Hi,
the Open dialog is a poor replacement for a file manager. If you only
use it as a drag source, then why not just use your file manager
instead?
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
the Open dialog is a poor replacement for a file manager. If you only
use it as a drag source, then why not just use your file manager
instead?
...
My file manager is Midnight Commander :) I've just tried
People using mc should not worry about drag and drop. They should use
Menu(F9)CommandsEdit extensions file and friends and add
gimp-remote as handler for extensions you want.
If I am not wrong that is the mail reason gimp-remote was developed.
If I continue about MC, I am afraid it will be
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 14:54 +, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote:
People using mc should not worry about drag and drop. They should use
Menu(F9)CommandsEdit extensions file and friends and add
gimp-remote as handler for extensions you want.
With gimp-2.4, the use of gimp-remote is deprecated,
jbaker wrote:
o What would really be nice and make the dropzone a lot more
usable... if there is was a file browser built into it...
split the niw vertically, put a file browser on one side,
and dropzone and whatever else on the other side...
I
Hi all,
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Kevin Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jbaker wrote:
o What would really be nice and make the dropzone a lot more
usable... if there is was a file browser built into it...
split the niw vertically, put a file
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 15:31 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
About the graying out toolbox, dockers and elements not used when no
image is open, I think it breaks a functionality that is already present
in gimp: the ability to custumize the interface (moving dialogs to
dockers,
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:54:59 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 15:31 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
About the graying out toolbox, dockers and elements not used when no
image is open, I think it breaks a functionality that is already present
in gimp:
As you can see from the responses to your mail, there are quite a few
trolls on this list who aren't even willing to try the new stuff.
Otherwise we wouldn't have gotten so many responses that are obviously
based on wrong assumptions and that clearly show that people have not
followed your
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 13:41 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so why are they greyed out ?
They aren't. That's the wrong assumption you are making.
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 13:27 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
You're assuming, as usual, that a final user should compile the svn
code, know how to deal with the installed version and the development
version in the same machine, etc. Otherwise the user can't speak his mind.
I am
About the graying out toolbox, dockers and elements not used when no
image is open, I think it breaks a functionality that is already present
in gimp: the ability to custumize the interface (moving dialogs to
dockers, changing the dimensions and position of elements, etc.)
That's, imo, a
Guillermo wrote:
About the graying out toolbox, dockers and elements not used when no
image is open, I think it breaks a functionality that is already
present
in gimp: the ability to custumize the interface (moving dialogs to
dockers, changing the dimensions and position of elements, etc.)
13 matches
Mail list logo
