Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-18 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:19:20 +0100 Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote: Currently we put portage into /usr/portage and all related stuff is to be in the subfolders there (distfiles, binpkg). I've always myself override these defaults in make.conf to point for /var/portage/ (not

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-18 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:36:18 +0100 Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi, several people have pointed out to me that the 10.0 - 13.0 transition would be a good moment to finally remove the (also in my opinion rather useless) server profiles. The easiest way to do this

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies

2013-08-21 Thread joshua saddler
On Aug 20, 2013, at 11:19 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: My question is, how can we improve our stabilization procedures/policies so we can convince people not to run production servers on ~arch and keep the stable tree more up to date? do the Arch Linux thing…keep just one

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Xorg 1.6/libxcb 1.4 stabilization news item

2009-10-02 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:52:24 +0200 Rémi Cardona r...@gentoo.org wrote: Thanks for the wording, I've somewhat made it a bit stronger. @Dev, please ACK or NAK or whatever. Looks good to me. (Both as a dev and as a PR member.) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone interested in maintaining the Gentoo Handbooks?

2009-10-03 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:54:31 +0100 AllenJB gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk wrote: I have tried to bring up the issues on the docs team list but pretty much get shot down and told everything is fine and dandy. Going to have to call bullshit on this one. Who told you that on the lists? Have you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone interested in maintaining the Gentoo Handbooks?

2009-10-03 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:58:56 +0100 AllenJB gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk wrote: I have no intention of shitting all over anybodys work. My apologies if that was the interpretation. I'm simply escalating an issue I have raised before to somewhere I think it'll get more attention. I realize (now)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone interested in maintaining the Gentoo Handbooks?

2009-10-03 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:45:21 +0300 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: This is actually true. Maybe all devs should have access on docs since the docs teams are dead. I would suggest to let all developers contribute to documentation whether they belong to docs team or not No. Many

[gentoo-dev] Updated handbooks for autobuilds

2009-10-04 Thread Joshua Saddler
There. I did the x86 and amd64 handbooks (networked, anyway; who cares about networkless). They're now ready for the 10th anniversary. I'm pretty sure. I also did the x86 quickinstall handbooks. GDP, and interested devs who can contribute patches to Bugzilla: Please review all the files I

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-09 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:57:07 +0200 Matthias Schwarzott z...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi there! As some of you have waited long for this to happen, sys-apps/openrc-0.5.1 is there. It has a default enabled (eapi-1) useflag oldnet to install the old-style network scripts called net.*. Regardless of

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: package.use.stable.mask

2009-10-11 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:04:50 +0200 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi, lately I spoted that quite few packages have optional parts bit unstable (KDE parts, boinc [i wont stable it until the cuda is, i wont do the work explained bellow :)], kipi,...). I really don't like the

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-13 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:52:06 +0200 Dawid Węgliński c...@gentoo.org wrote: Upstream already provides such a documentation as you can see above. Gentoo provides migration guide. I believe doc team will update use flag description as soon as it's possible. In this case, As soon as it's possible

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-13 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:54:31 +0200 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: I disagree in this place. ~arch is called testing because it actually is about TESTING new versions and packages. You should expect problems and you should be able to recover from them and you should be able to use

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME

2009-10-26 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:11:38 +0200 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: AllenJB wrote: * Why is the developer profile even shown on eselect profile? Wouldn't it be better to keep unsupported profiles off this list. Surely Gentoo devs can cope with setting their profile manually in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla testers wanted - Email send to: no one issue

2009-11-24 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:01:06 + Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote: I too was seeing this at a frequency that was noticeable. In the past week (or more), there has not been any missed emails that I have seen. Did something get changed to fix this issue? Or are we still guessing? It does

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc stabilization todo

2009-12-02 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 02:44:47 + Sylvain Alain d2_rac...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, I think that the best should be to release a migration guide just before the official release and also a news on the first page of Gentoo.org You really should have checked our doc repo before sending

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular project metadata check

2009-12-08 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:20:36 +0100 Thilo Bangert bang...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi all, similarly to the metadata.xml check, the following is a list of small problems related to the project metadata as found in the gentoo CVS repository. Documentation: Only 1 developers signed up

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: QA last rites for x11-wm/ion

2009-12-15 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:09:20 +0100 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: Wasn't there some licence issue with this package, too? Ulrich There was with ion3, yes. It was removed for that reason about 2.5 years ago -- not just Gentoo, but basically all distros pulled it. Upstream went crazy.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns

2009-12-25 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600 Victor Ostorga vosto...@gentoo.org wrote: # Víctor Ostorga vosto...@gentoo.org (23 Dec 2009) # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956 # Removal in 30 days net-dns/ldapdns So what about

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns

2009-12-26 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:47:51 -0600 Victor Ostorga vosto...@gentoo.org wrote: Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc. Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide? Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: MySQL 5.1 bump

2010-02-16 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 06:37:03 -0800 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: On 15.2.2010 22.26, Robin H. Johnson wrote: As soon as the 72 hours on this news announcement are done, I'm going to be unmasking it. I do expect most of the breakage to come from the client libraries, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: MySQL 5.1 bump

2010-02-16 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:20:06 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: Giving the staffing levels of PR vs. the eyes on the -dev ML, I don't see the point either. Yup. Besides, it's not like any of us have commit access to go back and fix something in a news announcement after the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday?

2010-02-28 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:04:04 +0100 Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: On 02/28/10 20:54, Markos Chandras wrote: Do we still have bugdays? Who is taking care of this project and the respective webpage? I think we first need to answer these questions before we even consider resurrect

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: games-fps/openarena

2010-03-03 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:35:10 +0200 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (03 Mar 2010) # Masked for QA, security # # Internal copies of vuln. zlib, jpeg, speex and likely # others # # http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255453 # # Masked

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve circular deps

2010-03-03 Thread Joshua Saddler
On 3 March 2010 19:45, Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: I don't believe we should selectively cripple one GUI toolkit with not having proper printing support out of the box on a desktop profile, while others do, just because maintainers are lazy. It is not something that is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-05 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 19:22:41 +0100 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote: Python 3 is a new major version of Python and is intentionally incompatible with Python 2. Many external modules have not been ported yet to Python 3, so currently Python 3.1 should not be set as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-05 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:52:50 +0200 Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote: I'll give three days max for the suggestions here etc, and then I'll proceed in creating the news item. So I guess it will be committed in a week max. Thanks Feel free to submit some documentation patches now

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-05 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:10:00 +0100 Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: Because 'stable' denotes that it works as intended, that it can be installed easily, etc. All of these are true now for python3. There are applications being written for it. We want to package those too. I'm fine with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-05 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:56:23 +0100 Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: No one has said yet why this is. So . . . direct question, gimme a direct answer: why? Because in my opinion stable means that the people who package this are stating that hey, we did some testing with this, it works

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-07 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:26:24 +0200 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: On 03/07/2010 07:32 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: no need to stabilize experimental python, not even convinced it should be in ~arch yet (but package.masked for testing) I don't think upstream considers python 3

Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-09 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:32:22 -0600 Nathan Zachary nathanzach...@gentoo.org wrote: On 09/03/10 22:08, Sebastian Pipping wrote: Hello! We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump I assume that quite a few of them would be no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-24 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:43:56 +0100 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote: 2010-03-23 20:28:38 Ben de Groot napisał(a): As mentioned in the other thread, this news item should mention that users who do not need python-3 should mask it locally to prevent it from being

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-24 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:14:44 +0100 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote: 2010-03-24 17:57:35 Joshua Saddler napisał(a): On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:43:56 +0100 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote: Python maintainers do not recommend to mask

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-24 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:04:51 +0100 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote: People, don't want Python 3, probably have already masked it. There is no reason to waste Council's time for decision on what sentence should be included in the news item. Not the folks running

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-24 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:12:55 -0500 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:36:52PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: We agree that this is the minimum that should be done. But our Python lead stubbornly refuses to honor this reasonable request. On the other hand, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] List of User projects

2010-03-28 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:09:07 -0700 Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:07:52PM +0200, Rennn 'Necoro' Neumann wrote: Am 28.03.2010 21:04, schrieb Brian Harring: Instead, if the purpose is a thanks, why not every once in a while put up a news item discussing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is Gentoo dying?

2010-04-03 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:16:32 +0200 Tobias Scherbaum dertobi...@gentoo.org wrote: - Our formerly outstanding documentation still is somewhat maintained, but that's it. I haven't seen any new additions (both to our docs, but also to our docs-team) for years. People are constantly asking for a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] an official Gentoo wiki

2010-04-04 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 03:20:53 +0200 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: GuideXML documents are often experienced as an unnecessary barrier. I think you should clearly state again that this is not gonna replace GuideXML, just migrate a few use cases where a wiki fits better. This is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is Gentoo dying?

2010-04-04 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 10:22:06 +0200 Tobias Scherbaum dertobi...@gentoo.org wrote: 5 years ago [...] constantly added [...] You need to clarify your metric. How are you defining constant? How often does a new document need to appear? What mostly happens is steady refinement and expansion of our

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] an official Gentoo wiki

2010-04-04 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 17:23:54 +0200 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: As has been pointed out, your table example was unfair, as they don't do the same thing. I would frown on such inline styling (that's what stylesheets are for), and there are a number of ways you can markup tables in

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] an official Gentoo wiki

2010-04-04 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 02:08:06 +0200 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 4 April 2010 21:33, Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org wrote: Having to write a custom stylesheet just to get one wiki page to do what you want is pretty dumb. Yes it would be. The idea is that you design

Re: [gentoo-dev] Does anyone use the VERIFIED status in bugzilla?

2010-05-14 Thread Joshua Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 14 May 2010 12:45:54 + Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: Following Petteri's thread last month about RESOLVED LATER and given a issue that has been reported to User Relations about the abuse of the VERIFIED status

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo embedded reference accounts?

2010-05-29 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Fri, 28 May 2010 22:47:58 -0700 spinugio spinu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everybody, can I please get some so-to-speak reference accounts of products that are using Gentoo as their embedded Linux distribution of choice? in other words, can you please let me know of any embedded appliance

Re: [gentoo-dev] 'State of Gentoo' BoF session, Linux Symposium 2010.

2010-07-11 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 01:30:08 -0400 Jacob Godserv jacobgods...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 13:19, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm running a BoF session during the Linux Symposium 2010 in Ottawa next week, entitled 'State of Gentoo'. I've had my own uneducated

Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook

2012-03-28 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:49:00 +0200 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello I am a bit surprised handbook still doesn't suggest people to create a separate partition for /usr/portage tree. I remember my first Gentoo systems had it inside / and that lead to a lot of fragmentation, much

[gentoo-dev] ipv6 documentation: net-dns/totd substitutes

2010-07-18 Thread Joshua Saddler
Hey folks, thought I'd ask here, since I can't find answers on what's maintained in our ipv6 packages. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326771 asks for updates to our sadly neglected ipv6 guide (http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ipv6.xml). I removed the note that said to keyword net-dns/totd,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Updated handbooks for autobuilds

2010-07-20 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 11:42:13 -0700 Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org wrote: There. I did the x86 and amd64 handbooks (networked, anyway; who cares about networkless). They're now ready for the 10th anniversary. I'm pretty sure. I also did the x86 quickinstall handbooks. It's been several

Re: [gentoo-dev] Updated handbooks for autobuilds

2010-07-20 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:11:10 -0400 Richard Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Is the process for creating these documented somewhere? I did some googling and couldn't really find any documentation on how our stages and liveCDs are built in the first place. There are some generic catalyst

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item announcing as-needed (glep 42 stuff)

2010-07-26 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:44:36 -0700 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: This might be a bit unclear to less savvy users. How about just make sure your LDFLAGS in /etc/make.conf contains -Wl,--as-needed or is unset? Instead of saying overriding, I'd say something more similar to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the Get Gentoo page

2010-08-16 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:34:08 +0300 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: You should talk directly to the teams how are responsible for this part of the webpage like dosc or pr teams Common misconception. Neither the GDP, PR, or even Releng is directly responsible for those pages, though

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the Get Gentoo page

2010-08-16 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:43:06 -0700 Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org wrote: That said, I've been looking at the proposed changes, so I'll be implementing some or all of them soon, probably today, time permitting. I'm not going to be able to get to this, so anyone else with commit access

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the Get Gentoo page

2010-08-17 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:24:45 -0700 Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: I have access to main/en and I am willing to do website stuff; just nothing with a quick turnaround. I know guidexml and enough xsl to be dangerous. Excellent. I've been the defacto www@ team for as long as I can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-08-24 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:30:20 -0400 Richard Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Looking at the tracker bug, I see all of three issues blocking openrc from going stable. One is documentation, It seems like we should just make the next bugday OpenRC Cleanup Day or something like that. Everybody

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-08-24 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:18:56 +0200 Christian Faulhammer fa...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi, Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org: The big issue with the docs is that IF OpenRC/baselayout-2 are marked stable, it will require massive changes to hundreds of our other doc files. Is there a list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-08-24 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:57:46 -0500 Nathan Zachary nathanzach...@gentoo.org wrote: I don't think that the documentation changes should be a determining factor in switching to OpenRC. If we are going to endorse using OpenRC, the more relevant issues are the ones regarding its future

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc stabilization update

2010-09-20 Thread Joshua Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 06:46:21 -0400 Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote: Why can't we keep both? There are strong advantages/disadvantages either way and there are users invested in both new/oldnet. I know this is more work on doc

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc: oldnet vs newnet

2010-09-20 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:16:08 -0500 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: All, I want to start a new thread since the discussion on openrc is centering on whether we should use oldnet, newnet, or keep both. Use oldnet. Why? 1. We already have a migration guide setup for it:

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc stabilization update

2010-09-26 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:37:35 -0400 Jacob Godserv jacobgods...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: man, fix your line length. what a nub you are. Or adjust your mail client. Then you could save yourself the name calling, which

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc stabilization update

2010-09-26 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:32:49 -0700 Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: because he's a stupid nub -mike NO U Is that pronounced 'nub' or 'noob' ? Man I should really go to SCALE next year :X We got the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:13:03 -0800 Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote: On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:58:20 +0100 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: So we have some automatic reporting. Can we have a webpage for that, or a mailing list that people can subscribe to? Mailing list: http://bugs.gentoo.org/329165 I have no idea how to go about doing an automated

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Installer (text-based)

2011-02-09 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:42:52 +0100 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: Can anaconda give the user a shell at any point of the installation? Is it possible to manually skip the automated steps? Last I checked, Anaconda was designed for binary installations, originally for RPM-based

Re: [gentoo-dev] Wiki status

2011-02-28 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 01:17:18 +0100 Stefan Behte cr...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi list, seeing Donnie link to a GSOC page on en.gentoo-wiki.com, I was wondering about the status of our own, gentoo-hosted wiki. When gentoo-wiki.com had its major failure, I was very frustrated and thus have some

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for sys-kernel-usermode-sources

2011-04-13 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:31:18 -0400 Daniel Gryniewicz d...@gentoo.org wrote: # Daniel Gryniewicz d...@gentoo.org (13 Apr 2011) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Functionality is merged into and maintained in # the upstream kernel. Use any kernel (e.g. gentoo-sources) instead.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: split up media-sound/ category

2011-06-22 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:24:07 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello, As we discussed for a while, the media-sound/ category has grown very large and it may be a good idea to split it. Right now, it contains audio players, editing software, converters, sound systems and a lot

Re: [gentoo-dev] The Python problem

2011-06-28 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:49:23 -0400 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: if you dont want multiple builds on your system, then dont install multiple versions of python. -mike This would be nice, but unfortunately the python maintainer forced 3.x on everyone, despite the fact that nothing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/dhcpv6

2011-07-15 Thread Joshua Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:05:42 +0300 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (10 Jul 2011) # Dead upstream. Bugs #353788 and #348232 # Alternatives: #

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/dhcpv6

2011-07-15 Thread Joshua Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:59:29 +0300 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: # Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (10 Jul 2011) # Dead upstream. Bugs #353788 and #348232 # Alternatives: # net-misc/dibbler # net-misc/dhcp[ipv6] # Masked

[gentoo-dev] Re: mesa r600 gallium news item

2011-08-26 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:12:22 +0200 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello, Please see the attached news item for review. The news item should be published before mesa-7.11 goes stable. Corresponding bug report: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377349 Best

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc: use iproute2 for all network handling in linux

2011-11-11 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:53:44 -0600 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi all, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389437 has prompted a discussion of whether or not we should use ifconfig in openrc to configure networking on linux systems. I'm not asking that we consider