On 2002-04-11 at 1834.02 +0200, Rapha?l Quinet typed this mail:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:01:03 -0400, "Carol Spears" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2002-04-11 at 1741.53 +0200, Sven Neumann typed this mail:
> > > nothing. The bad thing is to have multiple places to look for plug-ins.
> > >
> >
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:34:02PM +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> > so far, i have been pretty good about not having things on my site that
> > are already included in the GIMP. from a user point of view, this is a
> > frustrating thing about www.gimp.org and registry.gimp.org.
>
> Then by all
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:01:03 -0400, "Carol Spears" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2002-04-11 at 1741.53 +0200, Sven Neumann typed this mail:
> > nothing. The bad thing is to have multiple places to look for plug-ins.
> >
> i seem to remember from the discussion of the registry from this list
> (
On 2002-04-11 at 1735.06 +0200, David Neary typed this mail:
>
> "work" is overstating it :) In fact I just found out about
> ENABLE_GIMP_COMPAT_CRUFT, and essentially all I did was to make
> a couple (psd_save and DigitalSignature) of 1.0 plug-ins compile
> without it. It's basically search-and-
On 2002-04-11 at 1741.53 +0200, Sven Neumann typed this mail:
> Hi,
>
> well, then the registry needs to be improved. Did you contact Ingo and
> offered your help?
>
> > what could be so bad with a place to collect the updated plug-ins?
>
> nothing. The bad thing is to have multiple places to l
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i have been frustrated using the registry.
>
> several times, i downloaded and installed a plug-in, only to find it was
> already included with GIMP.
>
> lately, i would like to use snarf to get the plug-in i would like (since
> mozilla save seems
On 2002-04-11 at 1718.41 +0200, Sven Neumann typed this mail:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > i have been wanting to collect all of the working plug-ins and make them
> > available on my site. only plug-ins that are not already included with
> > GIMP, however.
> >
> >
Carol Spears wrote:
> On 2002-04-11 at 1255.35 +0200, David Neary typed this mail:
> > There were
> > a couple of older plug-ins I used recently which needed a little
> > bit of updating to get them to work with 1.2, and I'd like to
> > update the originals on registry.gimp.org, but the author's
>
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:55:58 -0400, "Carol Spears" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2002-04-11 at 1255.35 +0200, David Neary typed this mail:
> > Following on from the other plug-in discussion, can anyone tell
> > me what the procedure is for updating old plug-ins which were
> > added by someone wh
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i have been wanting to collect all of the working plug-ins and make them
> available on my site. only plug-ins that are not already included with
> GIMP, however.
>
> if you have a lot of updated plug-ins, it should be no problem to give
> you a p
On 2002-04-11 at 1255.35 +0200, David Neary typed this mail:
>
> ...they just stop leaving a forwarding e-mail address :)
>
> Following on from the other plug-in discussion, can anyone tell
> me what the procedure is for updating old plug-ins which were
> added by someone who is now (apparrently
11 matches
Mail list logo
