Hello.
I found the following bug in debian bugzilla:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=386570
Is this an issue for gentoo? Should I repackage tarball(/convince
upstream to repackage) and exclude this icons sounds from tarball? Or
may be RESTRICT fetch it enough to solve the problem
If you are not a glep author; stop reading now.
This message is to warn anyone trying to write a glep, there is a error
the in the glep template. Bug 152313[1] was filed to address the issue
and I fixed all the GLEPs currently in CVS (this should include all
submitted GLEPs). If you want to auth
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:25:08 +
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was read writing:
> > Any issues with this?
> Yes. Check every previous time this has been discussed on this list.
Seen, thanks... my archives didn't span that far.
Bye,
Michele
--
Oh, so there you are!
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo
On Sunday 25 March 2007 21:46, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 16:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 24 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> > > It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being
> > > dependent upon a single sponsor or corporat
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r3 was added to the tree which fixed the
> virtual/x11 and GCC 4.1 compile issues. It was marked stable on all
> archs except alpha. Someone doing some cleanup accidentally removed it
> from the tree instead of the broken -r2.
This
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 21:57 +0200, Warwick Bruce Chapman wrote:
> Will you be marking linux-headers-2.6.19 stable as well? I really think
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160381 needs some serious attention.
Because of this bug, 2007.0 has dropped soem of the ATM-based support we
had in
Because of this bug, 2007.0 has dropped soem of the ATM-based support we
had in 2006.1, as there comes a time when we simply can't wait for bugs
to get fixed anymore if we ever plan on releasing, and we're already
*way* behind the schedule that we wanted to release under.
Ok, what needs done
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 11:57 +0400, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I found the following bug in debian bugzilla:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=386570
>
> Is this an issue for gentoo? Should I repackage tarball(/convince
> upstream to repackage) and exclude this icons s
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 11:32 +, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru wrote:
> > And how exactly does this help us in the event of say the OSL burning
> > down or the GNi suffering flooding? :)
> For anyone, I can host a mirror for gentoo.org. Just contact me.
It isn't mirrors that we're discussing here.
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 15:19 +0200, Warwick Bruce Chapman wrote:
> > Because of this bug, 2007.0 has dropped soem of the ATM-based support we
> > had in 2006.1, as there comes a time when we simply can't wait for bugs
> > to get fixed anymore if we ever plan on releasing, and we're already
> > *way*
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:07:03 -0400
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran has brought attention to a very important thing -- QA seems to
> take a backseat to a few things, and it is actually a little
> disturbing that it does.
I believe the QA team expect developers to *ask* when they
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:07:03 -0400
> Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ciaran has brought attention to a very important thing -- QA seems to
>> take a backseat to a few things, and it is actually a little
>> disturbing that it does.
>
> I believe the QA team expect developers to *ask*
First off, this is not a discussion on why XML sucks, or why we shouldn't
be using XML or anything like that. This is not a discussion about what
we should be using instead of XML. This is a discussion about using XML
for our webpages.
Many projects have old and nasty webpages. This has been a
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 07:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
"Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:07:03 -0400
> > Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Ciaran has brought attention to a very important thing -- QA seems
> >> to take a backseat to a few things, and it is actually
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:46 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
>
>> And how exactly does this help us in the event of say the OSL burning
>> down or the GNi suffering flooding? :)
>>
>
> Well, we're on the second floor of the data center which has a quite
> large ba
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 08:05 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> So this is getting pretty long winded; my basic question is do you as a
> developer find writing web pages to be confusing or difficult? Is there
> not a good tutorial for learning our webpage XML syntax? Do you find that
> you bump up again
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
> Some breakages, like this one,
There wasn't any additional breakage. Not working and not compiling package
can't be broken any more.
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:47:30 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think this whole idea is a moot point anyways ... go visit the
> Gentoo Foundation web site and see Chapter 2 Section 5
> -mike
> Gentoo is independent
> Gentoo will never be reigned by a company nor be dictated by a
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> People reporting bugs often get annoyed when their bug is marked
> INVALID; especially when they're relatively new to the Gentoo
> Experience. We've all seen it many times, I'm sure.
I know I'm coming in late on this one, but I can see how having a bug
marked as INVALID wi
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 08:05 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> my basic question is do you as a
> developer find writing web pages to be confusing or difficult?
As one who does a fair amount of web development myself. I rather like
the guidexml formatted docs. Writing them is not a big deal at all.
>
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
"Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> do you as a developer find writing web pages to be confusing or
> difficult?
No.
> Is there not a good tutorial for learning our webpage XML syntax?
For my use, I've found the available docs sufficient.
> Do yo
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 15:38 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:07:03 -0400
> Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ciaran has brought attention to a very important thing -- QA seems to
> > take a backseat to a few things, and it is actually a little
> > disturbing that
-Original Message-
From: Alec Warner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 10:06 AM
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] {Guide,Project,Foo}XML too confusing for many devs?
my basic question is do you as a
developer find writing web pages to be confusing
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 16:39 +0100, Richard Brown wrote:
> Hi vapier, thanks for pointing this out. Am I wrong to assume from your
> responses in this thread to ciaranm's "hypothetical" case that the
> current council have not implemented any policy at the instruction of an
> external company or org
On Monday 26 March 2007 15:05, Alec Warner wrote:
> First off, this is not a discussion on why XML sucks, or why we shouldn't
> be using XML or anything like that. This is not a discussion about what
> we should be using instead of XML. This is a discussion about using XML
> for our webpages.
>
>
On Monday 26 March 2007, Alec Warner wrote:
> Many projects have old and nasty webpages. This has been a problem within
> gentoo since before I arrived and probably has been a problem since we
> started having webpages. One of the issues I wish to address is whether
> or not writing webpages in X
Alec Warner escribió:
So this is getting pretty long winded; my basic question is do you as a
developer find writing web pages to be confusing or difficult? Is there
not a good tutorial for learning our webpage XML syntax? Do you find that
you bump up against restrictions in the DTD or other p
Hi,
for those interested, linux.com has a rather long article about the CoC,
carefully worded so the email snippets sound like interview opinions
:-). It seems the open source press will watch this list for some time
to come, I see more articles than usual about Gentoo and the recent
flamewar
On Monday 26 March 2007, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru wrote:
> For anyone, I can host a mirror for gentoo.org. Just contact me.
we're not worried about mirrors, we're worried about the core infrastructure
which really cant be mirrored
if you're offering to host a web node mirror though, please open
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 12:01 -0500, Mike Bonar wrote:
> Should we encourage more content to go into the wiki, expecially
> content that is likely to change over a short period of time?
Gentoo has no wiki.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Ga
[snip]
Err, where the heck has gone the GuideXML editor project that was part
of last SoC?
(And yeah, I've heard from quite a couple of people that they are not
touching any docs because the GuideXML thing is something they'd rather
avoid like plague).
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMA
Jakub Moc escribió:
[snip]
Err, where the heck has gone the GuideXML editor project that was part
of last SoC?
Its name is 'beacon' [1] and is developed by our dev Anant Narayanan who
probably can give you more info about it.
[1] http://code.kix.in/projects/beacon/
--
Jose Luis Rivero <[
* Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07/03/26 08:05 -0700]:
> So this is getting pretty long winded; my basic question is do you as a
> developer find writing web pages to be confusing or difficult?
I'm one of the few people who like XML. Probably it's
because I don't have to care for the design an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
José Luis Rivero (yoswink) napisał(a):
> Alec Warner escribió:
>>
>> So this is getting pretty long winded; my basic question is do you as a
>> developer find writing web pages to be confusing or difficult? Is there
>> not a good tutorial for learning
> Many projects have old and nasty webpages. This has been a problem within
> gentoo since before I arrived and probably has been a problem since we
> started having webpages. One of the issues I wish to address is whether
> or not writing webpages in XML (Guide or Project or something_else) is
>
On Saturday 24 March 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Kevin F. Quinn napsal(a):
> [snip]
>
> See, I don't really care how the reporter feels, if something's not a
> bug, then it's not a bug. Don't invent confusing 'politically correct'
> junk for this just because someone might feel 'offended'.
One issue
On Sunday 25 March 2007, »Q« wrote:
> "Kevin F. Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Closing INVALID is like saying they never had an issue - when clearly
> > they did have an issue, even if it was just an issue of understanding.
>
> If bugs.gentoo.org users think that it's like saying there's no
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 21:46 +0200, Lars Weiler wrote:
> But back to the question you started your message with: The
> outdated project-pages. My opinion is, that GuideXML is not
> the blocker for updating them. It's more a menpower issue.
Exactly.
Even projects that I am heavily involved in, do
On Monday 26 March 2007, Dale wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:46 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> >> And how exactly does this help us in the event of say the OSL burning
> >> down or the GNi suffering flooding? :)
> >
> > Well, we're on the second floor of the data
On Monday 26 March 2007, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 08:05 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> > my basic question is do you as a
> > developer find writing web pages to be confusing or difficult?
>
> As one who does a fair amount of web development myself. I rather like
> the gui
On Monday 26 March 2007, Lars Weiler wrote:
> There are for sure some difficulties with our DTD,
> especially for our project-pages. Adding a news-entry at
> top or putting the elements in a fixed order.
And that is mostly because of the nature of DTD's. As soon as you want to
require items you
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 00:22 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Monday 26 March 2007, Dale wrote:
> > Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:46 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> > >> And how exactly does this help us in the event of say the OSL burning
> > >> down or the GNi sufferi
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Monday 26 March 2007, Dale wrote:
[snip]
Actually the situation is not that hypothetical. Some years ago the datacenter
of the University of Twente (The Netherlands) was set to fire by an angry
systems administrator. The building housed among other infrastructure v
On Monday 26 March 2007, bret curtis wrote:
> Only wimps use tape backup: *real **men* just upload their important
> stuff on *ftp*, and let the rest of the world mirror it. -- LT :1996
actually, i wonder if this would be useful ... we set up a master backup
server where we post raw svn/cvs/etc..
I just realized that there not only doesn't seem to be any consensus
about what the location of /lib/rcscripts should be (as witnessed by
the location where the following packages install
lib64/rcscripts sys-apps/baselayout-1.13.0_alpha12
lib64/rcscripts sys-apps/gawk-3.1.5-r3
lib64/rcscrip
Thanks for all the replies (and the offers of help, very comforting). I
will no longer accept the excuse of 'I can't write GuideXML' since we have
an army of volunteers to GuideXMLify stuff for us :)
As such, I don't need to learn (I know enough to get by, and with this
glep index I'll soon know
On Monday 26 March 2007, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> I just realized that there not only doesn't seem to be any consensus
> about what the location of /lib/rcscripts should be (as witnessed by
> the location where the following packages install
it should be /$(get_libdir)/rcscripts
no one has really
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 26 March 2007, bret curtis wrote:
>> Only wimps use tape backup: *real **men* just upload their important
>> stuff on *ftp*, and let the rest of the world mirror it. -- LT :1996
>
> actually, i wonder if this would be useful ... we set up a master backup
> server
Thomas Rösner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 26 Mar 2007
20:42:40 +0200:
> for those interested, linux.com has a rather long article about the CoC,
> carefully worded so the email snippets sound like interview opinions
> :-). It seems the open source press
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> The first public draft of PMS is open for comment. The PDF is at
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spb/pms.pdf, and will be updated periodically
> as changes are made. Anonymous SVN access to the LaTeX source is
> available; I won't give the URL here since most won't need it and I'd
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:49:52 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 26 March 2007, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> > I just realized that there not only doesn't seem to be any consensus
> > about what the location of /lib/rcscripts should be (as witnessed by
> > the location where th
51 matches
Mail list logo
