Hi,
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 20:57 -0500, Helen wrote:
> I love the GIMP, I admire the GIMP community immensely, and am
> reluctant to find a fault -- but I do believe
> that would be a worthwhile improvement.
I think I made it clear that such a change would have to happen in GTK+,
since that's whe
in Photoshop, there is a tool 'adjustment layer', what's the
equivalent in Gimp? thanks.
--
woody
then sun rose thinly from the sea and the old man could see the other
boats, low on the water and well in toward the shore, spread out
across the current.
__
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 03:30:19 +0100, Jeffrey Brent McBeth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't believe you are. That is exactly the feature she wants.
No, I don't think it is. 'Save as' does change the filename, but it saves
a new file, leaving the old file on the disk. Sometimes that can be
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:11:08PM -0600, Bill Lee wrote:
> I use the "Save As" feature an awful lot. Am I missing something?
>
> Bill Lee
I don't believe you are. That is exactly the feature she wants.
My personal favorite is "Save a Copy", it allows me to make edits to a file,
and save off sn
I use the "Save As" feature an awful lot. Am I missing something?
Bill Lee
Helen wrote:
> With all due respect and admiration to the GIMP developers, I do believe
> that the inability to at least rename a file from the camera's default
> of dsc00405 to something meaningful is a serious impedime
With all due respect and admiration to the GIMP developers, I do believe
that the inability to at least rename a file from the camera's default of
dsc00405 to something meaningful is a serious impediment to convenient use
of the GIMP.
Once I have made some color adjustments, and maybe some croppin
* Robin Laing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-08-07 16:20]:
[...]
> In linux I use GQview for this purpose. I can browse files, delete,
> rename, etc. I can even open the image in gimp for editting. I
> don't know if I want GIMP to do this or not. Not the way I normally
> do things.
I agree and have
Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
> It depends on a person's workflow when retouching photos. If gimp is
> used from scratch without preliminary viewing photos in some browser, or
> some kind of retouching is used to decide if the file worth to stay, it
> would be better to allow simple deletion of s
Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
> It depends on a person's workflow when retouching photos. If gimp is
> used from scratch without preliminary viewing photos in some browser, or
> some kind of retouching is used to decide if the file worth to stay, it
> would be better to allow simple deletion of
On 7 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 13:02 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> What are the correct settings?
>
> There are no correct settings as color management is not yet
> completely implemented. You better disable color management as you
> will only get wr
Hi
@ Scott,
Thank you very much for the script. I will give it a try.
@ David
A knockout, in general terms, is a layer that 'makes' a hole in the beneath
layers allowing to show the background layer. Picture this: you've a
background layer with an image, a layer that covers the background layer
w
On Monday 08 January 2007 1:40 am, Jorge Antunes wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm new to Gimp and i'm trying to find a way to duplicate in
> gimp a procedure that I've used in Photoshop.
> In photoshop I use extensively the layer grouping because
> layer's advanced blending knockout options.
> I know that layer
Hi,
I'm new to Gimp and i'm trying to find a way to duplicate in gimp a
procedure that I've used in Photoshop.
In photoshop I use extensively the layer grouping because layer's advanced
blending knockout options.
I know that layer grouping is not possible in Gimp, but I also can´t find
similar opt
13 matches
Mail list logo
