Sven wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 00:06 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
>
>>> Where we are back at the point where this is not likely going to be
>>> ever
>>> possible on all supported platforms using the toolkit that we use
>>> and
>>> will continue to use.
>>
>> I am used to development teams te
On 07/11/2007, Alexandre Prokoudine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2007 2:40 AM, peter sikking wrote:
>
> > and something about text (layers), that is not so trivial in the UI btw,
> > text, svg and other vector stuff need their own stacking order within a
> > layer and if you want to avoid
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 00:06 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
> > Where we are back at the point where this is not likely going to be
> > ever
> > possible on all supported platforms using the toolkit that we use and
> > will continue to use.
>
> I am used to development teams telling me 'can't
Sven Neumann wrote:
>> well, obviously where one works with colors in the inspector that
>> part is either never or on mouse-over not going to be transparent.
>
> Where we are back at the point where this is not likely going to be
> ever
> possible on all supported platforms using the toolkit th
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 16:22 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
> well, obviously where one works with colors in the inspector that
> part is either never or on mouse-over not going to be transparent.
Where we are back at the point where this is not likely going to be ever
possible on all supported
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure this is the right time and place to argue, but from my
>> experience using Paint.Net, which has this functionality, transparent
>> palettes will absolutely useless and even annoying.
>
> I agree. Transparency will be distracting.
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 13:56 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> I'm not sure this is the right time and place to argue, but from my
> experience using Paint.Net, which has this functionality, transparent
> palettes will absolutely useless and even annoying.
I agree. Transparency will be dis
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 11:47 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
> > I don't think that "true floating inspectors" are implementable at
> > all.
> > But perhaps you need to explain first what "true floating" means.
>
> let's see: always on top of any normal window, but under menus and
> dialogs; do
On Nov 7, 2007 2:40 AM, peter sikking wrote:
> and something about text (layers), that is not so trivial in the UI btw,
> text, svg and other vector stuff need their own stacking order within a
> layer and if you want to avoid the question "are they above or in the
> layer pixels", then they need
Sven wrote:
>> * solve user request #1, part 1: one menu bar, keep window with
>>menu bar open when no image is open, true floating inspectors,
>>transparency where inspectors overlap the image (found a way
>>how it can be faked);
>
> I don't think that "true floating inspectors" are i
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 00:40 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
> * solve user request #1, part 1: one menu bar, keep window with
>menu bar open when no image is open, true floating inspectors,
>transparency where inspectors overlap the image (found a way
>how it can be faked);
I don't t
11 matches
Mail list logo
