On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 11:13 -0400, Fennec wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently the GIMP on Windows has 1 icon that is used for all file formats
associated with it. It would be possible to have separate icons for every
format handled by the GIMP, but somebody would have to create them.
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Fennec wrote:
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 11:13:47 -0400
From: Fennec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently the GIMP on Windows has 1 icon that is used for all file formats
Hello again!I don't find any solution yet. Seems like signal.h is not included - but why?If anybody need more information or clarification to help in this problem, please tell me.Thanks in advance,
HaaraldOn 7/1/06, Haarald Sinihammas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, now i can post exact
In regard to: [Gimp-developer] Re: Compiling problem with Gimp 2.3.9 in...:
On 7/1/06, Haarald Sinihammas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, now i can post exact info:
Configure command is:
./configure LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include/
CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include/
if i
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 10:38 +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
Why not to bring all the GIMP windows up over all the others windows when I
clic on to one of the many GIMP windows?
Because it isn't trivial to do that. You can try the transient windows
option in the Preferences dialog of a recent
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 11:03 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
For mentors, it is not just recommended to be subscribed here, it is a
requirement - as in this case, important information about the program
is sent to this list, and I have been working on the assumption that all
GIMP mentors are
The XCF file format is currently documented primarily by the Gimp
source, and by the very old and sketchy devel-docs/xcf.txt in the
source tree.
I have attempted to write a better specification, encouraged by Dave
Neary and partly based on my experiences writing a third-party XCF
reader
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 11:59 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
The switch over to Tiny-Fu will result in a certain amount of
incompatibilities anyway so it might be a good time to reconsider.
We are most likely not going to do the switch to Tiny-Fu until those
incompatibilities have been sorted
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 01:11 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote:
Now that GIMP handles registration of the same menu item from different
plug-ins, I am just waiting for the time a user reports a bug in Whirl and
Pinch (for example) and doesn't realize which version they were using (as in
the
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:44 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
Related to this: While researching the format I discovered a buffer
overrun somewhere in the XCF parsing code. Is there a recommended way
to report security bugs confidentially? (I asked on IRC and was
encouraged to just use the
Sven Neumann wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 11:03 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
For mentors, it is not just recommended to be subscribed here, it is a
requirement - as in this case, important information about the program
is sent to this list, and I have been working on the assumption that all
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 11:03 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
For mentors, it is not just recommended to be subscribed here, it is a
requirement - as in this case, important information about the program
is sent to this list, and I have been working on the assumption that all
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 04:47 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 01:11 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote:
Now that GIMP handles registration of the same menu item from
different plug-ins, I am just waiting for the time a user reports
a bug in Whirl and Pinch (for example) and
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 09:36 pm, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 04:47 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 01:11 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote:
Now that GIMP handles registration of the same menu item from
different plug-ins, I am just waiting
Sven Neumann writes:
And so far I don't see anyone complaining about my proposal to not
install any Python scripts at all with GIMP 2.4.
Not installing scripts that are there strictly as example code
makes sense. Would they stay in CVS head, so it would be easy
for people learning gimp-python
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 21:36 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
It is allright for me if you do not install then- but I had
complained. - At least count that.
IIRC, there hasn't been a comment in the respective bug report, but I
might be wrong.
Actually we could think of then
16 matches
Mail list logo
