On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 07:28:13PM -0500, Kelly Lynn Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to redo the UI for 1.4/2.0, which included a considerably different
> way of handling plugins. Plugins would be installed w/i the Gimp
> interactively (a noninteractive installation procedure would be
> offe
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 14:31:52 +, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
>Better yet, a GIMP interface. If we are to change the entire plug-in
>architecture anyway, we should make a single way of compiling and installing
>them.
I've thought about this somewhat. I had a vague idea i
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 01:24:44AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
>enough. Ideally, this project should completely replace the registry.
>A web interface to the repository together with tips for installation
>will be essential. Plug-ins should be released on a regulary basis,
Better yet, a GIMP in
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 07:17:31PM -0500, Federico Mena Quintero
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People should feel free to ask for a CVS account on the cvs.gnome.org
> box. If they have something cool they are working on for the GIMP, we
As a matter of fact, it is very difficult ot get a cvs acco
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 19:17:31 -0500
From: Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In particular, I would love to see the fantastic Print plug-in on the
GNOME CVS :-) Of course, that is up to Robert to decide. If there is
anything the CVS maintainers can do to make Robert's l
Marc Lehmann spontaneously blurts out:
>
> Hmm... sounds sensible. Unless somebody comes up with something better
> I'll start it in a week or so.
>
> My idea is to copy the full cvs tree of gimp to (lets call it gimpforge)
> and give any intersted plug-in author write access.
>
> Updates from
> Hmm... sounds sensible. Unless somebody comes up with something better
> I'll start it in a week or so.
>
> My idea is to copy the full cvs tree of gimp to (lets call it gimpforge)
> and give any intersted plug-in author write access.
>
> Updates from the gimp-cvs-tree/{libgimp,app,tools...} t
> > For the record, I think a plug-in CVS tree independent of Gimp is a good idea.
>
> "Let's focus, people!"
[snip]
> > The issue is: who has the time? Without people, good ideas remain abstract.
>
> I have no time, but I would nevertheless devote part of on merges between
> the two cvs
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 04:00:23PM -0600, Dean Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Failing that, I will set up a gimp server on a local machine (in germany),
> > but I can't promose that (I iwll need to find a free disk, but maybe in
> > one or two weeks I can spare 2GB for it).
> >
>
> This
From: Dean Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:00:23 -0600 (CST)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Garry R. Osgood),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gimp Developer's Newslist)
Marc Lehmann spontaneously blurts out:
>
> Failing that, I will set up a gimp server on a local m
Marc Lehmann spontaneously blurts out:
>
> So my first wish would be to set up an empty cvs on some reliable server,
> and I would try to populate it with the gimp tree, with (say) nightly
> updates from main cvs => gimp plug-in cvs (for the core), so that plug-in
> developers can just check out
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 12:03:43PM -0500, "Garry R. Osgood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the record, I think a plug-in CVS tree independent of Gimp is a good idea.
"Let's focus, people!"
> At the time this was discussed, the office of a "plugin-maintainer" was also posed,
I don't think this
Marc Lehmann wrote:
> Falks: what about that "secondary cvs server for plug-ins"-idea? I only
> remember a few posotive responses, but no really negative ones. Is it only
> that nobody has the time to set one up?
>
For the record, I think a plug-in CVS tree independent of Gimp is a good idea.
At
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 04:10:46PM -0500, Michael Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like I've missed the deadline for another version of GIMP. I
> read that people are concerned about the number of plug-ins currently
> shipping with the GIMP. I have previously tried to elicit an opini
14 matches
Mail list logo
