Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp license

2009-01-09 Thread saulgoode
Quoting C Wang : > All: > Gimp has bundled babl and gegl since 2.5.0 release, and these two > modules are under LGPLv3 license. According to this diagram > > , the Gimp license has already been converted to GPLv3. I disagree.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp license

2009-01-09 Thread saulgoode
Quoting saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com: > I don't see why you'd have to remove BABL and GEGL code; they are > libraries and to my understanding there is nothing wrong with linking > GPL2 code to LGPL3 libraries. The above should have been: ... nothing wrong with linking "GPL2 or later"

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp license

2009-01-09 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 15:36 +0800, C Wang wrote: > Gimp has bundled babl and gegl since 2.5.0 release GIMP does not bundle babl or gegl, it just links to them as it links to dozens of other libraries. > According to this diagram >

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp license

2009-01-09 Thread Michael Natterer
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 15:36 +0800, C Wang wrote: > All: > Gimp has bundled babl and gegl since 2.5.0 release, and these two > modules are under LGPLv3 license. According to this diagram > > , the Gimp license has already been c

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp license

2009-01-09 Thread Martin Nordholts
Michael Natterer wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 15:36 +0800, C Wang wrote: > > So finally, I hereby suggest to move to GPL3 asap. > > Comments from any developers appreciated. > Hi I agree, it's about time we move to GPLv3 now. - Martin ___ Gimp-

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp license

2009-01-09 Thread saulgoode
Quoting Michael Natterer : > So finally, I hereby suggest to move to GPL3 asap. > > Comments from any developers appreciated. Personally, I would welcome such a change. The licensing specified in the files app/gui/ige-mac-menu.[ch] appears to be LGPL2.1 with no "or later" clause. LGPLv2.1 perm

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp license

2009-01-09 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 17:10 -0500, saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote: > The licensing specified in the files app/gui/ige-mac-menu.[ch] appears > to be LGPL2.1 with no "or later" clause. LGPLv2.1 permits, without any > further authorization, changing the code's license to later

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp license

2009-01-09 Thread Michael Natterer
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 17:10 -0500, saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote: > The licensing specified in the files app/gui/ige-mac-menu.[ch] appears > to be LGPL2.1 with no "or later" clause. LGPLv2.1 permits, without any > further authorization, changing the code's license to later GPL

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Patch] Less cluttered UI, on-demand showing of docking bars

2009-01-09 Thread Martin Nordholts
Martin Nordholts wrote: > Hi > > In current GIMP the docking bars are always visible even though they are > only useful when rearranging the GIMP UI. I have attached a fairly > simple patch (you need latest trunk) that hides these by default and > only shows them when a dockable-drag is started. Th