On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
wrote:
> The point I was addressing is the suggestion that the above should be
> possible and the idea that any single developer is "entitled" to do so.
It's a moot point, because no one (that I see) claimed or is claiming
to be entitled
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29-08-2011 21:23, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 03:18 Fri 26 Aug , Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> I've picked this message as I want to address one point in this
>> thread that was focused on this sub-thread. I disagree with the
>> idea th
On 03:18 Fri 26 Aug , Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> I've picked this message as I want to address one point in this thread
> that was focused on this sub-thread. I disagree with the idea that
> adding an application to the Gentoo tree that collects data from users
> and sends it to a c
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
I've picked this message as I want to address one point in this thread
that was focused on this sub-thread.
I disagree with the idea that adding an application to the Gentoo tree
that collects data from users and sends it to a central (or distributed)
system is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25-08-2011 14:35, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Rich Freeman
> wrote:
>> The big issue with opt-out is privacy law - especially in Europe
>> (that's leaving aside just being up-front with users). We'd end
>> up having to
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
> We did post to -dev, hence this thread.
My post was intended to be general in applicability, and not critical
of the particular instance of this issue being discussed.
I would generally suggest that implementing this as a package and not
as
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Roy Bamford wrote:
>> It has to be opt-in as opt out would be a dangerous precendent to set.
>>
>> I don't see any harm is a gentle reminder message from emerge, provided
>> that the reminder can be turned off
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Roy Bamford wrote:
> It has to be opt-in as opt out would be a dangerous precendent to set.
>
> I don't see any harm is a gentle reminder message from emerge, provided
> that the reminder can be turned off too, if the user really does not
> want to opt in. Thats no
On 2011.08.24 11:48, Patrick Lauer wrote:
[snip]
>
> If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get
> pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland
> will
> meet some rather unpleasant resistance :)
>
>
>
>
This app and if its opt in or opt out will se
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:03:44 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 24 August 2011, 12:48:35 schrieb Patrick Lauer:
> >
> > If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get
> > pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland
> > will meet some rather
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
>> Sorry, but NO. If you want you can make a big noise message that asks
>> users to install the cron-job but opt-out is not an option here.
>
> Well, that's up to the Council/Trustees ult
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Sorry, but NO. If you want you can make a big noise message that asks
> users to install the cron-job but opt-out is not an option here.
Well, that's up to the Council/Trustees ultimately, but opinions (and
better still reasoning) are welcom
i am a user and i am ok with opt-out if the std data that is transferd
is compleatly anonymized
so no sensitive data.
and if the user wants to register his/her machine pkg's more data is trasnfered
thx
Mario
2011/8/24 Thomas Kahle :
> On 13:03 Wed 24 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> Am Mit
On 13:03 Wed 24 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 24 August 2011, 12:48:35 schrieb Patrick Lauer:
> >
> > If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get
> > pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland will
> > meet some rather unpleasant r
On 12:48 Wed 24 Aug 2011, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 08/24/11 12:31, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 18:16 Tue 23 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> >> there is one important aspect of your program that really needs to be
> >> documented (and comments in the code are not enough):
> >>
> >
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get
> pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland will
> meet some rather unpleasant resistance :)
Well, we could always broadcast the news widely (lists,
Am Mittwoch 24 August 2011, 12:48:35 schrieb Patrick Lauer:
>
> If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get
> pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland will
> meet some rather unpleasant resistance :)
>
Of course, we could place it in some blatantl
On 08/24/11 12:31, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18:16 Tue 23 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> there is one important aspect of your program that really needs to be
>> documented (and comments in the code are not enough):
>>
>> What data exactly is the client sending to the server?!
>>
>>
Hi,
On 18:16 Tue 23 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> there is one important aspect of your program that really needs to be
> documented (and comments in the code are not enough):
>
> What data exactly is the client sending to the server?!
>
> What you need is basically an easy-to-find file /
Hi Vikram,
there is one important aspect of your program that really needs to be
documented (and comments in the code are not enough):
What data exactly is the client sending to the server?!
What you need is basically an easy-to-find file / web page / ... where this is
explained concise and
20 matches
Mail list logo
