On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 09:46:29 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Laxminarayan Kamath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 21:45:36 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I used it earlier today and it fit my needs. I don't see why we should
remove
Hi,
Joseph Heled [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In 2.2, the histogram always takes the full image. I thought that in
the past it took the selection if there was one. Am I imagining
this?
Yes, I think you are imagining this. There's a rather old bug report
about it and basically we agreed that we
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 17:31:35 -0800, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:59:39AM +1300, Joseph Heled wrote:
In 2.2, the histogram always takes the full image. I thought that in the
past it took the selection if there was one. Am I imagining this? Is there
a way
Hi,
Laxminarayan Kamath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, what i mean is, when such confusions occur, like whether
or not to remove a tool from the toolbar, isn't it nice to have a
poll engine and make the poll public?
No, I don't think such questions should be decided by means of a
On Thursday 09 December 2004 06:45, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote:
OOps, Sorry Sven, Gmail is nice but is confusing for replies. Will
be care full next time.
By the way, what i mean is, when such confusions occur, like
whether or not to remove a tool from the toolbar, isn't it nice to
have a
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 09:27:02 -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 09 December 2004 06:45, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote:
OOps, Sorry Sven, Gmail is nice but is confusing for replies. Will
be care full next time.
By the way, what i mean is, when such
Joseph Heled [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In 2.2, the histogram always takes the full image. I thought that in
the past it took the selection if there was one. Am I imagining
this?
Sven writes:
Yes, I think you are imagining this. There's a rather old bug report
about it and basically we
Joseph Heled wrote:
In 2.2, the histogram always takes the full image. I thought that in the
past it took the selection if there was one. Am I imagining this? Is there
a way to get the histogram for just the selection?
Carol wrote:
it is easy enough to make a new layer of the selection
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 02:35:51PM +0530, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 17:31:35 -0800, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:59:39AM +1300, Joseph Heled wrote:
In 2.2, the histogram always takes the full image. I thought that in the
past it
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Joseph Heled [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In 2.2, the histogram always takes the full image. I thought that in
the past it took the selection if there was one. Am I imagining
this?
Yes, I think you are imagining this. There's a rather old bug report
about it and basically
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:24:59 -0800, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 02:35:51PM +0530, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 17:31:35 -0800, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:59:39AM +1300, Joseph Heled wrote:
In
11 matches
Mail list logo
