On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 12:53:20PM +0100, Raphael Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Count me in. I volunteer for making the required changes in Script-Fu.
I'll do all the changes in the perl scripts.
--
-==- |
==-- _
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I agree with marc here. Nobody expects Gimp 1.0 / 1.2 compatibility.
> > If we change this right after the 1.2 release we would force people
> > who want to use new plugins to a probably really unstable developers
> > version. IMHO t
> I agree with marc here. Nobody expects Gimp 1.0 / 1.2 compatibility.
> If we change this right after the 1.2 release we would force people
> who want to use new plugins to a probably really unstable developers
> version. IMHO this is bad.
Ok, so who is going to do it? We will certainly not acce
Marc Lehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Kevin Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From some of the other comments on the mailing list here, perhaps its
> > something that should be changed after 1.2 is out. Many scripts may have to
>
> I don't think so: if you need to do an incompatible c
On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 09:24:54PM -0500, Kevin Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From some of the other comments on the mailing list here, perhaps its
> something that should be changed after 1.2 is out. Many scripts may have to
I don't think so: if you need to do an incompatible change, d
> So I am not the only one that has the usage pattern with fill listed above.
> I don't know if its from other graphics programs I have used or just what
> made sense to me but I expected fill to use the foreground colour. I mean
> after all, you don't expect the pencil tool to draw with the ba
>My usage pattern is
>
>Fill => Undo => Swap Colours => Fill => Swap Colours
>^
>+ insert a "this damnit fill braindamage e3stD%$&DFZG§ gimp thing"
> here.
>
>Apart form the API changes (breaking _some_ plug-ins), I highly welcome
>that change. But I'd also say it was not
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 07:04:44PM +0200, Tuomas Kuosmanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (unless we have alpha) and Fill should use foreground. but like I said
> earlier, I dont really have an usage pattern on this feature so I cannot say
> much..
My usage pattern is
Fill => Undo => Swap Colours
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Garry R. Osgood wrote:
> Tom Rathborne wrote:
>
> > I just noticed this new CVS entry:
> >
> > Fri Feb 4 18:27:16 CET 2000 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * app/global_edit.c: edit_fill with foreground, not background.
>
> >
>
> Indeed, some of the
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 08:53:50PM -0500, Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 19:07:37 -0500, Zach Beane - MINT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >>Fill (by default Ctrl-.) has filled using the background colour in
> >>the GIMP for as long as I can remember. I don't think it's a bug
> >[sni
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 07:07:37PM -0500, Zach Beane - MINT wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 06:59:57PM -0500, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > I just noticed this new CVS entry:
> >
> > Fri Feb 4 18:27:16 CET 2000 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * app/global_edit.c: edit_fill wi
On 4 Feb, Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
>>What does Photoshop do?
> What does that matter?
Photoshop is the most used graphicstool out there and it makes sense
to have a closer look on their behaviour especially in the UI sector.
Anyway, even if books do now say that Fill fills with the back
Kelly Lynn Martin said...
|
|>What does Photoshop do?
|
|What does that matter?
We've changed the GUI to match PhotoShop more than once.
Sometimes it was a good idea, but not always.
I don't really care what PhotoShop does; I think this
change, even though it seems logical to me, is about
1 ye
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 20:32:33 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
>What does Photoshop do?
What does that matter?
Kelly
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 19:07:37 -0500, Zach Beane - MINT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>Fill (by default Ctrl-.) has filled using the background colour in
>>the GIMP for as long as I can remember. I don't think it's a bug
>[snip]
>I agree. I have grown very accustomed to the existing behavior, and I
>d
Tom Rathborne wrote:
> I just noticed this new CVS entry:
>
> Fri Feb 4 18:27:16 CET 2000 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * app/global_edit.c: edit_fill with foreground, not background.
>
> I don't think it's a bug, and
> making this change will suddenly render all of the G
> > Fill (by default Ctrl-.) has filled using the background colour in the
> > GIMP for as long as I can remember. I don't think it's a bug
> [snip]
>
> I agree. I have grown very accustomed to the existing behavior, and I don't
> think it should be changed.
>
> I know it hasn't been cus
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 06:59:57PM -0500, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> I just noticed this new CVS entry:
>
> Fri Feb 4 18:27:16 CET 2000 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * app/global_edit.c: edit_fill with foreground, not background.
>
> Checked the code. Looks like 'Fill' now use
I just noticed this new CVS entry:
Fri Feb 4 18:27:16 CET 2000 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* app/global_edit.c: edit_fill with foreground, not background.
Checked the code. Looks like 'Fill' now uses the foreground. So I
recompiled the GIMP. Indeed, the changes do what it sa
19 matches
Mail list logo
