On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
wrote:
> I agree with Andrea. The loss of mailing list subscribers would have a
> severe impact; I do not think we should move our mailing lists unless we
> have another major outage in the next two years. In my eyes, SourceForge
> are on probat
I agree with Andrea. The loss of mailing list subscribers would have a
severe impact; I do not think we should move our mailing lists unless we
have another major outage in the next two years. In my eyes, SourceForge
are on probation.
A very good reason for moving to the OSGeo lists is that ou
>
>
> None of the others took down the system for a whole week, that was
> actually bad, the others, well... (in my mail I started with "only one
> really serious outage", the rest talked about "one trouble" in fact, I
> should have been more clear
>
Fair enough, "serious outage" is relatively ope
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Torben Barsballe <
tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote:
> With respect to SourceForge reliability: From a search of GS discussions
> (Gitter and otherwise), there's been a notable SourceForge outage at least
> once a year. In addition to these, I believe there have b
With respect to SourceForge reliability: From a search of GS discussions
(Gitter and otherwise), there's been a notable SourceForge outage at least
once a year. In addition to these, I believe there have been a number of
other short, minor outages that were an annoyance, but not of sufficient
scope
I don't think there's a hard requirement that all dependencies have to
be available on Maven central...
That said, it is a typical nice-to-have thing...
I'd say that having GT/GWC/GS jars on Maven central and having OSGeo, or
interested companies host JAI on their Maven repos seems like a
rea
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:34 PM, Jim Hughes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As a quick question, are there any impediments to publishing GeoTools and
> GeoServer jars on Maven Central?
>
JAI, I think? :-)
Cheers
Andrea
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V
for mo
Hi all,
As a quick question, are there any impediments to publishing GeoTools
and GeoServer jars on Maven Central?
I believe the requirements could be met easily enough:
http://central.sonatype.org/pages/requirements.html. (I've done this for
LocationTech projects like JTS and GeoMesa, and I
Hi all,
I agree with Andrea ... so far my experience with the OSGeo maven repository
doesn't
give me too much confidence for such an important move and one trouble per 2.5
years
is not that bad indeed.
Regards,
Nuno Oliveira
On 03/07/2018 02:24 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi Jody,
I don't think
Hi Jody,
I don't think it's a specific event, my colleagues not involved in the full
stack (and thus not having maybe an up to date GeoTools checkout)
report repository slowness periodically (e.g., weekly or monthly).
If the artifactory on SAC would get separation from other downloads, that
is, its
The recent qgis release hit the OSGeo download servers hard, and our maven
repo was affected. After all the fun with repo.boundlessgeo.org we probably
know a) enough to host artifactory on SAC b) not to try cloud hosting of
the same.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:43 PM Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi Torben,
Hi Torben,
I'm tentatively -1 on the idea but willing to discuss.
The proposal you're citing is 2.5 years old and the mailing list trouble we
have had in the past week is
been the only really serious issue we have had since, as far as I remember.
Migrating the lists to OSGeo will generate a very
12 matches
Mail list logo
