Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp-Python with no ui? (external script)

2006-04-01 Thread Ministeyr

Manish Singh wrote:

 By the way, I thought the batch mode only understood scheme, so it 
would make the whole thing even more complicated.


 One line of scheme to call your python script won't increase the
 complexity appreciably.

The problem is that if i have huge lists and complex python objects in 
my external scripts, and i want to access them in the gimp's python-fu 
script, i have to pass them through scheme, and thus it means converting 
back and forth.

I will try to adapt with pickle if it works.

 If you want something better, why don't you contribute it?

I would make a mess, since i'm not really a good programmer (plus i 
don't know anything about gimp's internal structure or python's...).



Ministeyr
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp-Python with no ui? (external script)

2006-04-01 Thread Ministeyr

Carol Spears wrote:

i asked because i put instructions of how to do this online.

i have a crontab that runs gimp.

that being said, it has been running for so long now, i have no idea
what sort of mess it is making, but it was all so easy that it was a
pleasure to put the instructions online.


Well, i don't know if that is exactly what i meant, but i would still be 
grateful if you could give me the url to that document.

Thanks.


Ministeyr
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] A few suggestions forThe Gimp

2006-04-01 Thread Alan Horkan

(As Carol mentioned the formattting in your mail was troublesome.  I think
maybe you need to change you line wrapping settings to less than 80
characters.  Fortunately the email program I use can correct for that.)

On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Richard Reddy wrote:

 Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 00:42:46 -0500
 From: Richard Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
 Subject: [Gimp-developer] A few suggestions forThe Gimp

 Greetings Developers,

  I've been using Photoshop since version 1 of Photostyler.  Before
 that, I dreamed of digital images while using an 8086 PC and CGI
 graphics.  Photoshop is a good application, but I feel a growing
 distaste for proprietary software.

This is one answer to the question of why so many users want the GIMP to
behave more like Adobe Photoshop, they do not dislike Photoshop but
they do dislike the limitations of proprietary software.  (People have
asked and I think it is worth highlighting an opinion from a long term
Photoshop user like you.)

 So, for 2006 my photography business migrates to the GNU/Linux box.  I

 thought.  A mutual friend, Richard Stallman, said I should run them by
 you, so here you are.

Does he still pronounce the SLASH in GNU/Linux?

 1.  A browser just like Photoshop.

Gimp 1.0 had a built in browser called GUASH but (if I recall correctly)
there were so many better thumbnail browsers out there and GUASH wasn't
getting a whole lot of maintainance love and the integration benefits were
minimal.

 No, better not.  The browser is junk--very clunky and hungry for system
 resources.

Okay ...
so maybe it the current stategy is a good idea then.

 CS browser is just one of those flat-file Microsoft thingies.  Why not
 incorporate a real relational database?  So, my suggestion is to
 dramatically improve workflow by developing a MySQL database companion
 for Gimp, that allows users to search and sort large image databases
 like mine (30,000 digital images).  Images could be tagged while they
 are being processed, or batch tagged.

Interesting idea.  I suspect you would need to sponsor a developer if you
really wanted it to happen though.

 As director of photography for North American Women's Baseball League
 (NAWBL), I know that searching and sorting images can be very
 time-consuming work.  Using Gimp you could automatically transfer image
 metadata to tags.  It would be very useful to do a search involving all
 the images shot at f/2.8 or f/4.0?  All the photos shot with a
 particular lens.  All the photos shot at ISO 100, or ISO 800.  Photos of

Programs like Bibble Pro, Aperture (from Apple) and Adobe Lightroom sound
better suited to these tasks of batch processing sets of photos and RAW
files.  These are seperate and distinct programs from the likes of Adobe
Photoshop, Corel Paint, and Macromedia Fireworks.  I wonder if trying to
shoehorn even more functionality into the GIMP in a clean and organised
way is really managable.

 Such a database could be great learning tool for spirited amateurs.

Incidentally are you familiar with Photo.net?

 in the browser.  Adobe cannot afford to package a powerful database
 engine, because they would be paying license fees!

I'm pretty sure Adobe could use MySQL just as easily as they already use
Python.

 2.  The much talked about user interface.  Nobody will agree on one, any
 more than they agree on the ten best photographs.  Why not have
 configuration options, that you could test, and pick a design you like?

The cost of offering more interface and configuration options is
maintainance.  It is more than twice as much work to maintain two
inferfaces.  Just look at how upset some people have been getting over the
differences between the GNU Image Manipulation program and GIMPShop (and
previously Cinepaint).

 Gimp looks pretty good on Fedora 5--because Fedora 5 has a beautiful
 design for the desktop.  Reminds me of Japanese art.  So, this
 suggestion is just to provide different skins--as many as people care to
 develop or download.

There are groups already interested in providing themes for GTK and Gnome
applications.  This doesn't usually happen within the developement of the
GNU Image manipulation program.  (I would be interested to see a fully
featured theme with dark widgets like those which are so popular in 3D
software and high end video production.)

In response to your comments about one size not fitting all: I dont use
multiple desktops, ever.  Your suggestions about making even more use of
mulitlple desktops sounds complicated.

 It's a bitch to port MySQL and ODBC to windoze, in conjunction with a

I'd be surprised if it wasn't already there.

 MySQL database feature. Power is leveraged, by utilizing system

leveraged
utilizing

where is Dave Neary :P

(It is an in joke, dont worry about it.)

 Having said all this, I prefer working with film.  :-)


 Hope my suggestions are not too impractical.

With interested developers, time and resources they sound possible.
Otherwise they 

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plea for a new interface for the GIMP

2006-04-01 Thread Ministeyr

Roland Wild wrote:
From: http://linuxmedia.tuxfamily.org/contrib/gimp/index2.html 

 Appearance of the layer an channels window ''onmouseover''.

Another solution is that you could just have some special key (to set up 
in the preferences) to pop up the minimized windows. For example you 
keep only the main toolbox and the image window above all, the other 
windows minimized (or in the background), and when you press ctrl it 
shows the tools options and the layers/channels window, in the exact 
position you left them before minimization, but above the image window. 
Then you just have to configure your tools or change your working layer, 
and when you release ctrl, those windows just get back to where they 
were before (minimized or in the background).
Alternatively you could have the key toggle the displaying or not of 
those windows (instead of having to keep the key pressed, this is more 
suited for other keys, like the letters).



Ministeyr
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] A few suggestions forThe Gimp

2006-04-01 Thread Robert L Krawitz
   Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 14:34:45 +0100 (BST)
   From: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED]

CS browser is just one of those flat-file Microsoft thingies.
Why not incorporate a real relational database?  So, my
suggestion is to dramatically improve workflow by developing a
MySQL database companion for Gimp, that allows users to search
and sort large image databases like mine (30,000 digital images).
Images could be tagged while they are being processed, or batch
tagged.

   Interesting idea.  I suspect you would need to sponsor a developer
   if you really wanted it to happen though.

As director of photography for North American Women's Baseball
League (NAWBL), I know that searching and sorting images can be
very time-consuming work.  Using Gimp you could automatically
transfer image metadata to tags.  It would be very useful to do a
search involving all the images shot at f/2.8 or f/4.0?  All the
photos shot with a particular lens.  All the photos shot at ISO
100, or ISO 800.  Photos of

   Programs like Bibble Pro, Aperture (from Apple) and Adobe Lightroom
   sound better suited to these tasks of batch processing sets of
   photos and RAW files.  These are seperate and distinct programs
   from the likes of Adobe Photoshop, Corel Paint, and Macromedia
   Fireworks.  I wonder if trying to shoehorn even more functionality
   into the GIMP in a clean and organised way is really managable.

Check out KPhotoAlbum (http://ktown.kde.org/kphotoalbum/), which
previously was named KimDaBa (KDE Image Database).  It uses an XML
file rather than a relational database for its back end storage, but
it has this kind of search capability (including user tagging, date
ranges, and EXIF data in the current pre-release snapshot, via
SQLite).  It's very fast.  I have about 12,000 images and there's very
little delay on just about any operation.

There has been some discussion about using an RDBMS backend for
storage vs. the XML backend.  My own calculations suggest that at
least up to 50,000 or so images there's no need for anything more
elaborate, and there are significant advantages to the textual XML
storage.

That said, merging image storage with image manipulation doesn't feel
quite right to me.  KPhotoAlbum was designed for one purpose -- to
maintain large collections of images with excellent search
capability.  The GIMP is also designed for one purpose -- to create
and edit images.  These two functions seem completely orthogonal to
me.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] LGM 2nd Edition - discussion going on

2006-04-01 Thread Louis Desjardins

Hi,

I just want to let know the GIMP's devels that we are currently 
gathering ideas about the next edition of LGM here 
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/create/2006-March/000378.html 
and following posts.


There is also a nice article from Peter Linnel at 
http://www.scribus.net/index.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=115

for all that could not attend!

AFAIK, it was suggested we settle on the host city around mid-april. 
So please, let yourself hear!


It was a *real* pleasure for me to meet people from the GIMP's crew 
in Lyon! Hope to meet you again next year!


Cheers!

Louis Desjardins
[Scribus]
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp-Python with no ui? (external script)

2006-04-01 Thread Carol Spears
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 03:01:31PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
 Carol Spears wrote:
 i asked because i put instructions of how to do this online.
 
 i have a crontab that runs gimp.
 
 that being said, it has been running for so long now, i have no idea
 what sort of mess it is making, but it was all so easy that it was a
 pleasure to put the instructions online.
 
 Well, i don't know if that is exactly what i meant, but i would still be 
 grateful if you could give me the url to that document.
 Thanks.
 
http://carol.gimp.org/gimp/scripting/routines.html#shell

carol

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] What is this list?

2006-04-01 Thread George Rice



Could you please tell me what this mailing list is? 
Do I post my buisness on this mailing list?
Please let me know. Thank 
You, George Rice
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Smaller toolbar and grouping

2006-04-01 Thread Bart


Hi,

just a proposal about a smaller toolbar and a way grouping of buttons in 
the toolbar (not about what kind of buttons belong to which specific 
group and there position etc.).


http://www.neeneenee.de/blender/toolbar.png

--
|\/\/\/|
|  |
| (O)(O)Bart.
C  _)   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|   ,_/
|   /- Ich bin nicht berechtigt Aushilfslehrer zu feuern -
/   \
http://www.neeneenee.de
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Plea for a new interface user for the GIMP

2006-04-01 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

Roland Wild [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Before to show you that review I want to point out that I'm
neither a developper nor a designer but just a user. And I don't
know if other alternativ interfaces were suggested on this
mailing list.  I would like you to give me your opinion on this:
http://linuxmedia.tuxfamily.org/contrib/gimp/index.html you can
access to the english version by clicking on the little flag on
the top. this english version was translated by me: again I
apologize for the possible bad words.

Nothing really new there except for the transparent windows which are
simply not implementable in a portable way (yet). Otherwise your
proposal is very similar to other proposals we've seen before. Our
plan is to discuss these changes based on the product vision that we
have created at LGM and based on the user scenarios that we are
going to create next. Feel free to join to this effort.


Sven

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Smaller toolbar and grouping

2006-04-01 Thread Jon A. Cruz


On Apr 1, 2006, at 7:32 AM, Bart wrote:



Hi,

just a proposal about a smaller toolbar and a way grouping of  
buttons in the toolbar (not about what kind of buttons belong to  
which specific group and there position etc.).


http://www.neeneenee.de/blender/toolbar.png


That seems pretty

However, from a usability standpoint it might be much harder to use  
than just a straight line of buttons popping up either below or to  
the right. (Similar to the don't have to stop and look for it  
position for the Mac OS menubar on the screen not the window).


There could be an argument for it becoming second nature, like  
Graffiti moves on a Palm, but then you also have to commit to keeping  
the popups' relative locations in the same spots forever.


Also, while some people work more naturally with mouse gestures,  
others do not.

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Smaller toolbar and grouping

2006-04-01 Thread Campbell Barton

Hey Bart.. Another Blender3D person here!

As far as useability, goes- im that That fussed. though I tend towards 
the more common row of buttons under the button your pressing (alligned 
to the right/left)
This is simple because your not limited to a 4 options. (okay 5 would 
work but look silly) and since a diagonal button is not a part of the 
options but still outlined somewhat, (in barts example the measurement 
tool is outlined on 3 sides, though I can tell its not an option, a 
quick click and select may be more confusing in this case.)

its better to just have a row//

Another resion to use a left/right aligned row. is that many people 
place there toolbars at the side of there screen. no5. would have the 
LHS button off the screen.


Still I like the idea of having nested buttons, especialy for the 
transform tools that I rarely use but need to access.

- Cam


Jon A. Cruz wrote:


On Apr 1, 2006, at 7:32 AM, Bart wrote:



Hi,

just a proposal about a smaller toolbar and a way grouping of buttons 
in the toolbar (not about what kind of buttons belong to which 
specific group and there position etc.).


http://www.neeneenee.de/blender/toolbar.png


That seems pretty

However, from a usability standpoint it might be much harder to use 
than just a straight line of buttons popping up either below or to the 
right. (Similar to the don't have to stop and look for it position 
for the Mac OS menubar on the screen not the window).


There could be an argument for it becoming second nature, like 
Graffiti moves on a Palm, but then you also have to commit to keeping 
the popups' relative locations in the same spots forever.


Also, while some people work more naturally with mouse gestures, 
others do not.

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer




--
Campbell J Barton

133 Hope Street
Geelong West, Victoria 3218 Australia

URL:http://www.metavr.com
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: AU (03) 5229 0241
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Re: Plea for a new interface for the GIMP

2006-04-01 Thread GSR - FR
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2006-04-01 at 1546.52 +0200):
 Roland Wild wrote:
  From: http://linuxmedia.tuxfamily.org/contrib/gimp/index2.html 
   Appearance of the layer an channels window ''onmouseover''. 
 Another solution is that you could just have some special key (to set up 
 in the preferences) to pop up the minimized windows. For example you 

You should try tab key when over an image window... at least it does
something here. Control(+shift)+tab do interesting things too.

GSR
 
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Pea for a new interface for the GIMP

2006-04-01 Thread Roland Wild
Good Morning,

I read all your answers and i thank you for.

Thank you a lot Alex Fernandez, Robert L Krawitz, Alastair M. Robinson and Ministeyr
 You suggested me to use certain functionalities of my
window manager and I found. Robert, what you proposed me get closer
that I wanted to do. I will try to make a little video to show how.
Alex, I understand now why gimp-developpers doesn't want to make such
an interface: it is explain as you said in this page http://docs.gimp.org/en/concepts-beginners.html#gimp-concepts-usage
 : 
Unlike some other programs, GIMP does not give you the options of putting
everything—controls and image displays—all into a single comprehensive
window. The GIMP developers have always felt that this is a poor way of
working, because it forces the program to perform a wide range of
functions that are much better done by a dedicated window manager [...] it is almost impossible to
do in a way that works correctly across all of the operating systems GIMP
is intended to run on.
Ministeyr I'm not a good user of keyboard keys but this could be a solution too.
 As I said I will try to make a little video to show how my
window manager (KDE) is able to respond to a part of my waitings.
 But the same problem persist, as Alastair pointed out :
Sadly that's not an option under Windows, and most disappointingly,
not under stock Gnome either.

Thank you Carol Spears...
 but I think you have not understand my aim which was not to make noise but to improve.
As I said before, I'm not a developper (so I'm not able to make my own
patches even if I would like) nor a profesional designer. I'm just a
simple user who want to contibute at his level.
Another thing: I use the GIMP because it's the best alternative to draw
and manipulate photos in the freesoftware world and I'm a GNU/Linux
user for years now. What is done in other softwares like
paintshoppro or photoshop (and thus gimpshop) for example does not
interest me here... and I think these softwares meet the same problems
when it is about saving screen space to draw (on 17 screen). So I ask
you the same question: Don't you feel the GIMP interface may be
uncomfortable to use at lengh? If your answer to this question is no,
I take back my comments and I will review my own use of the software.
 What I don't understand is the maneer you consider a
simple user can contribute to a project. Is it only the developpers who
have the right to their software or can the users bring their feelings
about the use of it? If these users are not able to develope a patch
don't they have right to speak?
 I respect the work of the GIMP developers creew and by propose my vision I don't think I work against them.

Thank you Sven Neumann...
 for the invitation, I will try to participate as possible as I can.

Roland.

  
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Plea for a new interface...

2006-04-01 Thread Roland Wild
Excuse me for the title in my precedent mail. I would like to write Plea instead of Pea.

Roland
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] A few suggestions forThe Gimp

2006-04-01 Thread cedric GEMY

Hi Richard,

As my englis his quite poor, i'm not sure i've understood, but i try.
i have been teaching photoshop for several years. But in the same time, 
i was using Gimp and only Gimp at home.


It is always hard to change. Of course, Gimp will lack some features, if 
you see it from Photoshop's point of view. But take it the other way, 
and Photoshop will have to be improved too.


But i also feel sometimes that we can work much faster with Photoshop, 
but not always. And, in fact,I don't know if productivity is a good way 
to judge free software. I'm not sure.


Here is what ia can tell

1. Image Browser : there are many image browser, even free. The question 
is why developping one for Gimp ? There are so many things to do, and 
most part of developper are really working on so many things. But may be 
i have something that could help you. If you run Linux and have Gqview 
installed, I have made a simple C script that allows you to run it from 
within Gimp (Simple). I'm beeing modifying Gqview for a better 
integration, but i've not reach that point i can publish it. The script 
could be esaily changed for another app, if it can help.
it's not including the DB feature you tell about, but i take it 
somwhere. If one day i become a good developer. ;)


2. Your proposal seem to be : more complete theming. why not. I've 
already propose on Sven's website to have profiles on Gimp that could 
allow very important customization for each Gimp purpose (an UI for a 
photographer, is not a goos UI for a 3d Designer : see Bart's proposal 
http://www.neeneenee.de/blender/toolbar.png : it is typical from 3d 
softwares. But anybody can already add theme. Just have to do some. 
Tango is particularly working on it. Just wait and see.


cheers
Cedric


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Smaller toolbar and grouping

2006-04-01 Thread Bart

Hi,

thanks for the replies, so i going on with it:
http://www.neeneenee.de/blender/toolbar02.png

--
|\/\/\/|
|  |
| (O)(O)Bart.
C  _)   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|   ,_/
|   /- Ich bin nicht berechtigt Aushilfslehrer zu feuern -
/   \
http://www.neeneenee.de
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp-Python with no ui? (external script)

2006-04-01 Thread Manish Singh
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 02:58:12PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
 Manish Singh wrote:
 
  By the way, I thought the batch mode only understood scheme, so it 
 would make the whole thing even more complicated.
 
  One line of scheme to call your python script won't increase the
  complexity appreciably.
 
 The problem is that if i have huge lists and complex python objects in 
 my external scripts, and i want to access them in the gimp's python-fu 
 script, i have to pass them through scheme, and thus it means converting 
 back and forth.
 I will try to adapt with pickle if it works.

You could serialize them to a temporary file, or choose from a number of
IPC methods python ships with. No need to pass stuff like that over the
command line.

How were you planning on doing it via your original though of having
having a gimp_noui anyway? The issues are more or less the same.
 
-Yosh
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Pea for a new interface for the GIMP

2006-04-01 Thread Carol Spears
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 04:24:42PM -0400, Roland Wild wrote:
 
but I think you have not understand my aim which was not to make noise
 but to improve.

my aim was to explain that there are many options than just voicing your
ideas here on this mail list.

this mail list used to be very alive and passionate about making
software.

 As I said before, I'm not a developper (so I'm not able to make my own
 patches even if I would like) nor a profesional designer. I'm just a simple
 user who want to contibute at his level.
 Another thing: I use the GIMP because it's the best alternative to draw and
 manipulate photos in the freesoftware world and I'm a GNU/Linux user for
 years now.  What is done in other softwares like paintshoppro or photoshop
 (and thus gimpshop) for example does not interest me here... and I think
 these softwares meet the same problems when it is about saving screen space
 to draw (on 17 screen). So I ask you the same question: Don't you feel the
 GIMP interface may be uncomfortable to use at lengh? If your answer to
 this question is no, I take back my comments and I will review my own use of
 the software.

i am difficult to improve software for.  i say this because i loved
gimp-1.0.2 when i first got it.  my workflow involved the software that
i had.  me and gimp and a very small computer that ran linux ran circles
around a photoshop user, the huge (in comparison) computer that i use
now and windows.

it seems to be out of fashion to use what you have and try to determine
the reasons it works the way it does.

gimp has kept up with my needs and work flow.  due to the ease in
scripting it, as i needed to do more, gimp was able to do more.

i was actually surprised at how much i liked the new gui in gimp-2.0.
but even then, it is a lot the gtk+ developers who made things that made
sense to them.  gimp uses these widgets.  gtk+ is the gimp toolkit, btw.
using linux for years and knowing where the software comes from and who
writes it are different things.

What I don't understand is the maneer you consider a simple user can
 contribute to a project. Is it only the developpers who have the right to
 their software or can the users bring their feelings about the use of it? If
 these users are not able to develope a patch don't they have right to speak?
I respect the work of the GIMP developers creew and by propose my vision
 I don't think I work against them.
 
i tried to answer questions on the gimp-user list and i lurked on the
developer list for a long while.

if a user feels that making a suggestion is a good contribution, first
this user should probably look to see if the suggestion has been made
before and what happened from that.

other ways to contribute would be to translate tutorials for other
software apps (like photoshop or paintshoppro or even microsoft paint)
into gimp tutorials.  there is also the gimp documentation project, i
don't know how complete or good the gimp-help docs are -- i understand
there are some areas that could be better or more complete.

i ask the following as a simple question.  here is the background to
this question as well.  after i used the humble gimp-1.0 and had such a
great success (by working with it) i felt nothing but respect for the
people who wrote it and tried to think like they did.  now here is my
question, as a user, what made you think that your suggestions (that
were perhaps without research or similar respectful background searches)
would be helpful?  i really believe that you consider it to be helpful,
i am trying to understand the logic that got you there.

perhaps you think that the developers are paid.  maybe you did not
consider tutorial writing because again, you considered this to be a we
hire you based on merit position.  as you can see, i have a difficult
time building the logic that got you here with your suggestions. 

my approach with the gimp developers long ago was the same approach i
would like people to take with me when i have been involved with
something that i considered so wonderful and beautiful as the gimp i get
when i work with it.

here is how another user contributed.  at the lgm meeting, i have no
idea where he came from or how far he travelled to get there.  after
much discussion about things, he raised his hand and said that he had
been a user for years and was really happy with gimp.

maybe you could make a web page for people like that to have a voice.
that sure felt better and i think he did enough research to confidently
say what he did.

i appreciate your enthusiasm,

carol


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer