dev and we need a to find a
mentor for him. What do you think about adding a status bit to LDAP that
would mark you as available for mentoring? Recruiters could then use
this info to forward
On Thursday 17 January 2008 16:47:28 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Hi folks,
Infra is working on a bunch of things lately, and there are going to be
changes or brief outages for the following services (this is pretty much
the order they are being worked on).
anonvcs.gentoo.org: anoncvs, anonsvn,
On Friday 21 December 2007 08:43:43 Richard Freeman wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Please don't comment any further until you understand how this whole
thing works.
CON:
Yet another value to be parsed out of an increasingly-complex filename.
Doesn't look pretty :)
Taste is a matter of
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 18:21:31 Markus Ullmann wrote:
Doug Klima schrieb:
Cardoe zmedico: what if I have EAPI=2 above the inherit but an eclass
has EAPI=1
if an eclass sets EAPI, then the ebuild shouldn't... make it two
eclasses if needed or plain bump them if really really needed.
On Monday 03 December 2007 20:29:20 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
via
While I can't maintain this(no gentoo-x86/ access) I can test it if no one is
able to.
--
2.6.23-gentoo-r3
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 04:54:13 Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
all arch devs interested in above tool (app-portage/gatt-svn), I wrote
a little introduction for it. See Planet.
V-Li
From the Blog Post:
1. emerge the package with different USE flags
Tasks 1, 2, 4 and 5 can be
On Thursday 04 October 2007 09:36:29 Doug Goldstein wrote:
Ravi Pinjala wrote:
Ryan Hill wrote:
There are several packages in portage (and even in base-system) that
fail
in src_test when userpriv/usersandbox is enabled or disabled. That
is, some
testsuites fail when run as
Did your work have anything to do with the e-mails from bugzilla-daemon only
containing HTTPS links? I noticed that over the previous few days.
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 22:04:40 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I went and processed a bunch of pending Bugzilla bugs, and thought folk
might be
On Sunday 09 September 2007 15:15:12 Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
As I would like to introduce it to the official Portage Tree in
preparation of things to come, we would welcome any comments, patches
and, of course, your kind approval to commit it. :-)
Looks really nice. Just one question: What
On Friday 07 September 2007 20:25:07 Alec Warner wrote:
On 9/7/07, Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 07 September 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 02:44:21PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
X-VCS-Repository: gentoo-x86
I would say, yes. This is a very important for some dialup users. I personally
ditched the default way on my system because I couldn't do this.
With regard to the concerns leveled at users defining their own scripts, it
shouldn't cause too much trouble as long as the user knows a bit about
Thanks!
Is there any roadmap for stabilizing python-2.5(as in weeks,months,
decades?) ;)
If anything goes into the GWN I think people running 'arch' would like to know
when they will be affected.
On Thursday 23 August 2007 11:01:02 Tiziano Müller wrote:
Hi everyone,
Thanks to an increased
74 matches
Mail list logo
