-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
R Hill wrote:
Craig Lawson wrote:
Comments?
This subject has also been brought up on the forum[1] very recently.
There have been some interesting ideas and alternatives posed that seem
workable. I was hoping some of the developers, if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Whoopse, should have gone to gentoo-portage-dev, my bad ;)
Alec Warner wrote:
This is basically a resubmission of Genone's file format merger [1].
The code to handle digests and manifests is currently being designed and
rewritten. As such we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico wrote:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102073
Author: Zac Medico
Some refactoring could help make the emerge code more maintainable. I
have written a trivial patch that encapsulates the spinner code into an
object. This
Christopher Korn wrote:
Hi Jason and other folks,
I saw your last comment on
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73350 about most the these
feature to be present in the next major version. That is really
great to read.
On that subject, I'd like to have an idea about when we should
expect
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 17 September 2005 01:59, Paul Varner wrote:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90680
Author: Paul Varner
The current implementation of gentoolkit creates a portage.config object
for every package object that it
Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 11:31:32PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 16:13:06 -0500 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| A) would like to hear what you think is required planning wise
| compared to the previous haubi prototype patch.
There has been
is bound to run into. If it's so
hard that's it's impossible then maybe I should just give up now
What sort of plan do you suggest?
On 10/5/05, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 11:31:32PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 21:39:49 -0500 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| So bluntly, shut up and let those who you think are being retarded,
| be retarded. Discussions on this list regarding those attempts
| shouldn't be heckled unless you're contributing to those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:40:26PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
I've moved trunk/ to branches/2.1-experimental/ and branches/2.0 to trunk/.
Make sure to update before doing any changes...
i thought 2.1 / trunk was dead ?
in it. This is not meant to be official documentation,
although my hope is that the wiki may later help to fluff up the docs,
kind of like the User Comments section in php documentation :)
Alec Warner (antarus)
Marco Morales wrote:
where in the page is the savior portage code related stuff?...
On Sat, Nov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This patch should cover the backport of 3.0's plugin framework. Mostly
needed to backport a few utils, which were stuck in portage_util.py. A
few extra files ( portage_plugins and portage_modules ) were taken
wholesale. Also a small addition to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian asked me to split this up, and the first patch had some
cruft...and I broke things, both from old messing around. So I started
with a clean installed of rc7, hopefully these are a bit better.
One patch is for the backend stuff,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:00:07 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Why introduce a feature which is crippled? It would be almost as
| easy to allow ebuilds to mess with their 'real' runtime dependency
| value as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:42:14 -0500 Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:00:07 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| wrote:
| | Why introduce a feature which is crippled
to refer people to :p
- -Alec Warner (Antarus)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQIVAwUBQ5WGIGzglR5RwbyYAQKUyw/8DzLWhxIUX8fwp0UdbGq1nlX7PQw/InBx
GZxA9xZOEMdIff72vZCWEbJBkIQVC5eHS
people using
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS and yell at them? :)
zmedico if ACCEPT_KEYWORDS in os.environ: print dumbass
Any reasons/opinions against adding something like this?
- -Alec Warner (antarus)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Disclaimer: This is nowhere near done, mostly looking to start a
conversation with people about stuff it's missing, and ways to improve,
mostly it was a proof of concept. However please try it out and play
with it a bit, find issues, etc..
included
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Author: ferringb
Date: 2006-01-04 08:57:07 + (Wed, 04 Jan 2006)
New Revision: 2522
Modified:
main/trunk/pym/portage_dep.py
Log:
el buggo pointed out via spyderous.
|| ( a ( x? ( b ) y? ( c ) ) )
- -x -y , was resulting in || ( a () )
the main
it wouldn't nuke existing entries in the pmask file.
Comments welcome as usual.
Alec Warner (antarus)
pgpe9C7P88z5H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
My Apologies, KMail died, and when I restarted it it had the mail but stripped
the attachment ;)
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: /etc/portage/profile/{pmask,arch.list, categories}
Date: Monday 09 January 2006 09:59
From: Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gentoo-portage-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
config has two sets of environment + use stuff.
one is called configlist, the other configdict. They are essentially
copies of each other, and since for me dicts with named keys are easier,
plus the old code was written crappily and is hard for me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 19 January 2006 19:39, Mike Frysinger wrote:
here's what i was talking about when i mentioned the mutate() idea
tested and it works for me ... binary is built properly and environment.bz2
contains the correct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
Yo.
Looking to integrate confcache support into trunk some time in the
near future- had users testing it for about 2 months (give or take),
so far it's behaved pretty decently. A few packages eat themselves
when ran
]. Then
Swegener came out and said it was going away[3].
So I ask, which is it, and if the behavior is going away, why not the
check in repoman now ;)
- -Alec Warner
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79337
[2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-devm=111750102823602w=2
[3] http
to allow this option?
If in doubt, file one and if it isn't one we can always close it later.
Just double check that you can reproduce the outcome.
Is there a reason you can't just alias it?
Er, if it's a bug it's a bug ;) Although that is probably a solution in
the meantime :)
- -Alec
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 13:44, Alec Warner wrote:
Well that problem would be, no one wants to modify everything in
app-portage/ :). If my portage EAPI is 1, but my tools don't support
processing +- in IUSE, how does EAPI help me here? The support check
is only
Zac Medico has graciously done a pre5 release of the 2.1 tree and placed
it in his dev space and on the mirrors. The ebuild is not currently in
the portage tree, but please feel free to test it prior to it's actual
release. The intent here is to hopefully catch any show stopping bug
prior to
Paul Varner wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:07 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
Your testing is appreciated.
I'll file a bug for this one, once I investigate further. 'genlop -t'
doesn't get along with it very well.
# genlop -t screen
* app-misc/screen
snip
Thu Dec 15 23:10:28 2005 app
Please review for badness, otherwise I'll commit this soon ;)
--- portage.py 2006-01-15 00:08:06.170717008 -0500
+++ - 2006-01-15 00:22:00.597106000 -0500
@@ -931,17 +931,8 @@
self.use_defs = copy.deepcopy(clone.use_defs)
self.usemask =
Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 25 February 2006 10:40, Alec Warner wrote:
Please review for badness, otherwise I'll commit this soon ;)
- self.backupenv = os.environ.copy()
- self.configlist.append(self.backupenv) # XXX Why though?
- self.configdict[backupenv]=self.configlist[-1
Marius Mauch wrote:
Does that mean we should drop the SVN branch?
Marius
I've already removed it from the documentation and added links to
Brian's current work on ge.org. As far as the actual repo, I think
keeping it around a bit longer might be beneficial, but who knows.
The kernel ( along with QA ) has reported that the portage generated $KV
is sometimes quite horribly wrong. They would like us to retire the
kernel generated $KV, ebuilds that need $KV should inherit linux-info,
unless they are themselves a kernel-module, in which case they should
inherit
? Normalizing does two
things, reduces redundant data, and increases database speed as tables
are designed in a manner that minimalizes merging time.
Running with a schema you pulled out of your ass is likely to give poor
database performance.
-Alec Warner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
tvali wrote:
Can someone tell me, which portage python commands should be used or
which kind of file created, if i'm going to test this idea? -- in
beginning, i would like to just add simple deps - are ebuilds the only
place to change and is there any clear doc of them [as i wouldnt like to
+# Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006
+
+from output import *
+import string
+
+allowed_filename_chars=a-zA-Z0-9._-+:
+version=1.2
+
+ Repoman's short action modes
+shortmodes={ci:commit}
+
+ Help for each of Repoman's action modes
+modeshelp={
+scan : Scan directory tree for QA issues (default),
+fix
Sorry, send with wrong address earlier.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon?
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 20:09:06 -0400
From: Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN
Zac Medico wrote:
This kind of thing will be less of a problem if we shorten the period of the
release cycle. If we shorted it to 2 months or so, then it won't matter much
when something gets bumped to the next cycle.
Also this isn't exactly news to you all as I sent my intentions
Brian Harring wrote:
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 05:15:53PM +0200, Philipp Riegger wrote:
On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:26 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
We have a new cache format, confcache, parallel fetch, etc... The
bonus
is these features are already mature and relatively old ( a year +
as of
now
Simon Stelling wrote:
Hey all,
I'm just wading through a list of ~200 bugs of which some need decisions
what
should be done, whether it should be done at all or simply whether it is
a bug
or not.
Bug: SRC_URI: spaces not supported
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102607
Is this a
Simon Stelling wrote:
Next bunch of bugs that need a decision:
Bug: portage: emerge unmerge ... should stop in case of an error
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118515
Another WONTFIX/WILLFIX issue
Bug: need a way to package.unmask packages in profiles
Philipp Riegger wrote:
On Apr 15, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Duncan wrote:
But i really think this is not about helping but about confusion. If i
post my emerge --info you don't know if i really use confcache even
if i
have FEATURES=confcache, because emerge --info does not say if i have
emerged
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 23 April 2006 12:36, Alec Warner wrote:
Modified:
main/trunk/bin/sed
Log:
Make sed wrapper not executable.
why ? it isnt hurting anything to be set executable
-mike
At present it is not in the pre9 tarball. However it is in SVN, so it
will make
Is there any chance you can break this up? Mostly one patch for each *
below? OTherwise it's rather large ( 1000 lines ) and is difficult to
figure out what/when/where happened
m h wrote:
Upon further testing, I'm updating a line in the patch
On 4/28/06, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
I noticed that this patch won't apply to the new portage (pre10 broke
it). Should I be working against that or different code (from the cvs
tree perhaps)? (I'd like to get a patch in that people can try before
it becomes outdated).
On 4/29/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
A bunch of bugs have been fixed with both of these lately, anyone
against splitting them out, please speak up now, otherwise I will split
them out later this week and portage will depend on some nasty virtual
whose name I have not come up with yet ( new style virtual ).
-Antarus
--
Per some discussion on IRC, I am bring stablizing 2.1 at the pre9 or
pre10 branch to the table. Reasons for doing so include:
2006.1 - They say if 2.1 is to be in 2006.1, mid-july
Xorg Modular - They cannot stable xorg modular until 2.1 is stable
FreeBSD - Their entire port depends on features
Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote:
Alec Warner schrieb:
Why Branch at 2.1_pre9?
Manifest2 is already in the tree and needs refinement. Branching at
pre7 is also a canidate, but i would rather press for keeping manifest2
# Portage has 3 security levels that depend on the uid and gid of the main
# process and are assigned according to the following table:
#
# Privileges secpass uidgid
# normal 0anyany
# group 1anyportage_gid
# super 20 any
#
# If the
Paul Dlug wrote:
On 6/6/06, *Grant Goodyear* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Dlug wrote:
The following patch upgrades www-apache/mod_jk to 1.2.15 (current
latest
available version in portage is 1.2.13 which has numerous evil bugs).
This is my
Now I get it. So could somebody add a line to
make.conf.example that says which features are on by
default? I didn't notice strict was on.
We can't tell you that, FEATURES are stacked, first make.defaults, and
then from your profile setting; aka the default FEATURES are only known
at runtime
Since you're sliding this in, why not slide it in using use dep
syntax?
No, not going to fight over this not being in package.mask, what I'm
saying is this _is_ masking of a use dep atom, just use use dep syntax
in the file instead.
If y'all get use deps, it'll be a bit simpler for folks
Paul Bredbury wrote:
Hi, I was directed to this list after my Portage patches were rejected.
I'm hoping that someone *other* than the rejecter will look at the bug,
and: See it as a valid bug, reopen it, and take SpanKY's keyboard away
so he can't reject it again.
The bug is:
Paul Bredbury wrote:
There is a third option. Reporting an error.
But it is not an error. The answer is known to be False, through the
application of logic.
There are really 3 states here
Either you have enough information to prove something true; OR
you have enough information to prove
Zac Medico wrote:
Users can unforce them via /etc/portage/profile/{use.force,package.use.force}
in the usual -flag way.
Why new files? Why isn't this just pushed into the use stacking order
over-ridable by the user (default USE flags, and not forcing)?
Then they can over-ride it in
Zac Medico wrote:
Alec Warner wrote:
Zac Medico wrote:
Users can unforce them via
/etc/portage/profile/{use.force,package.use.force} in the usual -flag
way.
Why new files? Why isn't this just pushed into the use stacking order
over-ridable by the user (default USE flags, and not forcing
So I have implemented merging of sets (more or less) in a local portage
branch. However there are some use cases for which the appopriate
action is ambiguous.
Use Case #1:
Set1 = { postfix, gentoolkit, lsof, bind-utils, vixie-cron }
A set of standard tools to be on a machine. Assume a new
excludes GIT, since it's a huge
non-standard piece of crap./bias
I may work on fixing that code up and putting it into HEAD before I retire.
-Alec Warner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 25-11-2006 03:00:10 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
Fabian Groffen wrote:
Hi all,
Please find attached the patch of the prefix repoman sources against the
current trunk. I hope I removed all hunks that have prefix-only
changes.
You realize I wrote generic SCM support
Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Barkalow wrote:
If the configuration has keywords foo bar, and a package has -foo
bar, mask the package (masked by -bar keyword).
This is the sensible behavior if we ever make use of listing multiple
keywords in the
Marius Mauch wrote:
Sometimes a package has to depend on a specific version of a slotted package
being the active one to build correctly, like in the current tr1
discussion on -dev [1] or with packages that depend on the running kernel.
Currently this isn't really possible, however I while
Hmm; one could get the same benefit by introducing a new interface
(e.g. pkg_env_check()) which is defined to return true if the
environment is ok, false otherwise (with some text to stdout, perhaps).
The package manager would then run this function, after building the
depgraph and
Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:06:51 +0100
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea is to add a special category (let's call it active for
now) that has the following properties:
- this category doesn't exist in portdir or vdb (= no ebuilds)
- when portage
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:27:10 -0500
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm; one could get the same benefit by introducing a new interface
(e.g. pkg_env_check()) which is defined to return true if the
environment is ok, false otherwise (with some text to stdout
In order to facilitate better ease of use with phase hooks, I propose a
paludis-style default phase hook. Basically ebuild.sh provides a default
hook that looks in PORTAGE_HOOKS_DIR/{pre,post}_${EBUILD_PHASE}/ for shell
scripts and sources them.
The patch to ebuild.sh only generates hooks 1
Ryan Hill wrote:
Hey all.
I'd like to add two warnings to the QA GCC warning message reporter for
GCC 4.2.
The first is a new warning that is given when GCC makes an optimization
assuming that overflow for operations on signed ints is undefined, as
per the standard. Apparently a lot of
I've gone ahead and ported the namespace changes for HEAD into gentoolkit
so it can now import modules properly. If the new-style modules fail it
will fall back to the old-n-busted import style, keeping backwards
compatability for people with different portage versions.
I also removed the string
There have been various efforts to add localization for errors and
other portage messages.
The codebase is not well designed for it though, and the people who
want it done keep getting busy with other tasks, so it mostly lies
unused.
On 10/19/07, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis [EMAIL
On 10/24/07, Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As package sets are mostly done now, I'm starting to think about
something else. One of my pet peeves with portage is the packages
file in profiles, for several reasons:
1) it has two completely independent purposes
ok
2) it implements a
On 11/4/07, Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
the current interface to use flags, useq, usev, use_with, use_enable, as
defined in /usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh lacks generality. The common
thing is testing a use flag and possibly echoing a string, but there
On 3/14/08, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 14 March 2008, Alec Warner wrote:
On 3/14/08, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 13 March 2008, Steve Dibb wrote:
Because package.mask in CVS for profiles is so huge, I think it might
help it to get
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
Please consider a new eapi profile configuration file that will
designate the EAPI to which any package atoms within a given layer
of the profile stack must
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Amit Dor-Shifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there syntax in eix for querying: is package X installed with a version
X.Y or higher?
Amit
portageq has_version / ATOM
René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
Amit Dor-Shifer schrieb:
Thanks :)
Reason I thought this
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Tambet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/12/2 Emma Strubell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
True, true. Like I said, I don't really use overlays, so excuse my
igonrance.
Do you know an order of doing things:
Rules of Optimization:
Rule 1: Don't do it.
Rule 2 (for experts
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Tambet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/12/2 Emma Strubell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
True, true. Like I said, I don't really use overlays, so excuse my
igonrance.
Do you know an order of doing things:
Rules of Optimization
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Douglas Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Michael Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had the same idea and even began working on a roadmap for it.
Step 1: move gentoolkit to site-packages
Step 2: move individual command classes to
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Douglas Anderson d...@gendja.com wrote:
Hi all,
It's been a few months since we first discussed refactoring equery on
this list and I think made pretty good time and I'm reasonably happy
with it. So I'm throwing out to you all. I've tried to keep a running
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lucian Poston wrote:
The following patchs add a library dependency rebuilder as a package
set, @missing-rebuild, to portage-2.2_rc6. Similar to the --library
flag in
My first guess is 'no one.' I'd try devmanual.gentoo.org over
anything in /proj/en/devrel/, however developer relations owns stuff
in /proj/en/devrel, so if there are incorrect things in it you
probably want to file bugs at bugs.gentoo.org against devrel for
changes.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Amit Dor-Shifer ami...@oversi.com wrote:
Hi all.
While working on my overlay, I stumbled on an issue where qfile refused to
acknowledge an installed file as being part of my package.
Looking into q's implementation (portage-utils-0.1.29), I see:
amit0
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:33 AM, René 'Necoro' Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Börjesson schrieb:
# emerge -1av bacon
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted
20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
22:17:41 +0200:
Why
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
Duncan wrote:
Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Amit Dor-Shiferami...@oversi.com wrote:
amit0 ~ # ls -la /var/db/pkg/var
ls: cannot access /var/db/pkg/var: No such file or directory
amit0 ~ # ls -la /var/db/pkg/tmp
ls: cannot access /var/db/pkg/tmp: No such file or directory
amit0 ~ # portageq match
Ugh I hate this list name ;p
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org
Date: Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:38 AM
Subject: Random patch
To: gentoo-dev-port...@gentoo.org
Get rid of if True...True is always true in CPython.
replace icky:
'foo' + \
'bar'
constructs
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Mikko Rinne mikko.ri...@tnnet.fi wrote:
Hey,
It's my first time I'm mailing to this list so be warned.
I have a problem with GFS2. In the past there's been sys-fs/gfs2 ebuild
available in the portage, but for now it's been removed as one of it's
dependencies
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/27/2010 01:25 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 11/26/10 21:18, Zac Medico wrote:
The asciidoc format seems nice, but personally, I think I prefer docbook
since the SGML/XML approach seems more flexible and extensible.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Saturday, November 27, 2010 16:39:04 Alec Warner wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
As it is, I'm fairly comfortable with docbook. Now you want me to learn
a new format, with possible drawbacks
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 21:27:39 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Provide public-domain implementation of the Whirlpool hash algorithm to
be used as new Manifest2 hash.
Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/02/2011 05:46 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 09:40:13PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
If we control these hashes via metadata/layout.conf, then we can toggle
it atomically for all commiters. Otherwise,
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
bin/isolated-functions.sh | 2 +-
bin/portageq | 8
pym/portage/output.py | 6 ++
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Paul Varner fuzzy...@gentoo.org wrote:
All:
(Apologies if you get this twice. I never saw my initial send of the
message hit the mailing list)
Sending this here before I send to the gentoo-dev list. Below is the
list of packages that are managed by the
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Christian Ruppert id...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 07/17/12 at 03:48PM -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
All:
(Apologies if you get this twice. I never saw my initial send of the
message hit the mailing list)
Sending this here before I send to the gentoo-dev list. Below
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El sáb, 22-09-2012 a las 13:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
On Friday 21 September 2012 15:08:20 Pacho Ramos wrote:
In that one, we try to use the following:
has vala ${IUSE//+/} ! use vala return 0
inherit eutils
LGTM
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 18:28 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Use $BASHPID which will be unique even in subshells.
URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/487478
---
bin/phase-helpers.sh | 17 +++--
1 file
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Greg Turner g...@malth.us wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
+ sed -i \
+ -e
1s:^#![[:space:]]*/bin/sh:#!$CONFIG_SHELL: \
+
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Greg Turner g...@malth.us wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
Sed is already atomic
antarus@goats5 /tmp/test $ cat foo
Debian Rocks!
antarus@goats5 /tmp/test $ strace -e trace=file sed -i -e
's/Debian/Gentoo/g
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
First off, I know many of you think portage needs to do everything on
it's own. NO outside dependencies.
BUT! Please hear me out.
While working on many of gentoo's tools gentoolkit's equery, eclean,
enalyze, Layman,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
---
bin/repoman | 53 +
man/repoman.1 | 4
2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
I urge you to not author new checks like this. /usr/bin/repoman is already
a mess.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Alexander Berntsen alexan...@plaimi.netwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
We have quite a few dedicated developers now. To ensure that good
taste is exercised, and that best practices are followed, patches
should be signed.
I'm
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 7:07 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
The current fetch() function is quite long, which makes it hard to
know what I can change without adverse side effects. By pulling this
logic out of the main function, we get clearer logic in fetch() and
more explicit
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
