I apologize that I did not make this fully clear when I sent this to the
list. I have had people ask questions about the usablity of this script.
This script is ugly and cumbersome. It is not made to be very robust and it
does little error checking. It is clunky and not designed to be integrated
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 09:01, jEsuSdA wrote:
> > That said, I have made a hak soemwher that uses Python plug-ins and
> > parasites to be able to name certain layer groups and have some
> > minimal funcitonality with that. I can mail you those f you are
> > interested.
> >
> > Regards,
>
> O
> That said, I have made a hak soemwher that uses Python plug-ins and
> parasites to be able to name certain layer groups and have some
> minimal funcitonality with that. I can mail you those f you are
> interested.
>
> Regards,
>
Of course!
Send me it! ;)
Thanks!
__
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 09:54, jEsuSdA wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm not a developer, but i suscribed to the devel list because i
> work everyday with gimp and i like to know how it grow day by day.
>
> First at all i would to congratulate us for you efforts.
> I love Gimp and i try to install it whe
jEsuSdA wrote:
> My question is why and when Gimp will include LAYER GROUPS or FOLDERS
> (more useful)?
>
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86337 for the current situation.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.
* Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021202 15:00]:
> > RGBA value_blur(RGBA,radius){
> > .--RGBA--.
> > | split_RGBA |
> > `-R--G--B--A-'
> > | | | |
> > | | | `---.
> > .-R--G--B-. \
> > | rgb2hsv | \
> > `-H--S--V-' \
> > | | \
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> A little while ago I added another little code project to my todo
> queue, it's just a toy project but might end up providing useful
> ideas for the implementation. I've been toying with the idea to
> create a small program that is built entirely of plug-ins and a
On 30-Nov-2002, Tino Schwarze wrote:
> Apart from that, one often needs a copy of a layer to create some
> effect. Combined with effect or active layers, one would only need to
> alter the source layer and everything else would change by itself.
>
That is the coolest thing ever. Santa, I want _
On Fri 29 November 2002 18:33, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:29:12 -0500, Patrick McFarland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Btw, has there been a discussion on how layer grouping will
> > work? I want to be able to both group layers in just a group
> > (aka doesnt change how render
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been toying with the idea to create a small program that is built entirely
of plug-ins and allows you to build graphs of dataflow between inputs and outputs
of the plug-ins (nodes in the graph).
This is exactly what Gimpeon does. It's a Gimp plugin, lets you
build
On 29-Nov-2002, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> However, here is my point of view (which may be different from what
> some other developers think, so do not take this for granted). There
> are two kinds of "grouping":
>
> - Simple linking of layers so that some operations such as toggling
> their vis
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 19:10:20 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021129 18:38]:
> > There has been some discussion about layer grouping, but I do not
> > think that any concrete implementation proposals have ever been agreed
> > upon. So anyone who could come up
* Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021129 18:38]:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:29:12 -0500, Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Btw, has there been a discussion on how layer grouping will work?
> > I want to be able to both group layers in just a group (aka doesnt change
> > how renderi
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:29:12 -0500, Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Btw, has there been a discussion on how layer grouping will work?
> I want to be able to both group layers in just a group (aka doesnt change
> how rendering works at all) then also be able to group layers together,
14 matches
Mail list logo