> So go fix it in gegl. I think it was decided 4 years ago what is going to
> happen to the layer mode bugs.
And my point is that wasn't such a good decision precisely because it took 4
years to get it fixed. As stated, an earlier native fix would have brought the
benefit to GEGL. It's disi
On 7/29/10, Charlie De wrote:
Charlie,
I cannot help myself noticing a slight contradiction:
> There are three respondents who have so far been arguing against me, three
> others haven't. And I'd suggest that the three of you aren't representative
> of
> the majority of users.
and then you say
> Just in case, not everyone in this list is a GIMP developer. There are
> ways and ways to be involved in the project, so there's not much point
> counting opinions just because they were expressed. We all have our
> own ideas how GIMP could evolve, what bugs should be fixed first and
> so on,
On 7/29/10, Charlie De wrote:
> I beg to differ. Priorities must ultimately be set by end users.
Let me just say that you fail to understand development process in real life.
Opinions of users are important, one cannot possibly doubt that. But
you cannot rely on just that, because every user ha
Am Donnerstag, 29. Juli 2010 schrub Charlie De:
> > Just in case, not everyone in this list is a GIMP developer. There are
> > ways and ways to be involved in the project, so there's not much point
> > counting opinions just because they were expressed. We all have our
> > own ideas how GIMP cou
