Dear Professor Watson,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/9483790.stm
How absurd. Now we have it confirmed that the Arctic Council is there,
not to pretect the Arctic, but to carve up the resources. And now we
know that the people involved ARE rubbing their hands with glee as
Correct Ken.
But the more relevant question is a political science question: what
would the impact be of a substantial SRM program on various countries'
willingness to undertake a serious emission mitigation program. We
cannot assume that these two societal decisions are independent.
Personally,
agree 100%
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Hawkins, Dave dhawk...@nrdc.org wrote:
Correct Ken.
But the more relevant question is a political science question: what would
the impact be of a substantial SRM program on various countries'
willingness to undertake a serious emission
Greg (cc list).
Thanks for alerting us to this video, which I have watched. I learned a good
bit more from the pre-filed testimony and then reading the (not very long)
bill. The bill authorizes (but not appropriates) mainly for a still not quite
fixed indemnification process. I would expect
Mark
You raise a number of objections to marine cloud brightening which I
will deal with in order.
Nature does not like uneven mixtures and uses turbulence to make things
more homogenious. The bottom of the marine boundary layer is quite
turbulent. You can do you own experiments with
Sara Kate
It may be 'standard publishing procedure' but it is not right for a two
billion dollar company to be indemnified for unlimited risk by an old
age pensioner however small the risk. if you insist on it I will have
to withdraw the contribution.
I will be urging my colleagues, many
There are too many interesting issues in this thread for me to respond
to so I'll just focus on intergenerational justice.
Adjusting our behaviour to account for the interests of future
generations raises a number of challenging problems. The endeavour
assumes several things: a) that we have the
The methane tends to be devoured by microbes. However, methane supply may
exceed availability of other necessary nutrients such as oxygen and trace
elements that living organisms require. Thus there is a saturation point where
methane conversion to carbon dioxide stops, after this the methane
FYI. wil
--
Dr. Wil Burns, Editor in Chief
Journal of International Wildlife Law Policy
2875 Shasta Road
Berkeley, CA 94708 USA
Ph: 650.281.9126
Fax: 510.779.5361
ji...@internationalwildlifelaw.org
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/13880292.asp
SSRN site: http://ssrn.com/author=240348
Hello Mark,
Concerning cryogenic use, have you factored in the Atmospheric Electrical
aspects of CCN? It is a rarely talked about issue, but there is clear
indications that CCN has an electrical aspect.
Here are a few references. If your concept gets to the modeling stage, the
modelers
Hi Folks,
Andrew,
I did not have that extreme degree of aeration in mind. And, I can not see
massively enhanced methane excursions happening if reasonable bubblers
designs are developed. First and formost, the core of the concept is to
increase the O2 saturation a few percent for as deep as
One last thought, I would like to call this effort Sea Worm.
Michael
On May 13, 2011 7:29pm, Michael Hayes voglerl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Andrew,
I did not have that extreme degree of aeration in mind. And, I can not
see massively enhanced methane excursions happening if
12 matches
Mail list logo
