Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

2006-07-05 Thread Jakub Steiner
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 11:13 -0400, Fennec wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently the GIMP on Windows has 1 icon that is used for all file formats associated with it. It would be possible to have separate icons for every format handled by the GIMP, but somebody would have to create them.

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

2006-07-05 Thread Alan Horkan
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Fennec wrote: Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 11:13:47 -0400 From: Fennec [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently the GIMP on Windows has 1 icon that is used for all file formats

[Gimp-developer] Re: Compiling problem with Gimp 2.3.9 in FreeBSD 6.1

2006-07-05 Thread Haarald Sinihammas
Hello again!I don't find any solution yet. Seems like signal.h is not included - but why?If anybody need more information or clarification to help in this problem, please tell me.Thanks in advance, HaaraldOn 7/1/06, Haarald Sinihammas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, now i can post exact

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Compiling problem with Gimp 2.3.9 in FreeBSD 6.1

2006-07-05 Thread Tim Mooney
In regard to: [Gimp-developer] Re: Compiling problem with Gimp 2.3.9 in...: On 7/1/06, Haarald Sinihammas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, now i can post exact info: Configure command is: ./configure LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include/ CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include/ if i

Re: [Gimp-developer] feature request

2006-07-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 10:38 +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote: Why not to bring all the GIMP windows up over all the others windows when I clic on to one of the many GIMP windows? Because it isn't trivial to do that. You can try the transient windows option in the Preferences dialog of a recent

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: SoC mentors students: mid-term evaluations!

2006-07-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 11:03 +0200, Dave Neary wrote: For mentors, it is not just recommended to be subscribed here, it is a requirement - as in this case, important information about the program is sent to this list, and I have been working on the assumption that all GIMP mentors are

Re: [Gimp-developer] What is the roadmap / plan for GIMP development?

2006-07-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 16:44 +0200, Jesper de Jong wrote: Is there a roadmap or release planning for GIMP development? There's bugzilla, it has milestones and you can do queries for them. That's the tentative roadmap. Other than that, things get implemented when someone finds the time and

[Gimp-developer] XCF format specification

2006-07-05 Thread Henning Makholm
The XCF file format is currently documented primarily by the Gimp source, and by the very old and sketchy devel-docs/xcf.txt in the source tree. I have attempted to write a better specification, encouraged by Dave Neary and partly based on my experiences writing a third-party XCF reader

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-07-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 11:59 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote: The switch over to Tiny-Fu will result in a certain amount of incompatibilities anyway so it might be a good time to reconsider. We are most likely not going to do the switch to Tiny-Fu until those incompatibilities have been sorted

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

2006-07-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 01:11 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote: Now that GIMP handles registration of the same menu item from different plug-ins, I am just waiting for the time a user reports a bug in Whirl and Pinch (for example) and doesn't realize which version they were using (as in the

Re: [Gimp-developer] XCF format specification

2006-07-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:44 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: Related to this: While researching the format I discovered a buffer overrun somewhere in the XCF parsing code. Is there a recommended way to report security bugs confidentially? (I asked on IRC and was encouraged to just use the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: SoC mentors students: mid-term evaluations!

2006-07-05 Thread Michael Schumacher
Sven Neumann wrote: On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 11:03 +0200, Dave Neary wrote: For mentors, it is not just recommended to be subscribed here, it is a requirement - as in this case, important information about the program is sent to this list, and I have been working on the assumption that all

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: SoC mentors students: mid-term evaluations!

2006-07-05 Thread David Neary
Hi, Sven Neumann wrote: On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 11:03 +0200, Dave Neary wrote: For mentors, it is not just recommended to be subscribed here, it is a requirement - as in this case, important information about the program is sent to this list, and I have been working on the assumption that all

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

2006-07-05 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 04:47 pm, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 01:11 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote: Now that GIMP handles registration of the same menu item from different plug-ins, I am just waiting for the time a user reports a bug in Whirl and Pinch (for example) and

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

2006-07-05 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 09:36 pm, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: On Wednesday 05 July 2006 04:47 pm, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 01:11 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote: Now that GIMP handles registration of the same menu item from different plug-ins, I am just waiting

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

2006-07-05 Thread Akkana Peck
Sven Neumann writes: And so far I don't see anyone complaining about my proposal to not install any Python scripts at all with GIMP 2.4. Not installing scripts that are there strictly as example code makes sense. Would they stay in CVS head, so it would be easy for people learning gimp-python

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

2006-07-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 21:36 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: It is allright for me if you do not install then- but I had complained. - At least count that. IIRC, there hasn't been a comment in the respective bug report, but I might be wrong. Actually we could think of then