[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Services and software which is critical for Gentoo should be developed/run in Gentoo namespace

2020-09-13 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
-- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: switching default udev provider for new systems to udev

2020-08-10 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2020-08-10 14:07, Michał Górny wrote: > ...or a revert of a change made for change's sake. That's a bold statement for an unambiguous 7-0 decision as seen in https://bugs.gentoo.org/575718. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: switching default udev provider for new systems to udev

2020-08-10 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
lk about ditching eudev in general... So for me it still looks like change for change's sake without a real reason. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: switching default udev provider for new systems to udev

2020-08-09 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
-fs/udev? -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Multiple root kernel command-line arguments

2020-08-06 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
should teach kexec runscript to return persistent name instead (utilizing lsblk for example) but this will raises question like what to do if tools aren't available and maybe user's start environment can't even handle root=UUID=... value :/ -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Multiple root kernel command-line arguments

2020-08-06 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
d believe that avoiding that has much more value than avoid a problem like an unbootable system for just a few people (and for headless/servers this is a major problem in case you cannot trigger remote reboot)... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Multiple root kernel command-line arguments

2020-08-06 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ommon) you maybe also appending additional root argument which has the potential to cause boot failures in case you are using non-permanent device names and something will be different in start environment. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Multiple root kernel command-line arguments

2020-08-06 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ng that only for people who have genkernel installed would miss a bunch of users. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Multiple root kernel command-line arguments

2020-08-06 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ll help someone who didn't read documentation before or just didn't realize the obvious risk he/she is taking when using non-persistent names ("It worked that way for me past 15 years!") I believe it has served its purpose. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F

[gentoo-dev] News item v2: Multiple root kernel command-line arguments

2020-08-06 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Hi, here's v2 based on some IRC feedback (grammar- and punctuation-related) I am planning to add for tomorrow. --- Title: Multiple root kernel command-line arguments Author: Thomas Deutschmann Posted: 2020-08-05 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 2.0 Due to genkernel-4.1 development which

[gentoo-dev] News item: Multiple root kernel command-line arguments

2020-08-05 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/sys-apps/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-2.0.20-r3.ebuild?id=61c03ffab76740c0420e3c8a3185d047d461f7a7#n111 --- Title: Multiple root kernel command-line arguments Author: Thomas Deutschmann Posted: 2020-08-05 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 2.0 Due to genkernel-4.1 development

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff

2020-07-29 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ot even what happened. And yes, I probably wouldn't have notice this and wouldn't care if only <3 were masked. But again, that's not what has happened. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff

2020-07-29 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ptop. Thanks for > nothing. ...and not just because of net-nntp/sabnzbd like this thread has shown. I followed Gentoo policy when I reverted a broken commit. If can only urge you to revise pkg list and pay more attention for your next commit. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff

2020-07-29 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ork. C'mon. You even added net-nntp/sabnzbd to that list again which created a lot of drama beginning of this year. Please don't try to say you reviewed anything... -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Desc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff

2020-07-29 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
FYI: I reverted the entire commit like this thread and bugs clearly show that this list wasn't even reviewed/checked: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b76ee2f3e20b55d268ec291a1a1328cc047f5a04 -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1

Re: [gentoo-dev] */*: Mask Py2 only packages

2020-06-24 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ll their packages because you want to. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] */*: Mask Py2 only packages

2020-06-20 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
not user-friendly. It doesn't even has deps on other Python packages blocking your cleanup delusion. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

RE: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-27 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
happened). It would be cool if our solution would be aware of this and could handle this somehow. But I guess we would have to create our own solution for this... -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 openpgp-digital

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Should NATTkA reject keywordreqs for packages with -arch (-*) keywords?

2020-05-05 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ituation changing. -arch is so rare that I don't recall ever seeing > it. In either case, restoring an arch should be an explicit action. +1 -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation

2020-05-04 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2020-04-26 15:46, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 14:38:54 +0200 > Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > >> Let's assume we will get reports that app-misc/foo is only installed 20 >> times. If you are going to judge based on this data, "Obviously, nobody >> i

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation

2020-05-04 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ould have data for distfiles.gentoo.org this won't help us. See how Gentoo works: If you follow handbook you will pick a local/regional mirror. Now all these users are suddenly 'disconnected' from the download stats... -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer fpr: C4DD 695F A713

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cleaning up the installation handbook (Legacy boot / MBR / ...)

2020-05-03 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
share why you believe this has to be removed. I assume you are talking about https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Installation/Disks and for me it's not a *mess*. Maybe move it to a 'legacy' sub page but it's too early for complete removal from my P.O.V. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gen

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation

2020-04-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
r* point in their current situation. :/ -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] rpm.eclass: use BDEPEND for EAPI 7

2020-04-20 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Hi, merged, thanks: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=606c745e611c216df15568bc8655e2781dc11095 -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilizations and src_test

2020-04-12 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
of effort/work. Really, if you call for stabilization and haven't tested your own package you are offloading work to others which is not nice. I also dislike maintainers who simply restrict tests on first failure. But in the end it's at least a strong signal about package quality and state in Gentoo. :) --

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] KEYWORDREQ and STABLEREQ keywords

2020-04-11 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
-- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 00/10] GLEP 72 (arches.desc) revival

2020-04-11 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
don't forget to check on your own if this is also true for your architecture because in theory the maintainer could have decided to make use of arch-depending eapply for some reason..." => Keep it simple: Stable should mean the same across all architectures -- Regards, Thomas Deutsc

Re: [gentoo-dev] zoom concerns

2020-04-07 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
you don't have when you do proper ACLs). Regarding bin/non-bin: Software has bugs. Some software tends to have more issues. Just because we have the source code and compile software on user's system doesn't make the application itself more secure than the provided binary package. -- Regards, T

Re: [gentoo-dev] zoom concerns

2020-04-07 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
sons like "No one audited the Linux version yet". But in security you don't issue warnings if you aren't sure. Because if you make false statements people will no longer trust you. But trust is everything. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1

Re: [gentoo-dev] zoom concerns

2020-04-02 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
on severity of reported vulnerabilities) we maybe decide to last-rite or apply a mask to force user awareness through forced unmask action in case they need that software. But again, this software isn't special and doesn't require further discussion from our P.O.V. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: noarch keyword

2020-03-19 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2020-03-19 04:03, Kent Fredric wrote: > Because that experiment basically failed. > > Bugs with that flag, basically were treated (repeatedly) like that flag > wasn't there. Hehe, maybe because of missing tooling. Common tools like tatt don't understand "ALLARCHES" :)

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: noarch keyword

2020-03-18 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
thing math related (no SSE2, -mfpmath=387...). So as long as we want that a package keyworded for x86 really works on old x86 hardware, we have to go the long route an test it. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 sig

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/*, python-maintained, py3.6-only, no-revdep

2020-03-07 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ism like setting a mask to get attention), you have to deal with the fact that this is disruptive and that not everyone like that. But please, nobody is publicly shaming anyone. If you play that card, don't wonder that people will stop talking. Don't read too much into everything. -- Regards, Th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes made by acct-* ebuilds

2020-02-14 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ng log and even the mail discussion before you will read that I always shared concerns about touching existing user. I was only fine because I was told "We are aware, what you described won't happen" and I didn't make a secret that I didn't had the time to fully review and test myse

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes made by acct-* ebuilds

2020-02-14 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ht happen with the current implementation which tries to keep user/group state like described in package. Something you will only see in Gentoo and no other distribution. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes made by acct-* ebuilds

2020-02-14 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
lly a bad default and it's breaking with existing principles you can find in most distributions: Don't touch stuff which were changed by the user. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPG

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes made by acct-* ebuilds

2020-02-12 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
too-dev/message/05c9b211eb18012d16302194a7bc37e6 -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
e when someone wants to understand why an ebuild was changed that way. That's why Debian created https://salsa.debian.org/, Fedora has https://src.fedoraproject.org/ ... -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Vanilla sources

2020-01-04 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
egards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Security Team C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Vanilla sources

2020-01-04 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
onfiguration from current running kernel. Without providing a kernel config, user will probably fall back to generic configuration which isn't intended for daily usage. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] News Item: Genkernel 4 changed default kernel and initramfs filename

2019-12-30 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Hi, news item has been published: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/gentoo-news.git/commit/?id=b53539af13d77a7ad811327b677b9933e1dfb1b0 -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] News Item: Genkernel 4 changed default kernel and initramfs filename

2019-12-27 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
.org/support/news-items/2019-07-18-syncthing-update-incompatibility.html and https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-items/2019-11-25-rpi-firmware-dtb-files.html were posted? :-) -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 s

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] News Item: Genkernel 4 changed default kernel and initramfs filename

2019-12-27 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Title: Genkernel 4 changed default kernel and initramfs filename Author: Thomas Deutschmann Posted: 2019-12-27 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 2.0 Display-If-Installed: >=sys-kernel/genkernel-4 To be consistent with kernel's own naming which allows for easier matching of kernel/initra

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/4] acct-user/jenkins: Add jenkins user, UID 473

2019-12-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
sted packages would be wrong for the servers running grafana role/state, i.e. running www-apps/grafana-bin behind www-servers/nginx proxy. So you would end up with multiple acct-*/nginx ebuilds for each configuration which can't be right. Whereas at the moment you will use your configuration mana

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/4] acct-user/jenkins: Add jenkins user, UID 473

2019-12-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
to ensure somehow that system A which acts as application server for "myapp" will only get acct-*/- and system B which will act as application server for "myapp2" will get acct-*/- instead?! Not to mention what will happen if you get a third system which will be able to run multiple ngin

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/4] acct-user/jenkins: Add jenkins user, UID 473

2019-12-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2019-12-26 12:04, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 12/25/19 10:11 AM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: >> +ACCT_USER_HOME=/var/lib/jenkins > Needed? I cannot answer that for sure. In *my* setups I need a valid home for standard SSH setup (~/.ssh/authorized_keys). But there are dozen ways how

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/4] dev-util/jenkins-bin: bump to v2.210

2019-12-25 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.82, Repoman-2.3.20 Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann --- dev-util/jenkins-bin/Manifest | 1 + dev-util/jenkins-bin/jenkins-bin-2.210.ebuild | 47 +++ 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+) create mode 100644 dev-util/jenkins-bin/jenkins

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/4] dev-util/jenkins-bin: bump to v2.204.1

2019-12-25 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.82, Repoman-2.3.20 Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann --- dev-util/jenkins-bin/Manifest | 1 + .../jenkins-bin/jenkins-bin-2.204.1.ebuild| 47 +++ 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+) create mode 100644 dev-util/jenkins-bin/jenkins

[gentoo-dev] dev-util/jenkins-bin GLEP-81 migration

2019-12-25 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Hi, please see my first package migration to GLEP 81. Complete change set can be found at https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/14121. Previous ebuilds using user eclass called fowners jenkins:jenkins /var/log/jenkins ${JENKINS_DIR} ${JENKINS_DIR}/home ${JENKINS_DIR}/backup which I changed

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/4] acct-group/jenkins: Add jenkins group, GID 473

2019-12-25 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.82, Repoman-2.3.20 Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann --- acct-group/jenkins/jenkins-0.ebuild | 9 + acct-group/jenkins/metadata.xml | 12 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-group/jenkins/jenkins-0.ebuild create mode

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/4] acct-user/jenkins: Add jenkins user, UID 473

2019-12-25 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.82, Repoman-2.3.20 Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann --- acct-user/jenkins/jenkins-0.ebuild | 13 + acct-user/jenkins/metadata.xml | 12 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-user/jenkins/jenkins-0.ebuild create mode

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: acct-user/... modifies existing user sometimes

2019-12-14 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
. Could you please be a little bit more precise what's changing? acct-* shouldn't mess with already *existing* users. So upgrade experience shouldn't be affected... -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Descript

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Revisiting GLEP 81 (acct-*) policies (reviews, cross-distro syncing)

2019-12-10 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
docker run \ > --name some-mysql \ > -v /my/own/datadir:/var/lib/mysql \ > -e MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD=my-secret-pw \ > -d mysql:tag which will make /my/own/datadir from host available in container as /var/lib/mysql. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Revisiting GLEP 81 (acct-*) policies (reviews, cross-distro syncing)

2019-12-10 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
as match. No, when you follow best practice you will always pass user/group or use other available mapping solutions. So while it sounds like a valid *goal*, in real world, it isn't. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 sign

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Revisiting GLEP 81 (acct-*) policies (reviews, cross-distro syncing)

2019-12-09 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2019-12-09 19:48, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 09 Dec 2019, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > >> Like said, if an ID is already taken for any reason on user's system, >> that's not a problem. acct-* can handle that... there's nothing like a >> col

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Revisiting GLEP 81 (acct-*) policies (reviews, cross-distro syncing)

2019-12-09 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
most packages used dynamic allocation until GLEP 81), you won't have "clean", collision free systems with same ID all over the places. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Revisiting GLEP 81 (acct-*) policies (reviews, cross-distro syncing)

2019-12-09 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ree number. I.e. it should be recommended to pick the lowest free UID/GID pair instead (just to avoid fragmentation and keep 501+ free as long as possible). -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenP

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v4] mount-boot.eclass: Check if /boot is sane, but don't try to mount it.

2019-12-07 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Hi, just wondering if you have seen https://bugs.gentoo.org/532264#c24. If this is still valid, is your change really needed? -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2019-12-06 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
o away. And again: If this will really solve problems, why is anyone allowed to take over those package like I did for sabnzbd? If you are right and this is really a problem for Gentoo I shouldn't be allowed to do that. And *then* we would also have a reason to mask :-) -- Regards, Thomas Deutschm

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2019-12-06 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
(like PHP project did with PHP 5.6 and consumers). Maybe someday one of those responsible will admit that this step was not a thoughtful and good decision and promise not to do it that way again and I'll get over it. Who knows. :) -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2019-12-06 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ves me nuts... -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2019-12-06 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
For example, a lot of packages are now masked *with* dev-lang/php:5.6 because Gentoo will finally get rid of PHP 5.6 which is EOL since 2018-12-31. But we didn't break PHP 5.6 users by starting to remove PECL extension for this version while dev-lang/php:5.6 was still a thing... -- Regards, Thomas Deutsc

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2019-12-06 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ot;Yes, I am the maintainer of this package but I am fine with you touching it". -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2019-12-05 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
too-dev/message/d00a956180ab7df980ac5642e3abc179 -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/* leaf packages

2019-12-04 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2019-12-05 04:06, William Hubbs wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 03:56:05AM +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: >> On 2019-12-05 01:15, Aaron Bauman wrote: >>> * Removal in 30 days >> >> Why? I understand that Py2 will reach EOL upstream status but we all >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/* leaf packages

2019-12-04 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
zbd is a perfect example. Up to date in repository and working. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC acct-{user,group} for jenkins

2019-11-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
e, why do we care at all about "others"? -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] RFC acct-{user,group} for unbound

2019-11-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
I am requesting uid and gid 59, both named "unbound", for net-dns/unbound. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] RFC acct-{user,group} for collectd

2019-11-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
I am requesting uid and gid 440, both named "collectd", for app-metrics/collectd. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] RFC acct-{user,group} for jenkins

2019-11-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
assignment, should it? Therefore I am requesting uid and gid 818, both named "jenkins", for dev-util/jenkins-bin. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] RFC acct-{user,group} for nginx

2019-11-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
vers/nginx. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-apps/lsb-release

2019-11-07 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2019-11-07 18:57, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > sys-apps/lsb-release - Linux Standard Base version query program > > Low maintenance, but with six open bug reports. base-system will take that package. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/openssh-blacklist

2019-11-07 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
# Thomas Deutschmann (2019-11-07) # EAPI 0. It's been almost a decade since that openssl bug. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #697218. net-misc/openssh-blacklist -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should the bot add PRs directly to TRACKER tickets?

2019-10-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
to address the issue raised in tracker bug used that bug as reference. In other words: The initial failure was that no individual bugs per affected package was created... -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support move of genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to devspace

2019-10-11 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ith "https..."). I also tried that code and it's working fine for me... -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Using HTTPS mirrors only in thirdpartymirrors (when possible)

2019-09-29 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
checksums for distfiles and thirdpartymirrors file is only used for distfiles. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/

2019-09-05 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
's about *changing* devmanual which I *just* pointed out. But whoever will propose changing devmanual should support such a change because he/she will probably have to argue for that change. Something I cannot do when I like status quo like I do currently or have concerns. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/

2019-09-05 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
devmanual in case you believe this should be a hard requirement. Because at the moment I don't believe it should be a hard requirement, *I* will not propose any changes. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/

2019-09-04 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
t" and maybe clarify per-package exception and limit to update case if you believe that really *all* *new* eclasses must be send to mailing list. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] act-{user,group} & RDEPEND

2019-08-28 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
s don't do at the moment what specification will allow them to do? Moving to (B)DEPEND will address the problem for non-binary package users only. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools.eclass: drop outdated sys-devel/gettext blocker

2019-08-23 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
All Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann --- eclass/autotools.eclass | 5 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/autotools.eclass b/eclass/autotools.eclass index 9143aa454d0d..9df0e1b93663 100644 --- a/eclass/autotools.eclass +++ b/eclass/autotools.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] package.deprecated to mark packages deprecated and report dependencies

2019-08-16 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
package.deprecated file we would have a check in real time against current repository. And once all CI warnings are gone you can commit the mask. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] mount-boot.eclass: Fix ro check

2019-08-12 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Hi, now pushed, https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=7840e73dde3ff715806aff61708f134479581d9c -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] mount-boot.eclass: Fix ro check

2019-08-10 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Make sure we check only /boot mount and not any mount containing '/boot'. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/691874 Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann --- eclass/mount-boot.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/mount-boot.eclass b/eclass/mount-boot.eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] savedconfig.eclass: Only check config file candidate once

2019-08-07 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Due to the injection of $CTARGET and $CHOST in file path we could end up with an already checked config file candidate if $CTARGET or $CHOST isn't used. This commit will make sure that we don't check the same file twice. Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann --- eclass/savedconfig.eclass | 12

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] savedconfig.eclass: Always quote filename in output

2019-08-07 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann --- eclass/savedconfig.eclass | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/savedconfig.eclass b/eclass/savedconfig.eclass index f62a6055ffdb..1ea464271aff 100644 --- a/eclass/savedconfig.eclass +++ b/eclass/savedconfig.eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] savedconfig.eclass: Re-use configuration file scheme

2019-08-07 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis Make save_config() re-use configuration file scheme used by restore_config(). Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/686348 Signed-off-by: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann --- eclass/savedconfig.eclass | 40

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] savedconfig.eclass: Make save_config() re-use configuration file scheme used by restore_config()

2019-08-07 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2019-08-03 18:20, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 03 Aug 2019, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > >> +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: _SAVEDCONFIG_CONFIGURATION_FILE > > 31 chars? Seems excessive for a name of a private variable. And? I'll keep that name for readability i

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/3] savedconfig.eclass: Make save_config() re-use configuration file scheme used by restore_config()

2019-08-07 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2019-08-03 15:31, Mike Gilbert wrote: > The summary line on this patch is too long. GLEP 66 states it must be > no longer than 69 characters. v2 will have summary line <=69 characters, thanks. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] savedconfig.eclass: Only check config file candidate once

2019-08-03 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Due to the injection of $CTARGET and $CHOST in file path we could end up with an already checked config file candidate if $CTARGET or $CHOST isn't used. This commit will make sure that we don't check the same file twice. Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann --- eclass/savedconfig.eclass | 12

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] savedconfig.eclass: Always quote filename in output

2019-08-03 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann --- eclass/savedconfig.eclass | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/savedconfig.eclass b/eclass/savedconfig.eclass index b96f55d4c27c..5c6fd228269c 100644 --- a/eclass/savedconfig.eclass +++ b/eclass/savedconfig.eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] savedconfig.eclass: Make save_config() re-use configuration file scheme used by restore_config()

2019-08-03 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/686348 Signed-off-by: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann --- eclass/savedconfig.eclass | 40 ++- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New QA policy: Packages must not disable installing manpages via USE flags

2019-07-17 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
tweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/net-misc/iputils/iputils-.ebuild?id=ec886beb76dc342eec146f7e4d3785437c12bfa9#n159 -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: dev-libs/libaio: package up for grabs

2019-04-24 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2019-04-25 00:45, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: > The following package is up for grabs: > > dev-libs/libaio I'll take it. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] adding app-crypt/gentoo-keys to @system

2019-02-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
failures very well. I.e. no real timeout and switch to another server. But we enabled WKD a long time ago which fixed most problems for me because this will avoid normal keyservers in general. So I am wondering which problems do you have... -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is there any way I can help with pull requests?

2018-10-13 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
project and deal with all those pull requests. Looking forward to see your Gentoo developer bug in near future! :-) -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/dnssec-root: Blind stable on arm, critical bug 667774

2018-10-11 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
onest. We don't need another HPPA. Nobody will win something if we tell world "ARM is a first class citizen in Gentoo" when it isn't (anymore). But if people would know it is ~ARCH, we would not disappoint expectations. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/dnssec-root: Blind stable on arm, critical bug 667774

2018-10-11 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
a lacking architecture (net-dns/dnssec-root is not the only package where ARM arch team is lacking behind) which affects anyone "trusting" somehow in STABLE keywords. If everyone is using ~ARCH and don't care about STABLE keywords, well, we could save a bunch of time, energy... --

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/dnssec-root: Blind stable on arm, critical bug 667774

2018-10-11 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
date is critical for anyone using something like net-dns/unbound with DNSSEC validation enabled (which isn't enabled by default but you are encourage to switch this on). -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Desc

[gentoo-dev] net-dns/dnssec-root: Blind stable on arm, critical bug 667774

2018-10-11 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
ne. ;] Maybe it is time to destabilize ARM on Gentoo to stop the impression that we really support ARM. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

  1   2   >