Re: [Gimp-developer] ?no image? window: progress...

2008-04-06 Thread Kevin Cozens
Greetings, all. FWIW, here are my initial thoughts and comments on GMIP and its niw. The first time I ran GIMP after the introduction I only wanted to run something from the toolbox menu. I was surprised when I closed the unwanted window and found that GIMP went away. I find I'm having a littl

Re: [Gimp-developer] 'no image' window: progress...

2008-03-30 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 14:54 +, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote: > People using mc should not worry about drag and drop. They should use > "Menu(F9)>Commands>Edit extensions file" and friends and add > gimp-remote as handler for extensions you want. With gimp-2.4, the use of gimp-remote is depre

Re: [Gimp-developer] 'no image' window: progress...

2008-03-30 Thread Laxminarayan Kamath
People using mc should not worry about drag and drop. They should use "Menu(F9)>Commands>Edit extensions file" and friends and add gimp-remote as handler for extensions you want. If I am not wrong that is the mail reason gimp-remote was developed. If I continue about MC, I am afraid it will be off

Re: [Gimp-developer] 'no image' window: progress...

2008-03-30 Thread David Gowers
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > the Open dialog is a poor replacement for a file manager. If you only > use it as a drag source, then why not just use your file manager > instead? ... My file manager is Midnight Commander :) I've just tried Ro

Re: [Gimp-developer] 'no image' window: progress...

2008-03-30 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, the Open dialog is a poor replacement for a file manager. If you only use it as a drag source, then why not just use your file manager instead? Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.

Re: [Gimp-developer] 'no image' window: progress...

2008-03-30 Thread David Gowers
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 09:27 +1030, David Gowers wrote: > > > The 'Open' window can remain up as you DnD items from it to the > > toolbox. > > Yes, this works. And if you like it, then please continue to use th

Re: [Gimp-developer] 'no image' window: progress...

2008-03-30 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 09:27 +1030, David Gowers wrote: > The 'Open' window can remain up as you DnD items from it to the > toolbox. Yes, this works. And if you like it, then please continue to use the Open dialog in this way. But it is certainly not the recommended use. If you want to open m

Re: [Gimp-developer] 'no image' window: progress...

2008-03-29 Thread David Gowers
Hi all, On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Kevin Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jbaker wrote: > > o What would really be nice and make the dropzone a lot more > > usable... if there is was a file browser built into it... > > split the niw vertically, put a f

Re: [Gimp-developer] 'no image' window: progress ...

2008-03-29 Thread Kevin Cozens
jbaker wrote: > o What would really be nice and make the dropzone a lot more > usable... if there is was a file browser built into it... > split the niw vertically, put a file browser on one side, > and dropzone and whatever else on the other side... I

Re: [Gimp-developer] ?no image? window: progress...

2008-03-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 13:27 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote: > You're assuming, as usual, that a final user should compile the svn > code, know how to deal with the installed version and the development > version in the same machine, etc. Otherwise the user can't speak his mind. I am assu

Re: [Gimp-developer] ?no image? window: progress...

2008-03-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 13:41 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > so why are they greyed out ? They aren't. That's the wrong assumption you are making. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Ber

Re: [Gimp-developer] ?no image? window: progress...

2008-03-28 Thread Guillermo Espertino
> > As you can see from the responses to your mail, there are quite a few > trolls on this list who aren't even willing to try the new stuff. > Otherwise we wouldn't have gotten so many responses that are obviously > based on wrong assumptions and that clearly show that people have not > followed

Re: [Gimp-developer] ?no image? window: progress...

2008-03-28 Thread gg
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:54:59 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 15:31 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote: >> About the graying out toolbox, dockers and elements not used when no >> image is open, I think it breaks a functionality that is already present >>

Re: [Gimp-developer] ?no image? window: progress...

2008-03-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 15:31 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote: > About the graying out toolbox, dockers and elements not used when no > image is open, I think it breaks a functionality that is already present > in gimp: the ability to custumize the interface (moving dialogs to > dockers, cha

Re: [Gimp-developer] ?no image? window: progress...

2008-03-27 Thread peter sikking
Guillermo wrote: > About the graying out toolbox, dockers and elements not used when no > image is open, I think it breaks a functionality that is already > present > in gimp: the ability to custumize the interface (moving dialogs to > dockers, changing the dimensions and position of elements, e