Ben de Groot wrote:
On 12 April 2010 15:22, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowse wrote:
On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowsewrote:
[...]
If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I thin
On 12 April 2010 15:22, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowse wrote:
>> On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowse wrote:
>>> [...]
If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong.
Gentoo
On 12/04/2010 14:22, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowse wrote:
On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowsewrote:
[...]
If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong.
Gentoo knows about the unofficial
On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowse wrote:
> On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>>
>> On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowse wrote:
>> [...]
>>>
>>> If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong.
>>> Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission
On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowse wrote:
[...]
If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong.
Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission is to help
Gentoo and not to hinder it. Gentoo hardly makes a habi
On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowse wrote:
[...]
> If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong.
> Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission is to help
> Gentoo and not to hinder it. Gentoo hardly makes a habit of Apple-like
> litigation when tryin
On 12/04/2010 12:32, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 12 April 2010 12:28, Roy Bamford wrote:
Last time I looked, his about page complies with our trade mark
requirements.
But ONLY his about page. Our name and logo guidelines state this needs
to happen on each page:
the website clearly states, on ea
On 12 April 2010 12:28, Roy Bamford wrote:
>
> Last time I looked, his about page complies with our trade mark
> requirements.
But ONLY his about page. Our name and logo guidelines state this needs
to happen on each page:
> the website clearly states, on each page, that the project is no officia
On 2010.04.09 07:34, Duncan wrote:
> Patrick Nagel posted on Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:42:40 +0800 as excerpted:
[snip]
> Likewise, Gentoo's uncomfortable officially linking to something they
> don't control in any way, shape, or form (except to the extent that
> we could arguably pull his domain name
Here's one possible use-case.
For me, I would consider moving
http://dev.gentoo.org/~mpagano/genpatches/index.htm to the official wiki so
that other people in the kernel herd can update it.
If the updating could be scripted, of course.
I would not have considered it for an unofficial wiki runn
Allen, if you don't have anything constructive to add, then please
refrain from adding to this thread.
Thanks,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Qt project lead developer
Gentoo Wiki project lead
On 09/04/2010 18:24, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 06:02:40PM +0100, George Prowse wrote:
On 09/04/2010 13:38, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 9 April 2010 13:26, Guy Fontaine wrote:
There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to share my
knowledge with others a
On 09/04/10 18:24, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
> Really? I understood it as the wiki being an all-purposes wiki, meaning users
> could (would and should) create articles on how to get some application
> running or how to get some setting working, and the developers will have
> their own "sectio
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 06:02:40PM +0100, George Prowse wrote:
> On 09/04/2010 13:38, Ben de Groot wrote:
> > On 9 April 2010 13:26, Guy Fontaine wrote:
> >> There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to share my
> >> knowledge with others as well as I'm glad to learn from others.
On 09/04/2010 13:38, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 9 April 2010 13:26, Guy Fontaine wrote:
There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to share my
knowledge with others as well as I'm glad to learn from others. I'm not a
Gentoo dev and I neither have plan nor wish to be.
My feeling i
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 9 April 2010 14:35, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
>> See? This is the problem. Every time comes an initiative to introduce
>> official
>> Gentoo infra hosted Gentoo Wiki (yes, the one that won't loose randomly all
>> its contents) - there's lack
On 9 April 2010 14:35, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> See? This is the problem. Every time comes an initiative to introduce official
> Gentoo infra hosted Gentoo Wiki (yes, the one that won't loose randomly all
> its contents) - there's lack of interest of cooperation from already existing
> unofficial
On 9 April 2010 13:26, Guy Fontaine wrote:
> There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to share my
> knowledge with others as well as I'm glad to learn from others. I'm not a
> Gentoo dev and I neither have plan nor wish to be.
>
> My feeling is that Gentoo Wiki Project is just
On Friday 09 of April 2010 13:26:16 Guy Fontaine wrote:
> There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to share my
> knowledge with others as well as I'm glad to learn from others. I'm not a
> Gentoo dev and I neither have plan nor wish to be.
>
> My feeling is that Gentoo Wiki Proje
There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to share my
knowledge with others as well as I'm glad to learn from others. I'm not a
Gentoo dev and I neither have plan nor wish to be.
My feeling is that Gentoo Wiki Project is just but another occasion for
debating rules and politics
Hi,
On 2010-04-08 19:51 UTC Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:12:49 +0200
>
> Ben de Groot wrote:
> > After the mostly positive feedback on the recent wiki discussion, we
> > have now gone ahead, formed a preliminary team consisting of both
> > users and developers, and put up a project p
Indeed, that's why I don't want to have a wiki for devs only. The Gentoo wiki
must be for the community and by the community :P
There are many Gentoo experts that don't want to be officially devs.
d2_racing
> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
> From: dirtye...@gentoo.org
> Subject: [gentoo-dev]
The official wiki can be use by powerusers who want to write some pretty good
doc.
A lot of powerusers can write excellent doc on the gentoo forum right now, so
they don't need to by Gentoo Dev to right excellent stuff.
I don't see your point.
> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
> From: dir
On 8 April 2010 21:51, Ryan Hill wrote:
> why are we setting up a user wiki when a very popular one already exists?
Because some devs request things like this:
> can we can lock certain pages down to dev edits only?
In our wiki we will be able to.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Qt project lea
24 matches
Mail list logo
