Hi,
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 19:13 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
> Unfortunately, the code has more that one bug, or the correction
> I made didn't solve the issue completely.
I think we should then replace the example by something simpler. The
point of this tutorial is not to show how to implement
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 08:08 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I did some revectoring and tidy up work on the convolution plugin last
> year and got told off for not testing it and introducing bugs. It turned
> out the bugs have been there since 1997. My objective was to make the code
>
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:13:08 +0100, Luis A. Florit
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My 'solution' (change 'x1, y1,' in line 241 by 'x1, y1+1,')
> took care of the shift, but not of the banding.
> The homogeneous grey band just moved to the bottom...
> (you cannot imagine the mess this does in my cod
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 05:31:26 +0100,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting "Luis A. Florit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
>> http://w3.impa.br/~luis/fotos/lixo/grid_blurred.jpg
>>
>> You can see three problems:
>> 1) The old 1-pixel-down shift.
>> 2) The two dark bands (20 lines each) at top and botto
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 05:03, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have read through the list at
> http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/SummerOfCode and I think we need to
> triage the list and try to come up with fewer but more detailed
> proposals. Here are some comments to get us started:
>
I added some more
Quoting "Luis A. Florit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> http://w3.impa.br/~luis/fotos/lixo/grid_blurred.jpg
>
> You can see three problems:
> 1) The old 1-pixel-down shift.
> 2) The two dark bands (20 lines each) at top and bottom of the image.
> 3) Even much intriguing is the grey band right below the
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 01:43 -0500, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> > It is pretty easy to crash many (most?) of the plug-ins when
> > passed bad data from some script. Checks in libgimp can stop GIMP
> > from crashing but will only go so far to stop the plug-in from
> > crashing. I think it would be a wort
Matthew Wood wrote:
Hi Matthew,
> I'd really like to participate in Google SoC and specifically with the
> GIMP project. I am only a second year CS major though and so am still
> in the early stages of my education. I'm interested in the
> "search-based menu browser" idea, but was unsure how to f
> > My plugin is working fine, after I found my bug and the one in
> > the blur example. It's just annoying.
>
> Then please explain the bug in the example code and send us a patch
> (preferably against SVN) that we can apply so that others won't run
> into the problem again.
>
> http://svn.gnome.o
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:54:25 +0100, David Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/8/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > If you rotate by exactly 90 degrees, this is always done with
>> > INTERPOLATION_NONE, no matter what you select in the tool options.
>>
>> Perhaps thi
Hi,
Save-for-web plug-in has been rewritten in order to make code
maintainable and to introduce some features previously discussed on
the mailing list.
If someone tests it (last version 0.8), please tell if it is useful
and comment whether it should be added as standard gimp plugin. (There
is an
On 3/8/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> If you rotate by exactly 90 degrees, this is always done with
> INTERPOLATION_NONE, no matter what you select in the tool options.
Perhaps this is the culprit? An offset seems unavoidable if the
transformation is performed without interp
:-)
Raphaël Quinet píše v Čt 08. 03. 2007 v 11:16 +0100:
> On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:15:53 +0100, Petr Gajdos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm solving bug (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231161 ) in
> > package gimp-unstable-2.3.11. [...]
> > Is it OK to replace 2 by 4 in the
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:15:53 +0100, Petr Gajdos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm solving bug (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231161 ) in
> package gimp-unstable-2.3.11. [...]
> Is it OK to replace 2 by 4 in the definition of 'values' variable?
Yes, of course this is OK. Thanks
Hi,
I'm solving bug (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231161 ) in
package gimp-unstable-2.3.11. There are modified elements 2 and 3 of
'values' array on lines 223 - 226 of file
plug-ins/winicon/main.c
But this doesn't agree with definition of 'values' parameter of function
run
15 matches
Mail list logo
