> From: ?yvind Kol?s
> GEGL already has too many blending modes (36) to be
> meaningfully
> presented to most users. I guess it would make sense to
> trim down the
> existing set, and perhaps offer the more arcane modes (both
> existing
> GIMP ones and arcane ones from other software, in an
>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> Alchemie foto\grafiche wrote:
>>> Spontaneously I don't think custom layer modes is a good
>>> idea. Might be
>>> fun for programmers to play with, but graphic
>>> professionals?
There is a patch for such a thing for GIMP in bugzilla (wit
Alchemie foto\grafiche wrote:
>> Spontaneously I don't think custom layer modes is a good
>> idea. Might be
>> fun for programmers to play with, but graphic
>> professionals?
>>
>> HTH,
>> Martin
>>
>
>
> Actually Graphic professional do complain ,but for missed option:
> for the absence in G
>
> Spontaneously I don't think custom layer modes is a good
> idea. Might be
> fun for programmers to play with, but graphic
> professionals?
>
> HTH,
> Martin
Actually Graphic professional do complain ,but for missed option:
for the absence in Gimp of modes they learned to use in Photoshop
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> yahvuu wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Alchemie foto\grafiche schrieb:
>>
>>> The possibility to add "CUSTOM " layer modes [..]
>>>
>>
>> that sounds interesting. Just curious: i wonder how custom layer modes
>> differ from filters that take a sec
yahvuu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Alchemie foto\grafiche schrieb:
>
>> The possibility to add "CUSTOM " layer modes [..]
>>
>
> that sounds interesting. Just curious: i wonder how custom layer modes
> differ from filters that take a second layer as input (e.g. LIC)?
> i mean, other than that filt
Hi all,
Alchemie foto\grafiche schrieb:
> The possibility to add "CUSTOM " layer modes [..]
that sounds interesting. Just curious: i wonder how custom layer modes
differ from filters that take a second layer as input (e.g. LIC)?
i mean, other than that filters currently work destructively.
gree
Thank for clearing
I also searched the bugzilla report for overlay mode but i could not find it
anymore
But instead i find a interesting proposal of Jao O Buono that, i believe
risk to be forgotten because posted in a no so strictly related topic
(here http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?
Alchemie foto\grafiche wrote:
> I hoped that with the passage to GEGL the old bugs in the Mreging mode were
> fixed
> (i refer here to OVERLAY, that in gimp is NOT overlay but a misnamed clone of
> Soft Light, and to Color that do not seems work properly )
>
Hi
With GEGL enabled for the proj
I hoped that with the passage to GEGL the old bugs in the Mreging mode were
fixed
(i refer here to OVERLAY, that in gimp is NOT overlay but a misnamed clone of
Soft Light, and to Color that do not seems work properly )
But i didn't see any news in the release notes, or in the Bugzilla reports
10 matches
Mail list logo
