On 2010.04.09 07:34, Duncan wrote:
Patrick Nagel posted on Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:42:40 +0800 as excerpted:
[snip]
Likewise, Gentoo's uncomfortable officially linking to something they
don't control in any way, shape, or form (except to the extent that
we could arguably pull his domain name
On 12 April 2010 12:28, Roy Bamford neddyseag...@gentoo.org wrote:
Last time I looked, his about page complies with our trade mark
requirements.
But ONLY his about page. Our name and logo guidelines state this needs
to happen on each page:
the website clearly states, on each page, that the
On 12/04/2010 12:32, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 12 April 2010 12:28, Roy Bamfordneddyseag...@gentoo.org wrote:
Last time I looked, his about page complies with our trade mark
requirements.
But ONLY his about page. Our name and logo guidelines state this needs
to happen on each page:
the
On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowse george.pro...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong.
Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission is to help
Gentoo and not to hinder it. Gentoo hardly makes a habit of Apple-like
On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowsegeorge.pro...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong.
Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission is to help
Gentoo and not to hinder it.
On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowse george.pro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowsegeorge.pro...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong.
Gentoo knows about the
On 12/04/2010 14:22, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowsegeorge.pro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowsegeorge.pro...@gmail.comwrote:
[...]
If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think
On 12 April 2010 15:22, Arun Raghavan ford_pref...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowse george.pro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowsegeorge.pro...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
If you are arguing that the name is
Ben de Groot wrote:
On 12 April 2010 15:22, Arun Raghavanford_pref...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowsegeorge.pro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowsegeorge.pro...@gmail.comwrote:
There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to share my
knowledge with others as well as I'm glad to learn from others. I'm not a
Gentoo dev and I neither have plan nor wish to be.
My feeling is that Gentoo Wiki Project is just but another occasion for
debating rules and
On Friday 09 of April 2010 13:26:16 Guy Fontaine wrote:
There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to share my
knowledge with others as well as I'm glad to learn from others. I'm not a
Gentoo dev and I neither have plan nor wish to be.
My feeling is that Gentoo Wiki Project
On 9 April 2010 13:26, Guy Fontaine guy.fonta...@videotron.qc.ca wrote:
There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to share my
knowledge with others as well as I'm glad to learn from others. I'm not a
Gentoo dev and I neither have plan nor wish to be.
My feeling is that
On 9 April 2010 14:35, Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote:
See? This is the problem. Every time comes an initiative to introduce official
Gentoo infra hosted Gentoo Wiki (yes, the one that won't loose randomly all
its contents) - there's lack of interest of cooperation from already
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 9 April 2010 14:35, Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote:
See? This is the problem. Every time comes an initiative to introduce
official
Gentoo infra hosted Gentoo Wiki (yes, the one that won't loose randomly all
On 09/04/2010 13:38, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 9 April 2010 13:26, Guy Fontaineguy.fonta...@videotron.qc.ca wrote:
There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to share my
knowledge with others as well as I'm glad to learn from others. I'm not a
Gentoo dev and I neither have plan
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 06:02:40PM +0100, George Prowse wrote:
On 09/04/2010 13:38, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 9 April 2010 13:26, Guy Fontaineguy.fonta...@videotron.qc.ca wrote:
There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to share my
knowledge with others as well as I'm glad
On 09/04/10 18:24, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
Really? I understood it as the wiki being an all-purposes wiki, meaning users
could (would and should) create articles on how to get some application
running or how to get some setting working, and the developers will have
their own section,
On 09/04/2010 18:24, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 06:02:40PM +0100, George Prowse wrote:
On 09/04/2010 13:38, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 9 April 2010 13:26, Guy Fontaineguy.fonta...@videotron.qc.ca wrote:
There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to
Allen, if you don't have anything constructive to add, then please
refrain from adding to this thread.
Thanks,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Qt project lead developer
Gentoo Wiki project lead
Here's one possible use-case.
For me, I would consider moving
http://dev.gentoo.org/~mpagano/genpatches/index.htm to the official wiki so
that other people in the kernel herd can update it.
If the updating could be scripted, of course.
I would not have considered it for an unofficial wiki
On 8 April 2010 21:51, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
why are we setting up a user wiki when a very popular one already exists?
Because some devs request things like this:
can we can lock certain pages down to dev edits only?
In our wiki we will be able to.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
The official wiki can be use by powerusers who want to write some pretty good
doc.
A lot of powerusers can write excellent doc on the gentoo forum right now, so
they don't need to by Gentoo Dev to right excellent stuff.
I don't see your point.
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From:
Indeed, that's why I don't want to have a wiki for devs only. The Gentoo wiki
must be for the community and by the community :P
There are many Gentoo experts that don't want to be officially devs.
d2_racing
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: dirtye...@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev]
Hi,
On 2010-04-08 19:51 UTC Ryan Hill wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:12:49 +0200
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
After the mostly positive feedback on the recent wiki discussion, we
have now gone ahead, formed a preliminary team consisting of both
users and developers, and put up a
24 matches
Mail list logo
