Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.2 and Script-Fu/Tiny-Fu.

2004-09-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why wouldn't that be the case any longer? It would only be packaged in a separate source tree. Of course every GIMP installation would include it. How would you enfore the dependency? I don't understand how removing script-fu from the source

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.2 and Script-Fu/Tiny-Fu.

2004-09-08 Thread Alan Horkan
On another note, I'm not sure this is a desirable goal. splitting stuff off feels an awful lot like putting it out to pasture. The that does seem like a valid risk to consider goal of just having the core application, with no plug-ins, no image data structures, no scripts, and a minimum

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.2 and Script-Fu/Tiny-Fu.

2004-09-08 Thread William Skaggs
Kevin Cozens wrote: Replacing Script-Fu with Tiny-Fu could help push Tiny-Fu along a bit (ie. with translations) if it isn't fully ready yet by exposing it to more users but what is in the best interest of GIMP and its users? I'm actually quite sympathetic, but it doesn't seem to me that

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.2 and Script-Fu/Tiny-Fu.

2004-09-07 Thread Alan Horkan
Replacing Script-Fu with Tiny-Fu could help push Tiny-Fu along a bit (ie. with translations) if it isn't fully ready yet by exposing it to more users but what is in the best interest of GIMP and its users? I know I'd much prefer another stable release with Script-Fu in it first, but that is

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.2

2004-09-06 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Quoting Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I do think however that we should give us a little bit more time and try to get the following done during the next weeks: - add more plug-in previews - try to make the previews scale with the dialog - implement color management as was

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.2

2004-09-06 Thread David Odin
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 05:52:20PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, a while ago we decided for a feature freeze for GIMP 2.2 that should have taken effect last week. I haven't enforced this feature freeze yet because there's been some good hacking going on recently and I think we definitely

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.2

2004-09-06 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 06 Sep 2004 17:52:20 +0200 a while ago we decided for a feature freeze for GIMP 2.2 that should have taken effect last week. I haven't enforced this feature freeze yet because there's been some good hacking going on recently and I think

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.2

2004-09-06 Thread William Skaggs
Sven wrote: Please comment on this proposal if you disagree with it or think there are important features missing that you are already working on. I don't disagree with it, but I wish you had mentioned specifically what I consider the biggest issue of all: bug #143668 (performance problems

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.2

2004-09-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't disagree with it, but I wish you had mentioned specifically what I consider the biggest issue of all: bug #143668 (performance problems with GtkUIManager), which on a slow machine can make GIMP pause for 20 sec or more each time it creates