Hi Alan,
Alan Horkan wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, David Odin wrote:
> > and as I already said before, using the 2.0 version of gfig would mean
> > to at least port the old version to the HIG standards,
>
> I was suggesting shipping the old unmodified version because it was more
> stable.
I ju
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, David Odin wrote:
> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 21:28:44 +0100
> From: David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: new gfig [Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options]
>
> O
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 07:13:32PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> It might help you to understand my negativity when I explain that the
> underlying instability of windows doesn't do the gimp any favours. When
> binaries are available windows is the easiest platform to test on and in a
> way the i
Hi,
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It might help you to understand my negativity when I explain that
> the underlying instability of windows doesn't do the gimp any
> favours. When binaries are available windows is the easiest
> platform to test on and in a way the instability of the
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 00:31:13 +0100
> From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options
>
> Hi,
>
>
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 08:51:26PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> (I really hope Gfig will be rolled back as the developer working on it has
> previously suggested, it is definately not ready for 2.2)
>
Thanks for your help. AFAIK, I'm the only one really working on gfig
for now. It isn't read
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 09:03:28PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Simon Budig wrote:
> > Alan Horkan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > > > Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> My counterpoint is that even though a submenu means o
Hi,
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was unable to get to use the gimp 2.1 series until recently. I
> cannot provide feedback only when it suits your timetable. When I
> pointed out problems with 2.0 you gave out to me for not mentioning
> them during the 1.3 cycle so I am making my
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Simon Budig wrote:
> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:41:18 +0100
> From: Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options
>
> Hi all.
>
> Alan Horkan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> &g
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 23:42:42 +0100
> From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options
>
> Hi,
>
>
-- Forwarded message --
From: Laxminarayan Kamath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:34:51 +0530
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options
To: David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 01:02:31 +0100, David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
Hi all.
Alan Horkan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Given my previous comments that is understandable and I think
> > > discoverability is important but it doesn't make sense to have a
> > > seperate menu item
Hi,
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 'Useless discussion'.
>
> Thanks for the encouragement, with that attitude is it any wonder more
> people dont try and provide feedback and try and improve the gimp.
Alan, the discussion became useless after the facts had been exchanged
and several p
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 18:49:26 +0100
> From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options
>
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Given my previous comments that is understandable and I think
> discoverability is important but it doesn't make sense to have a seperate
> menu item for every obscure feature and to me this is most definately an
> obscure feature.
It has been reques
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Jakub Friedl (lists) wrote:
> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:57:51 +0100
> From: "Jakub Friedl (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> GDev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas
> I'm surprised that enough users would be changing the setting often enough
> to want to be able to set it on a once off per window basis, I would have
> though that a single global preference would to override the toolkit
> default would have been enough
oh please no. or is the gimp supposed to
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:39:58 +0100
> From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options
>
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can understand how that would require you to change it regularly
> and why you might want a menu item for it. How did you like how the
> feature was presented in 2.0 or were you unaware of it until it was
> given a prominant menu item?
Hiding usef
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 12:48:02PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, David Odin wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 01:02:31 +0100
> > From: David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, David Odin wrote:
> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 01:02:31 +0100
> From: David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004
Hi,
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is this feature really important to some users, so much so that it
> needs menu items? I am suggesting it would be better to put this in
> the preferences if at all rather than cluttering the menus.
It is indeed important to be able to change this f
> Yes, this feature is important to me at least. It is important to
> have a dark surrounding around a dark image and a light one around a
> light image, so you can judge the contrast better.
Yes, it is an important setting and I use it often. But I was happy
with 2.0 in this matter, it provide
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 11:06:21PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> I noticed the Canvas background colour options under the Image menu in the
> gimp 2.2.
>
> In gimp 2.0 this option was fairly discrete and was available on the top
> right just above the scrollbar which seemed fair enough even if it
I noticed the Canvas background colour options under the Image menu in the
gimp 2.2.
In gimp 2.0 this option was fairly discrete and was available on the top
right just above the scrollbar which seemed fair enough even if it was
not something I would ever change (except perhaps by changing my des
25 matches
Mail list logo
