[snip]
> I have just send a better bug report to the bugtracker, hoping that it
> will help you to fix the bugs in the scripts. However, I see that the
> form on Xach's site wraps the text in a very ugly way, so my nicely
> formatted bug report is now very difficult to read (#7732). I will
> sen
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 06:13:18AM -0800, pixel fairy wrote:
> is seems you cannot do to the three color channels what you can to any
> other, such as duplicate.
> duplicating a color channel is usefull for things like masking out
> complex selections (like hair)
The RGB channels are not real c
On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 10:04:05PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
[snip]
>
> Come on guys. This idea is not new and the only reason it's not yet
> implemented is the feature freeze. Read the list we created last August
> at the Chaos Communication Camp...
Perhaps it's time to make the TODO file a
On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 10:04:05PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
[snip]
>
> Come on guys. This idea is not new and the only reason it's not yet
> implemented is the feature freeze. Read the list we created last August
> at the Chaos Communication Camp...
What's the URL? I looked at http://sven.gi
It's a little confusing to me sometimes to use the gradient tool, thinking
the gradient at the bottom of the toolbar will be used, and finding out that
it's actually using the FG-BG colors (or vice versa). I do know how to
change it, but sometimes I forget which is in effect.
It would be nice if
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 10:36:19PM +0100, Raphael Quinet wrote:
> Is there any current archive for the Gimp mailing lists?
http://www.mail-archive.com/gimp-user%40xcf.berkeley.edu/ and
http://www.mail-archive.com/gimp-developer%40scam.xcf.berkeley.edu/ have
relatively recent archives. They're at
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 05:15:59PM +, Austin Donnelly wrote:
[snip]
>
> > It's not clear why it behaves differently from the Bucket Fill tool,
> > but it has done so forever. But then I only use DnD for filling
> > nowadays since you can't get the color wrong then.
>
> I say fix the behaviou
On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 10:09:42AM -0600, Jon Winters wrote:
>
> I've had problems with the toolbox ever since it became re-sizable. I can
> size it exactly the way I want it, three vertical rows of tools with
> colors, brushes, patterns, and gradients below but the brushes, patterns,
> and grad
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 06:24:28PM +0200, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
[snip]
>
> The icons are imho very good, try making better ones and you understand
> why. Of course they arent PuRdy CuTe, but that is not the point. Most
> graphics tools dont have too colorful icons, excluding Painter(tm) of
> co
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 06:59:57PM -0500, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> I just noticed this new CVS entry:
>
> Fri Feb 4 18:27:16 CET 2000 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * app/global_edit.c: edit_fill with foreground, not background.
>
> Checked the code. Looks like 'Fill' now use
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 10:35:33AM -0600, Elan Feingold wrote:
> > Shouldn't we increase the default for the tile_cache_size? GIMP
> > was shipped with the default of 10MB years ago. Memory is cheap
> > nowadays and I guess we can expect the average user to have
> > more RAM available. I'd suggest
On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 05:29:48PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
[snip]
>
> However, since the masses haven't cried out yet, I guess we can try and
> see how it works in practise.
Count this as a cry out against it. I suggest waiting for a logical pause in
development, such as the release of GIMP 1
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 11:10:14AM -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> > - Help us to make a seperate version of GtkXmHtml that compiles on a lot
> >of setups and fix the Gimp configure script.
>
> Just so you know, GNOME is dropping GtkXmHTML because it is no longer
> being maintained an
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 09:24:42PM +0300, Sven Neumann wrote:
[snip]
> I'm pretty sure there is no (visible) grid that can't be generated with the
> new interface. But I agree that it might be easier to specify a negative
> offset then to calculate the positive offset that leads to the same resu
The real-life units in the grid plugin are nice.
However, removing the ability to a) start with a negative offset b) exceed
the image size and c) remember the last used unit have rendered this plugin
completely useless for what I usually use it for.
Removing options just for the sake of removi
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 10:11:45AM -0700, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
[snip]
>
> [ OTHER STUFF ]
>
> Speaking of minor stuff, maybe someone could re-arrange the layer mode
> menus? Either sort it alphabetically with "Normal" on top and separated
> from the rest? Or we could even group different mode
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 04:05:08PM +0300, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> would somebody cry and whine if I check this in:
>
> http://sven.gimp.org/files/lc_new_icons.png
>
> IMHO a little facelift can't hurt and the anchor does fit better with
> the Gnome icons.
I would whine a bit. I think th
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 12:47:41PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 3 Oct, Zach Beane - MINT wrote:
>
> > Yosh is still working on this, and when he is done it will Do It
> > Exactly Right. Well, perhaps not that good, but certainly better than
> > its current in-de
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 04:59:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hiho!
>
> Is it the intended behaviour that the toolbar can be resized by the
> user at will? If the user makes it too small the icons will mix up and
> if the user makes it to large in its height the colorbox and the
> brus
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 07:14:33PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
>
> And I'm not totally happy that "compose" and "decompose" are under
> /Image/Mode, but I don't have a better idea :-(
I meant to comment on this earlier...
Does it make sense to put "Compose" and "Decompose" under the Channel
20 matches
Mail list logo
