> On 2011-03-29 14:09, LightningIsMyName wrote:
>> ** Default JPEG Quality (quickie, not a real topic) **
>> Change to 95 2x1, and add a hack to save defaults (using something
>> like the PNG plugin does, or something more elegant). Note that a
>> decent system to save plugin defaults, along with o
On 3/29/11, Michael Natterer wrote:
> On 03/29/2011 06:54 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>> On 3/29/11, Michael Natterer wrote:
>>
>>> As I said before, let's please work on our public interface
>>
>> Let's try to outline what exactly needs doing, eh? :)
>
> - Website updates
I think I could add
On 03/29/2011 06:54 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On 3/29/11, Michael Natterer wrote:
>
>> As I said before, let's please work on our public interface
>
> Let's try to outline what exactly needs doing, eh? :)
- Website updates
- News
- Wiki
- Blogs
- Maybe we should have a GIMP blog aggregator
On 3/29/11, Michael Natterer wrote:
> As I said before, let's please work on our public interface
Let's try to outline what exactly needs doing, eh? :)
The new website is stuck in the middle mostly because AFAIK Jimmac was
busy all the time with GNOME 3 which is finally soon to be out, so
maybe
On 03/29/2011 02:45 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> 2011/3/29 LightningIsMyName:
>> ** Re-Discussing GIMP's programming language **
>> For core (non-UI), continue using GObject, use code generators (such
>> as turbine) and do copy/paste/replace for existing GObject classes
>> (for the rare case where
On 2011-03-29 14:09, LightningIsMyName wrote:
> ** Default JPEG Quality (quickie, not a real topic) **
> Change to 95 2x1, and add a hack to save defaults (using something
> like the PNG plugin does, or something more elegant). Note that a
> decent system to save plugin defaults, along with other a
2011/3/29 LightningIsMyName :
> ** Re-Discussing GIMP's programming language **
> For core (non-UI), continue using GObject, use code generators (such
> as turbine) and do copy/paste/replace for existing GObject classes
> (for the rare case where the generator won't be enough).
Hi,
Unfortunately
Hello,
no organized meeting log this time, for various reasons, however I'm
attaching below the list of decided actions in the meeting, along with
some other off-topic points that were discussed:
** GSoC Student Applications **
Core developers sign up as mentors (for GSoC)
schumaml: Write mail a
Hello
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Kevin Cozens wrote:
>
> It's a good thing I asked that we clarify the problem as I was thinking it
> was something else entirely. Pointers to a couple of files that show the
> issue of a lot of boilerplate code would be good so we can all see the
> extent of
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> It has *something* to do with too much gobject boilerplate code.
It's a good thing I asked that we clarify the problem as I was thinking it
was something else entirely. Pointers to a couple of files that show the
issue of a lot of boilerplate code would be good so we
Martin Nordholts (ense...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2011/3/27 Michael Natterer :
> > And this is *exactly* the problem. We would end up with programmers
> > that quickly learnt vala, having no clue about GObject. That's
> > absolutely horrible.
>
> How is it a problem that our code becomes so easy that
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> How is it a problem that our code becomes so easy that even "dumb"
> programmers can understand and improve it when we are not forced to
> include patches from such "dumb" programmers?
This not how I understood mitch... I understood it as
2011/3/27 Michael Natterer :
> On 03/27/2011 04:45 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>>
>> On 03/27/2011 02:12 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
>>>
>>> As to the actual iussue of introducing whatever *additional*
>>> language in GIMP, I strongly doubt that it would help us in
>>> any way. It would increase th
On 03/27/2011 04:45 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> On 03/27/2011 02:12 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
>>
>> As to the actual iussue of introducing whatever *additional*
>> language in GIMP, I strongly doubt that it would help us in
>> any way. It would increase the complexity of both building and
>> pr
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
> So when you write code, how much time do you spend writing the
> boilerplate? 10%? I would say it's much much less, because writing
> the code is a small fraction of the time actually spent on the code,
> the rest is debugging, refact
On 03/27/2011 02:12 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
>
> So when you write code, how much time do you spend writing the
> boilerplate? 10%? I would say it's much much less, because writing
> the code is a small fraction of the time actually spent on the code,
> the rest is debugging, refactoring, readin
On 03/27/2011 11:36 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> 2011/3/27 Kevin Cozens:
>> LightningIsMyName wrote:
>>> *** Optional topic: Re-Discussing GIMP's programming language ***
>>> Some developers that weren't present in the last meeting, highly
>>> disagree on the attempt to introduce vala into gimp, c
2011/3/27 Kevin Cozens :
> LightningIsMyName wrote:
>> *** Optional topic: Re-Discussing GIMP's programming language ***
>> Some developers that weren't present in the last meeting, highly
>> disagree on the attempt to introduce vala into gimp, claiming that it
>> will scare off developers (more th
On 3/27/11, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> Before talking about which new programming language is needed(?) in GIMP we
> should make sure the problem is clearly defined as to *why* we need
> something new. What problem is the new language going to solve?
>
> IIRC, it had something to do with creation of GU
LightningIsMyName wrote:
> *** Optional topic: Re-Discussing GIMP's programming language ***
> Some developers that weren't present in the last meeting, highly
> disagree on the attempt to introduce vala into gimp, claiming that it
> will scare off developers (more than the "simple" C GObject code)
On 03/25/2011 02:31 PM, LightningIsMyName wrote:
> *** Other topics ***
> Any other suggestions should be suggested by replying to this email,
> or adding it directly to the wiki (if you have permissions to edit the
> wiki).
Hi,
What's the status of making wiki.gimp.org resolve to gimp-wiki.who.e
21 matches
Mail list logo
