Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-26 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: #51358 Acquire-screenshot not working with enlightenment http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51358 I'm sure it's enlightenments fault ;-) Perhaps we can do something about it anyway... I've had this problem, and it appears to exist

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-26 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've had this problem, and it appears to exist only with the version of xwd that's shipped with XFree86 4.0.x where x=2. I upgraded to 4.0.3 and the problem went away. Same problem (with same version of X) existed with WindowMaker

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-26 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
Larry Ewing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: hasn't timj complained loudly about how broken the code in gdk_pixbuf_get_from_drawable is? Of course the code he wrote for the desk guide likes to segfault, so who knows. Yeah, the function in the stable branch has a number of race conditions that will

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-20 Thread Dave Neary
Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, went out for some bug-hinting in the 1.2 wilderness tonight and came up with this list of beasts that are still alive and should be killed in 1.2 if possible: #51358 Acquire-screenshot not working with enlightenment

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-20 Thread Austin Donnelly
On Wednesday, 20 Jun 2001, Dave Neary wrote: The default Made with the GIMP comment is hard coded into plug-ins/common/xbm.c - and presumably into the others too. It seems to me that the easiest solution would be to include gtkrc in the relevant plug-ins, and do a read on the gimprc when

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-20 Thread Branko Collin
On 20 Jun 2001, at 10:27, Dave Neary wrote: Sven Neumann wrote: #51164 Default image comment not set correctly http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51164 I've added some comments on how one could be fixed to the report. Not sure what is the correct fix for this. Comments?

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-20 Thread Dave Neary
Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, went out for some bug-hinting in the 1.2 wilderness tonight and came up with this list of beasts that are still alive and should be killed in 1.2 if possible: Speaking of bug-hunting... I couldn't build gimp 1.2 (with gcc 2.96 - RedHat's 7.0 prerelease) for the

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also I noticed that when saving TIFFs, sometimes the 'hard coded' comment is used, sometimes the one I supplied in the preferences. The difference seems to be between images that I acquired from the Windows clipboard and images that I started

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-20 Thread Dave Neary
Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, I'll look into fixing this later or wait for a patch. Please report if you find more of these. Patch attached. If I find any more I'll let you know... I did think that an integer constant 0 could be used in a pointer context without a cast, though... Salut, Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-20 Thread Dave Neary
Dave Neary wrote: I did think that an integer constant 0 could be used in a pointer context without a cast, though... Hi all, I've confirmed that this code (for the case where the enum value passed is 0) should work in any ANSI conforming compiler (according to the impressarios of