On 3/13/22 13:21, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
Upgraded to: gentoo-sources-5.10.103
and kernel will not boot, not even recovery mode.
I'm getting some strange looping/scrolling message on the screen:
Kscan: watching read 1 fsk983s
I followed standard procedure:
emerge -avq =sys-k
After moving from gentoo-sources-2.6.39-r3 to 3.1.6 (yes, I had put off
upgrading the whole system for something like 6 mos.), I found
hibernation wouldn't work on my laptop. Instead of troubleshooting, I
tried the unstable gentoo-sources-3.2.1, and AFAICT everything is
working fine, incl
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:19:49 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> selected: 3.6.11
>protected: none
> omitted: 2.6.31-r6 2.6.36-r5 3.7.10-r1
Do you have them in your world file?
grep gentoo-sources /var/lib/portage/world
If not, "emerge -cpv gent
On Tuesday 31 March 2015 16:45:08 Bob Wya wrote:
> Neil,
>
> (a) Should I download the vanilla 3.18.1 kernel sources and apply all the
> gentoo-sources tar-ball patches in numerical order??
>
> (b) I tried downloading the vanilla 3.18.8 kernel. But of course the
> earlier
it again, emerge it again. For example, for gentoo-sources-2.6.30-r7:
emerge gentoo-sources:2.6.30-r7
emerge --depclean will never remove it again since you specified that
the "2.6.30-r7" slot is always to be kept.
2)How can I prevent this from happening again?
By doing wh
On 2008-08-04, Nicolas Sebrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've got gentoo-sources 2.6.25-r7 installed, and that's the only
>> verions of the kernel sources that I have installed.
>>
>> Suddenly (starting today) "emerge -auvtND world" want
Am Donnerstag, den 22.02.2007, 15:30 -0800 schrieb Grant:
> > > On one of my Gentoo systems, portage wants to re-emerge
> > > hardened-sources-2.6.16-r10 and hardened-sources-2.6.14-r7 because of
> > > (-doc%). I'm currently using hardened-sources-2.6.18-hardene
Thomas Drueke wrote:
> I want to emerge gentoo-sources-2.4.20-r31 but it has been
> deleted from the rsync repository.
>
> Is there a way to get the corresponding ebuild-file back to get
> it emerged ?
See
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources/
Downl
e: No packages selected for removal.
thats because the package name is gentoo-sources-2.6.13-r3 not
linux-2.6.13-gentoo-r3
--
Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Justin wrote:
> Thanasis schrieb:
>
>> Suppose I want to set the series of kernel sources:
>> gentoo-sources-2.6.28*
>> with the ~x86 keyword.
>> What should I write in /etc/portage/package.keywords ?
>>
>>
>>
>
> =sys-kernel/g
Regarding kernel maintenance, mostly from the point of view of security,
which is the best way to go:
1) Having gentoo-sources in /var/lib/portage/world, which would mean the
sources would be upgraded whenever portage marks a newer version as
stable (provided someone follows stable)?
2) Not
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday, 21 June 2019 04:08:03 BST Dale wrote:
>
>> The reason I have to add --exclude gentoo-sources to --depclean is so that
>> it won't remove kernels I still have installed and may even be using or
>> keeping as a fall back.
> Depclean
Am 18.10.2014 um 06:17 schrieb Philip Webb:
> I just installed Kernel 3.17.0 (gentoo-sources)
> & noticed there are specific options for Gentoo right at the beginning.
> Are we really privileged to have our own place in kernel-land
> or have these been added by the Gentoo devs ?
&g
Am 24.03.2013 18:14, schrieb Jarry:
> On 24-Mar-13 17:46, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:26:03 +0100, Jarry wrote:
>>
>>> [ebuild N ] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.7.10:3.7.10 USE="-build
>>> -deblob -symlink" 68,335 kB
>>
;t get detected. But this is fixed by disabling the Gentoo specific
> options. I may be wrong but I think they're just configuration patches, not
> the
> actual kernel sources. I do use the vanilla kernel because at one point I
> needed features from a version that wasn't yet on
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:05:20 +0100, Andres Becerra Sandoval wrote:
> A quick way to do it is:
> - back up your .config
If you installed the kernel with make install, the config is already
backed up to /boot.
> - emerge -C gentoo-sources or whatever-sources (this will clean all
&
On Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I decided to try gentoo-sources again. I was using vanilla,
> because of ext4 - when it was declared stable, gentoo-sources still was
> at the ext4dev phase (a version or so behind the upstream as expected).
&g
able to upgrade my kernel for some reason.
>>> (Obviously I could download it from kernel.org and go that route,
>>> but I would like to keep as much as possible in portage.)
The vanilla kernel is in portage as well (vanilla-sources).
>>> So I run an `emerge --sync`, and `e
On Sunday, August 21, 2016 10:12:59 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> After this morning's sync, both versions 4.4.6 and 4.6.4 of gentoo-sources
> have disappeared. Is this just finger trouble in the server chain? I get the
> same with UK and US sync servers.
Stra
Jacques Montier wrote:
> Dale a gentiment tapote:
>
>> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>>
>>> A problem I often have after a big update is emerge -p --depclean
>>> tells me it is going to remove my running kernel.
>>>
>>> sys-kernel
downgrade to 2.6.11, if someone can tell me how. I can see how to emerge new
> kernel sources, but can't find a reference in the emerge docs that say how to
> do old ones.
>
> Thanks again, guys.
Like this:
flash ~ # emerge -pv =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.9-r9
These
d -symlink" 44,122 kB
>
> Use eix to search packages, it shows all packages,
> including keyworded
> and masked versions. emerge -p only shows the latest
> version available
> for your arch and profile.
>
Did a fresh emerge --sync && emerge portage
ge.provided' is meant for such things.
>>>
>>> The syntax is not described in detail... I tried these:
>>>
>>> /etc/portage/package.provided
>>>
>>> >=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.1.6
>>>
>>> Still `emerg
Jarry wrote:
So, with your help I finally checked all software installed on my
gentoo-server (thanks to everyone, who replied). There were a few
gentoo-sources (I think 5 or 6 different versions), so I used
"emerge --prune gentoo-sources" to leave only the last one.
Then I checke
y xen?).
Albert, I cloned your hg repo and tried to build from it, but it fails
at downloading gentoo-sources. Something about not being able to
resolve the kernel URLS.
I suspect it is a problem in the ebuild itself, but I was not able to
find where `portage' is on disc during that build. I wante
Hi
I am using gentoo-sources on my notebook and would really like to get
software suspend v2 working. The only problem is there is no patch for
the gentoo-sources. I tried the software-suspend-2.1.8-for-2.6.11
patch with the following problem:
[quote]ziig linux #
/root/software-suspend-2.1.8-for
been some decline in kernel quality.
>
> Gentoo-sources-4.14.65 is stable in the tree. Which is quite recent.
After I configured gentoo-sources-4.14.52 kernel with make oldconfig,
it even could not shut down the computer. So, I came to the same
decision about kernel quality and masked e
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 21:29:21 +0200
Thanasis wrote:
> Is there a way to specify that I want to install (emerge) the latest
> 3.10.X series of sys-kernel/gentoo-sources as a slot, in parallel with
> the latest gentoo-sources?
>
> Currently, that would be version 3.10.28.
> I kno
On Friday, 21 June 2019 04:08:03 BST Dale wrote:
> The reason I have to add --exclude gentoo-sources to --depclean is so that
> it won't remove kernels I still have installed and may even be using or
> keeping as a fall back.
Depclean won't remove your kernels - only the so
!!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
!!! Got: 4606
!!! Expected: 4609
Failed to emerge media-libs/libsdl-1.2.14-r6
Fetching (20 of 22) sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.37-r4
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!!
/mnt/data/portage/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 11:05 pm, Andres Becerra Sandoval wrote:
> On 1/19/06, Beau E. Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi -
> >
> > When a new kernel ( I'm using gentoo-sources ) comes down
> > the line, I go to /usr/src, ln -s to linux, copy curre
/patches/genpatches-${KV_MAJOR}.${KV_MINOR}-${GPV}/0000_README"
grep -i unipatch gentoo-sources-2.6.11-r6.ebuild
UNIPATCH_LIST="${DISTDIR}/genpatches-${KV_MAJOR}.${KV_MINOR}-${GPV}-base.tar.bz2
${DISTDIR}/genpatches-${KV_MAJOR}.${KV_MINOR}-${GPV}-extras.tar.bz2"
UNIPATCH_D
on 01/31/2014 06:35 PM Khumba wrote the following:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 21:29:21 +0200
> Thanasis wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to specify that I want to install (emerge) the latest
>> 3.10.X series of sys-kernel/gentoo-sources as a slot, in parallel with
>>
o: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] kernel-5.4.69
>
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 13:36:26 -0400,
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >
> > [1 ]
> > On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 13:20:09 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> >
> > > How can
on 01/28/2014 10:12 PM eroen wrote the following:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 21:29:21 +0200, Thanasis
> wrote:
>> Is there a way to specify that I want to install (emerge) the latest
>> 3.10.X series of sys-kernel/gentoo-sources as a slot, in parallel with
>> the latest gentoo-
Thomas Drueke wrote:
Hi,
I want to emerge gentoo-sources-2.4.20-r31 but it has been deleted from
the rsync repository.
Is there a way to get the corresponding ebuild-file back to get it
emerged ?
BR
Thomas
It looks like you can grab it from cvs:
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi
On 11/19/2009 6:22 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 11/19/2009 10:49 PM, Marcus Wanner wrote:
I was just wondering if a package such as "gentoo-sources-2.6.31-r6"
uses kernel 2.6.31.6, or just 2.6.31. I have been digging through
timestamps and the like for a while, but I just can'
On 2008-08-04, Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant Edwards schrieb:
>> I've got gentoo-sources 2.6.25-r7 installed, and that's the only
>> verions of the kernel sources that I have installed.
>>
>> Suddenly (starting today) "em
Yes: unlike most packages these are the kernel *sources* not the kernel
install (which you have done manually).
(So you could do emerge gentoo sources, config, make, install etc, and
immediately remove the kernel sources.)
--
Simon Kellett,| Gentoo Linux, Fvwm, Firefox
Darmstadt, German
On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 11:54:50 +, Kruglov Sergey wrote:
> Now I have gentoo-sources-4.14.8-r1 installed.
>
> After "emerge --ask --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse @world"
> command emerge installs old kernel in NS (after first update 4.12.12,
> after second upd
file named
>>> `package.provided' is meant for such things.
>>>
>>> The syntax is not described in detail... I tried these:
>>>
>>> /etc/portage/package.provided
>>>
>>> >=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.1.6
>>>
>>>
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 10:10 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Usually on gentoo when gentoo-sources gets updated, updating the kernel
> went as follows:
>
> eselect kernel set {new kernel}
> cd /usr/src/linux
make mrproper
> make menuconfig
...
BillK
Hello,
I might need to build and run an old 3.x kernel on a Desktop PC for some very
specific tests. Would Gentoo be a good solution?
I see that currently gentoo-sources only includes 4.x and 5.x sources.
Thanks,
raffaele
>
> > When I do a search for 2.6.28 I get a patch. For
ebu> gentoo-sources, 2.6.27
> > is the latest I can find.
>
> I'm using tuxonice-sources-2.6.28 on this Eee and
> gentoo-sources-2.6.28
> on my desktop. Either you haven't synced recently or
> you are o
Actually i'm using vanilla-sources just for rt73usb driver.
I've Gentoo 64Bit too.
Before i used Gentoo-Sources.
I just copy my .config from Gentoo Sources to Vanilla Sources and i have
no issue (since 2 month).
Grant a écrit :
>> I'm using ASUS WL-167g USB WLAN (rt73usb)
> Actually i'm using vanilla-sources just for rt73usb driver.
> I've Gentoo 64Bit too.
> Before i used Gentoo-Sources.
> I just copy my .config from Gentoo Sources to Vanilla Sources and i have
> no issue (since 2 month).
Nice, we're doing the same thing then. Did
--- On Mon, 29/9/08, Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-Sources/Vanilla-Sources/Video 4 Linux
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Date: Monday, 29 September, 2008, 10:59 AM
From: Alexander Kapshuk
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 2:46 PM
To: Gentoo mailing list
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0
Forwarding the email below to the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: andymenderunix
Date: Tue, Dec 13
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
>I noticed this line as I was emerging gentoo-sources this morning.
> (Yuk...4:30AM this morning...) Is it a problem?
>
> * Applying 4905_alpha-sysctl-uac.patch (-p0+) ...
>
6:17 schrieb Philip Webb:
> >> I just installed Kernel 3.17.0 (gentoo-sources)
> >> & noticed there are specific options for Gentoo right at the
> >> beginning.
> >> Are we really privileged to have our own place in kernel-land
> >> or have these
Am Montag, 7. Mai 2012, 16:56:43 schrieb walt:
> On 05/07/2012 04:13 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > And vanilla-sources just work. Stable. Even with suspend to ram and ati
> > drivers.
>
> That confuses me. Are you saying the gentoo-sources don't 'just wor
Michael Jones wrote:
>
> Again, no animosity against anyone:
>
> But Rich, Linux-4.19.97 was released on Jan 17th, and then
> gentoo-sources-4.19.97 was released on Jan 18th,
> whereas https://bugs.gentoo.org/706036 was acknowledged to be fixed by
> Linux-4.19.99 on Jan 29th,
ity.org. Then I can choose what security features to
>enable, and it's a little adventure. What I used to do (when I was
>running Slackware rather than Gentoo) is grab kernel.org sources and
>then apply the patch from openwall.com, and there also I could choose
>security featu
Title: RE: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 2.6.16-r7 and Hyperthreading => not working ?
You need to enable:
CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y
-Original Message-
From: Mike Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 5/16/2006 12:14 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-u
ocy but I'm not
> getting why this happens.
>
>
> I want to `unmerge' (-C) versions of gentoo-sources prior to -2.6.20-r6
>
> However this fails:
>
> root # emerge -vpC "<"gentoo-sources-2.6.20-r6
>
> >>> These are the packages
age (virtual/linux-sources) and not the actual
> package portage is trying to use, but I'm not sure...
Ok. I was able to put sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6
in /etc/portage/profile/package.provided and that works. It wouldn't work
without some version number attached, though.
I don'
On 01/05/2012 06:47 AM, . wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> genkernel --menuconfig all failed (ERROR: Cannot locate kernel binary).
> eix sys-kernel/gentoo-sources:
> http://paste.pocoo.org/show/530006/
I notice your gentoo-sources are installed with -symlink. Dou you have
a symlink
On 21/12/2017 17:41, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after the update and installation of gentoo-sources-4.14.7 my two machines no
> longer switch to SDDM on
> VT7, it stays on VT1. However, I can switch manually using CTRL-ALT-7 to SDDM
> and login as usual. If I boot
>
Now I am trying to install Gentoo on a new system but when try to emerge
gentoo-sources (as I am supposed to), it hangs at "Applying
4400_alpha-sysctl-uac.patch". This problem is also known as bug #291389.
I see with top in another virtual terminal that rm uses 100% CPU. Is
there
Hi there,
I need to get a 2.4 kernel onto a system, but
gentoo-sources now gives 2.6. I checked
gentoo-portage.com and it says that there is still a
2.4 ebuild in the gentoo-sources package(?). How do I
get it?
Thanks!!
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of
I'll try the testing version.
Cheers,
Mark
Neil,
The testign version is better, but sort of strange. For
gentoo-sources it gave a nice readable list. However for rt-sources it
didn't.
Any reason for wanting them to look different or is this a bug that
should be reported to someone
-0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> > >> I was poking around in packages.gentoo.org, and noticed
> > >>
> > >>>that 2.6.15-r1 is unmasked for x86. So I run an `emerge --sync`, and
> > >>>`emerge -av gentoo-sources`. And it wants to rebuild my 2.6.13-
ing official branding can also sometimes
> concern
> the binary distribution.
Thank you for the explanations. I also dug around a bit in the
kernel-build.eclass and the ebuilds.
My summary then is:
gentoo-sources: vanilla source tree + gentoo-patches (no automatic compiling
etc.).
gent
.
> Any ideas?
> Thanks!!
>
Your portage tree is in an inconsistent state because you had a bad emerge
sync. You need to remove the orphaned digest file.
rm /usr/portage/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources/files/digest-gentoo-sources-2.6.7-r19
Zac
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
> > >Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
> > >I mean, "u" for "update"?
>
> emerge -uav gentoo-sources
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
> Calcul
Hi,
I don't know if it's relevant but as the installation guide says, I do 'make && make modules_install'.
Otherwise you could try to use genkernel, just to see if kernel sources are corrupted.
On 9/13/06, Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,gentoo
On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:25:25 Maxim Wexler wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> according to the docs the approved method of removing old
> gentoo-sources is emerge --prune. But I've already used rm -rf on
> them. Have I set myself up for a problem later?
No.
Beware --prune. It
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2008, Amar Cosic wrote:
> > Hello all
> >
> > I am about to install Gentoo on laptop for first time.I use
> > gentoo-sources on desktop but I would like to know is the
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Alan Warren wrote:
> I think you are correct though. It does seem to only happen while the system
> is under heavy I/O.
>
> I've never experienced anything like this in previous versions of the linux
> kernel,
> and resorting back to gent
On 2022-09-23 10:28+0200 "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a specific reason why the keywords (apart from hppa) have
> been removed from gentoo-sources-5.15.59?
>
> I am seeing some issues with systems running this version, but not
> all. And as this i
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Jarry wrote:
> On 24-Mar-13 17:46, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:26:03 +0100, Jarry wrote:
>>
>>> [ebuild N ] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.7.10:3.7.10 USE="-build
>>> -deblob -symlink" 68,
On 4/15/06, Rohit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank, Richard - I shall follow you advice. You chose the following I
> presume?
> - kernel sources [gentoo-sources]
I'm using suspend2-sources (notice the 'suspend2' in my kernel
version), but gentoo-sources shou
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 18:02:55 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > Fair enough. I use standard gentoo-sources but always like to keep at
> > least one previous version available "just in case". I unmerge old
> > versions manually, I have to delete kernel sources manually anyway as
On 5/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >I grab my sources directly from kernel.org and then apply the patch
> > >from grsecurity.org. Then I can choose what security features to
> > >enable, and it's a little adventure
>
Lavender <448463...@qq.com> [11-10-13 15:48]:
> I want to download it . I have searched in the distfiles directory on the
> mirorrs , but I don't know where to get it . Anyone can tell me ?
Hi,
try
eix gentoo-sources
and than (as superuser)
emerge gentoo-sources
H
On 9/14/05, Paul Varner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In /etc/portage/package.mask:
> >sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r4
>
> In /etc/portage/package.unmask
> >=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r10
>
Thanks for the help. So the atoms in package.unmask ar
Kyle Adams skrev:
> On 12/11/09 16:43, Dale wrote:
>> Erik wrote:
>>> Now I am trying to install Gentoo on a new system but when try to emerge
>>> gentoo-sources (as I am supposed to), it hangs at "Applying
>>> 4400_alpha-sysctl-uac.patch". This proble
fire-eyes a gentiment tapote:
> On Wednesday 26 April 2006 12:29, Ptitjack wrote:
>
>> I have some problem with gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r3 and ati-drivers.
>> Everything works fine when logging in, but my pc freezes without any
>> error message when logging out.
>> D
ort list updates
> that portage wants to emerge, but there aren't any kernel updates.
However,
> if I run emerge -uDvp world, there is a new version of the gentoo-sources
> (2.6.12-r9). Why wouldn't kernel updates be included in a system emerge?
The packages in your system come fr
Has anyone seen the boot logo in 2.6.29-gentoo sources?
usr/src/linux/drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_vga16.ppm
Why did they substitute the penguin with this ugly disguised mouse?
sfully downloaded everything that needed
> to be downloaded and unpacked it, successfully chrooted to the new system,
> and reached the compiling the kernel section without a glitch.
>
> And the then the trouble began. I emerged gentoo-sources, and it ran fine for
> about five minut
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:45:32 -0800 (PST)
maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is anyone who is running 2.6.24 have a
>
> Where does this x.x.24 kernel come from? I did a
> recent emerge sync and when I do
On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 13:20:09 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> How can I emerge the sources for this version of the kernel? I think
> John suggested 5.4.69.
emerge -1a gentoo-sources:5.4.69
You need to be running ~arch for this, or have gentoo-sources in
package.accept_keywords, 5.4.66
On 2008-08-04, Nicolas Sebrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Grant Edwards a ?crit:
>
>> If I understand that correctly, the newer version of
>> gentoo-sources should satisfy those requirments (and it did
>> indeed seem to do so until yesterday).
>
>
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 03:07:11 +0100
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 December 2006 02:42, David Relson wrote:
> > It's interesting to compare the keywords of
> > Linux-headers-2.6.19.ebuild, i.e. "-*", to gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r1
> > which has "
lightning ~ # eix gentoo-sources
* sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
Available versions: !2.4.32-r7:2.4.32-r7 2.6.15-r1:2.6.15-r1
2.6.16-r13:2.6.16-r13 2.6.17-r8:2.6.17-r8 ~2.6.17-r9:2.6.17-r9
~2.6.18:2.6.18 ~2.6.18-r1:2.6.18-r1 2.6.18-r2:2.6.18-r2
2.6.18-r3:2.6.18-r3 2.6.18-r4:2.6.18-r4 ~2.6.19:2.6.19
On 2014-10-18 23:16, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am 18.10.2014 um 06:17 schrieb Philip Webb:
I just installed Kernel 3.17.0 (gentoo-sources)
& noticed there are specific options for Gentoo right at the
beginning.
Are we really privileged to have our own place in kernel-land
or have these
And that is because of the additional features? :-D
Am 18.10.2014 23:16, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
Am 18.10.2014 um 06:17 schrieb Philip Webb:
I just installed Kernel 3.17.0 (gentoo-sources)
& noticed there are specific options for Gentoo right at the
beginning.
Are we really privil
ry our
> > settings.
> >
> > Marcin
>
> Ah. CFQ stinks compared to Anticipatory. Google the Kernel mailing
> list for CFQ vs Anticipatory. There is a thread where Andrew Morton
> show how Anticipatory blows everything else away. You basically want
> Anticipatory fo
On 03/09/2011 07:01 PM, walt wrote:
> Just as an example, I use the "sys-kernel/gentoo-sources" package for
> my kernel source code.
I use gentoo-sources as well.
Does anyone already successfully run gentoo-sources-3.13.7 with
nvidia-drivers?
If yes, which version does work?
I am still at 3.13.6 plus nvidia-drivers-331.49
Thanks, Stefan
feature, or has it been applied on the
gentoo kernel suspend modules too?
what are "the gentoo kernel suspend modules"? None of the kernels in
portage are really gentoo kernels, but they're kernel.org (or other)
kernels, with gentoo (and other) patches.
If you mean gentoo-sou
Hi,
I had the same problem and I've installed gentoo-sources-2.6.11-r5
and the problem was gone, the old kernel was gentoo-sources-2.6.11-r3.
Now I'm running on gentoo-sources-2.6.11-r6 and it's ok.
Best regards
Al Bayrouni wrote:
> Al Bayrouni wrote:
>
>&
Grant,
On Tuesday, 2024-04-16 19:26:25 -, you wrote:
> ...
> That means that all gentoo-sources stable kernels are "longterm"
> kernel versions on kernel.org. It does not mean that all "longterm"
> kernel versions from kernel.org are available as "stab
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 10:17:45AM +0100, Bob Wya wrote:
>The experimental patchset is only applied if the experimental USE flag
>is enabled surely??
>See I'm learning stuff now! :-)
https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-kernel/gentoo-source
On 11 March 2016 at 11:44, Nicol TAO wrote:
>
> Has anyone use kdbus with gentoo? I built and installed the latest kdbus
> with gentoo-sources 4.3.6.
kdbus was discontinued back in October, so it shouldn't be used at all
as far as I know.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
wrote:
> I've been using gentoo-sources for a while now.
>
> I remember reading on this list about some users using alternative
> kernels on their gentoo systems. My understanding is that amongst some
> of the other alter
from
> > edis.at. They support to boot from a gentoo minimal live-cd in
> > order to install your own gentoo. The system has 5GB storage and
> > 256MB ram. Actually that should be enough for a minimal
> > installation. However, till now i couldn't get over that point
On 11/19/2009 4:10 PM, Eray Aslan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:49:19PM -0500, Marcus Wanner wrote:
I was just wondering if a package such as "gentoo-sources-2.6.31-r6"
uses kernel 2.6.31.6, or just 2.6.31. I have been digging through
timestamps and the like for a while,
ewhere? I am using vanilla-sources (not
> gentoo-sources). So do I need to set ALSA_CARDS when using
> vanilla-sources too?
The GWN seems clear:
"for users using the in-kernel drivers, they
should now properly set that variable"
I think that the other alsa packages must be aware of it. A
301 - 400 of 6490 matches
Mail list logo
