Re: [Gimp-developer] Improved brush editing interface mock-up

2009-07-26 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/26/2009 05:45 AM, SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote: Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: This is something that I, as an user, would like to have. It also seems to save some screen space when editing on a notebook that can do only 1024x768 too :-) This is a smaller version I made which shows that at

Re: [Gimp-developer] Improved brush editing interface mock-up

2009-07-26 Thread SHIRAKAWA Akira
Martin Nordholts wrote: I would just like to point out that the smallest screen size supported by GIMP is 1280x1024, so we don't need to make 1024x768 work or look good. Yes, I've read that many times and I would agree with it too since anything lower than that resolution is rather old gear.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Improved brush editing interface mock-up

2009-07-26 Thread Alexia Death
On Sunday 26 July 2009 11:02:30 SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote: Martin Nordholts wrote: I would just like to point out that the smallest screen size supported by GIMP is 1280x1024, so we don't need to make 1024x768 work or look good. Yes, I've read that many times and I would agree with it too

Re: [Gimp-developer] Improved brush editing interface mock-up

2009-07-26 Thread SHIRAKAWA Akira
Alexia Death wrote: Id have to agree with this one. I namely own a laptop with this resolution. I havent had any problems using gimp on it tho and I hope it stays that way. Yes, by keeping two dockable areas (left and right side of the screen) as by default, a 1440x900 resolution enables to

Re: [Gimp-developer] Improved brush editing interface mock-up

2009-07-26 Thread Owen
On Sunday 26 July 2009 11:02:30 SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote: Martin Nordholts wrote: I would just like to point out that the smallest screen size supported by GIMP is 1280x1024, so we don't need to make 1024x768 work or look good. Yes, I've read that many times and I would agree with it too

Re: [Gimp-developer] keybindings

2009-07-26 Thread peter sikking
Liam wrote: First, a BIG thank you to Peter and others: the new menu item overwrite is much clearer. I do still have a problem in several gnomish scenarios, but things are indeed getting better. If I use the file manager and drag a file to gimp, or if I use the image thumbnail browser

[Gimp-developer] VTF plug-in

2009-07-26 Thread Michael Hansen
Hello! At first: Sadly I am no programmer, but maybe there is a friendly, interested person out there who could make this: There exists a texture format (VTF), which is used by the Source game engine. http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/VTF There also exists an open library:

Re: [Gimp-developer] keybindings

2009-07-26 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 13:19 +0200, peter sikking wrote: (1) no default keybinding for overwrite precious file at all. this is the best solution. When the menu item is Overwrite foo.jpg there is no shortcut key (this will be a change to the git version) The other use of the menu item,

Re: [Gimp-developer] making tool re-arrangements cancellable in the preferences dialog

2009-07-26 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/24/2009 11:07 AM, Stephen Griffiths wrote: I am looking for some advice on how to make tool re-arrangements cancelable in the preferences dialog. (for http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500930) the current code that resets the preferences looks like this (in prefs-dialog): if

Re: [Gimp-developer] http post or ftp post

2009-07-26 Thread Nico
Joao S. O. Bueno a écrit : On Saturday 25 July 2009, Nico wrote: Hi Is it possible to send data (http and/or ftp) in a script-fu plugin ? Some examples ? Wich way ? Nico The Scheme intrpreter used in script-fu it is there because an scheme interpreter is tiny enough to fit inside the

Re: [Gimp-developer] http post or ftp post

2009-07-26 Thread Nico
Nico a écrit : Joao S. O. Bueno a écrit : On Saturday 25 July 2009, Nico wrote: Hi Is it possible to send data (http and/or ftp) in a script-fu plugin ? Some examples ? Wich way ? Nico The Scheme intrpreter used in script-fu it is there because an scheme interpreter is tiny enough to

Re: [Gimp-developer] Improved brush editing interface mock-up

2009-07-26 Thread Akkana Peck
Martin Nordholts wrote: I would just like to point out that the smallest screen size supported by GIMP is 1280x1024, so we don't need to make 1024x768 work or look good. SHIRAKAWA Akira writes: Yes, I've read that many times and I would agree with it too since anything lower than that