Re: Perl-Fu plug-ins in 1.1.21

2000-05-07 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 12:47:27AM +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The order of menus was determined by the order of installation. The code > in plug-in.c uses readdir(). On most systems this will give you the plug-ins > in the order the inodes were created. I doubt it. But the

Re: Perl-Fu plug-ins in 1.1.21

2000-05-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, myself wrote: > I have however noticed that perl i18n is totally broken at the moment (at > least on my box) and I couldn't figure out why. This was broken before my > changes and I have double-checked that the gimp-perl text-domain gets > passed to menus_create_item...() correctly. Later I

Re: Perl-Fu plug-ins in 1.1.21

2000-05-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, > For 1.2, the solution should be clear: find out why perl plug-ins get > specialcased (maybe because menus.c doesn't know about them but about the > c-plug-ins? or maybe because the i18n code handles them differently?) and > sort everything alphabetically (source language, e.g. english). Th

Re: Perl-Fu plug-ins in 1.1.21

2000-05-05 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 01:22:48PM +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > entries? Sort them according to their original name (easy) or according > to the translated one? I fear that the latter will be difficult and it > would lead to different menu orders depending on what language y

Re: Perl-Fu plug-ins in 1.1.21

2000-05-05 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 03:20:19PM +0200, Raphael Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's why I am surprised to get this problem: I double-checked that I > had no old files in the plug-ins directory before reporting this > strange bug. The only files that are in the plug-in-path came from a >

Re: Perl-Fu plug-ins in 1.1.21

2000-05-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Raphael wrote: > But I also noticed that something else has changed in the Perl-Fu > scripts: in the previous versions that I tried (under Solaris), these > scripts were always registered at the bottom of the menus, instead of > being mixed with the C plug-ins. Now it seems to be the contra

Re: Perl-Fu plug-ins in 1.1.21

2000-05-03 Thread Raphael Quinet
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 08:15:44PM +0200, Raphael Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I tried to use the Perl-Fu scripts in 1.1.21 and I saw that all of > > them abort with the following error displayed on the console: > > > > ** E

Re: Perl-Fu plug-ins in 1.1.21

2000-05-02 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 08:15:44PM +0200, Raphael Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried to use the Perl-Fu scripts in 1.1.21 and I saw that all of > them abort with the following error displayed on the console: > > ** ERROR (recursed) **: could not find handler for message: 65536 > abor

Re: Perl-Fu plug-ins in 1.1.21

2000-05-02 Thread Mattias EngdegÄrd
>While we are on it, could someone please check that all Perl scripts >register menu names with trailing dots if, and only if, they open a >dialog. Not a Perl script, but the About... menu entry shouldn't have the ellipsis, according to most GUI standards, since in this case opening a dialog is a

Re: Perl-Fu plug-ins in 1.1.21

2000-05-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, > But I also noticed that something else has changed in the Perl-Fu > scripts: in the previous versions that I tried (under Solaris), these > scripts were always registered at the bottom of the menus, instead of > being mixed with the C plug-ins. Now it seems to be the contrary: the > Perl-F

Perl-Fu plug-ins in 1.1.21

2000-05-02 Thread Raphael Quinet
I tried to use the Perl-Fu scripts in 1.1.21 and I saw that all of them abort with the following error displayed on the console: ** ERROR (recursed) **: could not find handler for message: 65536 aborting... And this message is displayed in a pop-up box: [/path/to/script]: the gimp is usin