Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

2004-12-13 Thread Michael Schumacher
Would it be too much of a compromise to just drop the P at the end? IMO it is too much of a compromise to even consider a name change. Discussions like these server only one purpose - artificial creation of a previously non-existant problem to support the position of the one who started the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

2004-12-13 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Robert L Krawitz wrote: Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:00:24 -0500 From: Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable? [was [Bug 160890] Change Gimp name (fwd)]

2004-12-13 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, David [iso-8859-15] Gómez wrote: Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:19:26 +0100 From: David [iso-8859-15] Gómez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable? [was [Bug 160890] Change Gimp name (fwd)]

2004-12-13 Thread Carol Spears
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 06:11:39PM +, Alan Horkan wrote: I do not know if you are a native English speaker but the term gimp is has a very similar meaning to cripple. If you look at the bug report I point to some comments where people other than me say they have encountered

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

2004-12-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi Alan, didn't you say you would stop arguing on this stupid subject? Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

2004-12-13 Thread Alan Horkan
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:26:37 +0100 From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable? Hi Alan, didn't you say you would stop

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

2004-12-13 Thread Alan Horkan
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:05:46 +0100 From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable? Hi, Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have to ask why

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable? [was [Bug 160890] Change Gimp name (fwd)]

2004-12-12 Thread Adam D. Moss
Alan Horkan wrote: Some people have difficulty dealing with the connotations of the term The GIMP. I wont go into details again about why some people have issues with the name, some even finding it offensive. I still find it baffling that people would get upset about something so lighthearted

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable? [was [Bug 160890] Change Gimp name (fwd)]

2004-12-12 Thread David Gómez
Hi Alan, I don't think it is a good idea to change the project name. So you kind of answered to yourself... It is a good sign that the gimp has improved so much that people are only left with the name to complain about :) I don't complain about the name. I think it would be a fair

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

2004-12-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have to ask why reject such patches? Because IMO the name is important. If we allow the name to be changed easily, our users will not any longer know what software they are using. Contributors will be lost because they will look for the Foo project

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable? [was [Bug 160890] Change Gimp name (fwd)]

2004-12-12 Thread Carol Spears
i have a question for you; you don't need to answer it to anyone but yourself. what does the word gimp mean to you and where ever could you have come up with this meaning? when i hear the word gimp, i get a chuckle from a media image that some pack of film geniuses inbedded into our collective

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

2004-12-12 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:05:46 +0100 Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have to ask why reject such patches? Because IMO the name is important. If we allow the name to be changed easily, our users will not any longer know what

[semi-OT] Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

2004-12-12 Thread Adam D. Moss
The word itself is inappropriate for software if you're trying to feed it to the unwashed masses. I said this when GIMP was chosen as a name back when it moved from Motif to GTK A correction... GIMP was called GIMP long before the move from Motif to GTK. The first public release (0.53 IIRC) was

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

2004-12-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Michael J. Hammel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 11:05, Sven Neumann wrote: I seriously doubt that the name is effectively keeping GIMP from being used. And I am all happy to ignore the very few people who are so narrow-minded as to having a problem with the name.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

2004-12-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would it be too much of a compromise to just drop the P at the end? GNU Image Manipulator instead of GNU Image Manipulation Program ? Of course I would suggest planning and waiting until a major version change to change it. _-T

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

2004-12-12 Thread Michael J. Hammel
On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 11:05, Sven Neumann wrote: I seriously doubt that the name is effectively keeping GIMP from being used. And I am all happy to ignore the very few people who are so narrow-minded as to having a problem with the name. While I agree with most of what you've said in response