On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Another implementation of Scheme? Aren't the ones in:
>
> http://www.schemers.org/Documents/FAQ/#implementations
>
> enough? Or isn't any of them better suited as a starting point?
Yeah, really, Little Scheme (http://www.crockford.com/javascript/scheme.ht
On Thursday 15 July 2004 07:12 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Anyone can go and write another
> editor or bug tracker or window manager, if he'd like. That's one of the
> rights that Liberalism gives you. But if someone wishes to embark on
> something like that I'd advise him to contribute to an existin
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Markus Triska wrote:
> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:52:36 +
> From: Markus Triska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Scheme [was Re: [Gimp-developer] OSCon attendance]
>
> On Thursday 15 July 2004 02:25 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Thursday 15 July 2004 21:52, Markus Triska wrote:
> On Thursday 15 July 2004 02:25 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Another implementation of Scheme? Aren't the ones in:
> >
> > http://www.schemers.org/Documents/FAQ/#implementations
> >
> > enough? Or isn't any of them better suited as a starting poin
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 July 2004 05:49, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
> > > Heh, my vote is for Valgrind. :)
> >
> > Well, valgrind is a very nice and useful tool. (I know becuase I'm also using
> > it extensively) However, I think th
On Thursday 15 July 2004 02:25 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Another implementation of Scheme? Aren't the ones in:
>
> http://www.schemers.org/Documents/FAQ/#implementations
>
> enough? Or isn't any of them better suited as a starting point?
Please ask Tom, not me, because he is doing it, or visit his
On Wednesday 14 July 2004 15:17, Markus Triska wrote:
> > 2. Its main developer (Tom Lord) is desperately in need of cash, as he is
> > currently unemployed. (or at least was the last time I checked).
>
> Visit http://gnuarch.org/ for more information. While he is de facto
> unemployed, as you say,
Hi,
Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The reason I think Arch should win the award instead of the GIMP is
> because of the financial difficulties its main developer is
> facing. I'm not aware of a similar financial difficulty within the
> GIMP core developers. (but would like to be shown
On Thursday 15 July 2004 15:30, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 July 2004 05:49, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
> > > Heh, my vote is for Valgrind. :)
> >
> > Well, valgrind is a very nice and useful tool. (I know becuase I'm also
> > using it extensively) However,
Hi,
Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 July 2004 05:49, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
> > Heh, my vote is for Valgrind. :)
>
> Well, valgrind is a very nice and useful tool. (I know becuase I'm also using
> it extensively) However, I think that perhaps GNU Arch deserves to win
> because:
And w
>
> 2. Its main developer (Tom Lord) is desperately in need of cash, as he is
> currently unemployed. (or at least was the last time I checked).
Visit http://gnuarch.org/ for more information. While he is de facto
unemployed, as you say, he puts it more brightly:
---
Are these "after hours ho
On Wednesday 14 July 2004 05:49, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Dave Neary wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Quoting Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 04:06:38PM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> > > > Part of the results of that is that the GIMP is
> > > > one of the
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 04:06:38PM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> > > Part of the results of that is that the GIMP is
> > > one of the candidates for the annual golden award (with a
> > > large cash prize)
Hi,
Quoting Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 04:06:38PM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> > Part of the results of that is that the GIMP is
> > one of the candidates for the annual golden award (with a
> > large cash prize) which will be presented to the winning
> > project
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 04:06:38PM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> As everyone knows (hopefully), the GIMP won an OSI award
> recently. Part of the results of that is that the GIMP is
> one of the candidates for the annual golden award (with a
> large cash prize) which will be presented to the winning
Hi all,
As everyone knows (hopefully), the GIMP won an OSI award
recently. Part of the results of that is that the GIMP is
one of the candidates for the annual golden award (with a
large cash prize) which will be presented to the winning
project in Portland at the O'Reilly Open Source Conferen
16 matches
Mail list logo
