Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale wrote:
A'right now. I'm going to start on hal and /usr being on / again.
:-P
Jeez, 43 years on and you're still
On Oct 15, 2011 1:58 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale wrote:
A'right now. I'm going to start on hal and /usr being on / again.
:-P
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale wrote:
A'right now. I'm going to start on hal and /usr being on / again. :-P
* Messages for package sys-fs/udisks-1.0.4-r1:
* CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND: is not set when it should be.
As the message above from emerge says, no way to update sys-fs/udisks as
CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND is not set.
The problem is where to find that option. Not in linux/.config, so where ?
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Alain Didierjean
alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
* Messages for package sys-fs/udisks-1.0.4-r1:
* CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND: is not set when it should be.
As the message above from emerge says, no way to update sys-fs/udisks as
CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND is not
Hi Canek,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 00:50:22 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, Dale
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale wrote:
A'right now. I'm going to start on hal and /usr
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Canek,
Hi Michael.
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 00:50:22 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dale
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 01:42:10 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
/var/lib usually stores whole
databases. The difference is important and relevant.
My systems has directories alsa, bluetooth, hp and many more
there that are not databases at all.
So?
Which one? That /var is not going
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24
On Saturday 15 Oct 2011 04:30:18 Lavender wrote:
I have just tried , the output is like something below
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc M92 LP
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 3644
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 10
Memory at 8000
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 01:42:10 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
/var/lib usually stores whole
databases. The difference is important and relevant.
My systems has directories alsa, bluetooth, hp and many more
Hi Canek,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:02:13 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM,
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Canek,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:02:13 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:11:43 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 01:42:10 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
/var/lib usually stores whole
databases. The difference is important and
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:21:18 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi Canek,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:02:13 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Michael Schreckenbauergrim...@gmx.de wrote:
I would. But given the way udev people solve those issues, I don't.
If something on /var is needed during boot in the next ten years, they will
propose to move it to /. They do it with
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:11:43 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 01:42:10 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:21:18 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi Canek,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:02:13 Canek Peláez
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:34:10 -0700, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
/var != /var/run
/var != /var/lock
/var/run is going in /run, but /var/run (by definition) only contains
things like PID files and runtime sockets. In the same vein, /var/lock
also is going into /run/lock. I have acknowledged
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Michael Schreckenbauergrim...@gmx.de
wrote:
I would. But given the way udev people solve those issues, I don't.
If something on /var is needed during boot in the
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:47:26 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:11:43 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer
grim...@gmx.de
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:34:10 -0700, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
/var != /var/run
/var != /var/lock
/var/run is going in /run, but /var/run (by definition) only contains
things like PID files and runtime sockets. In the
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:47:26 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:11:43 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 03:34:27 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:47:26 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer
grim...@gmx.de
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:47:26 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 03:34:27 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:47:26 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 03:10:37 -0700, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
It's arbitrary (basically) on executables and libraries. If an script
needs something more (from /var, lets say), then the rule should be
written in such a way that it can be called after that directory is
mounted. If you try to
hello boys [1],
i know i don't participate much on this list, but this does not mean that
i don't try to follow most of the threads (not all of them, i admit).
i realized just now that no one has commented on the news of the recent
death of dennis ritchie. considering that his contributions to
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:54:48 -0700
schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Alain Didierjean
alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
* Messages for package sys-fs/udisks-1.0.4-r1:
* CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND: is not set when it should be.
As the
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 7:33 AM, luis jure l...@internet.com.uy wrote:
hello boys [1],
i know i don't participate much on this list, but this does not mean that
i don't try to follow most of the threads (not all of them, i admit).
i realized just now that no one has commented on the news of
Am 15.10.2011 13:57, schrieb Jonas de Buhr:
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:54:48 -0700
schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Alain Didierjean
alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
* Messages for package sys-fs/udisks-1.0.4-r1:
* CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND: is
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 12:31:24 +0100
schrieb Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 03:10:37 -0700, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
It's arbitrary (basically) on executables and libraries. If an
script needs something more (from /var, lets say), then the rule
should be written in
On Saturday 15 Oct 2011 00:20:14 Jonas de Buhr wrote:
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:01:04 +0100
schrieb Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
Have you seen this before?
`/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/pam-1.1.4/work/Linux-PAM-1.1.4'
make[1]: Leaving directory
On 15/10/2011 12:33, luis jure wrote:
hello boys [1],
i know i don't participate much on this list, but this does not mean that
i don't try to follow most of the threads (not all of them, i admit).
i realized just now that no one has commented on the news of the recent
death of dennis
On 15/10/2011 13:26, Matt Harrison wrote:
On 15/10/2011 12:33, luis jure wrote:
hello boys [1],
i know i don't participate much on this list, but this does not mean that
i don't try to follow most of the threads (not all of them, i admit).
i realized just now that no one has commented on
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:26:40 +0100
schrieb Matt Harrison iwasinnamuk...@genestate.com:
On 15/10/2011 12:33, luis jure wrote:
hello boys [1],
i know i don't participate much on this list, but this does not
mean that i don't try to follow most of the threads (not all of
them, i
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:24:02 +0100
schrieb Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 15 Oct 2011 00:20:14 Jonas de Buhr wrote:
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:01:04 +0100
schrieb Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
Have you seen this before?
i realized just now that no one has commented on the news of the recent
death of dennis ritchie. considering that his contributions to the
development of computational technologies were not only paramount, but
affect all of us in a very direct way, i think we could somehow compensate
for the
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:34:10 -0700
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
/var != /var/run
/var != /var/lock
/var/run is going in /run, but /var/run (by definition) only contains
things like PID files and runtime sockets. In the same vein, /var/lock
also is going into /run/lock. I
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:34:10 -0700
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
It basically removes the need for a pesky init* thingy, although for
the life of me I cannot understand why someone will not see the
technical advantages of actually using an initramfs.
I'll use your own opening
On 2011-10-15 11:02, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Yes, as I said in my last mail, if you need LVM, you need an
initramfs. Remove the LVM, and you can have /var (and /usr for that
matter) withouth an initramfs. Where/when did I say something
different?
I assume you mean: if you need LVM for /,
Hi Raffaele,
how far did you get with compiling rootfs? Do you have complete gentoo
installation including kernel compiled for ARM? Would it be possible to make
vmdk/any other image for Qemu in which it could be run? I guess it would
ease quite many things...
As for my progress: I found out that
On 10/15/2011 03:26 PM, Matt Harrison wrote:
On 15/10/2011 12:33, luis jure wrote:
hello boys [1],
i know i don't participate much on this list, but this does not mean that
i don't try to follow most of the threads (not all of them, i admit).
i realized just now that no one has commented on
Wow. Just wow.
GREAT way to confuse and welcome the poor-English Chinese guy.
Welcome Lavender. You are now officially recognized as a human being, not a
bot.
We'll be glad to help you with Gentoo.
Please ignore all the FUD and discussion about /var needing (or not) to be
in the root partition,
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:47:07 +0300
schrieb Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de:
On 10/15/2011 03:26 PM, Matt Harrison wrote:
On 15/10/2011 12:33, luis jure wrote:
I have spent the last few hours trying to explain his work to the
folks here who were so saddened by Steve Jobs passing. While
On Saturday 15 Oct 2011 14:09:46 Jonas de Buhr wrote:
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:24:02 +0100
schrieb Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 15 Oct 2011 00:20:14 Jonas de Buhr wrote:
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:01:04 +0100
schrieb Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
Have you seen this
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Michael Schreckenbauergrim...@gmx.de
wrote:
I would. But given the way udev people solve those issues, I don't.
If something on /var is
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:17:41 +0100
schrieb Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 15 Oct 2011 14:09:46 Jonas de Buhr wrote:
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:24:02 +0100
schrieb Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 15 Oct 2011 00:20:14 Jonas de Buhr wrote:
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011
Jonas de Buhr jonas.de.b...@gmx.net [11-10-15 19:16]:
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:47:07 +0300
schrieb Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de:
On 10/15/2011 03:26 PM, Matt Harrison wrote:
On 15/10/2011 12:33, luis jure wrote:
I have spent the last few hours trying to explain his work to the
i don't think its about money, but about popularity. everybody knows
who steve jobs is, thats why his death makes front page.
average joe doesn't know ritchie and doesn't care about C.
Back at my University only very small number of people knows, who's Richie
(although GNU/Linux systems are
On Saturday, October 15, 2011 12:34:10 AM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I noticed the other day that when LVM tries to start, it fails. I have
/var on a separate partition here. It was complaining about something
on /var missing. So, you may be late in reporting this. I think it is
On Saturday 15 Oct 2011 18:43:06 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Jonas de Buhr jonas.de.b...@gmx.net [11-10-15 19:16]:
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:47:07 +0300
schrieb Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de:
On 10/15/2011 03:26 PM, Matt Harrison wrote:
On 15/10/2011 12:33, luis jure wrote:
On Saturday 15 Oct 2011 18:27:50 Jonas de Buhr wrote:
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:17:41 +0100
schrieb Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 15 Oct 2011 14:09:46 Jonas de Buhr wrote:
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:24:02 +0100
schrieb Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 15 Oct
On Saturday, October 15, 2011 03:34:27 AM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:47:26 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer
grim...@gmx.de
Hi Claudio, hi Lavender,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 13:46:31 Claudio Roberto França Pereira wrote:
Wow. Just wow.
:)
GREAT way to confuse and welcome the poor-English Chinese guy.
Welcome Lavender. You are now officially recognized as a human being, not a
bot.
We'll be glad to help you
Hi Canek,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 04:04:05 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I got that points wrong, I admit. I repeat, 3am here ;) I apogolize
for saying that to you Michael; I shouldn't have, even if I would have
been right (and I wasn't). Again, no excuse, but it's (actually) 4am
here now.
Hi Michael,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 08:10:13 Michael Mol wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 7:33 AM, luis jure l...@internet.com.uy wrote:
hello boys [1],
i know i don't participate much on this list, but this does not mean
that
i don't try to follow most of the threads (not all of
Hi guys,
I'm still struggling with this. Gave up last weekend and haven't had
time until now. Thought I had it going when I got a command prompt and
then, networking wasn't working. Anyway, more details .
On 10/10/11 16:43, David Abbott wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:31 PM, CJoeB
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 16:07:42 CJoeB wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm still struggling with this. Gave up last weekend and haven't had
time until now. Thought I had it going when I got a command prompt and
then, networking wasn't working. Anyway, more details .
On 10/10/11 16:43, David
On 10/14/2011 10:00 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Also less overthinking and more testing solves most of this stuff quicker.
I prefer to arm myself with enough knowledge before deploying -- even in
a testing setup -- to reduce any 'WTF?!' moments :-)
Research is good, but you'll learn way more
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:46:31 -0300, Claudio Roberto França Pereira wrote:
Wow. Just wow.
GREAT way to confuse and welcome the poor-English Chinese guy.
Good point. Sorry Lavender, please feel free to start another thread...
which may or may not get hijacked.
Please ignore all the FUD and
On 10/15/11 16:21, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Documentation for my monitor states that the max resolution is
1920x1080@60 Hz
To get this resolution that early you need kms.
Check your kernel-config:
CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=m
CONFIG_DRM_RADEON_KMS=y
CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y
#
Hi everyone,
Well, thanks to the help I got from the list, I finally have Gentoo
installed on my new desktop and booting to a command prompt.
However, now I have a networking issue.
In past, when I booted to the install CD and my ethernet connection was
not active, I typed net-setup eth0 and
On 10/15/2011 4:42 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Which one? That /var is not going into /? It's not disinformation, it
is th true. If not, please be so kind of showin one single developer
reference that says so. One. Single. One.
Email, blog post, wiki, you choose it. But one single one.
I
66 matches
Mail list logo
