Dear developers.
Firstly I would like to thank you warmly for a very good tool. I'm
personally very happy with the user interface and don't see it inferior
to Photoshop. I though would like to urge you to fix the 16 bit depth
asap. Its true that many end figure don't have 16 bit/channel but
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:01 AM, ronald.arvids...@privat.utfors.se
ronald.arvids...@privat.utfors.se wrote:
snip I though would like to urge you to fix the 16 bit depth
asap. Its true that many end figure don't have 16 bit/channel but
before you get there its a VERY good thing to have.
On 1/14/11, Kevin Cozens wrote:
It is well known in that a lot of people know it exists. As for it being
understood, not so much.
I hate to tell you, but JS indeed is broadly known and used. At least
half of Creative Suite is scripted in JS, and there is a whole
industry around various JS
On 01/14/2011 12:29 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On 1/14/11, Kevin Cozens wrote:
It is well known in that a lot of people know it exists. As for it being
understood, not so much.
I hate to tell you, but JS indeed is broadly known and used. At least
half of Creative Suite is scripted in
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 05:17:45PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: Alexia Death alexiade...@gmail.com
2010/4/8 Aurimas Juška aurimas.ju...@gmail.com:
I believe most users write script-fu scripts to automate commonly
repeated steps. Therefore, it would be even better to complete
On Friday 14 January 2011 21:59:36 Marco Ciampa wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 05:17:45PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Writing out recorded actions in any language shouldn't be the problem...
I think that this is one of the most wanted TODO for GIMP.
If it is not a problem, why noone
On 14.01.2011 21:59, Marco Ciampa wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 05:17:45PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: Alexia Death alexiade...@gmail.com
I think script-fu would be ideal for such use. If you could record an
action, and then optionally convert it to a full script a lot of
It's just Troy... again. :-)
Once a year he writes about a free application that still isn't
there (according to him).
Some of the points point he expressed in the post may be valid (at
least technically), but they're not exactly breaking news for anyone.
Repeating year after year the same story
