Re: [Geotools-devel] H2 dependency in imagemosaic-jdbc

2010-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
christian.muel...@nvoe.at ha scritto: > Fixed on 2.6.x and trunk, thanks for the hint Thanks for the quick fix! Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the develop

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: move app-schema from unsupported to extension

2010-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
/display/GEOT/Supporting+your+module > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/Gold+Star+Quality+Assurance+Check > > All the docs and much of the test coverage is in GeoServer. Ah, much of the test coverage where it cannot be measured... ugh... does it go beyond 40% with the tests in Geoto

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposed new module: gt-app-schema-resolver

2010-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
ow, we cannot have part of the normal build depend on unsupported modules. Does it qualify as supported by itself? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: OK to put some non-GeoTools dependencies (application schema bundles) in our osgeo maven repo?

2010-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
a lot of people depend onto I would expect some discussion before adding a dependency, but otherwise I don't think you really need to ask permission for that, just make sure the license of the dependency is compatible and past that I guess I trust your common sense ;-) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: OK to put some non-GeoTools dependencies (application schema bundles) in our osgeo maven repo?

2010-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: >> On 18/05/10 09:22, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >>> So, if I announced that I had a third-party whizbang-1.3.2.jar that I >>> wanted to use in app-schema testing, would I be allowed to upload it to >>&g

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: move app-schema from unsupported to extension

2010-05-18 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: > On 18/05/10 14:38, Andrea Aime wrote: >> How is the test coverage? > > OK. All encoding test are in GeoServer. > >> Is it a single module or multimodule? > > Multiple. gt-app-schema, gt-app-schema-resolver (coming soon), > g

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposed new module: gt-app-schema-resolver

2010-05-18 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: > On 18/05/10 14:39, Andrea Aime wrote: >> Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: >>> The new module has no dependencies on gt-app-schema. If >>> gt-app-schema-resolver works well enough, it might be useful elsewhere. >>> It will be

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: move app-schema from unsupported to extension

2010-05-18 Thread Andrea Aime
hink ip > check is the only formal one that can issue a down check. Correct. However I believe we should resist any module graduation that does not have enough tests unless there is good reason for that. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Strange problems with png8 image format and transparency=true requests

2010-05-19 Thread Andrea Aime
e'd need a color reduction algorithm that supports alpha in the palette, something that an open source project, pngnq, does, but it's not trivial at all to port over. I'd estimate it would take 3-5 days of work for a developer that knows _very_ well its way in the raster dat

[Geotools-devel] Allowing web applications to undeploy without perm gen leaks, a first cut

2010-05-19 Thread Andrea Aime
entral module you don't see all the necessary dependencies). So what about a page explaining what one should do instead? Is there a place in the sphinx docs for that? I plan to commit the changes tomorrow on trunk only unless someone objects Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://open

Re: [Geotools-devel] Unit of measure support is in

2010-05-19 Thread Andrea Aime
d the code, it has been designed to support just the uom at the symbolizer level. In GeoTools we lack the very support for representing an uom attached to each stroke width, size and whatnot, so adding support for what you're saying might requir

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Unit of measure support is in

2010-05-19 Thread Andrea Aime
literal expression; and try and evaluate as a Measure.class rather > then just an Integer.class or Double.class as is done now. Eh, it might get tricky as we have two so

Re: [Geotools-devel] symbology encoding: recode function

2010-05-20 Thread Andrea Aime
ookup value isn't found ? So recode acts like an hashamp right, it's a key/value transformation? I would say, we return null if the key is not known. Same contract as a java Map? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Ex

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Unit of measure support is in

2010-05-20 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > On 20/05/2010, at 4:57 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> Eh, it might get tricky as we have two sources of uom >> specification, the literal itself, but also the symbolizer one. I >> guess the local one would win. >> >> Anyone interested

Re: [Geotools-devel] Encoding GML and Xlink

2010-05-20 Thread Andrea Aime
7;s a good idea, as done for GEOT-3046. Should we go ahead and do > this? Seems like an acceptable compromise to me. If the admin is aware of the performance and stability implication (this approach is also memory bound, remember) and plans accordingly I don't see a problem with that. Che

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Unit of measure support is in

2010-05-20 Thread Andrea Aime
to letting the renderer at it. Question. Can > the rescale visitor inject a function expression around entries in > order to accomplish a conversion? Why a function expression? I'm usually a bit weary of using functions as they don't translate d

[Geotools-devel] Patch to support useExisting feature insertion mode

2010-05-22 Thread Andrea Aime
appy, now they actually test a WFS-T server supports useExisting and for the moment we just skip that test in the CITE nightly builds (boy I'm so happy they are there). Well, let me know. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. d

Re: [Geotools-devel] Patch to support useExisting feature insertion mode

2010-05-23 Thread Andrea Aime
ay/GEOTDOC/07+FeatureStore Err... documenting on the wiki? I guess Sphinx is still not used enough for that purpose... oh well, ok, no problem. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http

Re: [Geotools-devel] Patch to support useExisting feature insertion mode

2010-05-23 Thread Andrea Aime
plan and a talk with > frank or Justin about deployment. Until then the wiki us our docs. Ok :-) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight f

Re: [Geotools-devel] New unsupported module for hexagonal features

2010-05-24 Thread Andrea Aime
configured to provide these grids, I guess it would be popular. Anyways, just sharing some wild idea here Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from t

Re: [Geotools-devel] New unsupported module for hexagonal features

2010-05-24 Thread Andrea Aime
Michael Bedward ha scritto: > On 24 May 2010 17:02, Andrea Aime wrote: >> Option b), we make a module for grids. Also rectangular ones. >> Gabriel has added some code in GeoServer to generate grids >> to be used in the CRS area of definition preview, see here: >> http:/

Re: [Geotools-devel] Nominate Shane Bailie for GeoTools commit access

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
i and Justin. Works for me, +1 Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- ___ Geotools-devel mailing list Ge

Re: [Geotools-devel] multithreaded rendering

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
em sooner - small local layers can render fast enough to provide sufficient context for people to keep zooming/panning around without waiting the whole map to be rendered, better start them sooner as well Hope this helps Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Ai

Re: [Geotools-devel] feature collection and rendering

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
will do when that hint is not advertised in the feature source. > - What should I try and optimise? Pass down all hints as possible. Which really means, reduce to the bare bones the usage of col

[Geotools-devel] Adding parameters in sql views

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
up Queries in MapLayer just for the sake of passing down hints when rendering a parametrized view layer - the env function is somewhat more flexible in that it allows both per thread and global enviroment values (see EnvFunction.setGlobalValues(...) Opinions? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Ai

[Geotools-devel] Making SLD param substitution go down to the databases

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
eclare the same? Imho the case of param values not changing feature by feature is the most common and having an optimization for it would be good, yet the dynamic case could be of interest as well Opinions? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from

Re: [Geotools-devel] Making SLD param substitution go down to the databases

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
ng Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- ___ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sour

Re: [Geotools-devel] Making SLD param substitution go down to the databases

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > On 25/05/2010, at 8:12 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> Jody Garnett ha scritto: >>> Interesting. >>> Could you add some kind of scoping? Something like ${feature.bounds} for >>> the bounds of the current feature? >> How has that

Re: [Geotools-devel] Making SLD param substitution go down to the databases

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > On 25/05/2010, at 8:12 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> Jody Garnett ha scritto: >>> Interesting. >>> Could you add some kind of scoping? Something like ${feature.bounds} for >>> the bounds of the current feature? >> How has that

Re: [Geotools-devel] Making SLD param substitution go down to the databases

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> On 25/05/2010, at 8:12 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: >> >>> Jody Garnett ha scritto: >>>> Interesting. >>>> Could you add some kind of scoping? Something like ${feature.bounds} for >>>> the

Re: [Geotools-devel] The beginning of the end for FeatureCollection

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
(this time answering the right mail) Sounds like an improvement to me. +1 Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- ___

[Geotools-devel] Build failing in app-schema?

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
this until tomorrow I took the liberty of putting app-schema out of the build, please fix and insert the module back in the build? :-) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Tagging a 2.7.x version

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
lease go ahead and > make the 2.7-M0 tag. Mind app-schema is out of the build due to build failuers. Want to tag like that? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service

Re: [Geotools-devel] feature collection and rendering

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
at many users seem to be playing with, where the features either: - do not come from a store - come from a store but are cached in memory to speed up rendering I may be wrong, but ContentFeatureCollection requires something like a real store to back it? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - h

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build failing in app-schema?

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: > On 25/05/10 21:52, Andrea Aime wrote: >> This is probably due to a version difference, in the repo we have: >> http://download.osgeo.org/webdav/geotools/net/opengis/schemas/sweCommon-1.0.1/1.0.1-1/ >> >> >> which apparently does

[Geotools-devel] A missing bit in the SimpleFeatureSource switch?

2010-05-27 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, today I noticed there is still one non simple bit in the SimpleFeatureSource family: getDataStore() still returns DataAccess instead of just a DataStore. Is this intended? I did not check the consequences Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight

Re: [Geotools-devel] Tagging 2.7-M0

2010-05-27 Thread Andrea Aime
Eh? Did you see the ones I've closed on Sunday? The monthly chart says 57 created and 214 closed Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert servic

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: documentation

2010-05-27 Thread Andrea Aime
fine any. There was a python based tool to go from html to rst but was pretty primitive too... I guess copying in the browser, pasting in a text editor and going from there is the best way I know so far. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: documentation

2010-05-29 Thread Andrea Aime
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > As per discussion I did up a proposal with the plan. > > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Sphinx+Documentation+Process +1 Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the d

[Geotools-devel] PMC: using existing FIDs during feature insertion

2010-05-29 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- ___ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: using existing FIDs during feature insertion

2010-05-29 Thread Andrea Aime
strongly one way or the other, if the other developer feel that "user provided" is better I'll make the change, no problem :-) Cheers Anrea -- Andrea Aime

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: using existing FIDs during feature insertion

2010-05-30 Thread Andrea Aime
nd error condition). Not allow null to be passed in... yet, afaik, it's not possible to build a feature whose id is null in the current code. I guess a API clarification is in order in case someone uses their own implementation of Feature? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://ope

Re: [Geotools-devel] Referencing improvements for multithreading

2010-05-30 Thread Andrea Aime
Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- ___ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Geotools-devel] Setting up a new branch to work on ImageMosaic

2010-06-01 Thread Andrea Aime
+1 on adding the branch (if that was ever necessary to start with ;-) ) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- __

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools OSGi compatibility

2010-06-01 Thread Andrea Aime
enance perspective). Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- ___ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotoo

Re: [Geotools-devel] SimpleFeatureIterator vs Iterator

2010-06-03 Thread Andrea Aime
eptions. SimpleFeatureIterator is the sane way to access data, Iterator is for people actively looking for trouble (it's still there just for backwards compatibility, but we should really, really deprecate it). Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expe

[Geotools-devel] Informal poll: how good are we for a switch to Java 6 now?

2010-06-04 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, quick informal poll. What about switching the current trunk to Java 6? Would you be pro? Against? Don't care? I would be pro. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Informal poll: how good are we for a switch to Java 6 now?

2010-06-04 Thread Andrea Aime
e formally support building only against Java 5, by this meaning Java 6 builds might actually fail (sometime a unit test is stupidly dependent on hash iteration order, though other times there are less obvious issues). Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service s

Re: [Geotools-devel] Informal poll: how good are we for a switch to Java 6 now?

2010-06-04 Thread Andrea Aime
o stumble into stupid JDK issues. And of course we'd also need the ok from the PSC and general dev community about supporting both build enviroments, it will certainly put some more effort on our shoulders. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http

Re: [Geotools-devel] Informal poll: how good are we for a switch to Java 6 now?

2010-06-04 Thread Andrea Aime
eloper pool before going to do a user one... so far not sure a user one is necessary, not enough enthusiasm for a switch to java 6 around here I guess ;-) Although... who knows, maybe a user pool could be interesting anyways (we're curious animals anyways no?) ;-) Cheers Andrea -- And

Re: [Geotools-devel] Informal poll: how good are we for a switch to Java 6 now?

2010-06-04 Thread Andrea Aime
e right direction as well. What else can we do? > Meanwhile, I'd be curious, like Andrea, to see what the folks on the > user list think. My guess is that it's not on the radar for most of > them judging by the absence of posts about it. Michale, you're the users list maste

Re: [Geotools-devel] docs.geotools.org

2010-06-04 Thread Andrea Aime
Michael Bedward ha scritto: >> Thanks Justin that is beautiful :-) >> > > What Jody said. Much appreciated Justin. Justin++ (ah, these new programming languages, they just on keep popping up...) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Exper

Re: [Geotools-devel] Informal poll: how good are we for a switch to Java 6 now?

2010-06-05 Thread Andrea Aime
we rely on it, meaning java 6 is not guaranteed to be building all the time, and people can fix those issues at a more relaxed pace - if someone breaks the java 5 build he's still supposed to fix it as fast as he can (or someone else will revert the change that broke the buil

Re: [Geotools-devel] SimpleFeatureIterator vs Iterator

2010-06-05 Thread Andrea Aime
ls 2.8 ? /me really hates feature collections being writable. Would be +1 making them read only right now Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. --

Re: [Geotools-devel] SimpleFeatureIterator vs Iterator

2010-06-05 Thread Andrea Aime
uirement of uniqueness, otherwise current implementations are a disgrace both performance and memory consumption wise. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- Thin

Re: [Geotools-devel] Informal poll: how good are we for a switch to Java 6 now?

2010-06-07 Thread Andrea Aime
christian.muel...@nvoe.at wrote: > This is an interesting thread, so I want to spend my 2 cents. > > 1) I am astonished about discussing to check a build on SUN SDK 6 > > http://gis.linux4all.at/hudson32 > http://gis.linux4all.at/hudson64 > > Everybody can look at it, developers knowing the cred

Re: [Geotools-devel] Informal poll: how good are we for a switch to Java 6 now?

2010-06-07 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime wrote: > christian.muel...@nvoe.at wrote: >> This is an interesting thread, so I want to spend my 2 cents. >> >> 1) I am astonished about discussing to check a build on SUN SDK 6 >> >> http://gis.linux4all.at/hudson32 >> http://gis.linux4all.at/

Re: [Geotools-devel] Informal poll: how good are we for a switch to Java 6 now?

2010-06-07 Thread Andrea Aime
christian.muel...@nvoe.at wrote: > Do you have a blank in your build path. ? > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: 32/tmp > > The absolute path is > > "/home/hudson 32/tmp" > > I am sure if I remove the blank, this bug will disappear. But I can > remember that it was a

[Geotools-devel] gt-process and built-in processes

2010-06-07 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, the current gt-process module is giving me a little of a headache in that if you want the API you get also some default processes: org.geotools.process.literal.BufferFactory org.geotools.process.literal.IntersectionFactory org.geotools.process.literal.UnionFactory org.geotools.process.literal.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposed InGeo Data Access module

2010-06-07 Thread Andrea Aime
Евгений Лазарев wrote: > > Hi Jody, in Russia very popular GIS programm is InGeo > (http://www.integro.ru/projects/gis/main_gis.htm), so to use geotools > and geoserver in our work and add more usability in russia there are > need to support is format. > and i want to develop this module for us

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: Map Context Refractor Proposal

2010-06-08 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett wrote: > Proposal is established enough to be voted on; I will be working on this over > several evenings this week with this weekend targeted for the first commit. > - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/MapContext+Refactor > - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3136 (Initial

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: Map Context Refractor Proposal

2010-06-08 Thread Andrea Aime
Michael Bedward wrote: > On 8 June 2010 15:20, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> MapLayerCollection? That is the best I have been able to come up with, >> so perhaps "Map" is not so bad after all ... :-) >> >> I suppose this is an instance of misused mathematical/compsci jargon >> finally being used fo

Re: [Geotools-devel] ZooWPS and GeoTools use from an embedded Java

2010-06-10 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett wrote: > Okay I got back an amazing story that is more to do with Zoo WPS then > geotools... - File permission exceptions were more about the > classpath being set up wrong - Stack Overflow was more about > executing GeoTools from within an embedded Java; it requires a lot of > classes

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposed InGeo Data Access module

2010-06-11 Thread Andrea Aime
ymore Cheers Andrea > Lazarev Eugene > Ingener - Software Architecture > UralGeoInform > mailto: lazareveug...@gmail.com <mailto:lazareveug...@gmail.com> > SKYPE: lazareveugene > Cellular: +79058077697 > > > 2010/6/7 Andrea Aime mailto:aa...@opengeo.org>> >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposed InGeo Data Access module

2010-06-11 Thread Andrea Aime
lim goh wrote: > Speaking of NG, I see that the old stuffs are deprecated. Are they > going to be removed ever? if yes, is there a schedule for the removal > already? We don't have a plan, but since we could not move the old postgis module into unsupported in 2.6.x I guess a reasonable plan would

[Geotools-devel] A patch for gt-process and some discussion

2010-06-11 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, this week I've tried to make some of the processes in gt-process run in GeoServer, as they presented some decent variety in input and outputs. I succeded with some of them and found out a few issues in the processes that the attached patch fixes. The patch however does not contain only fixes

Re: [Geotools-devel] A patch for gt-process and some discussion

2010-06-11 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime wrote: > In general, to allow a client to describe and handle all the inputs > and output of the processes there has to be some agreement on what > data types are supported and how to handle multiplicity. And I forgot to deal with multiplicity. First off, if a parameter is

Re: [Geotools-devel] FeatureSource dispose and setTransaction

2010-06-12 Thread Andrea Aime
eak Not sure if they are applicable straigth to our case, but worth looking into > - FeatureSource.setTransaction( Transaction ) - > just because we are using readonly access does not mean we should be > prevented from drawing what is going on during a transaction +1 Cheers Andrea

[Geotools-devel] Handling DMS unit in the EPSG database

2010-06-13 Thread Andrea Aime
so we don't have backwards compatibility issues from that pov b) alternatively, add a flag to control the DMS/degree behavior. The patch to do simply a) is attached. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. diff --git a/modules

Re: [Geotools-devel] Handling DMS unit in the EPSG database

2010-06-13 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > On 13/06/2010, at 5:19 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> My guess is that anybody using a CRS with DMS unit is actually storing >> the data in decimal deegrees, and that providing actual support for >> the DMS unit transformation would just

Re: [Geotools-devel] Handling DMS unit in the EPSG database

2010-06-13 Thread Andrea Aime
eeing odd errors because the first digits after the decimal separator have a different meaning in DMS. I don't think it's of any likeliness that anybody uses that format (never stumbled into any GIS using it), but just in case, the flag would be a sort of documentation about the assumpt

Re: [Geotools-devel] Handling DMS unit in the EPSG database

2010-06-13 Thread Andrea Aime
e (to have a flag) I would also > settle for a warning in the javadocs. Sounds good to me. How would that flag look like? Something to be set in Hints? A system variable? From the pov of patching that behavior somthing behaving like a global variable would be best Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aim

[Geotools-devel] Feeback on the MapContext refactor

2010-06-13 Thread Andrea Aime
o see code that has just been commented out like in FeatureSourceMapLayer, bad practice... well, unless you noted down all the code that you've commented out and will remove it later. MapContext wise I see the interface has been modified and one method removed. No issue for me, but didn't

Re: [Geotools-devel] Feeback on the MapContext refactor

2010-06-13 Thread Andrea Aime
long as you remember to remove the commented out code I have no issues with that either. >> MapContext wise I see the interface has been modified and one >> method removed. No issue for me, but didn't you say the old API was >> not being changed? > > I did not; the ol

Re: [Geotools-devel] Feeback on the MapContext refactor

2010-06-14 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > On 14/06/2010, at 4:52 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> Jody Garnett ha scritto: >>>> Please don't add a layer.dispose() method, resources to be >>>> disposed are harder to use so let's limit the usage of >>>> dis

Re: [Geotools-devel] A patch for gt-process and some discussion

2010-06-14 Thread Andrea Aime
or out of a process. Yep, it's something the GS WPS is still not dealing with properly. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- ThinkGeek and WIRED&

Re: [Geotools-devel] A patch for gt-process and some discussion

2010-06-14 Thread Andrea Aime
re is an actual good reason to make single feature processes at all. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for

Re: [Geotools-devel] How to handle Oracle SRID problem

2010-06-14 Thread Andrea Aime
t;Central_Meridian", 9], PARAMETER ["Scale_Factor", .9996], PARAMETER ["False_Easting", 50], PARAMETER ["False_Northing", 0], UNIT ["Meter", 1]] where the projection name should simply be "Transverse Mercator". I see no easy way to per

Re: [Geotools-devel] How to handle Oracle SRID problem

2010-06-14 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: > However I tried the example from an online documentation I've found: > (http://youngcow.net/doc/oracle10g/appdev.102/b14255/sdo_cs_ref.htm#CHDIEJHH) > > SELECT SDO_CS.MAP_ORACLE_SRID_TO_EPSG(82361) FROM DUAL; Forgot to say that the above one worked a

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: How to handle Oracle SRID problem

2010-06-15 Thread Andrea Aime
45329251994328]], PROJECTION ["Transverse Mercator"], PARAMETER ["Latitude_Of_Origin", 0], PARAMETER ["Central_Meridian", 9], PARAMETER ["Scale_Factor", .9996], PARAMETER ["False_Easting", 50], PARAMETER ["False_Northing", 0],

Re: [Geotools-devel] HashMap Considered Harmful

2010-06-15 Thread Andrea Aime
impose (LinkedHashSet is just worse memory consumption wise). Memory issues are not problematic if they are used in places where you don't get to build millions of them though (and do so lazily, e.g., making the feature user map be built lazily provided a good performance boost

Re: [Geotools-devel] HashMap Considered Harmful

2010-06-15 Thread Andrea Aime
#x27;s harmful, it's the clueless developer that is. But we can all learn and improve no? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- ThinkGeek and WI

Re: [Geotools-devel] HashMap Considered Harmful

2010-06-15 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: > On 15/06/10 15:50, Andrea Aime wrote: >> Developer depending on hashmap order -> chaos >> It's not the fault of poor hashmap that developers use it in a number >> of places where it's unnecessary if not even harmful. > >

Re: [Geotools-devel] HashMap Considered Harmful

2010-06-15 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: > On 15/06/10 16:17, Andrea Aime wrote: >> I still see an incompetent developer in action there. >> You look at that interface, you get a Map, so you know: >> - the API designer decided the iteration order was not important >> - the iterat

Re: [Geotools-devel] HashMap Considered Harmful

2010-06-15 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: > On 15/06/10 16:45, Andrea Aime wrote: >> I would not blame Alice for Bob lack of skill (or simple oversight). >> She exposed a Map and made no promises on ordering, Bob took it and >> promised what he could not deliver. > > How does fi

[Geotools-devel] Backporting UOM work on 2.6.x

2010-06-15 Thread Andrea Aime
pinions. If I can't backport we'll roll a separate repo for it (most likely a git clone, maybe on GitHub, maybe somewhere else) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. --

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: MapContext proposal final call

2010-06-15 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > So I have a few votes in - and a few reviews (thanks!) > > • Andrea Aime +1 Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the d

[Geotools-devel] PostGIS geography column support is in

2010-06-15 Thread Andrea Aime
?) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PR

Re: [Geotools-devel] A patch for gt-process and some discussion

2010-06-15 Thread Andrea Aime
e all reworked, but with a certain amount of pain included. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultim

Re: [Geotools-devel] Backporting UOM work on 2.6.x

2010-06-15 Thread Andrea Aime
nd of releases; however we could issue one for > June or July. No release is required, a nightly build will do, though I hope that with CITE tests being automated GS can go back on a bit more frequent release cycle. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.or

Re: [Geotools-devel] A patch for gt-process and some discussion

2010-06-15 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Michael Bedward ha scritto: >> Hi Andrea et al, >> >> Thanks for looking at ways to improve the process module ! >> >> I'm happy with your comments about both VectorToRaster and RasterToVector. >> >> I would

Re: [Geotools-devel] Backporting UOM work on 2.6.x

2010-06-15 Thread Andrea Aime
> any changes should be additive. It is not affected, as far as I can see the uom were already parsed, but ignored. Not sure if the uom are encoded back in the transformer tough, never checked that Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service st

[Geotools-devel] UOM rescaling and DPI

2010-06-16 Thread Andrea Aime
: I see we already have a generic RescaleStyleVisitor, I guess I'll use that one for DPI handling (maybe double checking it's doing all the same rescales as the uom one, which has quite some unit tests backing it) -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert s

[Geotools-devel] Making other symbols obstacles for labels

2010-06-16 Thread Andrea Aime
the code work against the implementations on 2.6.x Otherwise I can setup a git clone just for this work for the time being. Opinions? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ---

Re: [Geotools-devel] UOM rescaling and DPI

2010-06-16 Thread Andrea Aime
es for printing (looking for confirmation on this one) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate Ge

[Geotools-devel] FilterFactory creating by default case insensitive LIKE

2010-06-16 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, the current filter factory creates case insensitive like filters which end up being encoded in sql as upper(att) like 'BLAH%' making it impossible to use indexing. Was that done on purpose or just by accident? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expe

Re: [Geotools-devel] Backporting UOM work on 2.6.x

2010-06-16 Thread Andrea Aime
t's doable, the uom rescaling activation is pretty much localized into a couple of spots in the code, so I could just do that, make it depend on a system property Good idea, thanks for the suggestion Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service stra

Re: [Geotools-devel] UOM rescaling and DPI

2010-06-16 Thread Andrea Aime
7;s doing basically what I'm suggesting, multiplying all symbol sizes by targetDpi/standarDdpi. Can we find any agreement on how we should call this so that I can move on and deliver this functionality? :-) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight

Re: [Geotools-devel] FilterFactory creating by default case insensitive LIKE

2010-06-17 Thread Andrea Aime
use FilterFactory2 and exert control over the case sensitivity flag, but in CQL and OGC Filter 1.1 there is no way to state a case sensivity flag... Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service

Re: [Geotools-devel] FilterFactory creating by default case insensitive LIKE

2010-06-17 Thread Andrea Aime
the catch that sql encoders won't recognize the function call as encodable so we'd end up running the filter in memory, but that can be fixed Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ---

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >