On 03/04/2024 19:53, Jack wrote:
Are you certain it hasn't started on some TTY other than 8? I always
start out on TTY1, although I start up text only, no SDDM. However, I do
have a very vague memory of something similar, and I believe it was that
I needed to change one of the kernel FB
Hoël Bézier wrote:
>> However, it does wake up if I switch to another TTY (e.g.
>> ctrl+alt+F4) and lets me log on, so it has obviously booted up. If I
>> switch back to TTY 8 from there it just shows a blinking cursor (i.e.
>> not SDDM, which is what I'd expect). If I reboot from the TTY that
>>
However, it does wake up if I switch to another TTY (e.g. ctrl+alt+F4) and lets
me log on, so it has obviously booted up. If I switch back to TTY 8 from there
it just shows a blinking cursor (i.e. not SDDM, which is what I'd expect). If I
reboot from the TTY that lets me log on, the boot
On 4/3/24 2:29 PM, Markus Gustafsson wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a problem I'm not quite sure how to tackle: every other
startup or so results in a black screen. Usually nothing gets printed
(no bios splash, not GRUB menu, no OpenRC prints), and the monitor
goes to low power mode after a while (I
Hi,
I'm having a problem I'm not quite sure how to tackle: every other startup or
so results in a black screen. Usually nothing gets printed (no bios splash, not
GRUB menu, no OpenRC prints), and the monitor goes to low power mode after a
while (I haven't quite confirmed if this is actually
On 03.04.24 09:40, Michael wrote:
In case you haven't done it yet, if you rebuild the toolchain things should
hopefully self-correct on your system:
emerge --sync
emerge -1av sys-devel/binutils
emerge -1av --nodeps sys-devel/gcc
Use 'gcc-config -l' to check you are using the correct gcc
Hi Vit
I presume you plan to have a single boot partition that will contain your
bootloader, kernel and initramfs. There are actually two kinds of boot
partitions that are commonly used together:
1. The EFI system partition (ESP) contains Linux and Windows's bootloaders.
It's formatted as FAT.
2.
On Wednesday, 3 April 2024 16:10:41 BST Vít Smolík wrote:
> Hello fellow Gentooers,
>
> I want to dual-boot Gentoo and M$ Windows on my computer, but windows only
> created a 100MB EFI partition. Is it necessary to resize it so my boot
> files will fit? If so - how to resize it so I don't mess up
Do you store your initramfs on the 100mb partition? Or do you stire it
somewhere else?
May the Force be with you,
Vít Smolík.
Dne st 3. 4. 2024 17:35 uživatel Alexis Praga
napsal:
> Hi Vit,
>
> I have a dual boot with a 100Mb EFI partition. It works fine, except there
> isn’t enough place for
Hi Vit,
I have a dual boot with a 100Mb EFI partition. It works fine, except there
isn’t enough place for both old and new kernels for upgrading. So I moved the
old kernel from /boot into a safe directory before upgrading.
Maybe not the best strategy but I didn’t dare resize it.
Alexis
On
Hello fellow Gentooers,
I want to dual-boot Gentoo and M$ Windows on my computer, but windows only
created a 100MB EFI partition. Is it necessary to resize it so my boot
files will fit? If so - how to resize it so I don't mess up my Windows EFI
files?
--
May the Force be with you,
Vít Smolík.
I am a html meta data bot
The human you are trying to contact is unavailable.
The human you are trying to contact is purchasing a product from a grocery business with a credit card with php computer data
The human you are trying to contact has been preaching Holy Bible conforming
On Wednesday, 3 April 2024 06:24:53 BST Paul Sopka wrote:
> On 02.04.24 21:43, Paul Sopka wrote:
> > On 02.04.24 20:50, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> Did you upgrade GCC recently?
> >> If yes, did you follow the gcc-upgrade guide:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Upgrading_GCC
> >>
> >> ?
> >
On 02.04.24 21:43, Paul Sopka wrote:
On 02.04.24 20:50, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Did you upgrade GCC recently?
If yes, did you follow the gcc-upgrade guide:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Upgrading_GCC
?
--
Joost
Thank you for your answer Joost.
As far as I know, I didn't upgrade GCC recently. I
On Tue, 02 Apr 2024 14:47:28 -0400,
J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 2 April 2024 10:14:11 CEST Michael wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 2 April 2024 07:03:42 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > On Monday, 1 April 2024 23:46:49 CEST John Covici wrote:
> > > > Hi. Well, I followed the steps in the news item,
On 02.04.24 20:50, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Did you upgrade GCC recently?
If yes, did you follow the gcc-upgrade guide:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Upgrading_GCC
?
--
Joost
Thank you for your answer Joost.
As far as I know, I didn't upgrade GCC recently. I just rebuilt libtool
to be sure, but
On Saturday, 30 March 2024 19:34:42 CEST Walter Dnes wrote:
> Thanks for the help. I've migrated my 3 operating Gentoo machines;
> main desktop, backup desktop, and an old used Lenovo Thinkpad X201. The
> poor thing was thrashing away for over 18 hours with 657 packages on the
> emerge
On Tuesday, 2 April 2024 16:11:20 CEST Paul Sopka wrote:
> Hello Gentoo,
>
> my entire system crashes reliably on "Detecting C compiler ABI info"
> when compiling some packages, happened on sci-libs/netcdf and
> media-libs/svt-av1.
>
> I am pretty sure it isn't a hardware instability since I can
On Tuesday, 2 April 2024 10:14:11 CEST Michael wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2 April 2024 07:03:42 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Monday, 1 April 2024 23:46:49 CEST John Covici wrote:
> > > Hi. Well, I followed the steps in the news item, to move
> > > todefault/linux/amd64/23.0/desktop/gnome/systemd
> >
On Tuesday, 2 April 2024 11:17:25 CEST John Covici wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Apr 2024 02:02:08 -0400,
>
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 2 April 2024 05:51:08 CEST John Covici wrote:
> > > On Mon, 01 Apr 2024 18:05:47 -0400,
> > >
> > > Dale wrote:
> > > > John Covici wrote:
> > > > > Hi. Well,
Hello Gentoo,
my entire system crashes reliably on "Detecting C compiler ABI info"
when compiling some packages, happened on sci-libs/netcdf and
media-libs/svt-av1.
I am pretty sure it isn't a hardware instability since I can compile
everything that doesn't run "Detecting C compiler ABI
Hi all,
the xz-backdoor (CVE-2024-3094) luckily did not target gentoo, but it could
have easily done so. One step in this sophisticated attack involved injecting
concealed code into the build-process by some kind of homebrew steganography.
I asked myself how many high-entropy files I can find
On Tue, 02 Apr 2024 02:02:08 -0400,
J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 2 April 2024 05:51:08 CEST John Covici wrote:
> > On Mon, 01 Apr 2024 18:05:47 -0400,
> >
> > Dale wrote:
> > > John Covici wrote:
> > > > Hi. Well, I followed the steps in the news item, to move
> > > >
On 02/04/2024 04:51, John Covici wrote:
My kernels are not in the world file at all, so I am confused why
portage should care about them when I am updating the world file. My
question is why do I need to do this at all -- could I just keep
updating as normal?
Your kernels should be in the
On Tuesday, 2 April 2024 07:03:42 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Monday, 1 April 2024 23:46:49 CEST John Covici wrote:
> > Hi. Well, I followed the steps in the news item, to move
> > todefault/linux/amd64/23.0/desktop/gnome/systemd
> >
> > and it all worked till it wants me to emerge the whole
On Monday, 1 April 2024 23:46:49 CEST John Covici wrote:
> Hi. Well, I followed the steps in the news item, to move
> todefault/linux/amd64/23.0/desktop/gnome/systemd
>
> and it all worked till it wants me to emerge the whole world file.
> Here is what I get:
>
> emerge --ask --emptytree
On Tuesday, 2 April 2024 05:51:08 CEST John Covici wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Apr 2024 18:05:47 -0400,
>
> Dale wrote:
> > John Covici wrote:
> > > Hi. Well, I followed the steps in the news item, to move
> > > todefault/linux/amd64/23.0/desktop/gnome/systemd
> > >
> > > and it all worked till it
John Covici wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Apr 2024 18:05:47 -0400,
> Dale wrote:
>> John Covici wrote:
>>> Hi. Well, I followed the steps in the news item, to move
>>> todefault/linux/amd64/23.0/desktop/gnome/systemd
>>>
>>> and it all worked till it wants me to emerge the whole world file.
>>> Here is
On Mon, 01 Apr 2024 18:05:47 -0400,
Dale wrote:
>
> John Covici wrote:
> > Hi. Well, I followed the steps in the news item, to move
> > todefault/linux/amd64/23.0/desktop/gnome/systemd
> >
> > and it all worked till it wants me to emerge the whole world file.
> > Here is what I get:
> >
> >
John Covici wrote:
> Hi. Well, I followed the steps in the news item, to move
> todefault/linux/amd64/23.0/desktop/gnome/systemd
>
> and it all worked till it wants me to emerge the whole world file.
> Here is what I get:
>
> emerge --ask --emptytree @world
>
> These are the packages that would
On 01/04/2024 22:46, John Covici wrote:
I don't want to unmerge that kernel -- its my backup kernel, so I
definitely want to keep it. I am using the nextcloud they are
complaining about , I will upgrade it soon, but I want to keep it for
now.
You can pass --exclude to emerge to prevent it
Hi. Well, I followed the steps in the news item, to move
todefault/linux/amd64/23.0/desktop/gnome/systemd
and it all worked till it wants me to emerge the whole world file.
Here is what I get:
emerge --ask --emptytree @world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating
On 4/1/24 15:53, Hoël Bézier wrote:
Hi,
Am Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 03:19:27PM +0200 schrieb n952162:
How do you see that radicale is marked for testing?
[snip]
The actual error mesg:
/ !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "radicale" have been masked.//
// !!! One of the following
Hi Alan,
Alan Mackenzie writes:
> Hello, Gentoo.
>
> I'm trying to do
>
> # emerge -a @preserved-rebuild
>
> .. For this purpose, I created a temporary repository, filling it with
> ancient ebuilds recovered from /var/db/pkg.
>
> It shows me 5 packages to be merged, among them being
>
>
On Monday, 1 April 2024 16:12:51 BST Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hello, Gentoo.
>
> I'm trying to do
>
> # emerge -a @preserved-rebuild
>
> .. For this purpose, I created a temporary repository, filling it with
> ancient ebuilds recovered from /var/db/pkg.
I may be missing something, but why
If you are just going to unmerge it anyway, why not do so before
emerging @preserved-rebuild?
On 4/1/24 11:12 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hello, Gentoo.
I'm trying to do
# emerge -a @preserved-rebuild
.. For this purpose, I created a temporary repository, filling it with
ancient ebuilds
On 2024-04-01 15:12, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hello, Gentoo.
I'm trying to do
# emerge -a @preserved-rebuild
.. For this purpose, I created a temporary repository, filling it with
ancient ebuilds recovered from /var/db/pkg.
It shows me 5 packages to be merged, among them being
[ebuild
Hello, Gentoo.
I'm trying to do
# emerge -a @preserved-rebuild
.. For this purpose, I created a temporary repository, filling it with
ancient ebuilds recovered from /var/db/pkg.
It shows me 5 packages to be merged, among them being
[ebuild R] dev-lang/spidermonkey-78.15.0
On 3/31/24 14:32, Alexandru N. Barloiu wrote:
I think in the past, the service file had a -v. Somewhere near the
present, they reverted to a non -v service file. So if you keep
upgrading distcc, prolly the service file still has a -v from past
installations. If you uninstall it, and install it
Am Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 03:53:19PM +0200 schrieb Hoël Bézier:
That’s a different thing than masking a package using a package.mask file,
where the package is technically available for your architecture but someone
(usually you or the gentoo developpers) decided it wasn’t fit to be installed:
for
Hi,
Am Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 03:19:27PM +0200 schrieb n952162:
How do you see that radicale is marked for testing?
[snip]
The actual error mesg:
/ !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "radicale" have been masked.//
// !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete
On 3/29/24 21:09, Jack wrote:
I see www-apps/radicale-3.1.8 marked as testing, but not masked. The
place to look for masking reasons is
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask (or wherever your portage tree lives.)
However, if I search for radicale, I only see the one package, and the
associated
On Friday, 29 March 2024 15:16:18 CEST Michael wrote:
> On Friday, 29 March 2024 13:30:23 GMT J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > To improve the bootup time of my server, I want to enable "parallel",
> > however, I run into an issue where some of the services take longer than
> > 60
> >
No argument from me. That JiaTan dude had other projects forked he was
looking at. And none of them are good news. zstd. lz4. libarchive.
squashfs-tools. But still, I think its good news if people already
figured how to turn it off in a few days.
On 4/1/2024 1:36 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On Mon, 2024-04-01 at 01:32 +0300, Alexandru N. Barloiu wrote:
> https://piaille.fr/@zeno/112185928685603910
>
> There's an ENV var you can set that is a kill switch for the whole thing :)
>
For the part that we found :)
The author of the backdoor had commit access to the upstream repository
https://piaille.fr/@zeno/112185928685603910
There's an ENV var you can set that is a kill switch for the whole thing :)
On 4/1/2024 1:29 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On Sun, 2024-03-31 at 18:19 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
The old version will show up as liblzma.so.5.6.1. Restart anything
On Sun, 2024-03-31 at 18:19 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> The old version will show up as liblzma.so.5.6.1. Restart anything that
> uses it.
Or liblzma.so.5.6.0
On Sun, 2024-03-31 at 12:04 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> It is not necessary to rebuild anything, unless you're doing something
> so unusual that you'd already know the answer to the question.
>
You should probably reboot afterwards though.
For a more fine-grained approach, you can check for
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 5:36 PM Wol wrote:
>
> On 31/03/2024 20:38, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> > For commercial entities, the government could just contact the company
> > and apply pressure, no need to sneak the backdoor in. Cf. RSA .
>
> Serving a "secret compliance" notice on a third party is
On 31/03/2024 20:38, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
For commercial entities, the government could just contact the company
and apply pressure, no need to sneak the backdoor in. Cf. RSA .
Apply pressure to who? At the end of the day, the only people the
government can trust are their own agents.
I think in the past, the service file had a -v. Somewhere near the
present, they reverted to a non -v service file. So if you keep
upgrading distcc, prolly the service file still has a -v from past
installations. If you uninstall it, and install it again, then prolly
you got the new service
/etc/systemd/system/distccd.service.d/00gentoo.conf or the service file.
has to be. there cant be anything else. that's how distcc behaves when
started with -v. do a ps axw. figure out where the -v is coming from.
maybe a systemctl daemon-reload && systemctl restart distccd. cant be
anything
On 3/31/24 13:59, Alexandru N. Barloiu wrote:
think the distcc.service file has an extra -v (--verbose). if you remove
that, it will behave as expected.
I checked all the units on one of the machines still showing the problem
and an extra '-v' is not present in any of the files.
That's a
think the distcc.service file has an extra -v (--verbose). if you remove
that, it will behave as expected.
On 3/31/2024 11:57 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
On 3/29/24 22:38, Daniel Frey wrote:
Hi all,
I've moved a couple of machines from openrc to systemd.
I have discovered this odd problem. On
On 3/29/24 22:38, Daniel Frey wrote:
Hi all,
I've moved a couple of machines from openrc to systemd.
I have discovered this odd problem. On openrc, distcc was quiet during
building packages. It would obey environment variable set in /etc/env.d:
DISTCC_DIR=/var/distcc
Den 31.03.2024 14:33, skrev Rich Freeman:
(moving this to gentoo-user as this is really getting off-topic for -dev)
It might also happen with commercial software, but the challenge there
is HR as you can't just pay 1 person to masquerade as 10 when they all
need to deal with payroll taxes.
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:59 AM Michael wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 31 March 2024 13:33:20 BST Rich Freeman wrote:
> > (moving this to gentoo-user as this is really getting off-topic for -dev)
>
> Thanks for bringing this to our attention Rich.
>
> Is downgrading to app-arch/xz-utils-5.4.2 all that is
On 3/31/24 07:59, Michael wrote:
On Sunday, 31 March 2024 13:33:20 BST Rich Freeman wrote:
(moving this to gentoo-user as this is really getting off-topic for -dev)
Thanks for bringing this to our attention Rich.
Is downgrading to app-arch/xz-utils-5.4.2 all that is needed for now, or are
we
On Sunday, 31 March 2024 13:33:20 BST Rich Freeman wrote:
> (moving this to gentoo-user as this is really getting off-topic for -dev)
Thanks for bringing this to our attention Rich.
Is downgrading to app-arch/xz-utils-5.4.2 all that is needed for now, or are
we meant to rebuilding any other/all
(moving this to gentoo-user as this is really getting off-topic for -dev)
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 7:32 AM stefan1
wrote:
>
> Had I seen someone say that a bad actor would spend years gaining the
> trust of FOSS
> project maintainers in order to gain commit access and introduce such
>
Thanks for the help. I've migrated my 3 operating Gentoo machines;
main desktop, backup desktop, and an old used Lenovo Thinkpad X201. The
poor thing was thrashing away for over 18 hours with 657 packages on the
emerge --emptytree!!! And that's after using a homebrew bash script to
select the
Thanks for the hints. Indeed, I didn't read the news regarding grub.
Booting from a rescue system and running grub-install followed by a grub-
mkconfig solved the problem.
Although I do not fully understand why this happend. AFIAK, installing/
updating grub does not update files in /boot nor
On Friday, 29 March 2024 19:06:45 GMT Stefan Schmiedl wrote:
>
>
> Michael wrote on Friday, 29. März 2024 18:53:
> > My guess and this is only a guess, is the two binaries are in separate
> > subdirectories of /usr and therefore there shouldn't be a problem. Before
> > you progress with
Hi all,
I've moved a couple of machines from openrc to systemd.
I have discovered this odd problem. On openrc, distcc was quiet during
building packages. It would obey environment variable set in /etc/env.d:
DISTCC_DIR=/var/distcc
DISTCC_ENABLE_DISCREPANCY_EMAIL=
DISTCC_FALLBACK=1
On 2024.03.29 15:53, n952162 wrote:
I'd like to emerge *radicale*, but see it's masked for amd, etc. I
looked at the portage meta data and the ebuild to see if I could find
out why it should be masked - it's just a python program, supposedly.
But I can't find out anything. This warnings are
Hello.
I'd like to emerge *radicale*, but see it's masked for amd, etc. I
looked at the portage meta data and the ebuild to see if I could find
out why it should be masked - it's just a python program, supposedly.
But I can't find out anything. This warnings are unequivocal about
unmasking a
Michael wrote on Friday, 29. März 2024 18:53:
> On Friday, 29 March 2024 16:05:29 GMT Stefan Schmiedl wrote:
>> Greetings.
>> After updating profiles, I decided to try switching to merged-user, too,
>> following the wiki page at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Merge-usr
>> One server reported
On Friday, 29 March 2024 16:05:29 GMT Stefan Schmiedl wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> After updating profiles, I decided to try switching to merged-user, too,
> following the wiki page at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Merge-usr
>
> One server reported during the dry run:
> ERROR: Conflict for file
On Tuesday, 26 March 2024 13:01:16 GMT Michael wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 March 2024 10:32:05 GMT William KENWORTHY wrote:
> > I have a question about binaries and the new profile: I have a number of
> > almost identical architectures that I build binaries for and share across
> > the similar sytems
On 3/29/24 03:55, Alexander Puchmayr wrote:
Hi,
After upgrading two Lenovo Laptops (UEFI, secure boot disabled), grub does not
work anymore; instead it says "Welcome to Grub" ... And then immediately boots
into bios setup.
What did go wrong?
I did the usual things:
* emerge update world
*
Greetings.
After updating profiles, I decided to try switching to merged-user, too,
following the wiki page at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Merge-usr
One server reported during the dry run:
ERROR: Conflict for file '/usr/sbin/spfd': [Errno 17] File exists:
'/usr/bin/spfd'
# equery belongs
On Friday, 29 March 2024 13:30:23 GMT J. Roeleveld wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> To improve the bootup time of my server, I want to enable "parallel",
> however, I run into an issue where some of the services take longer than 60
> seconds to start, causing this to be classed as "not started", which then
>
Hi All,
To improve the bootup time of my server, I want to enable "parallel", however,
I run into an issue where some of the services take longer than 60 seconds to
start, causing this to be classed as "not started", which then kills the
entire boot sequence.
Boot, obviously, goes fine with
On Wednesday, 27 March 2024 19:58:47 CET J. Roeleveld wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking for a way to synchronise a filesystem between 2 servers.
> Changes can occur on both sides which means I need to have it synchronise
> in both directions.
>
> Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
>
> Also,
Am Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 09:26:33PM -0500 schrieb Grant Taylor:
> On 3/27/24 13:58, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> Hi,
>
> > I am looking for a way to synchronise a filesystem between 2 servers.
> > Changes
> > can occur on both sides which means I need to have it synchronise in both
> >
Am Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 05:33:43PM +0100 schrieb ralfconn:
> Il 28/03/24 07:30, J. Roeleveld ha scritto:
> > > Unison creates a local index of all files it syncronised. So when you
> > > move a
> > > file around on one end, Unison will notice that because the file at the
> > > new
> > > location
Am Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 01:08:03AM +0100 schrieb Alarig Le Lay:
> On Wed 27 Mar 2024 20:37:27 GMT, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > +1 for Unison. I’ve been using it for many years now to synchronise between
> > the four PC systems in my household.
> >
> > Unison creates a local index of all files
Am 29.03.24 um 11:55 schrieb Alexander Puchmayr:
Hi,
After upgrading two Lenovo Laptops (UEFI, secure boot disabled), grub does not
work anymore; instead it says "Welcome to Grub" ... And then immediately boots
into bios setup.
What did go wrong?
I did the usual things:
* emerge update world
*
Am 29.03.24 um 11:55 schrieb Alexander Puchmayr:
Hi,
After upgrading two Lenovo Laptops (UEFI, secure boot disabled), grub does not
work anymore; instead it says "Welcome to Grub" ... And then immediately boots
into bios setup.
What did go wrong?
I did the usual things:
* emerge update world
*
Hi,
After upgrading two Lenovo Laptops (UEFI, secure boot disabled), grub does not
work anymore; instead it says "Welcome to Grub" ... And then immediately boots
into bios setup.
What did go wrong?
I did the usual things:
* emerge update world
* emerge --config gentoo-kernel
* grub-mkconfig -o
On 3/27/24 13:58, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Hi all,
Hi,
I am looking for a way to synchronise a filesystem between 2 servers. Changes
can occur on both sides which means I need to have it synchronise in both
directions.
What sort of turn around time are you looking for? seconds, minus,
hours,
On 3/28/24 18:12, Paul Colquhoun wrote:
On Friday, March 29, 2024 11:07:10 A.M. AEDT Thelma wrote:
Is anybody still using Hylafax ?
I'm trying to start hylafaxplus but getting an error:
/etc/init.d/hylafaxplus start
* Check hylafax server configuration... ...
* Use spool directory
Is anybody still using Hylafax ?
I'm trying to start hylafaxplus but getting an error:
/etc/init.d/hylafaxplus start
* Check hylafax server configuration... ...
* Use spool directory /var/spool/fax
* Starting HylaFAX server daemons ...
* Starting /usr/sbin/faxq ...
* Error on start
I'm using "master-pdf-editor" app-text/master-pdf-editor-4.3.89 as this version
does not have force watermarks.
But after a recent upgrade when I open a pdf document, it opens in full screen
mode, there are nor icons to minimize it, F11 doesn't have any effect on the
window either.
Il 28/03/24 07:30, J. Roeleveld ha scritto:
Unison creates a local index of all files it syncronised. So when you move a
file around on one end, Unison will notice that because the file at the new
location has the same hash as the file at the old location. As a result, it
does not transmit the
On Thursday, 28 March 2024 14:51:42 CET Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2024-03-27, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:59 AM J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> I am looking for a way to synchronise a filesystem between 2
> >> servers. Changes can occur on both sides which means I need to
> >>
Remember to disable distcc in your make.conf FEATURES, or you're going
to waste a bunch of time troubleshooting strange build failures like I
did.
That's all, carry on folks.
On 2024-03-27, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:59 AM J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> I am looking for a way to synchronise a filesystem between 2
>> servers. Changes can occur on both sides which means I need to
>> have it synchronise in both directions.
>
> How synchronized? For
On Thursday, 28 March 2024 12:01:54 CET Michael wrote:
> On Thursday, 28 March 2024 10:23:29 GMT Matthias Hanft wrote:
> > J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > Do you use the binary packages supplied by Gentoo?
> > > Or all local-compiled?
> >
> > All local-compiled, with the exemption of "monster-packages"
On Thursday, 28 March 2024 11:23:29 CET Matthias Hanft wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > Do you use the binary packages supplied by Gentoo?
> > Or all local-compiled?
>
> All local-compiled, with the exemption of "monster-packages" which
> would take hours or even days to compile (e.g. rust - here
On Thursday, 28 March 2024 10:23:29 GMT Matthias Hanft wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > Do you use the binary packages supplied by Gentoo?
> > Or all local-compiled?
>
> All local-compiled, with the exemption of "monster-packages" which
> would take hours or even days to compile (e.g. rust - here
J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> Do you use the binary packages supplied by Gentoo?
> Or all local-compiled?
All local-compiled, with the exemption of "monster-packages" which
would take hours or even days to compile (e.g. rust - here I use
"dev-lang/rust-bin" instead).
I don't even have any of
On 2024-03-28 07:32+0100 "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> On Wednesday, 27 March 2024 20:54:14 CET Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > Am Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 03:42:07PM -0400 schrieb Matt Connell:
> > > On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 19:58 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I am looking
On Thursday, 28 March 2024 08:42:57 CET Matthias Hanft wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > When rebooting, I noticed the "openrc" program was moved from
> > "/sbin/openrc" to "/usr/sbin/openrc". I understand this is related to the
> > merge-usr stuff, but I am planning on doing this change later.
> >
J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> When rebooting, I noticed the "openrc" program was moved from "/sbin/openrc"
> to "/usr/sbin/openrc". I understand this is related to the merge-usr stuff,
> but
> I am planning on doing this change later.
> The profile I selected has the "split-usr" in the name (just as
Hi all,
After succesfully migrating my desktop to 23.0, I decided to do the same for
my server.
The only difference is that the server uses a hardened profile.
When rebooting, I noticed the "openrc" program was moved from "/sbin/openrc"
to "/usr/sbin/openrc". I understand this is related to
On Wednesday, 27 March 2024 20:37:27 CET Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 08:18:14PM +0100 schrieb ralfconn:
> > Il 27/03/24 19:58, J. Roeleveld ha scritto:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am looking for a way to synchronise a filesystem between 2 servers.
> > > Changes can occur
On Wednesday, 27 March 2024 20:54:14 CET Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 03:42:07PM -0400 schrieb Matt Connell:
> > On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 19:58 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am looking for a way to synchronise a filesystem between 2 servers.
> > >
On Wednesday, 27 March 2024 20:08:00 CET Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:59 AM J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am looking for a way to synchronise a filesystem between 2 servers.
>
> Changes
>
> > can occur on both sides which means I need to have it synchronise in
On Wed 27 Mar 2024 20:37:27 GMT, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> +1 for Unison. I’ve been using it for many years now to synchronise between
> the four PC systems in my household.
>
> Unison creates a local index of all files it syncronised. So when you move a
> file around on one end, Unison will
801 - 900 of 187226 matches
Mail list logo
