On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:12:27 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 04/30/2011 11:03 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/index.html
[..]
> It no where in the link you provided mentions ChangeLog is required
> for removals. Removing an unused eb
Dale wrote:
I'm a user, tho a lowly one, and even I look in the changelogs from
time to time. I don't even see why this should be discussed. If you
*change* something, but it in the *change* log. If not, maybe the
changelog should be called something else.
Using the logic that something be
Duncan wrote:
I'm a user, and despite the fact that I tend to run ~arch or even pre-tree
testing overlays, I find ebuild removal information in the changelog WAY
more useful than, say, when some obscure arch keyworded a version.
Ergo, the argument that users don't find that info useful is dispro
On 04/30/2011 11:35 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011, Petteri Räty wrote:
>
>> Individual developers (especially QA project members) should not be
>> ignoring policies when they feel like it.
>
>> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/index.html
>
>
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Individual developers (especially QA project members) should not be
> ignoring policies when they feel like it.
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/index.html
While I'm all for adding a ChangeLog entry when removing a
On 04/30/2011 11:12 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> It no where in the link you provided mentions ChangeLog is required for
> removals. Removing an unused ebuild is not the same as making changes to
> an ebuild.
>
> We have no policy for logging removals. And that's like it should be.
>
It doesn
On 04/30/2011 11:03 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 04/30/2011 07:39 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
>>
>> sources.gentoo.org is for that. ChangeLog is for users, and "old" is
>> not useful information to them
>>
>> So no, I won't start cluttering up ChangeLogs and I would prefer if
>> others would st
On 04/30/2011 10:22 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> I'd suggest having repoman force a changelog entry on ebuild removal.
>
Opened yesterday:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365361
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 04/30/2011 07:39 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> sources.gentoo.org is for that. ChangeLog is for users, and "old" is
> not useful information to them
>
> So no, I won't start cluttering up ChangeLogs and I would prefer if
> others would stop it as well
>
Individual developers (especially
В Сбт, 30/04/2011 в 07:39 +0300, Samuli Suominen пишет:
> On 04/30/2011 07:10 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> sources.gentoo.org is for that.
It's not convenient to use browser to read ChangeLog.
> So no, I won't start cluttering up ChangeLogs and I would prefer if
> others would stop it as well
I'm
Samuli Suominen posted on Sat, 30 Apr 2011 08:15:55 +0300 as excerpted:
> On 04/30/2011 07:45 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Samuli Suominen
>> wrote:
>>> sources.gentoo.org is for that. ChangeLog is for users, and "old" is
>>> not useful information to them
>>
>>
> sources.gentoo.org is for that. ChangeLog is for users, and "old" is
> not useful information to them
>
> So no, I won't start cluttering up ChangeLogs and I would prefer if
> others would stop it as well
This makes no sense.
Either you document things, and then you have to keep the docume
Excerpts from Samuli Suominen's message of Sat Apr 30 06:39:52 +0200 2011:
> sources.gentoo.org is for that. ChangeLog is for users, and "old" is
> not useful information to them
If this is not useful information, then entry about added files is not
useful either - user see that files are there.
On 04/30/2011 07:45 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Samuli Suominen
> wrote:
>> sources.gentoo.org is for that. ChangeLog is for users, and "old" is
>> not useful information to them
>
> So it follows that users don't need to see when ebuilds were removed?
>
Correc
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> sources.gentoo.org is for that. ChangeLog is for users, and "old" is
> not useful information to them
So it follows that users don't need to see when ebuilds were removed?
On 04/30/2011 07:10 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On 04/29/2011 01:34 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 04/29/2011 09:26 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
>>> "Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" said:
ssuominen11/04/29 18:13:31
Removed: transmission-2.12.ebuild
Log:
dr
On 04/29/2011 01:34 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 04/29/2011 09:26 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
"Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" said:
ssuominen11/04/29 18:13:31
Removed: transmission-2.12.ebuild
Log:
drop old, broken with stable libnotify
(Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha30/
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:40:49PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > On 04/29/2011 09:26 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
> >> "Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" said:
> >>> ssuominen 11/04/29 18:13:31
> >>>
> >>> Removed: transmission-2.12
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 04/29/2011 09:26 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
>> "Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" said:
>>> ssuominen 11/04/29 18:13:31
>>>
>>> Removed: transmission-2.12.ebuild
>>> Log:
>>> drop old, broken with stable libnotify
>>>
>>>
Samuli Suominen said:
> On 04/29/2011 09:26 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
> > "Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" said:
> >> ssuominen11/04/29 18:13:31
> >>
> >> Removed: transmission-2.12.ebuild
> >> Log:
> >> drop old, broken with stable libnotify
> >>
> >> (Portage version: 2.2.
On 04/29/2011 09:26 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
> "Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" said:
>> ssuominen11/04/29 18:13:31
>>
>> Removed: transmission-2.12.ebuild
>> Log:
>> drop old, broken with stable libnotify
>>
>> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha30/cvs/Linux x86_64, RepoMan optio
"Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" said:
> ssuominen11/04/29 18:13:31
>
> Removed: transmission-2.12.ebuild
> Log:
> drop old, broken with stable libnotify
>
> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha30/cvs/Linux x86_64, RepoMan options: --force)
When removing an ebuild, please do do
22 matches
Mail list logo
