Re: [gentoo-user] Choosing a new profile: multilib or not?

2014-12-23 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 23 Dec 2014 03:44:30 Andrew Savchenko wrote: On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:53:06 + Mick wrote: It used to be the case that adobe flash and other applications would not work with a no-multilib profile. However, I was surprised to see that a previous no-multilib installation of

[gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Anyone here running ceph / http://ceph.com/ on gentoo? As server(s) or client or ... ? I am learning about this right now and currently on my way to a first small test cluster. Very interesting possibilities ! Stefan

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hi, On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:22:26 +0100 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Anyone here running ceph / http://ceph.com/ on gentoo? As server(s) or client or ... ? I am learning about this right now and currently on my way to a first small test cluster. Very interesting possibilities ! We used it

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Tomas Mozes
On 2014-12-23 15:22, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Anyone here running ceph / http://ceph.com/ on gentoo? As server(s) or client or ... ? I am learning about this right now and currently on my way to a first small test cluster. Very interesting possibilities ! Stefan I tried the filesystem

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 23.12.2014 um 16:25 schrieb Tomas Mozes: I tried the filesystem with kernel 3.7 a year ago (to export distfiles to several machines). Since it's kernel based a bug caused my system to reboot and sadly it was a database. However the project mentioned that the filesystem wasn't production

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 23.12.2014 um 16:20 schrieb Andrew Savchenko: Hi, On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:22:26 +0100 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Anyone here running ceph / http://ceph.com/ on gentoo? As server(s) or client or ... ? I am learning about this right now

[gentoo-user] Re: ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread James
Stefan G. Weichinger lists at xunil.at writes: Though this was a year ago or so. Your mileage may vary and it is likely that during this year stability was improved. Ceph is very promising by both design and capabilities. I expect that there were many changes over the time of a year ...

[gentoo-user] Is lshw reporting correctly?

2014-12-23 Thread Mick
This is what I see when I plugged in two memory modules: === *-memory description: System Memory physical id: 2f slot: System board or motherboard size: 16GiB *-bank:0 description:

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 23.12.2014 um 16:28 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Am 23.12.2014 um 16:25 schrieb Tomas Mozes: I tried the filesystem with kernel 3.7 a year ago (to export distfiles to several machines). Since it's kernel based a bug caused my system to reboot and sadly it was a database. However the

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: got my first two demo nodes up and in-sync ... what a success ;-) I started to look into ceph, and my biggest issue is that they don't protect against silent corruption. They do checksum data during transit, but not at

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 23.12.2014 um 21:40 schrieb Rich Freeman: On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: got my first two demo nodes up and in-sync ... what a success ;-) I started to look into ceph, and my biggest issue is that they don't protect against silent corruption.

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: Am 23.12.2014 um 21:40 schrieb Rich Freeman: On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: got my first two demo nodes up and in-sync ... what a success ;-) I started to look into ceph,

[gentoo-user] Re: ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Holger Hoffstätte
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 21:54:00 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: At least for the future ... now that btrfs is declared stable at least Yeah, no. 3.18 is finally OK-ish (after they missed the .17 merge window with a huge number of fixes) but you really want to wait for 3.19. In the other

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 23.12.2014 um 22:08 schrieb Holger Hoffstätte: On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 21:54:00 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: At least for the future ... now that btrfs is declared stable at least Yeah, no. 3.18 is finally OK-ish (after they missed the .17 merge window with a huge number of fixes)

Re: [gentoo-user] Is lshw reporting correctly?

2014-12-23 Thread Poison BL.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: This is what I see when I plugged in two memory modules: === *-memory description: System Memory physical id: 2f slot: System board or

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Bill Kenworthy
On 23/12/14 23:28, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Am 23.12.2014 um 16:25 schrieb Tomas Mozes: I tried the filesystem with kernel 3.7 a year ago (to export distfiles to several machines). Since it's kernel based a bug caused my system to reboot and sadly it was a database. However the project

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hi, On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:36:25 +0100 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Am 23.12.2014 um 16:20 schrieb Andrew Savchenko: [...] We used it about a year ago for our infrastructure (backup and live sync of HA systems), obviously both servers and clients were used, both on Gentoo. We stopped this

[gentoo-user] gst-plugins-*

2014-12-23 Thread gottlieb
I shamefully had not run a --depclean for a few months. Today I did and was surprised by the barrage of gst-plugins to be removed. I have not changed any USE flags nor removed any packages. The plugins to remove include a large bunch where the 0.10.* version is to go but the 1.2.* version is to

Re: [gentoo-user] gst-plugins-*

2014-12-23 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 7:34 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote: I shamefully had not run a --depclean for a few months. Today I did and was surprised by the barrage of gst-plugins to be removed. I have not changed any USE flags nor removed any packages. The plugins to remove include a large bunch

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Holger Hoffstätte holger.hoffstae...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 21:54:00 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: In the other direction: what protects against these errors you mention? ceph scrub :) Are you sure about that? I was under the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Bill Kenworthy
On 24/12/14 11:24, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Holger Hoffstätte holger.hoffstae...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 21:54:00 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: In the other direction: what protects against these errors you mention? ceph scrub :) Are