Hi,
Geert has made some progress on the patch to improve downscaling quality
in GIMP (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464466) and we would
like to include this change for GIMP 2.6. But in order to do this, we
need to know if the approach taken with this patch is indeed an
improvement ove
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 19:15 -0700, Valerie wrote:
> Half the current default is made up of non-editable round-ish
> brushes (that in my opinion makes the brush editor hard to
> discover, because new users end up wondering why the brush
> editor never works. In fact, I start each new instal
Andrei Simion wrote:
> When applying a pattern called 'GIMP Pattern #1' in 1.2 and 2.4 it does
> not produce the same result. I'd like to know where do the patterns of
> this type reside.
The standard pattern files which ship with GIMP are stored in
/usr/share/gimp/2.0/patterns on a Linux machi
Note: the developers barely have to do a thing.
Half the current default is made up of non-editable round-ish
brushes (that in my opinion makes the brush editor hard to
discover, because new users end up wondering why the brush
editor never works. In fact, I start each new installation of
Gimp
names like "gimp pattern #1" are shown in gimp when more than one
pattern has the same name ('gimp pattern' is the default pattern name
when saving.). Most likely, your pattern was in a specific directory,
that used to be included in the list of directories to look for
patterns in. compare your p
Ek kian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks Martin, finally i can compile GIMP 2.4.3 under Linux.
>
> maybe i should unpack the tarball under Linux and try to compile it
> first under Linux before try to compile it under Windows.
>
Hi
It's good that you can now compile on Linux
But I seem to have failed to
Hi,
I know that Gimp patterns are actually files having the extension .pat.
I want to upgrade from an older version of Gimp (1.2) to 2.4.
When applying a pattern called 'GIMP Pattern #1' in 1.2 and 2.4 it does
not produce the same result. I'd like to know where do the patterns of
this type res
Hi,
Thanks Martin, finally i can compile GIMP 2.4.3 under Linux.
after i carefully delete generated files from the source and try to compile
it again, it's still failed.
the error msg that displayed is "No rule to make target POTFILES.in" so i
check the folder, there is potfiles.in but not POTFIL
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 14:20 -0700, Bill Skaggs wrote:
> Jim Sabatke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems that in 2.4.6 that exif data are missing when saving as a
> > compressed jpg. They are not missing on jpgs with no compression.
>
> There is no such thing as a jpg with no compression, so i
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 08:59 +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> So, when on my original image, I select part, and use the "fill with
> gradient" tool, I first get a progress bar that moves in about 30
> seconds from 0 to 100%. Then I have to wait about 30 seconds for the
> swapping to stop. The fill
Hi,
it would have helped a lot if you had changed the subject of your mail,
since apparently you have changed the topic completely. Also your mail
should have better been send to the gimp-user list. Please do that next
time you have questions on using GIMP.
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 08:45 +0200, Rogi
11 matches
Mail list logo
