Re: [Gimp-developer] regex

2002-11-28 Thread Simon Budig
David Weeks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I called you right the first time. You don't know jack about much, and > nothing about the rest of it. > [...] Huh? The Gimp-Developer Mailing list is *not* about personal insulting people you apparently don't like. While the approach taken by Robin - b

Re: [Gimp-developer] regex

2002-11-27 Thread David Weeks
So Adam, what kept from doing so this time? Anyone who a) doesn't know what regular expressions are, and b) thinks a project is better without them is c) not fit for work in *nix. gimp or otherwise. Call it a basic competence. A basic competence. Soberly yours, David Weeks On Wednesday 27

Re: [Gimp-developer] regex

2002-11-27 Thread Adam D. Moss
David Weeks wrote: > I called you right the first time. You don't know jack about much, and > nothing about the rest of it. You're to green to phathom [blah blah blah] > Quit working with computers and go back to the > garbage you came from -- AKA Microsoft. [blah blah blah] Wow. At least when

Re: [Gimp-developer] regex

2002-11-27 Thread Christian Rose
tor 2002-11-28 klockan 00.32 skrev David Weeks: > Robin, > > I called you right the first time. David, please keep childish name-calling rants like this for yourself. Thanks. Kind regards, Christian ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Gimp-developer] regex

2002-11-27 Thread David Weeks
Robin, I called you right the first time. You don't know jack about much, and nothing about the rest of it. You're to green to phathom, let alone be embarassed, by your suggestion to remove regular expressions. This is *nix, and that's how *nix works. That's why *nix works. And GIMP is an

Re: [Gimp-developer] regex+

2002-11-27 Thread Robin Rowe
David, > I think the point is probably to do a > trawl through legacy code and see how much of it can be flushed, > if any. I wish! Sometime later. Although regex is available with *nix, it isn't part of Windows. My choice is to remove it or fix the broken regex implemenation included in Film Gi

Re: [Gimp-developer] regex+

2002-11-27 Thread David Neary
Sven Neumann wrote: > "Robin Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Do I correctly surmise that regex could be removed > > without being missed? > > Actually I don't understand at all why you are dealing with this > code. It seems unrelated to 16-bit or floating point support. If you > ask me, stop

Re: [Gimp-developer] regex+

2002-11-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Robin Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, I guess I'm just not making my question clear. I understand that regex > enables doing a wildcard search in the plug-ins database. > > What I have trouble imagining is the scenario where regex search in Gimp is > necessary or useful. Few users e

Re: [Gimp-developer] regex+

2002-11-26 Thread Robin Rowe
Simon, > It enables powerful searches over the various help texts plugins provide > via their Registration. I surely do not understand why having this > feature might be considered a bad thing. Thanks for the insights from you and Guillermo. I think I understand now. > Well, maybe it is a little

Re: [Gimp-developer] regex+

2002-11-26 Thread Simon Budig
Robin Rowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > What I have trouble imagining is the scenario where regex search in Gimp is > necessary or useful. Few users even know how to phrase a regex search. Is > this just feature-itis? Do I correctly surmise that regex could be removed > without being missed? Well,

Re: [Gimp-developer] regex+

2002-11-26 Thread Robin Rowe
Simon, > > My confusion relates to script-fu and gimp plug-ins with respect to regex. > > Why query a plug-in as a regular expression? What's the point? > > To have a nice way to specify a search pattern. For thinks like a > PDB-Browser for example. Ok, I guess I'm just not making my question cle

Re: [Gimp-developer] regex+

2002-11-26 Thread Simon Budig
Robin Rowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > The regex code is used by gimp-plug-ins-query (and a similar function > > in script-fu). > > Yes, I can follow that from the code. I understand what regex does > generally, just not why gimp-plug-ins-query needs it. > > My confusion relates to script-fu a

Re: [Gimp-developer] regex

2002-11-26 Thread Robin Rowe
Sven, > The regex code is used by gimp-plug-ins-query (and a similar function > in script-fu). Yes, I can follow that from the code. I understand what regex does generally, just not why gimp-plug-ins-query needs it. My confusion relates to script-fu and gimp plug-ins with respect to regex. Why q

Re: [Gimp-developer] regex

2002-11-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Robin Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi. GIMP has its own regex.c that the procedural database uses. That seems > to look up plug-ins using regexec. I'm having a little difficulty > understanding the logic of the code. Can anybody explain how regex is used > by GIMP? Why is it necessary

[Gimp-developer] regex

2002-11-24 Thread Robin Rowe
Hi. GIMP has its own regex.c that the procedural database uses. That seems to look up plug-ins using regexec. I'm having a little difficulty understanding the logic of the code. Can anybody explain how regex is used by GIMP? Why is it necessary? Thanks! Robin -