david gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> kevin:
> you misunderstood.
> it makes sense to store the Palettes as a list.. but not the contents of the
> palettes. what i meant was that each GimpPalette has a GList of
> GimpPaletteEntries.
>
> GArray-based allocation would be one way to optimize
kevin:
you misunderstood.
it makes sense to store the Palettes as a list.. but not the contents of the
palettes. what i meant was that each GimpPalette has a GList of
GimpPaletteEntries.
GArray-based allocation would be one way to optimize memory allocation, which
is currently unnecessarily in
At 07:57 PM 12/31/2003 -0500, david gowers wrote:
in the realm of 'discussion', does anyone here know why GimpPalette is
implemented using a list? it seems a lot saner to use an array.
Just as a guess, if you mean 'linked list' by 'list', then its probably to
avoid the headaches created by using a
On 31 Dec 2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
>> I'll be happy if palettes were sorted not only by name
>Are you refering to how the list of palettes is sorted or to the order
>of the colors in the palette?
The list of palettes. ;)
--
//\/\ Marco (LM) Lamberto (lm AT sunnyspot DOT org)
The Sunny Spot
Hi,
Marco Lamberto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll be happy if palettes were sorted not only by name
Are you refering to how the list of palettes is sorted or to the order
of the colors in the palette?
Sven
PS: http://adrian.gimp.org/sortpal/
___
Hi,
david gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> my involvement has been impeded by these things:
> - lack of documentation (hard to find my way around the gimp
> sourcetree without general guides as to what goes where (where to
> find/add a particular feature.)
http://developer.gimp.org/ap
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, david gowers wrote:
>in the realm of 'discussion', does anyone here know why GimpPalette is
>implemented using a list? it seems a lot saner to use an array.
>i would like to convert it to use an array if possible, as it would simplify
>future enhancements, and hopefully remo
i definitely want to get more involved with gimp development. (at the moment,
i would most like to upgrade the palette-editor to match or exceed a general
palette editor i wrote previously.)
my involvement has been impeded by these things:
- lack of documentation (hard to find my way ar
Hi,
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The list is a list of people who were active in the project several
> years ago, but who have gone on to other things. It would be nice to
> get some of them back working on the GIMP, if they have the time.
IMO everyone should be free to leave the pro
Hi,
Juhana Sadeharju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you really look for volunteers, then here I am. Anyone coder
> would like to implement with me an alternative selection tool (as
> existing tool seems to be practically unusable)?
GIMP has a bunch of selection tools and they seem to work quit
>From: Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>A couple of people asked this question - I thought I'd explained the idea
>pretty well, but I guess I missed the mark.
Gone with the wind?
How about changing the title of the list to "retired GIMP coders"?
Then everyone would know what you really mean.
So
Hi,
Quoting Kevin Cozens:
> What is supposed to be the point of such a list? If you pulled names from a
> changelog you are probably making a list of the more active developers of
> the GIMP who are probably already on the gimp-devel mailing list.
A couple of people asked this question - I thou
Hi Dave,
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's the list of names on the Friends of GIMP list
Please excuse my ignorance, but would you mind to explain the purpose
of this list again? I still do not understand how you want to use this
collection of email addresses for.
Sven
_
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 16:40:14 +0100
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the list of names on the Friends of GIMP list
> Jay Cox
<16 of the 18 friends snipped>
> Chris Lahey
Only 18 friends?
Does the Gimp need more friends?
Or does the "Friends of Gimp" have some other meaning that
At 04:40 PM 12/24/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Here's the list of names on the Friends of GIMP list at the
momenta
What is supposed to be the point of such a list? If you pulled names from a
changelog you are probably making a list of the more active developers of
the GIMP who are probably already on t
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
> David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What do people think of the idea of a Friends of GIMP list that gets
> > added to the announce list when we make a release, for example?
>
> I thought that's what gimp-developer was for.
Personally I don't think that's what th
Hi all,
Thanks to the people who pointed out my very Freudian slip above.
While we are, in large part, friends of GNOME, that's not what I
meant to write :)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
David Neary,
Lyon, France
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Gimp-
17 matches
Mail list logo
